All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 4/9] dmapool: improve scalability of dma_pool_alloc
@ 2018-11-12 15:43 ` Tony Battersby
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Battersby @ 2018-11-12 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox, Christoph Hellwig, Marek Szyprowski,
	iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg
  Cc: linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA

dma_pool_alloc() scales poorly when allocating a large number of pages
because it does a linear scan of all previously-allocated pages before
allocating a new one.  Improve its scalability by maintaining a separate
list of pages that have free blocks ready to (re)allocate.  In big O
notation, this improves the algorithm from O(n^2) to O(n).

Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb-vFAe+i1/wJI5UWNf+nJyDw@public.gmane.org>
---
--- linux/mm/dmapool.c.orig	2018-08-03 16:16:49.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/mm/dmapool.c	2018-08-03 16:45:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -15,11 +15,16 @@
  * Many older drivers still have their own code to do this.
  *
  * The current design of this allocator is fairly simple.  The pool is
- * represented by the 'struct dma_pool' which keeps a doubly-linked list of
- * allocated pages.  Each page in the page_list is split into blocks of at
- * least 'size' bytes.  Free blocks are tracked in an unsorted singly-linked
- * list of free blocks within the page.  Used blocks aren't tracked, but we
- * keep a count of how many are currently allocated from each page.
+ * represented by the 'struct dma_pool'.  Each allocated page is split into
+ * blocks of at least 'size' bytes.  Free blocks are tracked in an unsorted
+ * singly-linked list of free blocks within the page.  Used blocks aren't
+ * tracked, but we keep a count of how many are currently allocated from each
+ * page.
+ *
+ * The pool keeps two doubly-linked list of allocated pages.  The 'available'
+ * list tracks pages that have one or more free blocks, and the 'full' list
+ * tracks pages that have no free blocks.  Pages are moved from one list to
+ * the other as their blocks are allocated and freed.
  */
 
 #include <linux/device.h>
@@ -43,7 +48,10 @@
 #endif
 
 struct dma_pool {		/* the pool */
-	struct list_head page_list;
+#define POOL_FULL_IDX   0
+#define POOL_AVAIL_IDX  1
+#define POOL_MAX_IDX    2
+	struct list_head page_list[POOL_MAX_IDX];
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	size_t size;
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -54,7 +62,7 @@ struct dma_pool {		/* the pool */
 };
 
 struct dma_page {		/* cacheable header for 'allocation' bytes */
-	struct list_head page_list;
+	struct list_head dma_list;
 	void *vaddr;
 	dma_addr_t dma;
 	unsigned int in_use;
@@ -70,7 +78,6 @@ show_pools(struct device *dev, struct de
 	unsigned temp;
 	unsigned size;
 	char *next;
-	struct dma_page *page;
 	struct dma_pool *pool;
 
 	next = buf;
@@ -84,11 +91,18 @@ show_pools(struct device *dev, struct de
 	list_for_each_entry(pool, &dev->dma_pools, pools) {
 		unsigned pages = 0;
 		unsigned blocks = 0;
+		int list_idx;
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
-		list_for_each_entry(page, &pool->page_list, page_list) {
-			pages++;
-			blocks += page->in_use;
+		for (list_idx = 0; list_idx < POOL_MAX_IDX; list_idx++) {
+			struct dma_page *page;
+
+			list_for_each_entry(page,
+					    &pool->page_list[list_idx],
+					    dma_list) {
+				pages++;
+				blocks += page->in_use;
+			}
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
@@ -163,7 +177,8 @@ struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(const c
 
 	retval->dev = dev;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&retval->page_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&retval->page_list[POOL_FULL_IDX]);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&retval->page_list[POOL_AVAIL_IDX]);
 	spin_lock_init(&retval->lock);
 	retval->size = size;
 	retval->boundary = boundary;
@@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void pool_free_page(struct dma_po
 	void *vaddr = page->vaddr;
 	dma_addr_t dma = page->dma;
 
-	list_del(&page->page_list);
+	list_del(&page->dma_list);
 
 	if (is_page_busy(page)) {
 		dev_err(pool->dev,
@@ -278,8 +293,8 @@ static void pool_free_page(struct dma_po
  */
 void dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *pool)
 {
-	struct dma_page *page;
 	bool empty = false;
+	int list_idx;
 
 	if (unlikely(!pool))
 		return;
@@ -294,10 +309,15 @@ void dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *p
 		device_remove_file(pool->dev, &dev_attr_pools);
 	mutex_unlock(&pools_reg_lock);
 
-	while ((page = list_first_entry_or_null(&pool->page_list,
-						struct dma_page,
-						page_list))) {
-		pool_free_page(pool, page);
+	for (list_idx = 0; list_idx < POOL_MAX_IDX; list_idx++) {
+		struct dma_page *page;
+
+		while ((page = list_first_entry_or_null(
+					&pool->page_list[list_idx],
+					struct dma_page,
+					dma_list))) {
+			pool_free_page(pool, page);
+		}
 	}
 
 	kfree(pool);
@@ -325,10 +345,11 @@ void *dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *po
 	might_sleep_if(gfpflags_allow_blocking(mem_flags));
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(page, &pool->page_list, page_list) {
-		if (page->offset < pool->allocation)
-			goto ready;
-	}
+	page = list_first_entry_or_null(&pool->page_list[POOL_AVAIL_IDX],
+					struct dma_page,
+					dma_list);
+	if (page)
+		goto ready;
 
 	/* pool_alloc_page() might sleep, so temporarily drop &pool->lock */
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
@@ -339,11 +360,15 @@ void *dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *po
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags);
 
-	list_add(&page->page_list, &pool->page_list);
+	list_add(&page->dma_list, &pool->page_list[POOL_AVAIL_IDX]);
  ready:
 	page->in_use++;
 	offset = page->offset;
 	page->offset = *(int *)(page->vaddr + offset);
+	if (page->offset >= pool->allocation)
+		/* Move page from the "available" list to the "full" list. */
+		list_move_tail(&page->dma_list,
+			       &pool->page_list[POOL_FULL_IDX]);
 	retval = offset + page->vaddr;
 	*handle = offset + page->dma;
 #ifdef	DMAPOOL_DEBUG
@@ -381,13 +406,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_pool_alloc);
 
 static struct dma_page *pool_find_page(struct dma_pool *pool, dma_addr_t dma)
 {
-	struct dma_page *page;
+	int list_idx;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(page, &pool->page_list, page_list) {
-		if (dma < page->dma)
-			continue;
-		if ((dma - page->dma) < pool->allocation)
-			return page;
+	for (list_idx = 0; list_idx < POOL_MAX_IDX; list_idx++) {
+		struct dma_page *page;
+
+		list_for_each_entry(page,
+				    &pool->page_list[list_idx],
+				    dma_list) {
+			if (dma < page->dma)
+				continue;
+			if ((dma - page->dma) < pool->allocation)
+				return page;
+		}
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -444,6 +475,9 @@ void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool
 #endif
 
 	page->in_use--;
+	if (page->offset >= pool->allocation)
+		/* Move page from the "full" list to the "available" list. */
+		list_move(&page->dma_list, &pool->page_list[POOL_AVAIL_IDX]);
 	*(int *)vaddr = page->offset;
 	page->offset = offset;
 	/*

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 4/9] dmapool: improve scalability of dma_pool_alloc
@ 2018-11-12 15:43 ` Tony Battersby
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Battersby @ 2018-11-12 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox, Christoph Hellwig, Marek Szyprowski, iommu, linux-mm
  Cc: linux-scsi

dma_pool_alloc() scales poorly when allocating a large number of pages
because it does a linear scan of all previously-allocated pages before
allocating a new one.  Improve its scalability by maintaining a separate
list of pages that have free blocks ready to (re)allocate.  In big O
notation, this improves the algorithm from O(n^2) to O(n).

Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
---
--- linux/mm/dmapool.c.orig	2018-08-03 16:16:49.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/mm/dmapool.c	2018-08-03 16:45:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -15,11 +15,16 @@
  * Many older drivers still have their own code to do this.
  *
  * The current design of this allocator is fairly simple.  The pool is
- * represented by the 'struct dma_pool' which keeps a doubly-linked list of
- * allocated pages.  Each page in the page_list is split into blocks of at
- * least 'size' bytes.  Free blocks are tracked in an unsorted singly-linked
- * list of free blocks within the page.  Used blocks aren't tracked, but we
- * keep a count of how many are currently allocated from each page.
+ * represented by the 'struct dma_pool'.  Each allocated page is split into
+ * blocks of at least 'size' bytes.  Free blocks are tracked in an unsorted
+ * singly-linked list of free blocks within the page.  Used blocks aren't
+ * tracked, but we keep a count of how many are currently allocated from each
+ * page.
+ *
+ * The pool keeps two doubly-linked list of allocated pages.  The 'available'
+ * list tracks pages that have one or more free blocks, and the 'full' list
+ * tracks pages that have no free blocks.  Pages are moved from one list to
+ * the other as their blocks are allocated and freed.
  */
 
 #include <linux/device.h>
@@ -43,7 +48,10 @@
 #endif
 
 struct dma_pool {		/* the pool */
-	struct list_head page_list;
+#define POOL_FULL_IDX   0
+#define POOL_AVAIL_IDX  1
+#define POOL_MAX_IDX    2
+	struct list_head page_list[POOL_MAX_IDX];
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	size_t size;
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -54,7 +62,7 @@ struct dma_pool {		/* the pool */
 };
 
 struct dma_page {		/* cacheable header for 'allocation' bytes */
-	struct list_head page_list;
+	struct list_head dma_list;
 	void *vaddr;
 	dma_addr_t dma;
 	unsigned int in_use;
@@ -70,7 +78,6 @@ show_pools(struct device *dev, struct de
 	unsigned temp;
 	unsigned size;
 	char *next;
-	struct dma_page *page;
 	struct dma_pool *pool;
 
 	next = buf;
@@ -84,11 +91,18 @@ show_pools(struct device *dev, struct de
 	list_for_each_entry(pool, &dev->dma_pools, pools) {
 		unsigned pages = 0;
 		unsigned blocks = 0;
+		int list_idx;
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
-		list_for_each_entry(page, &pool->page_list, page_list) {
-			pages++;
-			blocks += page->in_use;
+		for (list_idx = 0; list_idx < POOL_MAX_IDX; list_idx++) {
+			struct dma_page *page;
+
+			list_for_each_entry(page,
+					    &pool->page_list[list_idx],
+					    dma_list) {
+				pages++;
+				blocks += page->in_use;
+			}
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
@@ -163,7 +177,8 @@ struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(const c
 
 	retval->dev = dev;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&retval->page_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&retval->page_list[POOL_FULL_IDX]);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&retval->page_list[POOL_AVAIL_IDX]);
 	spin_lock_init(&retval->lock);
 	retval->size = size;
 	retval->boundary = boundary;
@@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void pool_free_page(struct dma_po
 	void *vaddr = page->vaddr;
 	dma_addr_t dma = page->dma;
 
-	list_del(&page->page_list);
+	list_del(&page->dma_list);
 
 	if (is_page_busy(page)) {
 		dev_err(pool->dev,
@@ -278,8 +293,8 @@ static void pool_free_page(struct dma_po
  */
 void dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *pool)
 {
-	struct dma_page *page;
 	bool empty = false;
+	int list_idx;
 
 	if (unlikely(!pool))
 		return;
@@ -294,10 +309,15 @@ void dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *p
 		device_remove_file(pool->dev, &dev_attr_pools);
 	mutex_unlock(&pools_reg_lock);
 
-	while ((page = list_first_entry_or_null(&pool->page_list,
-						struct dma_page,
-						page_list))) {
-		pool_free_page(pool, page);
+	for (list_idx = 0; list_idx < POOL_MAX_IDX; list_idx++) {
+		struct dma_page *page;
+
+		while ((page = list_first_entry_or_null(
+					&pool->page_list[list_idx],
+					struct dma_page,
+					dma_list))) {
+			pool_free_page(pool, page);
+		}
 	}
 
 	kfree(pool);
@@ -325,10 +345,11 @@ void *dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *po
 	might_sleep_if(gfpflags_allow_blocking(mem_flags));
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(page, &pool->page_list, page_list) {
-		if (page->offset < pool->allocation)
-			goto ready;
-	}
+	page = list_first_entry_or_null(&pool->page_list[POOL_AVAIL_IDX],
+					struct dma_page,
+					dma_list);
+	if (page)
+		goto ready;
 
 	/* pool_alloc_page() might sleep, so temporarily drop &pool->lock */
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
@@ -339,11 +360,15 @@ void *dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *po
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags);
 
-	list_add(&page->page_list, &pool->page_list);
+	list_add(&page->dma_list, &pool->page_list[POOL_AVAIL_IDX]);
  ready:
 	page->in_use++;
 	offset = page->offset;
 	page->offset = *(int *)(page->vaddr + offset);
+	if (page->offset >= pool->allocation)
+		/* Move page from the "available" list to the "full" list. */
+		list_move_tail(&page->dma_list,
+			       &pool->page_list[POOL_FULL_IDX]);
 	retval = offset + page->vaddr;
 	*handle = offset + page->dma;
 #ifdef	DMAPOOL_DEBUG
@@ -381,13 +406,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_pool_alloc);
 
 static struct dma_page *pool_find_page(struct dma_pool *pool, dma_addr_t dma)
 {
-	struct dma_page *page;
+	int list_idx;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(page, &pool->page_list, page_list) {
-		if (dma < page->dma)
-			continue;
-		if ((dma - page->dma) < pool->allocation)
-			return page;
+	for (list_idx = 0; list_idx < POOL_MAX_IDX; list_idx++) {
+		struct dma_page *page;
+
+		list_for_each_entry(page,
+				    &pool->page_list[list_idx],
+				    dma_list) {
+			if (dma < page->dma)
+				continue;
+			if ((dma - page->dma) < pool->allocation)
+				return page;
+		}
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -444,6 +475,9 @@ void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool
 #endif
 
 	page->in_use--;
+	if (page->offset >= pool->allocation)
+		/* Move page from the "full" list to the "available" list. */
+		list_move(&page->dma_list, &pool->page_list[POOL_AVAIL_IDX]);
 	*(int *)vaddr = page->offset;
 	page->offset = offset;
 	/*

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] dmapool: improve scalability of dma_pool_alloc
  2018-11-12 15:43 ` Tony Battersby
@ 2018-11-13  6:19     ` Matthew Wilcox
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-11-13  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tony Battersby
  Cc: linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
	iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA,
	Christoph Hellwig, linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:43:25AM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> dma_pool_alloc() scales poorly when allocating a large number of pages
> because it does a linear scan of all previously-allocated pages before
> allocating a new one.  Improve its scalability by maintaining a separate
> list of pages that have free blocks ready to (re)allocate.  In big O
> notation, this improves the algorithm from O(n^2) to O(n).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb-vFAe+i1/wJI5UWNf+nJyDw@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] dmapool: improve scalability of dma_pool_alloc
@ 2018-11-13  6:19     ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-11-13  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tony Battersby
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Marek Szyprowski, iommu, linux-mm, linux-scsi

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:43:25AM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> dma_pool_alloc() scales poorly when allocating a large number of pages
> because it does a linear scan of all previously-allocated pages before
> allocating a new one.  Improve its scalability by maintaining a separate
> list of pages that have free blocks ready to (re)allocate.  In big O
> notation, this improves the algorithm from O(n^2) to O(n).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>

Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-13  6:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-12 15:43 [PATCH v4 4/9] dmapool: improve scalability of dma_pool_alloc Tony Battersby
2018-11-12 15:43 ` Tony Battersby
     [not found] ` <e982cd38-a721-bd06-8da8-0d6a0480685c-vFAe+i1/wJI5UWNf+nJyDw@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-13  6:19   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-13  6:19     ` Matthew Wilcox

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.