All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@loongson.cn>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
	Patchwork Bot <patchwork-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: ohci: add check for host controller functional states
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:15:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8aef4ff-5d5c-9330-a736-aa3586cba0ca@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211011161732.GA822456@rowland.harvard.edu>


在 2021/10/12 上午12:17, Alan Stern 写道:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:10:18PM +0800, zhuyinbo wrote:
>> 在 2021/10/10 上午3:39, Alan Stern 写道:
>>> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 10:01:25AM +0800, zhuyinbo wrote:
>>>> 在 2021/10/8 下午10:26, Alan Stern 写道:
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 03:26:10PM +0800, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>>>>>> The usb states of ohci controller include UsbOperational, UsbReset,
>>>>>> UsbSuspend and UsbResume. Among them, only the UsbOperational state
>>>>>> supports launching the start of frame for host controller according
>>>>>> the ohci protocol spec, but in S3/S4 press test procedure, it may
>>>>> Nobody reading this will know what "S3/S4 press test procedure" means.
>>>>> You have to explain it, or use a different name that people will
>>>>> understand.
>>>> okay, I got it.
>>>>>> happen that the start of frame was launched in other usb states and
>>>>>> cause ohci works abnormally then kernel will allways report rcu
>>>>>> call trace. This patch was to add check for host controller
>>>>>> functional states and if it is not UsbOperational state that need
>>>>>> set INTR_SF in intrdisable register to ensure SOF Token generation
>>>>>> was been disabled.
>>>>> This doesn't make sense.  You already mentioned that only the
>>>>> UsbOperational state supports sending start-of-frame packets.  So if the
>>>>> controller is in a different state then it won't send these packets,
>>>>> whether INTR_SF is enabled or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> What problem are you really trying to solve?
>>>> Only UsbOperational state supports sending start-of-frame packets, but in
>>>> fact, in S3/S4 press test procedure,
>>>>
>>>> usb in non-UsbOperational state that send start-of-frame packets but hc
>>>> driver doesn't deal with this frame. and hc will
>>>>
>>>> allways lauched the SOF for finishing the frame, the cpu will hand this sof
>>>> interrupt and doesn't deal with time interrupt
>>>>
>>>> that will cause rcu call trace then system doesn't suspend to memory/disk.
>>> I still don't understand.
>>>
>>> Are you saying that your OHCI controller behaves badly because it sends
>>> SOF packets even when the state is different from UsbOperational?
>> HC will allways report the SoF interrupt in the all time when HC was not in
>> NO-UsbOperation state.
> How did your host controller get into the non-UsbOperational state?
> What part of the code is responsible for changing to a different state?
>
> It looks like the only place where this could happen is in
> ohci_rh_suspend().  So if you disable SOF interrupts there, it should
> fix your problem.

in fact, I want to consider all non-UsbOperational state for my patch, 
as for UsbSuspend state and my issue that

your advice is the pefect solution, and apply for the change according 
to your advice, it can fix my problem by my test.

in addition, I got the non-UsbOperationnal state was by read hcfs bits 
in ohci control register, for the UsbSuspend status that

it is only changed in ohci_rh_suspend. and other states was changed in 
multiple place that seems disable sof interrupt was only

in ohci_irq. but if you still think it  has risk i want to following 
your advice and as it v5 version.

>
>> and no WritebackDoneHead interrupt that is the issue phenomenon. and this
>> situation is badly state for ohci.
>>
>>>> Hi Alan Stern,
>>>>
>>>>       even though ed_rm_list is non-NULL, if hc in non-UsbOperation state set
>>>> SoF status in usbsts register that is illegal,
>>>>
>>>> at this time hcd doesn't need care URB whether finished,  because hc had
>>>> into a wrong state. even thoug it doesn't has this patch,
>>>>
>>>> URB was not be able to finish when hc in above worng state. except software
>>>> can intervence this wrong state. but the SoF bit of usbsts
>>>>
>>>> register was set by HC, and this action will happen always !!! software
>>>> clear SoF state I think it isn't make sense. software only disable SoF
>>>>
>>>> interrupt to fix HC wrong state.
>>> This problem happens when you go into S3 or S4 suspend, right?  So you
>>> should fix the problem by disabling INTR_SF when the root hub is
>>> suspended.  Try adding
>>>
>>> 	/* All ED unlinks should be finished, no need for SOF interrupts */
>>> 	ohci_writel(ohci, OHCI_INTR_SF, &ohci->regs->intrdisable);
>>>
>>> into ohci_rh_suspend(), just before the update_done_list() call.  If you
>>> add this then INTR_SF will not be enabled during S3 or S4 suspend, so
>>> the problem shouldn't occur.  Does that work for you?
>> The system doesn't suspend to disk completely by my test result and hc will
>> always produce SoF interrupt.
> Have you tried adding those two lines of code shown above?
>
> If you haven't tested them, please don't write back until you have.
>
> Alan Stern

Hi Alan stern,

     I have a try that follow your advice and the s3/s4 test result is 
good for me.


Thanks,

Yinbo Zhu.


      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-08  7:26 [PATCH v3] usb: ohci: add check for host controller functional states Yinbo Zhu
2021-10-08 14:26 ` Alan Stern
2021-10-09  2:01   ` zhuyinbo
2021-10-09 19:39     ` Alan Stern
2021-10-11  5:10       ` zhuyinbo
2021-10-11  7:22         ` zhuyinbo
2021-10-11 16:17         ` Alan Stern
2021-10-12  8:15           ` zhuyinbo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e8aef4ff-5d5c-9330-a736-aa3586cba0ca@loongson.cn \
    --to=zhuyinbo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patchwork-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.