* ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
@ 2024-03-27 16:25 James Prestwood
2024-03-28 14:37 ` James Prestwood
2024-03-29 18:39 ` Jeff Johnson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Prestwood @ 2024-03-27 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER
Hi,
This error was brought to my attention in the kernel logs and I'm
wondering if it is of any concern:
kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
It seems to happen every few minutes or so. I don't notice any bad
behavior associated with it per-se, but maybe its an issue of some
buffer needing to be increased in size? Does this mean a frame is being
dropped due to no room to receive it?
Hardware we are running is:
[ 4.610399] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: wcn6855 hw2.1
[ 5.777030] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: chip_id 0x12 chip_family 0xb
board_id 0xff soc_id 0x400c1211
[ 5.777039] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: fw_version 0x1109996e
fw_build_timestamp 2023-12-19 11:11 fw_build_id
WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.36
Thanks,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
2024-03-27 16:25 ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28 James Prestwood
@ 2024-03-28 14:37 ` James Prestwood
2024-03-29 18:39 ` Jeff Johnson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Prestwood @ 2024-03-28 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER; +Cc: ath11k
+ CC ath11k
On 3/27/24 9:25 AM, James Prestwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This error was brought to my attention in the kernel logs and I'm
> wondering if it is of any concern:
>
> kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
>
> It seems to happen every few minutes or so. I don't notice any bad
> behavior associated with it per-se, but maybe its an issue of some
> buffer needing to be increased in size? Does this mean a frame is
> being dropped due to no room to receive it?
>
> Hardware we are running is:
>
> [ 4.610399] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: wcn6855 hw2.1
> [ 5.777030] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: chip_id 0x12 chip_family 0xb
> board_id 0xff soc_id 0x400c1211
> [ 5.777039] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: fw_version 0x1109996e
> fw_build_timestamp 2023-12-19 11:11 fw_build_id
> WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.36
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
2024-03-27 16:25 ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28 James Prestwood
2024-03-28 14:37 ` James Prestwood
@ 2024-03-29 18:39 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-04-01 3:30 ` Baochen Qiang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Johnson @ 2024-03-29 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Prestwood, open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER; +Cc: ath11k
On 3/27/2024 9:25 AM, James Prestwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This error was brought to my attention in the kernel logs and I'm
> wondering if it is of any concern:
>
> kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
>
> It seems to happen every few minutes or so. I don't notice any bad
> behavior associated with it per-se, but maybe its an issue of some
> buffer needing to be increased in size? Does this mean a frame is being
> dropped due to no room to receive it?
>
> Hardware we are running is:
>
> [ 4.610399] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: wcn6855 hw2.1
> [ 5.777030] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: chip_id 0x12 chip_family 0xb
> board_id 0xff soc_id 0x400c1211
> [ 5.777039] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: fw_version 0x1109996e
> fw_build_timestamp 2023-12-19 11:11 fw_build_id
> WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.36
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
+ ath11k list to get more specific eyes on this issue
+ bcc to internal list as well
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
2024-03-29 18:39 ` Jeff Johnson
@ 2024-04-01 3:30 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-04-11 8:00 ` Baochen Qiang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baochen Qiang @ 2024-04-01 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Johnson, James Prestwood,
open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER
Cc: ath11k
On 3/30/2024 2:39 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 3/27/2024 9:25 AM, James Prestwood wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This error was brought to my attention in the kernel logs and I'm
>> wondering if it is of any concern:
>>
>> kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
>>
>> It seems to happen every few minutes or so. I don't notice any bad
>> behavior associated with it per-se, but maybe its an issue of some
>> buffer needing to be increased in size? Does this mean a frame is being
>> dropped due to no room to receive it?
>>
>> Hardware we are running is:
>>
>> [ 4.610399] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: wcn6855 hw2.1
>> [ 5.777030] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: chip_id 0x12 chip_family 0xb
>> board_id 0xff soc_id 0x400c1211
>> [ 5.777039] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: fw_version 0x1109996e
>> fw_build_timestamp 2023-12-19 11:11 fw_build_id
>> WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.36
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>
> + ath11k list to get more specific eyes on this issue
> + bcc to internal list as well
>
I will look into this.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
2024-04-01 3:30 ` Baochen Qiang
@ 2024-04-11 8:00 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-04-16 12:50 ` James Prestwood
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baochen Qiang @ 2024-04-11 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Johnson, James Prestwood,
open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER
Cc: ath11k
On 4/1/2024 11:30 AM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
>
>
> On 3/30/2024 2:39 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 3/27/2024 9:25 AM, James Prestwood wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This error was brought to my attention in the kernel logs and I'm
>>> wondering if it is of any concern:
>>>
>>> kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
>>>
>>> It seems to happen every few minutes or so. I don't notice any bad
>>> behavior associated with it per-se, but maybe its an issue of some
>>> buffer needing to be increased in size? Does this mean a frame is being
>>> dropped due to no room to receive it?
>>>
>>> Hardware we are running is:
>>>
>>> [ 4.610399] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: wcn6855 hw2.1
>>> [ 5.777030] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: chip_id 0x12 chip_family 0xb
>>> board_id 0xff soc_id 0x400c1211
>>> [ 5.777039] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: fw_version 0x1109996e
>>> fw_build_timestamp 2023-12-19 11:11 fw_build_id
>>> WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.36
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> James
Hi James, I was not able to reproduce this issue so wondering if you
could help reproduce and collect logs for debug. If OK please first
merge the debug patch which is available in patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240411074812.86700-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com/
Please also enable full ath11k log:
modprobe ath11k debug_mask=0xffffffff
modprobe ath11k_pci
Once enabled you should see lots of ath11k logs.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> + ath11k list to get more specific eyes on this issue
>> + bcc to internal list as well
>>
> I will look into this.
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
2024-04-11 8:00 ` Baochen Qiang
@ 2024-04-16 12:50 ` James Prestwood
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Prestwood @ 2024-04-16 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baochen Qiang, Jeff Johnson, open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER
Cc: ath11k
On 4/11/24 1:00 AM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
>
>
> On 4/1/2024 11:30 AM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/30/2024 2:39 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> On 3/27/2024 9:25 AM, James Prestwood wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This error was brought to my attention in the kernel logs and I'm
>>>> wondering if it is of any concern:
>>>>
>>>> kernel: ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: failed to enqueue rx buf: -28
>>>>
>>>> It seems to happen every few minutes or so. I don't notice any bad
>>>> behavior associated with it per-se, but maybe its an issue of some
>>>> buffer needing to be increased in size? Does this mean a frame is
>>>> being
>>>> dropped due to no room to receive it?
>>>>
>>>> Hardware we are running is:
>>>>
>>>> [ 4.610399] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: wcn6855 hw2.1
>>>> [ 5.777030] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: chip_id 0x12 chip_family 0xb
>>>> board_id 0xff soc_id 0x400c1211
>>>> [ 5.777039] ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: fw_version 0x1109996e
>>>> fw_build_timestamp 2023-12-19 11:11 fw_build_id
>>>> WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.36
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> James
> Hi James, I was not able to reproduce this issue so wondering if you
> could help reproduce and collect logs for debug. If OK please first
> merge the debug patch which is available in patchwork:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240411074812.86700-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com/
>
>
> Please also enable full ath11k log:
> modprobe ath11k debug_mask=0xffffffff
> modprobe ath11k_pci
>
> Once enabled you should see lots of ath11k logs.
Thank you for looking at this. I'll get these changes in to test but it
may take me some time.
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> + ath11k list to get more specific eyes on this issue
>>> + bcc to internal list as well
>>>
>> I will look into this.
>>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-16 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-27 16:25 ath11k failed to enqueue rx buf: -28 James Prestwood
2024-03-28 14:37 ` James Prestwood
2024-03-29 18:39 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-04-01 3:30 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-04-11 8:00 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-04-16 12:50 ` James Prestwood
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.