[RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
GPIO.

There are different possibilities available today to handle this
situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:

 - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
   This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
   currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
   tree between the hog and the phy.

 - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
   The fec node supports properties

	phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
	phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;

   Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
   (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
   with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
   This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
   mac's node, but in a phy node instead.

So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
place and let it look as follows:

	mymdiobus {
		[...]
		myfirstphy: ethernet-phy@0 {
			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
			reg = <0>;

			reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
			reset-duration-ms = <200>;
		};

		mysecondphy: ethernet-phy@2 {
			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
			reg = <2>;

			reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
			reset-duration-ms = <200>;
		};
	};

And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
available yet.

Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
missed? Any further ideas/comments?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
GPIO.

There are different possibilities available today to handle this
situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:

 - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
   This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
   currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
   tree between the hog and the phy.

 - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
   The fec node supports properties

	phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
	phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;

   Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
   (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
   with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
   This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
   mac's node, but in a phy node instead.

So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
place and let it look as follows:

	mymdiobus {
		[...]
		myfirstphy: ethernet-phy at 0 {
			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
			reg = <0>;

			reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
			reset-duration-ms = <200>;
		};

		mysecondphy: ethernet-phy at 2 {
			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
			reg = <2>;

			reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
			reset-duration-ms = <200>;
		};
	};

And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
available yet.

Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
missed? Any further ideas/comments?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Re: [RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 5/12/2016 10:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
> GPIO.
>
> There are different possibilities available today to handle this
> situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:
>
>  - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
>    This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
>    currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
>    tree between the hog and the phy.
>
>  - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
>    The fec node supports properties
>
> 	phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
> 	phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;
>
>    Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
>    (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
>    with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
>    This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
>    mac's node, but in a phy node instead.
>
> So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
> place and let it look as follows:
>
> 	mymdiobus {
> 		[...]
> 		myfirstphy: ethernet-phy@0 {
> 			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
> 			reg = <0>;
>
> 			reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
> 			reset-duration-ms = <200>;
> 		};
>
> 		mysecondphy: ethernet-phy@2 {
> 			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
> 			reg = <2>;
>
> 			reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
> 			reset-duration-ms = <200>;
> 		};
> 	};
>
> And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
> available yet.
>
> Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
> missed? Any further ideas/comments?

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616495/

    I'll post a new version RSN.

> Best regards
> Uwe

MBR, Sergei

[RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 5/12/2016 10:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:

> I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
> GPIO.
>
> There are different possibilities available today to handle this
> situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:
>
>  - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
>    This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
>    currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
>    tree between the hog and the phy.
>
>  - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
>    The fec node supports properties
>
> 	phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
> 	phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;
>
>    Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
>    (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
>    with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
>    This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
>    mac's node, but in a phy node instead.
>
> So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
> place and let it look as follows:
>
> 	mymdiobus {
> 		[...]
> 		myfirstphy: ethernet-phy at 0 {
> 			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
> 			reg = <0>;
>
> 			reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
> 			reset-duration-ms = <200>;
> 		};
>
> 		mysecondphy: ethernet-phy at 2 {
> 			compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
> 			reg = <2>;
>
> 			reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
> 			reset-duration-ms = <200>;
> 		};
> 	};
>
> And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
> available yet.
>
> Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
> missed? Any further ideas/comments?

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616495/

    I'll post a new version RSN.

> Best regards
> Uwe

MBR, Sergei

Re: [RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

[adding Krzysztof as cc]

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> On 5/12/2016 10:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
>> I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
>> GPIO.
>>
>> There are different possibilities available today to handle this
>> situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:
>>
>>  - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
>>    This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
>>    currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
>>    tree between the hog and the phy.
>>
>>  - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
>>    The fec node supports properties
>>
>>         phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>         phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;
>>
>>    Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
>>
>> (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
>>    with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
>>    This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
>>    mac's node, but in a phy node instead.
>>
>> So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
>> place and let it look as follows:
>>
>>         mymdiobus {
>>                 [...]
>>                 myfirstphy: ethernet-phy@0 {
>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>                         reg = <0>;
>>
>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>                 };
>>
>>                 mysecondphy: ethernet-phy@2 {
>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>                         reg = <2>;
>>
>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>                 };
>>         };
>>
>> And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
>> available yet.
>>
>> Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
>> missed? Any further ideas/comments?
>
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616495/
>
>    I'll post a new version RSN.
>

This seems to be similar to what's needed by MMC/SD/SDIO devices (i.e:
a WiFi chip) that needs some power sequence for reset and be
enumerable.

Krzysztof has been working  to make the MMC pwrseq framework more
generic [0] since he wants to use it also for built-in USB devices.

From a quick look at the patches mentioned in this thread, it seems
that the same framework can be used to reset the PHYs unless I'm
missing something. Have you considered using this? It would be good if
there is a consistent way to define the power sequence for devices
across the different subsystems.

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/5/230

Best regards,
Javier

[RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

[adding Krzysztof as cc]

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> On 5/12/2016 10:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>
>> I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
>> GPIO.
>>
>> There are different possibilities available today to handle this
>> situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:
>>
>>  - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
>>    This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
>>    currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
>>    tree between the hog and the phy.
>>
>>  - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
>>    The fec node supports properties
>>
>>         phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>         phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;
>>
>>    Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
>>
>> (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
>>    with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
>>    This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
>>    mac's node, but in a phy node instead.
>>
>> So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
>> place and let it look as follows:
>>
>>         mymdiobus {
>>                 [...]
>>                 myfirstphy: ethernet-phy at 0 {
>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>                         reg = <0>;
>>
>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>                 };
>>
>>                 mysecondphy: ethernet-phy at 2 {
>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>                         reg = <2>;
>>
>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>                 };
>>         };
>>
>> And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
>> available yet.
>>
>> Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
>> missed? Any further ideas/comments?
>
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616495/
>
>    I'll post a new version RSN.
>

This seems to be similar to what's needed by MMC/SD/SDIO devices (i.e:
a WiFi chip) that needs some power sequence for reset and be
enumerable.

Krzysztof has been working  to make the MMC pwrseq framework more
generic [0] since he wants to use it also for built-in USB devices.

>From a quick look at the patches mentioned in this thread, it seems
that the same framework can be used to reset the PHYs unless I'm
missing something. Have you considered using this? It would be good if
there is a consistent way to define the power sequence for devices
across the different subsystems.

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/5/230

Best regards,
Javier

Re: [RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Hi,

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@dowhile0.org> wrote:
> [adding Krzysztof as cc]
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov
> <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>>
>> On 5/12/2016 10:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>
>>> I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
>>> GPIO.
>>>
>>> There are different possibilities available today to handle this
>>> situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:
>>>
>>>  - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
>>>    This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
>>>    currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
>>>    tree between the hog and the phy.
>>>
>>>  - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
>>>    The fec node supports properties
>>>
>>>         phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>>         phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;
>>>
>>>    Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
>>>
>>> (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
>>>    with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
>>>    This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
>>>    mac's node, but in a phy node instead.
>>>
>>> So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
>>> place and let it look as follows:
>>>
>>>         mymdiobus {
>>>                 [...]
>>>                 myfirstphy: ethernet-phy@0 {
>>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>>                         reg = <0>;
>>>
>>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>>                 };
>>>
>>>                 mysecondphy: ethernet-phy@2 {
>>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>>                         reg = <2>;
>>>
>>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
>>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>>                 };
>>>         };
>>>
>>> And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
>>> available yet.
>>>
>>> Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
>>> missed? Any further ideas/comments?
>>
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616495/
>>
>>    I'll post a new version RSN.
>>
>
> This seems to be similar to what's needed by MMC/SD/SDIO devices (i.e:
> a WiFi chip) that needs some power sequence for reset and be
> enumerable.
>
> Krzysztof has been working  to make the MMC pwrseq framework more
> generic [0] since he wants to use it also for built-in USB devices.
>
> From a quick look at the patches mentioned in this thread, it seems
> that the same framework can be used to reset the PHYs unless I'm
> missing something. Have you considered using this? It would be good if
> there is a consistent way to define the power sequence for devices
> across the different subsystems.
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/5/230

You probably missed the part that Rob nacked the bindings in that
series?

Putting the reset gpios under the PHY nodes and handling it from
phylib is probably the way to go. I'd like to ask for regulator
and clock support as well, if possible.

Regards
ChenYu

[RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Hi,

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@dowhile0.org> wrote:
> [adding Krzysztof as cc]
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov
> <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>>
>> On 5/12/2016 10:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>>
>>> I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
>>> GPIO.
>>>
>>> There are different possibilities available today to handle this
>>> situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:
>>>
>>>  - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
>>>    This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
>>>    currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
>>>    tree between the hog and the phy.
>>>
>>>  - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
>>>    The fec node supports properties
>>>
>>>         phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>>         phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;
>>>
>>>    Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
>>>
>>> (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
>>>    with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
>>>    This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
>>>    mac's node, but in a phy node instead.
>>>
>>> So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
>>> place and let it look as follows:
>>>
>>>         mymdiobus {
>>>                 [...]
>>>                 myfirstphy: ethernet-phy at 0 {
>>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>>                         reg = <0>;
>>>
>>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>>                 };
>>>
>>>                 mysecondphy: ethernet-phy at 2 {
>>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>>                         reg = <2>;
>>>
>>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
>>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>>                 };
>>>         };
>>>
>>> And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
>>> available yet.
>>>
>>> Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
>>> missed? Any further ideas/comments?
>>
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616495/
>>
>>    I'll post a new version RSN.
>>
>
> This seems to be similar to what's needed by MMC/SD/SDIO devices (i.e:
> a WiFi chip) that needs some power sequence for reset and be
> enumerable.
>
> Krzysztof has been working  to make the MMC pwrseq framework more
> generic [0] since he wants to use it also for built-in USB devices.
>
> From a quick look at the patches mentioned in this thread, it seems
> that the same framework can be used to reset the PHYs unless I'm
> missing something. Have you considered using this? It would be good if
> there is a consistent way to define the power sequence for devices
> across the different subsystems.
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/5/230

You probably missed the part that Rob nacked the bindings in that
series?

Putting the reset gpios under the PHY nodes and handling it from
phylib is probably the way to go. I'd like to ask for regulator
and clock support as well, if possible.

Regards
ChenYu

Re: [RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello ChenYu

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier@dowhile0.org> wrote:
>> [adding Krzysztof as cc]
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov
>> <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/12/2016 10:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
>>>> GPIO.
>>>>
>>>> There are different possibilities available today to handle this
>>>> situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:
>>>>
>>>>  - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
>>>>    This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
>>>>    currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
>>>>    tree between the hog and the phy.
>>>>
>>>>  - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
>>>>    The fec node supports properties
>>>>
>>>>         phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>>>         phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;
>>>>
>>>>    Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
>>>>
>>>> (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
>>>>    with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
>>>>    This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
>>>>    mac's node, but in a phy node instead.
>>>>
>>>> So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
>>>> place and let it look as follows:
>>>>
>>>>         mymdiobus {
>>>>                 [...]
>>>>                 myfirstphy: ethernet-phy@0 {
>>>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>>>                         reg = <0>;
>>>>
>>>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>>>                 };
>>>>
>>>>                 mysecondphy: ethernet-phy@2 {
>>>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>>>                         reg = <2>;
>>>>
>>>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
>>>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>>>                 };
>>>>         };
>>>>
>>>> And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
>>>> available yet.
>>>>
>>>> Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
>>>> missed? Any further ideas/comments?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616495/
>>>
>>>    I'll post a new version RSN.
>>>
>>
>> This seems to be similar to what's needed by MMC/SD/SDIO devices (i.e:
>> a WiFi chip) that needs some power sequence for reset and be
>> enumerable.
>>
>> Krzysztof has been working  to make the MMC pwrseq framework more
>> generic [0] since he wants to use it also for built-in USB devices.
>>
>> From a quick look at the patches mentioned in this thread, it seems
>> that the same framework can be used to reset the PHYs unless I'm
>> missing something. Have you considered using this? It would be good if
>> there is a consistent way to define the power sequence for devices
>> across the different subsystems.
>>
>> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/5/230
>
> You probably missed the part that Rob nacked the bindings in that
> series?
>

No, I didn't miss that. AFAICT the way forward is still being
discussed as you can see from the last email in that thread from Ulf
[0].

And yes, the DT bindings is likely to change (keeping the backward
compat for MMC) which is good,  but still the power sequence
management code can be reused across subsystems.

> Putting the reset gpios under the PHY nodes and handling it from
> phylib is probably the way to go. I'd like to ask for regulator
> and clock support as well, if possible.
>

A GPIO array, clock and regulator (after Krzysztof patch) is already
supported by the pwrseq_simple provider for example.

> Regards
> ChenYu

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/10/320

[RFC] Reset pins of phys and their representation in a device tree

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello ChenYu

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier@dowhile0.org> wrote:
>> [adding Krzysztof as cc]
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov
>> <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/12/2016 10:15 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a machine here where the reset pin of the phy is connected to a
>>>> GPIO.
>>>>
>>>> There are different possibilities available today to handle this
>>>> situation, here are the ones I'm aware of:
>>>>
>>>>  - Use a gpio-hog to set the reset gpio to non-active
>>>>    This might result in dependency problems (and that's what I am
>>>>    currently faced with) because there is no connection in the device
>>>>    tree between the hog and the phy.
>>>>
>>>>  - [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt]
>>>>    The fec node supports properties
>>>>
>>>>         phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>>>         phy-reset-duration = <200> /* milliseconds */;
>>>>
>>>>    Something similar exists in TI's vendor kernel
>>>>
>>>> (http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/commit/17d192b999ee904ced223c16cef76111a51c461b)
>>>>    with different (and IMHO bader) naming.
>>>>    This is the wrong place to specify the gpios; they shouldn't be in the
>>>>    mac's node, but in a phy node instead.
>>>>
>>>> So what I actually want is to put the gpio specification in the right
>>>> place and let it look as follows:
>>>>
>>>>         mymdiobus {
>>>>                 [...]
>>>>                 myfirstphy: ethernet-phy at 0 {
>>>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>>>                         reg = <0>;
>>>>
>>>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio2 14 0>;
>>>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>>>                 };
>>>>
>>>>                 mysecondphy: ethernet-phy at 2 {
>>>>                         compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>>>                         reg = <2>;
>>>>
>>>>                         reset-gpios = <&gpio3 10 0>;
>>>>                         reset-duration-ms = <200>;
>>>>                 };
>>>>         };
>>>>
>>>> And with this we could defer probe of &myfirstphy if &gpio2 isn't
>>>> available yet.
>>>>
>>>> Does this sound sensible? Does something like that already exist which I
>>>> missed? Any further ideas/comments?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616495/
>>>
>>>    I'll post a new version RSN.
>>>
>>
>> This seems to be similar to what's needed by MMC/SD/SDIO devices (i.e:
>> a WiFi chip) that needs some power sequence for reset and be
>> enumerable.
>>
>> Krzysztof has been working  to make the MMC pwrseq framework more
>> generic [0] since he wants to use it also for built-in USB devices.
>>
>> From a quick look at the patches mentioned in this thread, it seems
>> that the same framework can be used to reset the PHYs unless I'm
>> missing something. Have you considered using this? It would be good if
>> there is a consistent way to define the power sequence for devices
>> across the different subsystems.
>>
>> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/5/230
>
> You probably missed the part that Rob nacked the bindings in that
> series?
>

No, I didn't miss that. AFAICT the way forward is still being
discussed as you can see from the last email in that thread from Ulf
[0].

And yes, the DT bindings is likely to change (keeping the backward
compat for MMC) which is good,  but still the power sequence
management code can be reused across subsystems.

> Putting the reset gpios under the PHY nodes and handling it from
> phylib is probably the way to go. I'd like to ask for regulator
> and clock support as well, if possible.
>

A GPIO array, clock and regulator (after Krzysztof patch) is already
supported by the pwrseq_simple provider for example.

> Regards
> ChenYu

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/10/320