All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] Remaining patches for WM cleanup series
@ 2017-05-18 10:09 Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Mahesh Kumar
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2017-05-18 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, maarten.lankhorst

This series contains remaining two patches from wm cleanup series
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/20152/

Initial 10 patches already got merged in tree so sending remaining 2
separately.

Kumar, Mahesh (2):
  drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm
  drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 343 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm
  2017-05-18 10:09 [PATCH 0/2] Remaining patches for WM cleanup series Mahesh Kumar
@ 2017-05-18 10:09 ` Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-18 11:15   ` Lankhorst, Maarten
  2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-18 14:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Remaining patches for WM cleanup series Patchwork
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2017-05-18 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, maarten.lankhorst

From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>

This patch implements new DDB allocation algorithm as per HW team
recommendation. This algo takecare of scenario where we allocate less DDB
for the planes with lower relative pixel rate, but they require more DDB
to work.
It also takes care of enabling same watermark level for each
plane in crtc, for efficient power saving.

Changes since v1:
 - Rebase on top of Paulo's patch series

Changes since v2:
 - Fix the for loop condition to enable WM

Changes since v3:
 - Fix crash in cursor i-g-t reported by Maarten
 - Rebase after addressing Paulo's comments
 - Few other ULT fixes
Changes since v4:
 - Rebase on drm-tip
 - Added separate function to enable WM levels
Changes since v5:
 - Fix a crash identified in skl-6770HQ system
Changes since v6:
 - Address review comments from Matt
Changes since v7:
 - Fix failure return in skl_compute_plane_wm (Matt)
 - fix typo

Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 156 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 936eef1634c7..fb4cec3fb92c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4039,13 +4039,41 @@ skl_ddb_calc_min(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, int num_active,
 	minimum[PLANE_CURSOR] = skl_cursor_allocation(num_active);
 }
 
+static void
+skl_enable_plane_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+			   uint16_t plane_ddb,
+			   uint16_t max_level,
+			   struct skl_plane_wm *wm)
+{
+	int level;
+	/*
+	 * Now enable all levels in WM structure which can be enabled
+	 * using current DDB allocation
+	 */
+	for (level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv); level >= 0; level--) {
+		struct skl_wm_level *level_wm = &wm->wm[level];
+
+		if (level > max_level || level_wm->plane_res_b == 0
+				      || level_wm->plane_res_l >= 31
+				      || level_wm->plane_res_b >= plane_ddb) {
+			level_wm->plane_en = false;
+			level_wm->plane_res_b = 0;
+			level_wm->plane_res_l = 0;
+		} else {
+			level_wm->plane_en = true;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static int
 skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
+		      struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm,
 		      struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */)
 {
 	struct drm_atomic_state *state = cstate->base.state;
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc = cstate->base.crtc;
 	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
 	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
 	struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc = &cstate->wm.skl.ddb;
@@ -4058,6 +4086,8 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 	unsigned plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
 	unsigned plane_y_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
 	uint16_t total_min_blocks = 0;
+	uint16_t total_level_ddb;
+	int max_level, level;
 
 	/* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
 	memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
@@ -4096,10 +4126,48 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	alloc_size -= total_min_blocks;
-	ddb->plane[pipe][PLANE_CURSOR].start = alloc->end - minimum[PLANE_CURSOR];
+	alloc_size -= minimum[PLANE_CURSOR];
+	ddb->plane[pipe][PLANE_CURSOR].start = alloc->end -
+							minimum[PLANE_CURSOR];
 	ddb->plane[pipe][PLANE_CURSOR].end = alloc->end;
 
+	for (level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv); level >= 0; level--) {
+		total_level_ddb = 0;
+		for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(intel_crtc, plane_id) {
+			/*
+			 * TODO: We should calculate watermark values for Y/UV
+			 * plane both in case of NV12 format and use both values
+			 * for ddb calculation. NV12 is disabled as of now, So
+			 * using only single/UV plane value here.
+			 */
+			struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
+			uint16_t plane_res_b = wm->wm[level].plane_res_b;
+			uint16_t min = minimum[plane_id] + y_minimum[plane_id];
+
+			if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR)
+				continue;
+
+			total_level_ddb += max(plane_res_b, min);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * If This level can successfully be enabled with the
+		 * pipe's current DDB allocation, then all lower levels are
+		 * guaranteed to succeed as well.
+		 */
+		if (total_level_ddb <= alloc_size)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if ((level < 0) || (total_min_blocks > alloc_size)) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requested display configuration exceeds system DDB limitations");
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("minimum required %d/%d\n", (level < 0) ?
+				total_level_ddb : total_min_blocks, alloc_size);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	max_level = level;
+	alloc_size -= total_level_ddb;
+
 	/*
 	 * 2. Distribute the remaining space in proportion to the amount of
 	 * data each plane needs to fetch from memory.
@@ -4115,10 +4183,17 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 	start = alloc->start;
 	for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(intel_crtc, plane_id) {
 		unsigned int data_rate, y_data_rate;
-		uint16_t plane_blocks, y_plane_blocks = 0;
-
-		if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR)
+		uint16_t plane_blocks = 0, y_plane_blocks = 0;
+		struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
+		uint16_t plane_res_b = wm->wm[max_level].plane_res_b;
+
+		if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR) {
+			plane_blocks =
+				skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id]);
+			skl_enable_plane_wm_levels(dev_priv, plane_blocks,
+						   max_level, wm);
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		data_rate = plane_data_rate[plane_id];
 
@@ -4127,33 +4202,36 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 		 * promote the expression to 64 bits to avoid overflowing, the
 		 * result is < available as data_rate / total_data_rate < 1
 		 */
-		plane_blocks = minimum[plane_id];
-		plane_blocks += div_u64((uint64_t)alloc_size * data_rate,
-					total_data_rate);
 
 		/* Leave disabled planes at (0,0) */
 		if (data_rate) {
+			plane_blocks = max(minimum[plane_id], plane_res_b);
+			plane_blocks += div_u64((uint64_t)alloc_size *
+					data_rate, total_data_rate);
 			ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id].start = start;
 			ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id].end = start + plane_blocks;
+			start += plane_blocks;
 		}
 
-		start += plane_blocks;
-
 		/*
 		 * allocation for y_plane part of planar format:
+		 * TODO: Once we start calculating watermark values for Y/UV
+		 * plane both consider it for initial allowed wm blocks.
 		 */
 		y_data_rate = plane_y_data_rate[plane_id];
 
-		y_plane_blocks = y_minimum[plane_id];
-		y_plane_blocks += div_u64((uint64_t)alloc_size * y_data_rate,
-					total_data_rate);
-
 		if (y_data_rate) {
+			y_plane_blocks = y_minimum[plane_id];
+			y_plane_blocks += div_u64((uint64_t)alloc_size *
+					y_data_rate, total_data_rate);
 			ddb->y_plane[pipe][plane_id].start = start;
 			ddb->y_plane[pipe][plane_id].end = start + y_plane_blocks;
+			start += y_plane_blocks;
 		}
-
-		start += y_plane_blocks;
+		skl_enable_plane_wm_levels(dev_priv,
+					   plane_blocks,
+					   max_level,
+					   wm);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -4243,11 +4321,9 @@ skl_adjusted_plane_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 				struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 				const struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate,
-				uint16_t ddb_allocation,
 				int level,
 				uint16_t *out_blocks, /* out */
-				uint8_t *out_lines, /* out */
-				bool *enabled /* out */)
+				uint8_t *out_lines /* out */)
 {
 	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(intel_pstate->base.plane);
 	const struct drm_plane_state *pstate = &intel_pstate->base;
@@ -4270,10 +4346,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	bool y_tiled, x_tiled;
 
 	if (latency == 0 ||
-	    !intel_wm_plane_visible(cstate, intel_pstate)) {
-		*enabled = false;
+	    !intel_wm_plane_visible(cstate, intel_pstate))
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	y_tiled = fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
 		  fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED;
@@ -4359,9 +4433,6 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		if ((cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal / 512 < 1) &&
 		    (plane_bytes_per_line / 512 < 1))
 			selected_result = method2;
-		else if ((ddb_allocation && ddb_allocation /
-			fixed_16_16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line)) >= 1)
-			selected_result = min_fixed_16_16(method1, method2);
 		else if (latency >= linetime_us)
 			selected_result = min_fixed_16_16(method1, method2);
 		else
@@ -4381,64 +4452,42 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (res_blocks >= ddb_allocation || res_lines > 31) {
-		*enabled = false;
+	if (res_lines >= 31 && level == 0) {
+		struct drm_plane *plane = pstate->plane;
 
-		/*
-		 * If there are no valid level 0 watermarks, then we can't
-		 * support this display configuration.
-		 */
-		if (level) {
-			return 0;
-		} else {
-			struct drm_plane *plane = pstate->plane;
-
-			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requested display configuration exceeds system watermark limitations\n");
-			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] blocks required = %u/%u, lines required = %u/31\n",
-				      plane->base.id, plane->name,
-				      res_blocks, ddb_allocation, res_lines);
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requested display configuration exceeds system watermark limitations\n");
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] lines required = %u/31\n",
+				plane->base.id, plane->name, res_lines);
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	*out_blocks = res_blocks;
 	*out_lines = res_lines;
-	*enabled = true;
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int
 skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
-		      struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
 		      struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 		      const struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate,
 		      struct skl_plane_wm *wm)
 {
-	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(cstate->base.crtc);
-	struct drm_plane *plane = intel_pstate->base.plane;
-	struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
-	uint16_t ddb_blocks;
-	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
 	int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv);
 	int ret;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!intel_pstate->base.fb))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb->plane[pipe][intel_plane->id]);
-
 	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
 		struct skl_wm_level *result = &wm->wm[level];
 
 		ret = skl_compute_plane_wm(dev_priv,
 					   cstate,
 					   intel_pstate,
-					   ddb_blocks,
 					   level,
 					   &result->plane_res_b,
-					   &result->plane_res_l,
-					   &result->plane_en);
+					   &result->plane_res_l);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -4504,8 +4553,7 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 
 		wm = &pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
 
-		ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, ddb, cstate,
-					    intel_pstate, wm);
+		ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate, intel_pstate, wm);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 		skl_compute_transition_wm(cstate, &wm->trans_wm);
@@ -4618,6 +4666,45 @@ bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const struct skl_ddb_entry **entries,
 	return false;
 }
 
+static int
+skl_ddb_add_affected_planes(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
+			    const struct skl_pipe_wm *old_pipe_wm,
+			    const struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm)
+{
+	struct drm_atomic_state *state = cstate->base.state;
+	struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
+	struct drm_crtc *crtc = cstate->base.crtc;
+	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+	struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
+	struct skl_ddb_allocation *new_ddb = &intel_state->wm_results.ddb;
+	struct skl_ddb_allocation *cur_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
+	struct drm_plane_state *plane_state;
+	struct drm_plane *plane;
+	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
+
+	WARN_ON(!drm_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(state, crtc));
+
+	drm_for_each_plane_mask(plane, dev, cstate->base.plane_mask) {
+		enum plane_id plane_id = to_intel_plane(plane)->id;
+		const struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
+		const struct skl_plane_wm *old_wm = &old_pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
+
+		if ((skl_ddb_entry_equal(&cur_ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id],
+					&new_ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id]) &&
+		    skl_ddb_entry_equal(&cur_ddb->y_plane[pipe][plane_id],
+					&new_ddb->y_plane[pipe][plane_id])) &&
+		    !memcmp(wm, old_wm, sizeof(struct skl_plane_wm)))
+			continue;
+
+		plane_state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state, plane);
+		if (IS_ERR(plane_state))
+			return PTR_ERR(plane_state);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int skl_update_pipe_wm(struct drm_crtc_state *cstate,
 			      const struct skl_pipe_wm *old_pipe_wm,
 			      struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm, /* out */
@@ -4631,6 +4718,17 @@ static int skl_update_pipe_wm(struct drm_crtc_state *cstate,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(intel_cstate, pipe_wm, ddb);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	/*
+	 * TODO: Planes are included in state to arm WM registers.
+	 * Scope to optimize further, by just rewriting plane surf register.
+	 */
+	ret = skl_ddb_add_affected_planes(intel_cstate, old_pipe_wm, pipe_wm);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (!memcmp(old_pipe_wm, pipe_wm, sizeof(*pipe_wm)))
 		*changed = false;
 	else
@@ -4653,41 +4751,7 @@ pipes_modified(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 }
 
 static int
-skl_ddb_add_affected_planes(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
-{
-	struct drm_atomic_state *state = cstate->base.state;
-	struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
-	struct drm_crtc *crtc = cstate->base.crtc;
-	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
-	struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
-	struct skl_ddb_allocation *new_ddb = &intel_state->wm_results.ddb;
-	struct skl_ddb_allocation *cur_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
-	struct drm_plane_state *plane_state;
-	struct drm_plane *plane;
-	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
-
-	WARN_ON(!drm_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(state, crtc));
-
-	drm_for_each_plane_mask(plane, dev, cstate->base.plane_mask) {
-		enum plane_id plane_id = to_intel_plane(plane)->id;
-
-		if (skl_ddb_entry_equal(&cur_ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id],
-					&new_ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id]) &&
-		    skl_ddb_entry_equal(&cur_ddb->y_plane[pipe][plane_id],
-					&new_ddb->y_plane[pipe][plane_id]))
-			continue;
-
-		plane_state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state, plane);
-		if (IS_ERR(plane_state))
-			return PTR_ERR(plane_state);
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-skl_compute_ddb(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+skl_include_affected_crtcs(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
@@ -4751,14 +4815,6 @@ skl_compute_ddb(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 		cstate = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, intel_crtc);
 		if (IS_ERR(cstate))
 			return PTR_ERR(cstate);
-
-		ret = skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(cstate, ddb);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-
-		ret = skl_ddb_add_affected_planes(cstate);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -4839,7 +4895,7 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 	/* Clear all dirty flags */
 	results->dirty_pipes = 0;
 
-	ret = skl_compute_ddb(state);
+	ret = skl_include_affected_crtcs(state);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling
  2017-05-18 10:09 [PATCH 0/2] Remaining patches for WM cleanup series Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Mahesh Kumar
@ 2017-05-18 10:09 ` Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-18 11:18   ` Lankhorst, Maarten
  2017-05-18 14:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Remaining patches for WM cleanup series Patchwork
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2017-05-18 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, maarten.lankhorst

From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>

A display resolution is only supported if it meets all the restrictions
below for Maximum Pipe Pixel Rate.

The display resolution must fit within the maximum pixel rate output
from the pipe. Make sure that the display pipe is able to feed pixels at
a rate required to support the desired resolution.
For each enabled plane on the pipe {
    If plane scaling enabled {
	Horizontal down scale amount = Maximum[1, plane horizontal size /
		    scaler horizontal window size]
	Vertical down scale amount = Maximum[1, plane vertical size /
		    scaler vertical window size]
	Plane down scale amount = Horizontal down scale amount *
		    Vertical down scale amount
	Plane Ratio = 1 / Plane down scale amount
    }
    Else {
	Plane Ratio = 1
    }
    If plane source pixel format is 64 bits per pixel {
	Plane Ratio = Plane Ratio * 8/9
    }
}

Pipe Ratio = Minimum Plane Ratio of all enabled planes on the pipe

If pipe scaling is enabled {
    Horizontal down scale amount = Maximum[1, pipe horizontal source size /
		scaler horizontal window size]
    Vertical down scale amount = Maximum[1, pipe vertical source size /
		scaler vertical window size]
    Note: The progressive fetch - interlace display mode is equivalent to a
		2.0 vertical down scale
    Pipe down scale amount = Horizontal down scale amount *
		Vertical down scale amount
    Pipe Ratio = Pipe Ratio / Pipe down scale amount
}

Pipe maximum pixel rate = CDCLK frequency * Pipe Ratio

In this patch our calculation is based on pipe downscale amount
(plane max downscale amount * pipe downscale amount) instead of Pipe
Ratio. So,
max supported crtc clock with given scaling = CDCLK / pipe downscale.
Flip will fail if,
current crtc clock > max supported crct clock with given scaling.

Changes since V1:
 - separate out fixed_16_16 wrapper API definition
Changes since V2:
 - Fix buggy crtc !active condition (Maarten)
 - use intel_wm_plane_visible wrapper as per Maarten's suggestion
Changes since V3:
 - Change failure return from ERANGE to EINVAL
Changes since V4:
 - Rebase based on previous patch changes
Changes since V5:
 - return EINVAL instead of continue (Maarten)
Changes since V6:
 - Improve commit message
 - Address review comment

Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 8217ed0e7132..df0b3e77129b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -11177,6 +11177,9 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 			ret = skl_update_scaler_crtc(pipe_config);
 
 		if (!ret)
+			ret = skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(intel_crtc,
+							    pipe_config);
+		if (!ret)
 			ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev_priv, intel_crtc,
 							 pipe_config);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index bd500977b3fc..93afac4a83fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1885,6 +1885,8 @@ bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const struct skl_ddb_entry **entries,
 				 int ignore);
 bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev);
 int sanitize_rc6_option(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int enable_rc6);
+int skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
+				  struct intel_crtc_state *cstate);
 static inline int intel_enable_rc6(void)
 {
 	return i915.enable_rc6;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index fb4cec3fb92c..4edc5f4ee598 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3863,6 +3863,93 @@ skl_plane_downscale_amount(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 	return mul_fixed16(downscale_w, downscale_h);
 }
 
+static uint_fixed_16_16_t
+skl_pipe_downscale_amount(const struct intel_crtc_state *config)
+{
+	uint_fixed_16_16_t pipe_downscale = u32_to_fixed_16_16(1);
+
+	if (!config->base.active)
+		return pipe_downscale;
+
+	if (config->pch_pfit.enabled) {
+		uint32_t src_w, src_h, dst_w, dst_h;
+		uint32_t pfit_size = config->pch_pfit.size;
+		uint_fixed_16_16_t fp_w_ratio, fp_h_ratio;
+		uint_fixed_16_16_t downscale_h, downscale_w;
+
+		src_w = config->pipe_src_w;
+		src_h = config->pipe_src_h;
+		dst_w = pfit_size >> 16;
+		dst_h = pfit_size & 0xffff;
+
+		if (!dst_w || !dst_h)
+			return pipe_downscale;
+
+		fp_w_ratio = fixed_16_16_div(src_w, dst_w);
+		fp_h_ratio = fixed_16_16_div(src_h, dst_h);
+		downscale_w = max_fixed_16_16(fp_w_ratio, u32_to_fixed_16_16(1));
+		downscale_h = max_fixed_16_16(fp_h_ratio, u32_to_fixed_16_16(1));
+
+		pipe_downscale = mul_fixed16(downscale_w, downscale_h);
+	}
+
+	return pipe_downscale;
+}
+
+int skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
+				  struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
+{
+	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = &cstate->base;
+	struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->state;
+	struct drm_plane *plane;
+	const struct drm_plane_state *pstate;
+	struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate;
+	int crtc_clock, cdclk;
+	uint32_t pipe_max_pixel_rate;
+	uint_fixed_16_16_t pipe_downscale;
+	uint_fixed_16_16_t max_downscale = u32_to_fixed_16_16(1);
+
+	if (!cstate->base.active)
+		return 0;
+
+	drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, pstate, crtc_state) {
+		uint_fixed_16_16_t plane_downscale;
+		uint_fixed_16_16_t fp_9_div_8 = fixed_16_16_div(9, 8);
+		int bpp;
+
+		if (!intel_wm_plane_visible(cstate,
+					    to_intel_plane_state(pstate)))
+			continue;
+
+		if (WARN_ON(!pstate->fb))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		intel_pstate = to_intel_plane_state(pstate);
+		plane_downscale = skl_plane_downscale_amount(cstate,
+							     intel_pstate);
+		bpp = pstate->fb->format->cpp[0] * 8;
+		if (bpp == 64)
+			plane_downscale = mul_fixed16(plane_downscale,
+						      fp_9_div_8);
+
+		max_downscale = max_fixed_16_16(plane_downscale, max_downscale);
+	}
+	pipe_downscale = skl_pipe_downscale_amount(cstate);
+
+	pipe_downscale = mul_fixed16(pipe_downscale, max_downscale);
+
+	crtc_clock = crtc_state->adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
+	cdclk = to_intel_atomic_state(state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk;
+	pipe_max_pixel_rate = div_round_up_u32_fixed16(cdclk, pipe_downscale);
+
+	if (pipe_max_pixel_rate < crtc_clock) {
+		DRM_ERROR("Max supported pixel clock with scaling exceeded\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static unsigned int
 skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
 			     const struct drm_plane_state *pstate,
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm
  2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Mahesh Kumar
@ 2017-05-18 11:15   ` Lankhorst, Maarten
  2017-05-18 13:56     ` Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-23 14:48     ` Mahesh Kumar
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lankhorst, Maarten @ 2017-05-18 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, Kumar, Mahesh1; +Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R

Mahesh Kumar schreef op do 18-05-2017 om 15:39 [+0530]:
> From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> 
> This patch implements new DDB allocation algorithm as per HW team
> recommendation. This algo takecare of scenario where we allocate less
> DDB
> for the planes with lower relative pixel rate, but they require more
> DDB
> to work.
> It also takes care of enabling same watermark level for each
> plane in crtc, for efficient power saving.
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - Rebase on top of Paulo's patch series
> 
> Changes since v2:
>  - Fix the for loop condition to enable WM
> 
> Changes since v3:
>  - Fix crash in cursor i-g-t reported by Maarten
>  - Rebase after addressing Paulo's comments
>  - Few other ULT fixes
> Changes since v4:
>  - Rebase on drm-tip
>  - Added separate function to enable WM levels
> Changes since v5:
>  - Fix a crash identified in skl-6770HQ system
> Changes since v6:
>  - Address review comments from Matt
> Changes since v7:
>  - Fix failure return in skl_compute_plane_wm (Matt)
>  - fix typo
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Hm just to be sure it works as intended I tested this against full kms,
testsuite and it seems to cause FIFO underruns on my KBL with the
kms_atomic_transition test.

I think we shouldn't merge this until all those fifo underruns have
been fixed, especially because FIFO underruns may result in a complete
lockup of the gpu.

Sorry for the bad news,
Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling
  2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling Mahesh Kumar
@ 2017-05-18 11:18   ` Lankhorst, Maarten
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lankhorst, Maarten @ 2017-05-18 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, Kumar, Mahesh1; +Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R

Mahesh Kumar schreef op do 18-05-2017 om 15:39 [+0530]:
> From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> 
> A display resolution is only supported if it meets all the
> restrictions
> below for Maximum Pipe Pixel Rate.
> 
> The display resolution must fit within the maximum pixel rate output
> from the pipe. Make sure that the display pipe is able to feed pixels
> at
> a rate required to support the desired resolution.
> For each enabled plane on the pipe {
>     If plane scaling enabled {
> 	Horizontal down scale amount = Maximum[1, plane horizontal size
> /
> 		    scaler horizontal window size]
> 	Vertical down scale amount = Maximum[1, plane vertical size /
> 		    scaler vertical window size]
> 	Plane down scale amount = Horizontal down scale amount *
> 		    Vertical down scale amount
> 	Plane Ratio = 1 / Plane down scale amount
>     }
>     Else {
> 	Plane Ratio = 1
>     }
>     If plane source pixel format is 64 bits per pixel {
> 	Plane Ratio = Plane Ratio * 8/9
>     }
> }
> 
> Pipe Ratio = Minimum Plane Ratio of all enabled planes on the pipe
> 
> If pipe scaling is enabled {
>     Horizontal down scale amount = Maximum[1, pipe horizontal source
> size /
> 		scaler horizontal window size]
>     Vertical down scale amount = Maximum[1, pipe vertical source size
> /
> 		scaler vertical window size]
>     Note: The progressive fetch - interlace display mode is
> equivalent to a
> 		2.0 vertical down scale
>     Pipe down scale amount = Horizontal down scale amount *
> 		Vertical down scale amount
>     Pipe Ratio = Pipe Ratio / Pipe down scale amount
> }
> 
> Pipe maximum pixel rate = CDCLK frequency * Pipe Ratio
> 
> In this patch our calculation is based on pipe downscale amount
> (plane max downscale amount * pipe downscale amount) instead of Pipe
> Ratio. So,
> max supported crtc clock with given scaling = CDCLK / pipe downscale.
> Flip will fail if,
> current crtc clock > max supported crct clock with given scaling.
> 
> Changes since V1:
>  - separate out fixed_16_16 wrapper API definition
> Changes since V2:
>  - Fix buggy crtc !active condition (Maarten)
>  - use intel_wm_plane_visible wrapper as per Maarten's suggestion
> Changes since V3:
>  - Change failure return from ERANGE to EINVAL
> Changes since V4:
>  - Rebase based on previous patch changes
> Changes since V5:
>  - return EINVAL instead of continue (Maarten)
> Changes since V6:
>  - Improve commit message
>  - Address review comment
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  3 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 87
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 8217ed0e7132..df0b3e77129b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -11177,6 +11177,9 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct
> drm_crtc *crtc,
>  			ret = skl_update_scaler_crtc(pipe_config);
>  
>  		if (!ret)
> +			ret =
> skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(intel_crtc,
> +							    pipe_con
> fig);
> +		if (!ret)
>  			ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev_priv,
> intel_crtc,
>  							 pipe_config
> );
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index bd500977b3fc..93afac4a83fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1885,6 +1885,8 @@ bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const struct
> skl_ddb_entry **entries,
>  				 int ignore);
>  bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev);
>  int sanitize_rc6_option(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int
> enable_rc6);
> +int skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> +				  struct intel_crtc_state *cstate);
>  static inline int intel_enable_rc6(void)
>  {
>  	return i915.enable_rc6;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index fb4cec3fb92c..4edc5f4ee598 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3863,6 +3863,93 @@ skl_plane_downscale_amount(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  	return mul_fixed16(downscale_w, downscale_h);
>  }
>  
> +static uint_fixed_16_16_t
> +skl_pipe_downscale_amount(const struct intel_crtc_state *config)
> +{
> +	uint_fixed_16_16_t pipe_downscale = u32_to_fixed_16_16(1);
> +
> +	if (!config->base.active)
> +		return pipe_downscale;
Sorry, just one more thing I failed to notice the first time around.

I think this should be config->base.enable, in case of !active the crtc
is configured as if it's on, and it's ok to run scaling checks here.
The existing code expects this as well.

config should probably be renamed to crtc_state, or pipe_config. :)
Either is more consistent with current code.
> +
> +	if (config->pch_pfit.enabled) {
> +		uint32_t src_w, src_h, dst_w, dst_h;
> +		uint32_t pfit_size = config->pch_pfit.size;
> +		uint_fixed_16_16_t fp_w_ratio, fp_h_ratio;
> +		uint_fixed_16_16_t downscale_h, downscale_w;
> +
> +		src_w = config->pipe_src_w;
> +		src_h = config->pipe_src_h;
> +		dst_w = pfit_size >> 16;
> +		dst_h = pfit_size & 0xffff;
> +
> +		if (!dst_w || !dst_h)
> +			return pipe_downscale;
> +
> +		fp_w_ratio = fixed_16_16_div(src_w, dst_w);
> +		fp_h_ratio = fixed_16_16_div(src_h, dst_h);
> +		downscale_w = max_fixed_16_16(fp_w_ratio,
> u32_to_fixed_16_16(1));
> +		downscale_h = max_fixed_16_16(fp_h_ratio,
> u32_to_fixed_16_16(1));
> +
> +		pipe_downscale = mul_fixed16(downscale_w,
> downscale_h);
> +	}
> +
> +	return pipe_downscale;
> +}
> +
> +int skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> +				  struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
> +{
> +	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = &cstate->base;
> +	struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->state;
> +	struct drm_plane *plane;
> +	const struct drm_plane_state *pstate;
> +	struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate;
> +	int crtc_clock, cdclk;
> +	uint32_t pipe_max_pixel_rate;
> +	uint_fixed_16_16_t pipe_downscale;
> +	uint_fixed_16_16_t max_downscale = u32_to_fixed_16_16(1);
> +
> +	if (!cstate->base.active)
> +		return 0;
This one can be changed to enable as well I hope, though the FIXME in
intel_wm_plane_visible applies.. :)

> +	drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, pstate,
> crtc_state) {
> +		uint_fixed_16_16_t plane_downscale;
> +		uint_fixed_16_16_t fp_9_div_8 = fixed_16_16_div(9,
> 8);
> +		int bpp;
> +
> +		if (!intel_wm_plane_visible(cstate,
> +					    to_intel_plane_state(pst
> ate)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (WARN_ON(!pstate->fb))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		intel_pstate = to_intel_plane_state(pstate);
> +		plane_downscale = skl_plane_downscale_amount(cstate,
> +							     intel_p
> state);
> +		bpp = pstate->fb->format->cpp[0] * 8;
> +		if (bpp == 64)
> +			plane_downscale =
> mul_fixed16(plane_downscale,
> +						      fp_9_div_8);
> +
> +		max_downscale = max_fixed_16_16(plane_downscale,
> max_downscale);
> +	}
> +	pipe_downscale = skl_pipe_downscale_amount(cstate);
> +
> +	pipe_downscale = mul_fixed16(pipe_downscale, max_downscale);
> +
> +	crtc_clock = crtc_state->adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
> +	cdclk = to_intel_atomic_state(state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk;
> +	pipe_max_pixel_rate = div_round_up_u32_fixed16(cdclk,
> pipe_downscale);
> +
> +	if (pipe_max_pixel_rate < crtc_clock) {
> +		DRM_ERROR("Max supported pixel clock with scaling
> exceeded\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned int
>  skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  			     const struct drm_plane_state *pstate,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm
  2017-05-18 11:15   ` Lankhorst, Maarten
@ 2017-05-18 13:56     ` Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-23 14:48     ` Mahesh Kumar
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2017-05-18 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lankhorst, Maarten, intel-gfx; +Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R

Hi,


On Thursday 18 May 2017 04:45 PM, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> Mahesh Kumar schreef op do 18-05-2017 om 15:39 [+0530]:
>> From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
>>
>> This patch implements new DDB allocation algorithm as per HW team
>> recommendation. This algo takecare of scenario where we allocate less
>> DDB
>> for the planes with lower relative pixel rate, but they require more
>> DDB
>> to work.
>> It also takes care of enabling same watermark level for each
>> plane in crtc, for efficient power saving.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>   - Rebase on top of Paulo's patch series
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>>   - Fix the for loop condition to enable WM
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>>   - Fix crash in cursor i-g-t reported by Maarten
>>   - Rebase after addressing Paulo's comments
>>   - Few other ULT fixes
>> Changes since v4:
>>   - Rebase on drm-tip
>>   - Added separate function to enable WM levels
>> Changes since v5:
>>   - Fix a crash identified in skl-6770HQ system
>> Changes since v6:
>>   - Address review comments from Matt
>> Changes since v7:
>>   - Fix failure return in skl_compute_plane_wm (Matt)
>>   - fix typo
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Hm just to be sure it works as intended I tested this against full kms,
> testsuite and it seems to cause FIFO underruns on my KBL with the
> kms_atomic_transition test.
>
> I think we shouldn't merge this until all those fifo underruns have
> been fixed, especially because FIFO underruns may result in a complete
> lockup of the gpu.
Thanks for trying this out Maarten,
I don't have access to KBL board now. Will try to find one & debug this 
further.

-Mahesh
> Sorry for the bad news,
> Maarten

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Remaining patches for WM cleanup series
  2017-05-18 10:09 [PATCH 0/2] Remaining patches for WM cleanup series Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Mahesh Kumar
  2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling Mahesh Kumar
@ 2017-05-18 14:08 ` Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-05-18 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kumar, Mahesh; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: Remaining patches for WM cleanup series
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/24615/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 24615v1 Remaining patches for WM cleanup series
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/24615/revisions/1/mbox/

fi-bdw-5557u     total:278  pass:267  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11  time:453s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:278  pass:256  dwarn:8   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14  time:441s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:278  pass:242  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:36  time:586s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:278  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:510s
fi-byt-j1900     total:278  pass:254  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:494s
fi-byt-n2820     total:278  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:490s
fi-hsw-4770      total:278  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16  time:424s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:278  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16  time:409s
fi-ilk-650       total:278  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:50  time:414s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:278  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:500s
fi-ivb-3770      total:278  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:460s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:278  pass:255  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:462s
fi-skl-6260u     total:278  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10  time:461s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:278  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:17  time:583s
fi-skl-6700k     total:278  pass:256  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:474s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:278  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10  time:506s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:278  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:13  time:438s
fi-snb-2520m     total:278  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:539s
fi-snb-2600      total:278  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:400s

d89ce671546724cca610b42c95218532991a480c drm-tip: 2017y-05m-18d-12h-42m-48s UTC integration manifest
75a9815 drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling
c1e30f9 drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4737/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm
  2017-05-18 11:15   ` Lankhorst, Maarten
  2017-05-18 13:56     ` Mahesh Kumar
@ 2017-05-23 14:48     ` Mahesh Kumar
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2017-05-23 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lankhorst, Maarten, intel-gfx; +Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R

Hi,


On Thursday 18 May 2017 04:45 PM, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> Mahesh Kumar schreef op do 18-05-2017 om 15:39 [+0530]:
>> From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
>>
>> This patch implements new DDB allocation algorithm as per HW team
>> recommendation. This algo takecare of scenario where we allocate less
>> DDB
>> for the planes with lower relative pixel rate, but they require more
>> DDB
>> to work.
>> It also takes care of enabling same watermark level for each
>> plane in crtc, for efficient power saving.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>   - Rebase on top of Paulo's patch series
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>>   - Fix the for loop condition to enable WM
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>>   - Fix crash in cursor i-g-t reported by Maarten
>>   - Rebase after addressing Paulo's comments
>>   - Few other ULT fixes
>> Changes since v4:
>>   - Rebase on drm-tip
>>   - Added separate function to enable WM levels
>> Changes since v5:
>>   - Fix a crash identified in skl-6770HQ system
>> Changes since v6:
>>   - Address review comments from Matt
>> Changes since v7:
>>   - Fix failure return in skl_compute_plane_wm (Matt)
>>   - fix typo
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Hm just to be sure it works as intended I tested this against full kms,
> testsuite and it seems to cause FIFO underruns on my KBL with the
> kms_atomic_transition test.
>
> I think we shouldn't merge this until all those fifo underruns have
> been fixed, especially because FIFO underruns may result in a complete
> lockup of the gpu.
After debugging I found when, only cursor plane is enabled, that time 
total_data_rate is coming 0 because we don't include cursor for 
total_data_rate calculation.
And because of this we return from skl_allocate_pipe_ddb function 
without enabling WM levels for cursor plane. As a result cursor plane is 
enabled without WM getting enabled & resulting "fifo under-run"
Fixing it by doing cursor_plane wm enable calculation irrespective of 
total_data_rate calculation.

-Mahesh
>
> Sorry for the bad news,
> Maarten

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-23 14:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-18 10:09 [PATCH 0/2] Remaining patches for WM cleanup series Mahesh Kumar
2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Mahesh Kumar
2017-05-18 11:15   ` Lankhorst, Maarten
2017-05-18 13:56     ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-05-23 14:48     ` Mahesh Kumar
2017-05-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling Mahesh Kumar
2017-05-18 11:18   ` Lankhorst, Maarten
2017-05-18 14:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Remaining patches for WM cleanup series Patchwork

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.