From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@qlogic.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 20:43:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9e9933c-c1dd-2e77-fd85-c1c2ff0db885@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzwVT4spevcuC5Ncee974w2QyxwVJ7RS_2YCEikkqKdGQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 05.07.2016 19:32, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@qlogic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> - if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) {
>>> + if (rsp->msix && (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id())) {
>>
>> Did this wind up going into an official commit somewhere?
> It's not in my tree, at least.
> And I don't think I've seen a "yes, that fixes it".
Quinn Tran ACKed a nearly identical patch from Bruno Prémont in a
different thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2257008/focus=2257139
>From what I can see in the initial mail in that thread it seems Bruno
successfully tested the patch he submitted. But I have no idea if the
patch is in someones queue to mainline right now. That's why I had it on
my "if nothing happens soon, poke someone" list...
HTH, CU, Thorsten
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@qlogic.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 20:43:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9e9933c-c1dd-2e77-fd85-c1c2ff0db885@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzwVT4spevcuC5Ncee974w2QyxwVJ7RS_2YCEikkqKdGQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 05.07.2016 19:32, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@qlogic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> - if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) {
>>> + if (rsp->msix && (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id())) {
>>
>> Did this wind up going into an official commit somewhere?
> It's not in my tree, at least.
> And I don't think I've seen a "yes, that fixes it".
Quinn Tran ACKed a nearly identical patch from Bruno Prémont in a
different thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2257008/focus=2257139
From what I can see in the initial mail in that thread it seems Bruno
successfully tested the patch he submitted. But I have no idea if the
patch is in someones queue to mainline right now. That's why I had it on
my "if nothing happens soon, poke someone" list...
HTH, CU, Thorsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-05 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-19 14:52 Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19 Thorsten Leemhuis
2016-06-20 10:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 10:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-21 11:11 ` Josh Boyer
2016-06-21 20:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-22 0:55 ` Josh Boyer
2016-06-22 1:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-22 1:29 ` Quinn Tran
2016-06-22 11:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-06-22 15:57 ` Quinn Tran
2016-06-23 7:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-06-23 16:13 ` Quinn Tran
2016-06-23 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-23 20:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-07-05 16:30 ` Josh Boyer
2016-07-05 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-07-05 18:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2016-07-05 18:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2016-07-05 19:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-22 6:36 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-24 14:19 George Spelvin
2016-06-26 12:52 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2016-06-26 15:36 ` Lucas Stach
2016-06-26 15:36 ` Lucas Stach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9e9933c-c1dd-2e77-fd85-c1c2ff0db885@leemhuis.info \
--to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=quinn.tran@qlogic.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.