From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: Enable MCT timer for ARCH_EXYNOS
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:35:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e01b0072-008a-c83d-59b2-2174860c00fd@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPLW+4=YizLzdiZ1mdCGxvPCTYhNjeiomO=q=4Xk-ZxqqH++nA@mail.gmail.com>
On 28/10/2021 16:22, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 17:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/2021 13:59, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>> Some ARM64 Exynos SoCs have MCT timer block, e.g. Exynos850 and
>>> Exynos5433. CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT option is not visible unless COMPILE_TEST
>>> is enabled. Select CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT option for ARM64 ARCH_EXYNOS like
>>> it's done in arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig, to enable MCT timer support
>>> for ARM64 Exynos SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>
>> +CC Marek, Marc, Mark and Chanwoo,
>> Looks like duplicated:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181018095708.1527-7-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/
>>
>> The topic stalled and I think this particular patch did not make sense
>> on its own, without rest of changes from Marek. I am not sure, though...
>>
>
> Krzysztof, Marek,
>
> That series looks nice, I'm quite interested in that being applied. Do
> you think I can do something to help with that (e.g. rebasing,
> re-sending on behalf of Marek, testing on Exynos850, etc)?
I think there were no objections against v4 of this patchset, but
somehow it wasn't applied.
Marek,
Does it make sense to try respinning your v4?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: Enable MCT timer for ARCH_EXYNOS
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:35:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e01b0072-008a-c83d-59b2-2174860c00fd@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPLW+4=YizLzdiZ1mdCGxvPCTYhNjeiomO=q=4Xk-ZxqqH++nA@mail.gmail.com>
On 28/10/2021 16:22, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 17:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/2021 13:59, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>> Some ARM64 Exynos SoCs have MCT timer block, e.g. Exynos850 and
>>> Exynos5433. CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT option is not visible unless COMPILE_TEST
>>> is enabled. Select CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT option for ARM64 ARCH_EXYNOS like
>>> it's done in arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig, to enable MCT timer support
>>> for ARM64 Exynos SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>
>> +CC Marek, Marc, Mark and Chanwoo,
>> Looks like duplicated:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181018095708.1527-7-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/
>>
>> The topic stalled and I think this particular patch did not make sense
>> on its own, without rest of changes from Marek. I am not sure, though...
>>
>
> Krzysztof, Marek,
>
> That series looks nice, I'm quite interested in that being applied. Do
> you think I can do something to help with that (e.g. rebasing,
> re-sending on behalf of Marek, testing on Exynos850, etc)?
I think there were no objections against v4 of this patchset, but
somehow it wasn't applied.
Marek,
Does it make sense to try respinning your v4?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-26 11:59 [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: Enable MCT timer for ARCH_EXYNOS Sam Protsenko
2021-10-26 11:59 ` Sam Protsenko
2021-10-26 14:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-10-26 14:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-10-28 14:22 ` Sam Protsenko
2021-10-28 14:22 ` Sam Protsenko
2021-10-28 14:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2021-10-28 14:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-10-29 11:38 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-10-29 11:38 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-10-29 13:15 ` Sam Protsenko
2021-10-29 13:15 ` Sam Protsenko
2021-10-29 13:36 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-10-29 13:36 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-11-01 18:36 ` Sam Protsenko
2021-11-01 18:36 ` Sam Protsenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e01b0072-008a-c83d-59b2-2174860c00fd@canonical.com \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.