Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: socinfo: Add another ID for sc7180

[Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com>]

Hi,

On 5/4/2022 9:00 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:14 PM Sai Prakash Ranjan
> <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 5/3/2022 6:03 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>>> It appears the some sc7180 devices, like the one in my
>>> sc7180-trogdor-homestar, report an ID of 407 instead of 425. Add
>>> another ID into the list.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>    drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c | 1 +
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
>>> index cee579a267a6..2ef1dc2a1dd3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
>>> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static const struct soc_id soc_id[] = {
>>>        { 396, "IPQ8071A" },
>>>        { 402, "IPQ6018" },
>>>        { 403, "IPQ6028" },
>>> +     { 407, "SC7180" },
>>>        { 421, "IPQ6000" },
>>>        { 422, "IPQ6010" },
>>>        { 425, "SC7180" },
>> Hmm, this ID maps to SM6250 which is a mobile variant. Not sure we should
>> use it for SC7180 which already has 425 ID assigned, perks of marketing :)
> That's super weird. Any idea why my strongbad reports 407 then? Is it
> a firmware bug, or someone misprogrammed something? What can we do to
> make the CPU recognized in strongbad?

Let me check with coretech folks as to why the ID is reused.

> ...and just for extra info, I believe strongbad actually has the
> slightly faster version of sc7180. It has a higher GPU/CPU speed. In
> some places I've heard it called sc7185, but in other places I've
> heard it called just sc7180 with a faster clock speed...

The only other variant of SC7180 I see in the document is SC7180P
which has 495 soc_id and is an APQ variant.

Thanks,
Sai