From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64/mm: Fixes and cleanups for do_page_fault() Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:29:06 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <e5834e61-d6ac-39cc-6cbf-70b80b841db0@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190529124120.GF4485@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> On 05/29/2019 06:11 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Anshuman, > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 06:04:41PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This series contains some fixes and cleanups for page fault handling in >> do_page_fault(). This has been boot tested on arm64 platform along with >> some stress test but just build tested on others. > > These all seem to be cleanups, which is fine, but I just wanted to make > sure I'm not missing something that should be aiming for 5.2. Are there > actually fixes in this series? The following one might qualify (I would not insist though) but right now this is not very problematic. - arm64/mm: Drop mmap_sem before calling __do_kernel_fault() > > (in future, it's best to post fixes separately so I don't miss them) Sure will do.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64/mm: Fixes and cleanups for do_page_fault() Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:29:06 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <e5834e61-d6ac-39cc-6cbf-70b80b841db0@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190529124120.GF4485@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> On 05/29/2019 06:11 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Anshuman, > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 06:04:41PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This series contains some fixes and cleanups for page fault handling in >> do_page_fault(). This has been boot tested on arm64 platform along with >> some stress test but just build tested on others. > > These all seem to be cleanups, which is fine, but I just wanted to make > sure I'm not missing something that should be aiming for 5.2. Are there > actually fixes in this series? The following one might qualify (I would not insist though) but right now this is not very problematic. - arm64/mm: Drop mmap_sem before calling __do_kernel_fault() > > (in future, it's best to post fixes separately so I don't miss them) Sure will do. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-29 12:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-29 12:34 [PATCH 0/4] arm64/mm: Fixes and cleanups for do_page_fault() Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64/mm: Drop mmap_sem before calling __do_kernel_fault() Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64/mm: Drop task_struct argument from __do_page_fault() Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64/mm: Consolidate page fault information capture Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 14:53 ` Mark Rutland 2019-05-29 14:53 ` Mark Rutland 2019-05-31 9:10 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-31 9:10 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64/mm: Drop vm_fault_t argument from __do_page_fault() Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:34 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 15:11 ` Mark Rutland 2019-05-29 15:11 ` Mark Rutland 2019-05-31 9:05 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-31 9:05 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-30 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-05-30 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig 2019-05-31 8:55 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-31 8:55 ` Anshuman Khandual 2019-05-29 12:41 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm64/mm: Fixes and cleanups for do_page_fault() Will Deacon 2019-05-29 12:41 ` Will Deacon 2019-05-29 12:59 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message] 2019-05-29 12:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=e5834e61-d6ac-39cc-6cbf-70b80b841db0@arm.com \ --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \ --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=james.morse@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.