All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Laura Abbott <laura@oxidecomputer.com>,
	ksummit@lists.linux.dev,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" 
	<tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org" 
	<tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: CIVS opt-in for Technical Advisory Board voting
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:30:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfa20866-0d00-9bd3-6078-5544cfa5b633@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44ee2bfe-e4bc-b918-b908-7352ea012524@oxidecomputer.com>

My @linux.intel.com account is the most common one from the git logs.  I
have only received one TAB-related email there:

	Subject: Upcoming Technical Advisory Board election -- look for
		 your ballot

However, I never actually received a ballot at that email, presumably
because of this CIVS opt-in issue.

Was this just me?  Or would it be appropriate to send these opt-in
instructions to all of those that should have received a ballot instead
of just sending to the mailing lists?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Laura Abbott <laura@oxidecomputer.com>,
	ksummit@lists.linux.dev,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] IMPORTANT: CIVS opt-in for Technical Advisory Board voting
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:30:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfa20866-0d00-9bd3-6078-5544cfa5b633@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44ee2bfe-e4bc-b918-b908-7352ea012524@oxidecomputer.com>

My @linux.intel.com account is the most common one from the git logs.  I
have only received one TAB-related email there:

	Subject: Upcoming Technical Advisory Board election -- look for
		 your ballot

However, I never actually received a ballot at that email, presumably
because of this CIVS opt-in issue.

Was this just me?  Or would it be appropriate to send these opt-in
instructions to all of those that should have received a ballot instead
of just sending to the mailing lists?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-20 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-20 13:57 IMPORTANT: CIVS opt-in for Technical Advisory Board voting Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 13:57 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 13:57 ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 15:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-20 15:16   ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-20 15:16   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-20 15:36   ` Jan Kara
2021-09-20 15:36     ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Jan Kara
2021-09-20 15:36     ` Jan Kara
2021-09-20 15:30 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2021-09-20 15:30   ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dave Hansen
2021-09-20 15:30   ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-20 15:48   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 15:48     ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 15:48     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 16:03     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 16:03       ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 16:03       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 16:18       ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:18         ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:18         ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:23         ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:23           ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:23           ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:30           ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:30             ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:30             ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:48             ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:48               ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:48               ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:53               ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:53                 ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:53                 ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:57                 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:57                   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:57                   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 17:10                   ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 17:10                     ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 17:10                     ` Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 17:12                     ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 17:12                       ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 17:12                       ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 17:11                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 17:11                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 17:11                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-20 17:15                     ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 17:15                       ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 17:15                       ` Mark Brown
2021-09-20 16:15   ` [Tab-elections] " Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:15     ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Laura Abbott
2021-09-20 16:15     ` Laura Abbott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dfa20866-0d00-9bd3-6078-5544cfa5b633@sr71.net \
    --to=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=laura@oxidecomputer.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tab-elections@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.