* [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static
@ 2017-03-15 19:38 Michal Wajdeczko
2017-03-15 19:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Wajdeczko @ 2017-03-15 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
There is no need to expose this function as it is called from
one function only. Also move it up to avoid forward declaration.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h | 2 -
2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index 54c5aff..a0d8833 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -86,6 +86,141 @@ void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
mutex_init(&dev_priv->guc.send_mutex);
}
+static void intel_uc_prepare_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+ const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
+ struct uc_css_header *css;
+ size_t size;
+ int err;
+
+ uc_fw->fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_PENDING;
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("before requesting firmware: uC fw fetch status %s\n",
+ intel_uc_fw_status_repr(uc_fw->fetch_status));
+
+ err = request_firmware(&fw, uc_fw->path, &pdev->dev);
+ if (err)
+ goto fail;
+ if (!fw)
+ goto fail;
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("fetch uC fw from %s succeeded, fw %p\n",
+ uc_fw->path, fw);
+
+ /* Check the size of the blob before examining buffer contents */
+ if (fw->size < sizeof(struct uc_css_header)) {
+ DRM_NOTE("Firmware header is missing\n");
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
+ css = (struct uc_css_header *)fw->data;
+
+ /* Firmware bits always start from header */
+ uc_fw->header_offset = 0;
+ uc_fw->header_size = (css->header_size_dw - css->modulus_size_dw -
+ css->key_size_dw - css->exponent_size_dw) * sizeof(u32);
+
+ if (uc_fw->header_size != sizeof(struct uc_css_header)) {
+ DRM_NOTE("CSS header definition mismatch\n");
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
+ /* then, uCode */
+ uc_fw->ucode_offset = uc_fw->header_offset + uc_fw->header_size;
+ uc_fw->ucode_size = (css->size_dw - css->header_size_dw) * sizeof(u32);
+
+ /* now RSA */
+ if (css->key_size_dw != UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT) {
+ DRM_NOTE("RSA key size is bad\n");
+ goto fail;
+ }
+ uc_fw->rsa_offset = uc_fw->ucode_offset + uc_fw->ucode_size;
+ uc_fw->rsa_size = css->key_size_dw * sizeof(u32);
+
+ /* At least, it should have header, uCode and RSA. Size of all three. */
+ size = uc_fw->header_size + uc_fw->ucode_size + uc_fw->rsa_size;
+ if (fw->size < size) {
+ DRM_NOTE("Missing firmware components\n");
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The GuC firmware image has the version number embedded at a
+ * well-known offset within the firmware blob; note that major / minor
+ * version are TWO bytes each (i.e. u16), although all pointers and
+ * offsets are defined in terms of bytes (u8).
+ */
+ switch (uc_fw->fw) {
+ case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC:
+ /* Header and uCode will be loaded to WOPCM. Size of the two. */
+ size = uc_fw->header_size + uc_fw->ucode_size;
+
+ /* Top 32k of WOPCM is reserved (8K stack + 24k RC6 context). */
+ if (size > intel_guc_wopcm_size(dev_priv)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Firmware is too large to fit in WOPCM\n");
+ goto fail;
+ }
+ uc_fw->major_ver_found = css->guc.sw_version >> 16;
+ uc_fw->minor_ver_found = css->guc.sw_version & 0xFFFF;
+ break;
+
+ case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC:
+ uc_fw->major_ver_found = css->huc.sw_version >> 16;
+ uc_fw->minor_ver_found = css->huc.sw_version & 0xFFFF;
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ DRM_ERROR("Unknown firmware type %d\n", uc_fw->fw);
+ err = -ENOEXEC;
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
+ if (uc_fw->major_ver_wanted == 0 && uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted == 0) {
+ DRM_NOTE("Skipping uC firmware version check\n");
+ } else if (uc_fw->major_ver_found != uc_fw->major_ver_wanted ||
+ uc_fw->minor_ver_found < uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted) {
+ DRM_NOTE("uC firmware version %d.%d, required %d.%d\n",
+ uc_fw->major_ver_found, uc_fw->minor_ver_found,
+ uc_fw->major_ver_wanted, uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted);
+ err = -ENOEXEC;
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("firmware version %d.%d OK (minimum %d.%d)\n",
+ uc_fw->major_ver_found, uc_fw->minor_ver_found,
+ uc_fw->major_ver_wanted, uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted);
+
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_from_data(dev_priv, fw->data, fw->size);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj)) {
+ err = obj ? PTR_ERR(obj) : -ENOMEM;
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
+ uc_fw->obj = obj;
+ uc_fw->size = fw->size;
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("uC fw fetch status SUCCESS, obj %p\n",
+ uc_fw->obj);
+
+ release_firmware(fw);
+ uc_fw->fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS;
+ return;
+
+fail:
+ DRM_WARN("Failed to fetch valid uC firmware from %s (error %d)\n",
+ uc_fw->path, err);
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("uC fw fetch status FAIL; err %d, fw %p, obj %p\n",
+ err, fw, uc_fw->obj);
+
+ release_firmware(fw); /* OK even if fw is NULL */
+ uc_fw->fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_FAIL;
+}
+
void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
if (dev_priv->huc.fw.path)
@@ -269,137 +404,3 @@ int intel_guc_sample_forcewake(struct intel_guc *guc)
return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
}
-void intel_uc_prepare_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw)
-{
- struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
- struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
- const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
- struct uc_css_header *css;
- size_t size;
- int err;
-
- uc_fw->fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_PENDING;
-
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("before requesting firmware: uC fw fetch status %s\n",
- intel_uc_fw_status_repr(uc_fw->fetch_status));
-
- err = request_firmware(&fw, uc_fw->path, &pdev->dev);
- if (err)
- goto fail;
- if (!fw)
- goto fail;
-
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("fetch uC fw from %s succeeded, fw %p\n",
- uc_fw->path, fw);
-
- /* Check the size of the blob before examining buffer contents */
- if (fw->size < sizeof(struct uc_css_header)) {
- DRM_NOTE("Firmware header is missing\n");
- goto fail;
- }
-
- css = (struct uc_css_header *)fw->data;
-
- /* Firmware bits always start from header */
- uc_fw->header_offset = 0;
- uc_fw->header_size = (css->header_size_dw - css->modulus_size_dw -
- css->key_size_dw - css->exponent_size_dw) * sizeof(u32);
-
- if (uc_fw->header_size != sizeof(struct uc_css_header)) {
- DRM_NOTE("CSS header definition mismatch\n");
- goto fail;
- }
-
- /* then, uCode */
- uc_fw->ucode_offset = uc_fw->header_offset + uc_fw->header_size;
- uc_fw->ucode_size = (css->size_dw - css->header_size_dw) * sizeof(u32);
-
- /* now RSA */
- if (css->key_size_dw != UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT) {
- DRM_NOTE("RSA key size is bad\n");
- goto fail;
- }
- uc_fw->rsa_offset = uc_fw->ucode_offset + uc_fw->ucode_size;
- uc_fw->rsa_size = css->key_size_dw * sizeof(u32);
-
- /* At least, it should have header, uCode and RSA. Size of all three. */
- size = uc_fw->header_size + uc_fw->ucode_size + uc_fw->rsa_size;
- if (fw->size < size) {
- DRM_NOTE("Missing firmware components\n");
- goto fail;
- }
-
- /*
- * The GuC firmware image has the version number embedded at a
- * well-known offset within the firmware blob; note that major / minor
- * version are TWO bytes each (i.e. u16), although all pointers and
- * offsets are defined in terms of bytes (u8).
- */
- switch (uc_fw->fw) {
- case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC:
- /* Header and uCode will be loaded to WOPCM. Size of the two. */
- size = uc_fw->header_size + uc_fw->ucode_size;
-
- /* Top 32k of WOPCM is reserved (8K stack + 24k RC6 context). */
- if (size > intel_guc_wopcm_size(dev_priv)) {
- DRM_ERROR("Firmware is too large to fit in WOPCM\n");
- goto fail;
- }
- uc_fw->major_ver_found = css->guc.sw_version >> 16;
- uc_fw->minor_ver_found = css->guc.sw_version & 0xFFFF;
- break;
-
- case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC:
- uc_fw->major_ver_found = css->huc.sw_version >> 16;
- uc_fw->minor_ver_found = css->huc.sw_version & 0xFFFF;
- break;
-
- default:
- DRM_ERROR("Unknown firmware type %d\n", uc_fw->fw);
- err = -ENOEXEC;
- goto fail;
- }
-
- if (uc_fw->major_ver_wanted == 0 && uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted == 0) {
- DRM_NOTE("Skipping uC firmware version check\n");
- } else if (uc_fw->major_ver_found != uc_fw->major_ver_wanted ||
- uc_fw->minor_ver_found < uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted) {
- DRM_NOTE("uC firmware version %d.%d, required %d.%d\n",
- uc_fw->major_ver_found, uc_fw->minor_ver_found,
- uc_fw->major_ver_wanted, uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted);
- err = -ENOEXEC;
- goto fail;
- }
-
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("firmware version %d.%d OK (minimum %d.%d)\n",
- uc_fw->major_ver_found, uc_fw->minor_ver_found,
- uc_fw->major_ver_wanted, uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted);
-
- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
- obj = i915_gem_object_create_from_data(dev_priv, fw->data, fw->size);
- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj)) {
- err = obj ? PTR_ERR(obj) : -ENOMEM;
- goto fail;
- }
-
- uc_fw->obj = obj;
- uc_fw->size = fw->size;
-
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("uC fw fetch status SUCCESS, obj %p\n",
- uc_fw->obj);
-
- release_firmware(fw);
- uc_fw->fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS;
- return;
-
-fail:
- DRM_WARN("Failed to fetch valid uC firmware from %s (error %d)\n",
- uc_fw->path, err);
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("uC fw fetch status FAIL; err %d, fw %p, obj %p\n",
- err, fw, uc_fw->obj);
-
- release_firmware(fw); /* OK even if fw is NULL */
- uc_fw->fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_FAIL;
-}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
index 170dd70..000cafd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
@@ -188,8 +188,6 @@ void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
-void intel_uc_prepare_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw);
int intel_guc_send(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len);
int intel_guc_sample_forcewake(struct intel_guc *guc);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static
2017-03-15 19:38 [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static Michal Wajdeczko
@ 2017-03-15 19:55 ` Patchwork
2017-03-20 10:01 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-03-20 17:17 ` Oscar Mateo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-03-15 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Wajdeczko; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/21315/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 21315v1 drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/21315/revisions/1/mbox/
Test gem_exec_flush:
Subgroup basic-uc-pro-default:
incomplete -> PASS (fi-skl-6700hq) fdo#100130
fdo#100130 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100130
fi-bdw-5557u total:278 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 time: 466s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:278 pass:239 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time: 580s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:278 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time: 538s
fi-bxt-t5700 total:278 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time: 571s
fi-byt-j1900 total:278 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time: 497s
fi-byt-n2820 total:278 pass:247 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31 time: 495s
fi-hsw-4770 total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time: 439s
fi-hsw-4770r total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time: 430s
fi-ilk-650 total:278 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50 time: 439s
fi-ivb-3520m total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 517s
fi-ivb-3770 total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 505s
fi-kbl-7500u total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 485s
fi-skl-6260u total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time: 486s
fi-skl-6700hq total:278 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:17 time: 606s
fi-skl-6700k total:278 pass:256 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 483s
fi-skl-6770hq total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time: 526s
fi-snb-2520m total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time: 548s
fi-snb-2600 total:278 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time: 419s
9a2b1c7caa7c45e1ec5ae6183a70a2d259101f2e drm-tip: 2017y-03m-15d-15h-52m-11s UTC integration manifest
7e329a96 drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4188/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static
2017-03-15 19:38 [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static Michal Wajdeczko
2017-03-15 19:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-03-20 10:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-03-20 17:17 ` Oscar Mateo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-03-20 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Wajdeczko, intel-gfx
On ke, 2017-03-15 at 19:38 +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> There is no need to expose this function as it is called from
> one function only. Also move it up to avoid forward declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
+ Adding CCs
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static
2017-03-15 19:38 [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static Michal Wajdeczko
2017-03-15 19:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-03-20 10:01 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2017-03-20 17:17 ` Oscar Mateo
2017-03-21 9:52 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oscar Mateo @ 2017-03-20 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Wajdeczko, intel-gfx
On 03/15/2017 12:38 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> There is no need to expose this function as it is called from
> one function only. Also move it up to avoid forward declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h | 2 -
> 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index 54c5aff..a0d8833 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,141 @@ void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->guc.send_mutex);
> }
>
> +static void intel_uc_prepare_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
>
No need for prefix intel_*, since it's a static function?
-- Oscar
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static
2017-03-20 17:17 ` Oscar Mateo
@ 2017-03-21 9:52 ` Joonas Lahtinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-03-21 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oscar Mateo, Michal Wajdeczko, intel-gfx
On ma, 2017-03-20 at 10:17 -0700, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>
> On 03/15/2017 12:38 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> >
> > +static void intel_uc_prepare_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
> >
> No need for prefix intel_*, since it's a static function?
True so, can you rename Michal and send v2. You can keep my R-b.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-21 9:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-15 19:38 [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Make intel_uc_prepare_fw() static Michal Wajdeczko
2017-03-15 19:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-03-20 10:01 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-03-20 17:17 ` Oscar Mateo
2017-03-21 9:52 ` Joonas Lahtinen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.