From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table loading
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:59:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f045353d-7716-007c-a430-10c4aa15592c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BBCC54B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 6/12/2016 3:02 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> From: Wysocki, Rafael J
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for
>> table loading
>>
>> On 5/20/2016 2:57 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote:
>>> Hi, Rafael
>>>
>>>> From: rjwysocki@gmail.com [mailto:rjwysocki@gmail.com] On Behalf
>> Of
>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for
>> table
>>>> loading
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi, Rafael
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we queue this up in linux-next?
>>>>> ASLTS recursive tests are done in ACPICA upstream and no regressions
>> can be
>>>> seen.
>>>>> We need more tests around this experimental change from the real
>> users to
>>>> have the chances to learn the unknown cases.
>>>>> If they reported regressions, we could stop the regressions by
>> reverting
>>>> [PATCH 4/4].
>>>>> So it should be safe to do such experiments in the Linux upstream.
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>> There is a rule that during a merge window linux-next should only
>>>> contain material for that merge window. That is, currently linux-next
>>>> should only contain material targeted at v4.7.
>>>>
>>>> For this reason, I can't put the series into linux-next right now, but
>>>> I'll do that as soon as 4.7-rc1 is released.
>>> [Lv Zheng]
>>> Great!
>>> Thanks for the information.
>> Unfortunately, it is reported that the series actually causes problems
>> to happen.
>>
>> I sent you a CC of my response to the report in question earlier today.
> [Lv Zheng]
> Could the problem be stopped by reverting PATCH 4/4?
Yes, it can.
However, would the series be any useful without that patch?
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0e65135af51d94db0410c7059f3bc3a2300fc3b5>
2016-05-13 5:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table loading Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ACPICA: Dispatcher: Fix an issue that the opregions created by the linked MLC were not tracked Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ACPICA: ACPI 2.0, Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new TermList grammar for table loading Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Enable correct ACPI subsystem initialization order for new table loading mode Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Fix module level execution by correctly parsing table as TermList Lv Zheng
2016-05-13 5:35 ` Lv Zheng
2016-05-17 0:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table loading Zheng, Lv
2016-05-17 23:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-20 0:57 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-06-10 1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-12 1:02 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-06-13 22:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-06-20 9:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ACPICA: Namespace: Fix a regression that MLC support triggers dead lock in dynamic " Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 10:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-06-20 10:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-06-20 23:13 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-06-20 9:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ACPICA: Dispatcher: Fix an issue that the opregions created by the linked MLC were not tracked Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ACPICA: ACPI 2.0, Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new TermList grammar for table loading Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Enable correct ACPI subsystem initialization order for new table loading mode Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Fix module level execution by correctly parsing table as TermList Lv Zheng
2016-06-20 9:07 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table loading Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPICA: Namespace: Fix a regression that MLC support triggers dead lock in dynamic " Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 7:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-06-21 9:55 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-06-23 0:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-21 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ACPICA: Dispatcher: Fix an issue that the opregions created by the linked MLC were not tracked Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ACPICA: ACPI 2.0, Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new TermList grammar for table loading Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` Lv Zheng
2016-07-04 23:42 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-07-05 0:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-21 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Enable correct ACPI subsystem initialization order for new table loading mode Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Fix module level execution by correctly parsing table as TermList Lv Zheng
2016-06-21 4:34 ` Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] ACPI 2.0: Stop defer-executing module level code Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] ACPICA: Tables: Fix "UNLOAD" code path lock issues Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] ACPICA: Parser: Fix a regression in LoadTable support Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Enable correct ACPI subsystem initialization order for new table loading mode Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:26 ` Lv Zheng
2016-11-24 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-23 3:27 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Fix module level execution by correctly parsing table as TermList Lv Zheng
2016-09-23 3:27 ` Lv Zheng
2016-09-24 0:32 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] ACPI 2.0: Stop defer-executing module level code Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-26 7:43 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-09-26 12:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f045353d-7716-007c-a430-10c4aa15592c@intel.com \
--to=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=zetalog@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.