From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, kernellwp@gmail.com, jgross@suse.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] implement vcpu preempted check Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:47:09 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <e3fd1bd3-c57d-f0b0-68c4-ecd450d1ad32@de.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1476872416-42752-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> On 10/19/2016 12:20 PM, Pan Xinhui wrote: > change from v3: > add x86 vcpu preempted check patch If you want you could add the s390 patch that I provided for your last version. I also gave my Acked-by for all previous patches. > change from v2: > no code change, fix typos, update some comments > change from v1: > a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted > skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. > add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. > add more comments > thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. > > This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues. > > test-case: > perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g 400 -p && perf report > > 18.09% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock > 12.28% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] rwsem_spin_on_owner > 5.27% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_unlock > 3.89% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] wait_consider_task > 3.64% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] _raw_write_lock_irq > 3.41% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.is > 2.49% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] system_call > > We introduce interface bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) and use it in some spin > loops of osq_lock, rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. > These spin_on_onwer variant also cause rcu stall before we apply this patch set > > We also have observed some performace improvements. > > PPC test result: > > 1 copy - 0.94% > 2 copy - 7.17% > 4 copy - 11.9% > 8 copy - 3.04% > 16 copy - 15.11% > > details below: > Without patch: > > 1 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2188223.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 2 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1804433.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 4 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1237257.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 8 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1032658.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 16 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 768000.0 KBps (30.1 s, 1 samples) > > With patch: > > 1 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2209189.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 2 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1943816.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 4 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1405591.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 8 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1065080.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 16 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 904762.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > > X86 test result: > test-case after-patch before-patch > Execl Throughput | 18307.9 lps | 11701.6 lps > File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks | 1352407.3 KBps | 790418.9 KBps > File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks | 367555.6 KBps | 222867.7 KBps > File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks | 3675649.7 KBps | 1780614.4 KBps > Pipe Throughput | 11872208.7 lps | 11855628.9 lps > Pipe-based Context Switching | 1495126.5 lps | 1490533.9 lps > Process Creation | 29881.2 lps | 28572.8 lps > Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) | 23224.3 lpm | 22607.4 lpm > Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) | 3531.4 lpm | 3211.9 lpm > System Call Overhead | 10385653.0 lps | 10419979.0 lps > > Pan Xinhui (5): > kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface > locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() > kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner > powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check > x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 6 ++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 3 ++- > arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > kernel/locking/mutex.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 10 +++++++++- > kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- > 11 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com, jgross@suse.com, peterz@infradead.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, pbonzini@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] implement vcpu preempted check Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:47:09 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <e3fd1bd3-c57d-f0b0-68c4-ecd450d1ad32@de.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1476872416-42752-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> On 10/19/2016 12:20 PM, Pan Xinhui wrote: > change from v3: > add x86 vcpu preempted check patch If you want you could add the s390 patch that I provided for your last version. I also gave my Acked-by for all previous patches. > change from v2: > no code change, fix typos, update some comments > change from v1: > a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted > skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. > add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. > add more comments > thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. > > This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues. > > test-case: > perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g 400 -p && perf report > > 18.09% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock > 12.28% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] rwsem_spin_on_owner > 5.27% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_unlock > 3.89% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] wait_consider_task > 3.64% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] _raw_write_lock_irq > 3.41% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.is > 2.49% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] system_call > > We introduce interface bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) and use it in some spin > loops of osq_lock, rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. > These spin_on_onwer variant also cause rcu stall before we apply this patch set > > We also have observed some performace improvements. > > PPC test result: > > 1 copy - 0.94% > 2 copy - 7.17% > 4 copy - 11.9% > 8 copy - 3.04% > 16 copy - 15.11% > > details below: > Without patch: > > 1 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2188223.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 2 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1804433.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 4 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1237257.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 8 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1032658.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 16 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 768000.0 KBps (30.1 s, 1 samples) > > With patch: > > 1 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2209189.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 2 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1943816.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 4 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1405591.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 8 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1065080.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > 16 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 904762.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples) > > X86 test result: > test-case after-patch before-patch > Execl Throughput | 18307.9 lps | 11701.6 lps > File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks | 1352407.3 KBps | 790418.9 KBps > File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks | 367555.6 KBps | 222867.7 KBps > File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks | 3675649.7 KBps | 1780614.4 KBps > Pipe Throughput | 11872208.7 lps | 11855628.9 lps > Pipe-based Context Switching | 1495126.5 lps | 1490533.9 lps > Process Creation | 29881.2 lps | 28572.8 lps > Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) | 23224.3 lpm | 22607.4 lpm > Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) | 3531.4 lpm | 3211.9 lpm > System Call Overhead | 10385653.0 lps | 10419979.0 lps > > Pan Xinhui (5): > kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface > locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() > kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner > powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check > x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 6 ++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 3 ++- > arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > kernel/locking/mutex.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 10 +++++++++- > kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- > 11 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-19 6:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-10-19 10:20 [PATCH v4 0/5] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 6:47 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message] 2016-10-19 6:47 ` Christian Borntraeger 2016-10-19 16:57 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 16:57 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex, rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: " Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 10:20 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 17:24 ` Radim Krčmář 2016-10-19 17:24 ` Radim Krčmář 2016-10-19 18:45 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 18:45 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-24 14:39 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-10-24 15:14 ` Radim Krčmář 2016-10-24 15:14 ` Radim Krčmář 2016-10-24 15:18 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-10-25 1:25 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-25 1:25 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-24 15:18 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-10-24 14:39 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-10-19 15:58 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] implement " Juergen Gross 2016-10-19 15:58 ` Juergen Gross 2016-10-19 15:58 ` Juergen Gross 2016-10-19 15:58 ` Juergen Gross 2016-10-19 17:08 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 17:08 ` Pan Xinhui 2016-10-19 17:08 ` Pan Xinhui -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2016-10-19 10:20 Pan Xinhui
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=e3fd1bd3-c57d-f0b0-68c4-ecd450d1ad32@de.ibm.com \ --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \ --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \ --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \ --cc=jgross@suse.com \ --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \ --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ --cc=xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org \ --cc=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.