Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: xuartps: Setup early console when uartclk is also passed

[Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2414 bytes --]

On 23.4.2018 10:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:33:30PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Baudrate calculation depends on requested baudrate and uart clock.
>> This patch is checking that uartclk is also passed.
>>
>> The same logic is used 8250_early.c/init_port function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
>> index b9b2bc76bcac..a654cda203c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
>> @@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static int __init cdns_early_console_setup(struct earlycon_device *device,
>>  	/* only set baud if specified on command line - otherwise
>>  	 * assume it has been initialized by a boot loader.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (device->baud) {
>> +	if (port->uartclk && device->baud) {
>>  		u32 cd = 0, bdiv = 0;
>>  		u32 mr;
>>  		int div8;
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
> 
> This patch conflicts with the previous patch you sent: Subject: [PATCH]
> serial: xuartps: Fix the early_console junk character issue
> 
> So, which one should I apply?
> 
> I've dropped both from my review queue now, please resend the one(s) you
> want applied, in a patch series if needed.

First of all thanks for dropping. I forget that I have sent it in past.

Both patches are targeting the same problem. The first one is more
destructive.

And this one is what 8250 is doing.

I have also sent
"[PATCH] earlycon: Initialize port->uartclk based on clock-frequency
property" which is filling uartclk based on DT to do proper divider
calculation.

It means when patch above is applied we can keep divider calculation in
the driver because it is using right values. If not we need to remove
that baudrate calculation because it is not correct (uartclk is
hardcoded to BASE_BAUD * 16 in of_setup_earlycon).
And it is really a question if "port->uartclk = BASE_BAUD * 16" should
be in of_setup_earlycon.

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs
U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP SoCs



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]