From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] x86: more bool_t to bool cleanup
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 19:00:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3d90e0a-0f68-e37a-e331-c5a2178342a2@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170630170126.4148-1-wei.liu2@citrix.com>
On 30/06/17 18:01, Wei Liu wrote:
> Seeing that bool_t keeps creeping back in new patches I think the only solution
> is to get rid of bool_t once and for all, as soon as possible.
Patches: 4-13, 16-18
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Patch 1 still hasn't arrived in my mailbox yet, so review in shorthand here:
Attribute order on:
static bool __initdata acpi_skip_timer_override;
Prototype for:
cpuidle_using_deep_cstate()
Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-30 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 17:01 [PATCH 00/18] x86: more bool_t to bool cleanup Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 01/18] x86/acpi: use plain bool Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 02/18] x86/apic.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:26 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 03/18] x86/debug.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:28 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 04/18] x86/dmi.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 05/18] x86/domctl: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 06/18] x86/hpet.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 07/18] x86/e820.c: use plan bool Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 08/18] x86/i387.c: use plain bool Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 09/18] x86/i8259.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 10/18] x86/monitor.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-30 18:30 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 11/18] x86/xstate.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 12/18] x86/srat.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 13/18] x86/smpboot.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 14/18] x86/io_apic.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:53 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 15/18] x86/mpparse.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:54 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 16/18] x86/numa.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 17/18] x86/msi.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 17:01 ` [PATCH 18/18] x86/psr.c: " Wei Liu
2017-06-30 18:00 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2017-07-03 8:10 ` [PATCH 00/18] x86: more bool_t to bool cleanup Jan Beulich
2017-07-03 12:54 ` Wei Liu
2017-07-03 13:19 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-04 10:43 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3d90e0a-0f68-e37a-e331-c5a2178342a2@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.