[PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Biju Das]

Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found
on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.

While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.

Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
index 7e8d252f7bca..0d9840375132 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ properties:
   compatible:
     items:
       - enum:
+          - renesas,r9a07g043-ssi  # RZ/G2UL
           - renesas,r9a07g044-ssi  # RZ/G2{L,LC}
           - renesas,r9a07g054-ssi  # RZ/V2L
       - const: renesas,rz-ssi
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ properties:
     minItems: 1
     maxItems: 2
     description:
-      The first cell represents a phandle to dmac
+      The first cell represents a phandle to dmac.
       The second cell specifies the encoded MID/RID values of the SSI port
       connected to the DMA client and the slave channel configuration
       parameters.
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Biju Das]

Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found
on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.

While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.

Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
index 7e8d252f7bca..0d9840375132 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ properties:
   compatible:
     items:
       - enum:
+          - renesas,r9a07g043-ssi  # RZ/G2UL
           - renesas,r9a07g044-ssi  # RZ/G2{L,LC}
           - renesas,r9a07g054-ssi  # RZ/V2L
       - const: renesas,rz-ssi
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ properties:
     minItems: 1
     maxItems: 2
     description:
-      The first cell represents a phandle to dmac
+      The first cell represents a phandle to dmac.
       The second cell specifies the encoded MID/RID values of the SSI port
       connected to the DMA client and the slave channel configuration
       parameters.
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/04/2022 15:31, Biju Das wrote:
> Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found
> on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
> 
> While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/04/2022 15:31, Biju Das wrote:
> Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found
> on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
> 
> While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 3:32 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found
> on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
>
> While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 3:32 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found
> on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
>
> While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

RE: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Biju Das]

Hi All,

Gentle ping.

Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.

Cheers,
Biju

> Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC
> 
> Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found on
> the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
> 
> While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
> index 7e8d252f7bca..0d9840375132 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ properties:
>    compatible:
>      items:
>        - enum:
> +          - renesas,r9a07g043-ssi  # RZ/G2UL
>            - renesas,r9a07g044-ssi  # RZ/G2{L,LC}
>            - renesas,r9a07g054-ssi  # RZ/V2L
>        - const: renesas,rz-ssi
> @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ properties:
>      minItems: 1
>      maxItems: 2
>      description:
> -      The first cell represents a phandle to dmac
> +      The first cell represents a phandle to dmac.
>        The second cell specifies the encoded MID/RID values of the SSI
> port
>        connected to the DMA client and the slave channel configuration
>        parameters.
> --
> 2.25.1

RE: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Biju Das]

Hi All,

Gentle ping.

Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.

Cheers,
Biju

> Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC
> 
> Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found on
> the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
> 
> While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
> index 7e8d252f7bca..0d9840375132 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ properties:
>    compatible:
>      items:
>        - enum:
> +          - renesas,r9a07g043-ssi  # RZ/G2UL
>            - renesas,r9a07g044-ssi  # RZ/G2{L,LC}
>            - renesas,r9a07g054-ssi  # RZ/V2L
>        - const: renesas,rz-ssi
> @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ properties:
>      minItems: 1
>      maxItems: 2
>      description:
> -      The first cell represents a phandle to dmac
> +      The first cell represents a phandle to dmac.
>        The second cell specifies the encoded MID/RID values of the SSI
> port
>        connected to the DMA client and the slave channel configuration
>        parameters.
> --
> 2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1158 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:49:22AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Gentle ping.
> 
> Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
discussion is being addressed.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1158 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:49:22AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Gentle ping.
> 
> Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
discussion is being addressed.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

RE: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Biju Das]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL
> SoC
> 
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:49:22AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Gentle ping.
> >
> > Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.
> 
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

OK. Agreed.

> 
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> for the subsystem are normally handled.

OK. Will rebase and resend this patch.

> 
> Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
> readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
> you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
> discussion is being addressed.

Agreed.

Regards,
Biju

RE: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC

[Biju Das]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL
> SoC
> 
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:49:22AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Gentle ping.
> >
> > Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.
> 
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

OK. Agreed.

> 
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> for the subsystem are normally handled.

OK. Will rebase and resend this patch.

> 
> Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
> readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
> you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
> discussion is being addressed.

Agreed.

Regards,
Biju