kirkstone boost upgrade?

kirkstone boost upgrade?

[Roos, Thomas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 577 bytes --]

Hi,
we are hitting an issue with boost version 1.78 and like to ask if and how there is a boost upgrade on kirkstone branch?
Cheers, Thomas



Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL
38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg
Sitz der Gesellschaft: L-1855 Luxemburg
eingetragen im Luxemburgischen Handelsregister unter R.C.S. B186284

Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Niederlassung Deutschland
Marcel-Breuer-Str. 12, D-80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Zweigniederlassung: Muenchen
eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Muenchen unter HRB 242240, USt-ID DE317013094




[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1007 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?

[Vyacheslav Yurkov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 972 bytes --]

I would be cautious with boost upgrade in stable branch.

Boost is known for having breaking changes almost each new version. I 
only had a glance at 1.79-1.81 https://www.boost.org/users/history/ and 
there are a couple of them.

Are you affected by some particular bug or vulnerability in 1.78?

Vyacheslav

On 21.07.2023 06:49, Thomas Roos via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>
> Hi,
> we are hitting an issue with boost version 1.78 and like to ask if and 
> how there is a boost upgrade on kirkstone branch?
> Cheers, Thomas
>
>
>
>
> Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL
> 38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: L-1855 Luxemburg
> eingetragen im Luxemburgischen Handelsregister unter R.C.S. B186284
>
> Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Niederlassung Deutschland
> Marcel-Breuer-Str. 12, D-80807 Muenchen
> Sitz der Zweigniederlassung: Muenchen
> eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Muenchen unter HRB 
> 242240, USt-ID DE317013094
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1988 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?

[Christian Eggers]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1322 bytes --]

Hi Thomas,

On Friday, 21 July 2023, 06:49:24 CEST, Thomas Roos via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> Hi,
> we are hitting an issue with boost version 1.78 and like to ask if and how there is a boost upgrade on kirkstone branch?

I've a similar situation and decided to update boost by copying the current recipes from
oe-core master branch into my project's local layer (which works fine for me).

I would appreciate having a newer version in kirkstone, but this may be against the
policy of the LTS branch.

regards
Christian




_______________________________________________________
Christian
Eggers
Software Engineer
​
ARRI
Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
Arriweg 17,
83071
Stephanskirchen
www.arri.com

+49 8036 3009-3118
CEggers@arri.de

​
Get all the latest information from www.arri.com, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube.

Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
Sitz: München - Registergericht: Amtsgericht München - Handelsregisternummer: HRA 57918
Persönlich haftender Gesellschafter: Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH
Sitz: München - Registergericht: Amtsgericht München - Handelsregisternummer: HRB 54477
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Matthias Erb (Chairman); Lars Weyer; Stephan Schenk; Walter Trauninger

​

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9887 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: image413716.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 528 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: image615660.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 824 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?

[Christian Eggers]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1780 bytes --]

On Friday, 21 July 2023, 06:49:24 CEST, Thomas Roos via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> Hi,
> we are hitting an issue with boost version 1.78 and like to ask if and how there is a boost upgrade on kirkstone branch?

Another option:

Yesterday there were two posts on the docs@yoctoproject.org list about "mixin" layers [1][2].
There is already an own repository for this [3].

So the best option seems to be creating a branch like "kirkstone/boost" (for latest boost
release) or "kirkstone/boost-1.82" (for a specific boost release).

It looks like patches for the meta-lts-mixin layer should be posted to [4]. Searching for
"mixin" on the web interface shows some example messages. If you could put me on CC, I am
happy to test your patches.

regards
Christian


[1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/docs/message/4073
[2] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/docs/message/4074
[3] https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins/
[4] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/topics




_______________________________________________________
Christian
Eggers
Software Engineer
​
ARRI
Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
Arriweg 17,
83071
Stephanskirchen
www.arri.com

+49 8036 3009-3118
CEggers@arri.de

​
Get all the latest information from www.arri.com, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube.

Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
Sitz: München - Registergericht: Amtsgericht München - Handelsregisternummer: HRA 57918
Persönlich haftender Gesellschafter: Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH
Sitz: München - Registergericht: Amtsgericht München - Handelsregisternummer: HRB 54477
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Matthias Erb (Chairman); Lars Weyer; Stephan Schenk; Walter Trauninger

​

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 10416 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: image919797.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 528 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: image758798.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 824 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3512 bytes --]

For this purpose @LGE we're using meta-webos-backports layers for various
backports we need as in:
https://github.com/webosose/meta-webosose/tree/master/meta-webos-backports
https://github.com/webosose/meta-webosose/commits/master/meta-webos-backports

So we can easily just drop the layers whenever upgrading to newer Yocto
release.

I think it's easier and much faster than creating new mixing branch - for
recipes where it's not clear that multiple projects would need the backport
(like this unspecified issue in boost) and where the recipes can be easily
just copied to older release with minimal or no changes at all (so there is
no significant afford duplicated by multiple projects).

Regards,

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:30 AM Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de> wrote:

> On Friday, 21 July 2023, 06:49:24 CEST, Thomas Roos via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > Hi,
> > we are hitting an issue with boost version 1.78 and like to ask if and
> how there is a boost upgrade on kirkstone branch?
>
> Another option:
>
> Yesterday there were two posts on the docs@yoctoproject.org list about
> "mixin" layers [1][2].
> There is already an own repository for this [3].
>
> So the best option seems to be creating a branch like "kirkstone/boost"
> (for latest boost
> release) or "kirkstone/boost-1.82" (for a specific boost release).
>
> It looks like patches for the meta-lts-mixin layer should be posted to
> [4]. Searching for
> "mixin" on the web interface shows some example messages. If you could put
> me on CC, I am
> happy to test your patches.
>
> regards
> Christian
>
>
> [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/docs/message/4073
> [2] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/docs/message/4074
> [3] https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins/
> [4] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/topics
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________​
> Christian
> Eggers
> Software Engineer
> ​
> ARRI
> Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
> Arriweg 17 ,
> 83071
> Stephanskirchen
> www.arri.com
>
> <http://www.arri.com/>
> +49 8036 3009-3118 <+49%208036%203009-3118>
> CEggers@arri.de
>
> ​
> [image: CCM1 Camera Control Monitor]
> <https://www.arri.com/en/camera-systems/cameras/ccm-1>
> Get all the latest information from www.arri.com, Facebook
> <https://www.facebook.com/TeamARRI>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/ARRIChannel>, Instagram
> <https://www.instagram.com/arri/>, LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/arri> and YouTube
> <https://www.youtube.com/user/ARRIChannel>.
>
> Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG
>
> Sitz: München ‑ Registergericht: Amtsgericht München ‑ Handelsregisternummer: HRA 57918
> Persönlich haftender Gesellschafter: Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GmbH
>
> Sitz: München ‑ Registergericht: Amtsgericht München ‑ Handelsregisternummer: HRB 54477
>
> Geschäftsführer: Dr. Matthias Erb (Chairman); Lars Weyer; Stephan Schenk; Walter Trauninger
>
> ​
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#184670):
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/184670
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100271099/3617156
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> Martin.Jansa@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 13115 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: image919797.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 528 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: image758798.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 824 bytes --]

AW: [OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?

[Roos, Thomas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2141 bytes --]

Hi Vyacheslav,
I think it's this error: boost beast "Fixed WebSocket handshake response on failure."
Fixed in 1.79.
My question was what is the policy of upgrading boost in an LTS branch? I guess there is no change?
I totally agree that there are breaking changes - I had experienced a lot in the past...
Cheers, Thomas

________________________________
Von: Vyacheslav Yurkov <uvv.mail@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juli 2023 08:07:32
An: Roos, Thomas; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Betreff: RE: [EXTERNAL][OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.


I would be cautious with boost upgrade in stable branch.

Boost is known for having breaking changes almost each new version. I only had a glance at 1.79-1.81 https://www.boost.org/users/history/ and there are a couple of them.

Are you affected by some particular bug or vulnerability in 1.78?

Vyacheslav

On 21.07.2023 06:49, Thomas Roos via lists.openembedded.org wrote:

Hi,
we are hitting an issue with boost version 1.78 and like to ask if and how there is a boost upgrade on kirkstone branch?
Cheers, Thomas



Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL
38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg
Sitz der Gesellschaft: L-1855 Luxemburg
eingetragen im Luxemburgischen Handelsregister unter R.C.S. B186284

Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Niederlassung Deutschland
Marcel-Breuer-Str. 12, D-80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Zweigniederlassung: Muenchen
eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Muenchen unter HRB 242240, USt-ID DE317013094





Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL
38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg
Sitz der Gesellschaft: L-1855 Luxemburg
eingetragen im Luxemburgischen Handelsregister unter R.C.S. B186284

Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Niederlassung Deutschland
Marcel-Breuer-Str. 12, D-80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Zweigniederlassung: Muenchen
eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Muenchen unter HRB 242240, USt-ID DE317013094




[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3846 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?

[Ross Burton]

On 21 Jul 2023, at 09:25, Thomas Roos via lists.openembedded.org <throos=amazon.de@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Vyacheslav,
> I think it's this error: boost beast "Fixed WebSocket handshake response on failure."
> Fixed in 1.79.
> My question was what is the policy of upgrading boost in an LTS branch? I guess there is no change?
> I totally agree that there are breaking changes - I had experienced a lot in the past...

If you can isolate the fix to a small patch that doesn’t break anything else, then you can submit that as a patch.  If it needs to be an invasive upgrade, that’s less likely to happen.

Ross

AW: [OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?

[Roos, Thomas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1551 bytes --]

thank you, Ross - will try.
Cheers, Thomas

________________________________
Von: Ross Burton <Ross.Burton@arm.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juli 2023 13:42:02
An: Roos, Thomas
Cc: Vyacheslav Yurkov; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Betreff: RE: [EXTERNAL][OE-core] kirkstone boost upgrade?

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.



On 21 Jul 2023, at 09:25, Thomas Roos via lists.openembedded.org <throos=amazon.de@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Vyacheslav,
> I think it's this error: boost beast "Fixed WebSocket handshake response on failure."
> Fixed in 1.79.
> My question was what is the policy of upgrading boost in an LTS branch? I guess there is no change?
> I totally agree that there are breaking changes - I had experienced a lot in the past...

If you can isolate the fix to a small patch that doesn’t break anything else, then you can submit that as a patch.  If it needs to be an invasive upgrade, that’s less likely to happen.

Ross



Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL
38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg
Sitz der Gesellschaft: L-1855 Luxemburg
eingetragen im Luxemburgischen Handelsregister unter R.C.S. B186284

Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Niederlassung Deutschland
Marcel-Breuer-Str. 12, D-80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Zweigniederlassung: Muenchen
eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Muenchen unter HRB 242240, USt-ID DE317013094




[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2649 bytes --]