All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()
@ 2020-04-03 15:48 Hans de Goede
  2020-04-03 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler() Hans de Goede
  2020-04-04 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler() Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2020-04-03 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Darren Hart, Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-acpi, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, 5 . 4+

Since commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from
waking up the system") the SCI triggering without there being a wakeup
cause recognized by the ACPI sleep code will no longer wakeup the system.

This works as intended, but this is a problem for devices where the SCI
is shared with another device which is also a wakeup source.

In the past these, from the pov of the ACPI sleep code, spurious SCIs
would still cause a wakeup so the wakeup from the device sharing the
interrupt would actually wakeup the system. This now no longer works.

This is a problem on e.g. Bay Trail-T and Cherry Trail devices where
some peripherals (typically the XHCI controller) can signal a
Power Management Event (PME) to the Power Management Controller (PMC)
to wakeup the system, this uses the same interrupt as the SCI.
These wakeups are handled through a special INT0002 ACPI device which
checks for events in the GPE0a_STS for this and takes care of acking
the PME so that the shared interrupt stops triggering.

The change to the ACPI sleep code to ignore the spurious SCI, causes
the system to no longer wakeup on these PME events. To make things
worse this means that the INT0002 device driver interrupt handler will
no longer run, causing the PME to not get cleared and resulting in the
system hanging. Trying to wakeup the system after such a PME through e.g.
the power button no longer works.

Add an acpi_register_wakeup_handler() function which registers
a handler to be called from acpi_s2idle_wake() and when the handler
returns true, return true from acpi_s2idle_wake().

The INT0002 driver will use this mechanism to check the GPE0a_STS
register from acpi_s2idle_wake() and to tell the system to wakeup
if a PME is signaled in the register.

Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system")
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Some small indentation changes

Changes in v2:
- Move the new helpers to drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
- Rename the helpers to acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler(), also give some
  types/variables better names
---
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c  |  4 +++
 drivers/acpi/sleep.h  |  1 +
 drivers/acpi/wakeup.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/acpi.h  |  5 +++
 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index e5f95922bc21..dc8c71c47285 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -1025,6 +1025,10 @@ static bool acpi_s2idle_wake(void)
 		if (acpi_any_gpe_status_set() && !acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe())
 			return true;
 
+		/* Check wakeups from drivers sharing the SCI. */
+		if (acpi_check_wakeup_handlers())
+			return true;
+
 		/*
 		 * Cancel the wakeup and process all pending events in case
 		 * there are any wakeup ones in there.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.h b/drivers/acpi/sleep.h
index 41675d24a9bc..3d90480ce1b1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 
 extern void acpi_enable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state);
 extern void acpi_disable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state);
+extern bool acpi_check_wakeup_handlers(void);
 
 extern struct list_head acpi_wakeup_device_list;
 extern struct mutex acpi_device_lock;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
index 9614126bf56e..90c40f992e13 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
@@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "sleep.h"
 
+struct acpi_wakeup_handler {
+	struct list_head list_node;
+	bool (*wakeup)(void *context);
+	void *context;
+};
+
+static LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_handler_head);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
+
 /*
  * We didn't lock acpi_device_lock in the file, because it invokes oops in
  * suspend/resume and isn't really required as this is called in S-state. At
@@ -96,3 +105,75 @@ int __init acpi_wakeup_device_init(void)
 	mutex_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+/**
+ * acpi_register_wakeup_handler - Register wakeup handler
+ * @wake_irq: The IRQ through which the device may receive wakeups
+ * @wakeup:   Wakeup-handler to call when the SCI has triggered a wakeup
+ * @context:  Context to pass to the handler when calling it
+ *
+ * Drivers which may share an IRQ with the SCI can use this to register
+ * a handler which returns true when the device they are managing wants
+ * to trigger a wakeup.
+ */
+int acpi_register_wakeup_handler(int wake_irq, bool (*wakeup)(void *context),
+				 void *context)
+{
+	struct acpi_wakeup_handler *handler;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the device is not sharing its IRQ with the SCI, there is no
+	 * need to register the handler.
+	 */
+	if (!acpi_sci_irq_valid() || wake_irq != acpi_sci_irq)
+		return 0;
+
+	handler = kmalloc(sizeof(*handler), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!handler)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	handler->wakeup = wakeup;
+	handler->context = context;
+
+	mutex_lock(&acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
+	list_add(&handler->list_node, &acpi_wakeup_handler_head);
+	mutex_unlock(&acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_register_wakeup_handler);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler - Unregister wakeup handler
+ * @wakeup:   Wakeup-handler passed to acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
+ * @context:  Context passed to acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
+ */
+void acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(bool (*wakeup)(void *context),
+				    void *context)
+{
+	struct acpi_wakeup_handler *handler;
+
+	mutex_lock(&acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
+	list_for_each_entry(handler, &acpi_wakeup_handler_head, list_node) {
+		if (handler->wakeup == wakeup && handler->context == context) {
+			list_del(&handler->list_node);
+			kfree(handler);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler);
+
+bool acpi_check_wakeup_handlers(void)
+{
+	struct acpi_wakeup_handler *handler;
+
+	/* No need to lock, nothing else is running when we're called. */
+	list_for_each_entry(handler, &acpi_wakeup_handler_head, list_node) {
+		if (handler->wakeup(handler->context))
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 0f24d701fbdc..efac0f9c01a2 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -488,6 +488,11 @@ void __init acpi_nvs_nosave_s3(void);
 void __init acpi_sleep_no_blacklist(void);
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
 
+int acpi_register_wakeup_handler(
+	int wake_irq, bool (*wakeup)(void *context), void *context);
+void acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(
+	bool (*wakeup)(void *context), void *context);
+
 struct acpi_osc_context {
 	char *uuid_str;			/* UUID string */
 	int rev;
-- 
2.26.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
  2020-04-03 15:48 [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler() Hans de Goede
@ 2020-04-03 15:48 ` Hans de Goede
  2020-04-03 16:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2020-04-04 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler() Rafael J. Wysocki
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2020-04-03 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Darren Hart, Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-acpi, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, 5 . 4+

The Power Management Events (PMEs) the INT0002 driver listens for get
signalled by the Power Management Controller (PMC) using the same IRQ
as used for the ACPI SCI.

Since commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from
waking up the system") the SCI triggering, without there being a wakeup
cause recognized by the ACPI sleep code, will no longer wakeup the system.

This breaks PMEs / wakeups signalled to the INT0002 driver, the system
never leaves the s2idle_loop() now.

Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler() to register a function which checks
the GPE0a_STS register for a PME and trigger a wakeup when a PME has
been signalled.

Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system")
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Keep the pm_wakeup_hard_event() call

Changes in v2:
- Adjust for the wakeup-handler registration function being renamed to
  acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
index f14e2c5f9da5..55f088f535e2 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
@@ -127,6 +127,14 @@ static irqreturn_t int0002_irq(int irq, void *data)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static bool int0002_check_wake(void *data)
+{
+	u32 gpe_sts_reg;
+
+	gpe_sts_reg = inl(GPE0A_STS_PORT);
+	return (gpe_sts_reg & GPE0A_PME_B0_STS_BIT);
+}
+
 static struct irq_chip int0002_byt_irqchip = {
 	.name			= DRV_NAME,
 	.irq_ack		= int0002_irq_ack,
@@ -220,6 +228,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	acpi_register_wakeup_handler(irq, int0002_check_wake, NULL);
 	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -227,6 +236,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static int int0002_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
+	acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(int0002_check_wake, NULL);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.26.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
  2020-04-03 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler() Hans de Goede
@ 2020-04-03 16:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2020-04-03 16:23     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-04-03 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hans de Goede
  Cc: Len Brown, Darren Hart, Andy Shevchenko, linux-acpi,
	platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, 5 . 4+

On Friday, April 3, 2020 5:48:34 PM CEST Hans de Goede wrote:
> The Power Management Events (PMEs) the INT0002 driver listens for get
> signalled by the Power Management Controller (PMC) using the same IRQ
> as used for the ACPI SCI.
> 
> Since commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from
> waking up the system") the SCI triggering, without there being a wakeup
> cause recognized by the ACPI sleep code, will no longer wakeup the system.
> 
> This breaks PMEs / wakeups signalled to the INT0002 driver, the system
> never leaves the s2idle_loop() now.
> 
> Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler() to register a function which checks
> the GPE0a_STS register for a PME and trigger a wakeup when a PME has
> been signalled.
> 
> Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system")
> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Andy, any objections?

> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Keep the pm_wakeup_hard_event() call
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Adjust for the wakeup-handler registration function being renamed to
>   acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> index f14e2c5f9da5..55f088f535e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,14 @@ static irqreturn_t int0002_irq(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +static bool int0002_check_wake(void *data)
> +{
> +	u32 gpe_sts_reg;
> +
> +	gpe_sts_reg = inl(GPE0A_STS_PORT);
> +	return (gpe_sts_reg & GPE0A_PME_B0_STS_BIT);
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip int0002_byt_irqchip = {
>  	.name			= DRV_NAME,
>  	.irq_ack		= int0002_irq_ack,
> @@ -220,6 +228,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	acpi_register_wakeup_handler(irq, int0002_check_wake, NULL);
>  	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -227,6 +236,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  static int int0002_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
> +	acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(int0002_check_wake, NULL);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> 





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
  2020-04-03 16:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2020-04-03 16:23     ` Andy Shevchenko
  2020-04-04 11:52       ` Hans de Goede
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-04-03 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Hans de Goede, Len Brown, Darren Hart, Andy Shevchenko,
	ACPI Devel Maling List, Platform Driver,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, 5 . 4+

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 7:08 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 3, 2020 5:48:34 PM CEST Hans de Goede wrote:
> > The Power Management Events (PMEs) the INT0002 driver listens for get
> > signalled by the Power Management Controller (PMC) using the same IRQ
> > as used for the ACPI SCI.
> >
> > Since commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from
> > waking up the system") the SCI triggering, without there being a wakeup
> > cause recognized by the ACPI sleep code, will no longer wakeup the system.
> >
> > This breaks PMEs / wakeups signalled to the INT0002 driver, the system
> > never leaves the s2idle_loop() now.
> >
> > Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler() to register a function which checks
> > the GPE0a_STS register for a PME and trigger a wakeup when a PME has
> > been signalled.
> >
> > Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system")
> > Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
> > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> Andy, any objections?

No,
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

Hans, just today when testing some other stuff noticed this

[   49.279001] irq 9: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[   49.289176] CPU: 0 PID: 168 Comm: irq/123-ATML100 Not tainted
5.6.0-next-20200403+ #212
[   49.300915] Hardware name: Intel Corporation CHERRYVIEW D0
PLATFORM/Braswell CRB, BIOS BRAS.X64.B082.R00.150727 0557 07/27/2015
[   49.316520] Call Trace:
[   49.322093]  <IRQ>
[   49.327193]  dump_stack+0x50/0x70
[   49.333744]  __report_bad_irq+0x30/0xa2
[   49.340858]  note_interrupt.cold+0xb/0x62
...
[   49.685087] handlers:
[   49.690307] [<000000000ab3cf88>] acpi_irq
[   49.697463] [<00000000e5d78029>] int0002_irq [intel_int0002_vgpio]
[   49.707063] Disabling IRQ #9

Is this what your series fixes?

>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Keep the pm_wakeup_hard_event() call
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Adjust for the wakeup-handler registration function being renamed to
> >   acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
> > ---
> >  drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> > index f14e2c5f9da5..55f088f535e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> > @@ -127,6 +127,14 @@ static irqreturn_t int0002_irq(int irq, void *data)
> >       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool int0002_check_wake(void *data)
> > +{
> > +     u32 gpe_sts_reg;
> > +
> > +     gpe_sts_reg = inl(GPE0A_STS_PORT);
> > +     return (gpe_sts_reg & GPE0A_PME_B0_STS_BIT);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct irq_chip int0002_byt_irqchip = {
> >       .name                   = DRV_NAME,
> >       .irq_ack                = int0002_irq_ack,
> > @@ -220,6 +228,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >               return ret;
> >       }
> >
> > +     acpi_register_wakeup_handler(irq, int0002_check_wake, NULL);
> >       device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -227,6 +236,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  static int int0002_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >       device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
> > +     acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(int0002_check_wake, NULL);
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
  2020-04-03 16:23     ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-04-04 11:52       ` Hans de Goede
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2020-04-04 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko, Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Len Brown, Darren Hart, Andy Shevchenko, ACPI Devel Maling List,
	Platform Driver, Linux Kernel Mailing List, 5 . 4+

Hi,

On 4/3/20 6:23 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 7:08 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, April 3, 2020 5:48:34 PM CEST Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> The Power Management Events (PMEs) the INT0002 driver listens for get
>>> signalled by the Power Management Controller (PMC) using the same IRQ
>>> as used for the ACPI SCI.
>>>
>>> Since commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from
>>> waking up the system") the SCI triggering, without there being a wakeup
>>> cause recognized by the ACPI sleep code, will no longer wakeup the system.
>>>
>>> This breaks PMEs / wakeups signalled to the INT0002 driver, the system
>>> never leaves the s2idle_loop() now.
>>>
>>> Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler() to register a function which checks
>>> the GPE0a_STS register for a PME and trigger a wakeup when a PME has
>>> been signalled.
>>>
>>> Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system")
>>> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>
>> Andy, any objections?
> 
> No,
> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> 
> Hans, just today when testing some other stuff noticed this
> 
> [   49.279001] irq 9: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [   49.289176] CPU: 0 PID: 168 Comm: irq/123-ATML100 Not tainted
> 5.6.0-next-20200403+ #212
> [   49.300915] Hardware name: Intel Corporation CHERRYVIEW D0
> PLATFORM/Braswell CRB, BIOS BRAS.X64.B082.R00.150727 0557 07/27/2015
> [   49.316520] Call Trace:
> [   49.322093]  <IRQ>
> [   49.327193]  dump_stack+0x50/0x70
> [   49.333744]  __report_bad_irq+0x30/0xa2
> [   49.340858]  note_interrupt.cold+0xb/0x62
> ...
> [   49.685087] handlers:
> [   49.690307] [<000000000ab3cf88>] acpi_irq
> [   49.697463] [<00000000e5d78029>] int0002_irq [intel_int0002_vgpio]
> [   49.707063] Disabling IRQ #9
> 
> Is this what your series fixes?

I don't think that my series fixes this.

My series fixes CHT devices no longer waking up from s2idle
when woken by pressing a key on the USB attached keyboard dock
of various 2-in-1s. Before we were relying on the ACPI code
also waking up on IRQs which from the ACPI SCI handler pov where
spurious. Rafael fixed the ACPI SCI handling during s2idle
also waking the system on spurious events. My patch hooks
the INT0002 driver into the ACPI SCI handling / wakeup checks
during s2idle.

I guess Rafael may have made some related changes elsewhere
though where the SCI no longer returns IRQ_HANDLED in some cases?

Rafael?

Regards,

Hans




> 
>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Keep the pm_wakeup_hard_event() call
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Adjust for the wakeup-handler registration function being renamed to
>>>    acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
>>> index f14e2c5f9da5..55f088f535e2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
>>> @@ -127,6 +127,14 @@ static irqreturn_t int0002_irq(int irq, void *data)
>>>        return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static bool int0002_check_wake(void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +     u32 gpe_sts_reg;
>>> +
>>> +     gpe_sts_reg = inl(GPE0A_STS_PORT);
>>> +     return (gpe_sts_reg & GPE0A_PME_B0_STS_BIT);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static struct irq_chip int0002_byt_irqchip = {
>>>        .name                   = DRV_NAME,
>>>        .irq_ack                = int0002_irq_ack,
>>> @@ -220,6 +228,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>                return ret;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> +     acpi_register_wakeup_handler(irq, int0002_check_wake, NULL);
>>>        device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
>>>        return 0;
>>>   }
>>> @@ -227,6 +236,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>   static int int0002_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>   {
>>>        device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
>>> +     acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(int0002_check_wake, NULL);
>>>        return 0;
>>>   }
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()
  2020-04-03 15:48 [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler() Hans de Goede
  2020-04-03 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler() Hans de Goede
@ 2020-04-04 17:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-04-04 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hans de Goede
  Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Darren Hart, Andy Shevchenko,
	ACPI Devel Maling List, Platform Driver,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, 5 . 4+

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:48 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Since commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from
> waking up the system") the SCI triggering without there being a wakeup
> cause recognized by the ACPI sleep code will no longer wakeup the system.
>
> This works as intended, but this is a problem for devices where the SCI
> is shared with another device which is also a wakeup source.
>
> In the past these, from the pov of the ACPI sleep code, spurious SCIs
> would still cause a wakeup so the wakeup from the device sharing the
> interrupt would actually wakeup the system. This now no longer works.
>
> This is a problem on e.g. Bay Trail-T and Cherry Trail devices where
> some peripherals (typically the XHCI controller) can signal a
> Power Management Event (PME) to the Power Management Controller (PMC)
> to wakeup the system, this uses the same interrupt as the SCI.
> These wakeups are handled through a special INT0002 ACPI device which
> checks for events in the GPE0a_STS for this and takes care of acking
> the PME so that the shared interrupt stops triggering.
>
> The change to the ACPI sleep code to ignore the spurious SCI, causes
> the system to no longer wakeup on these PME events. To make things
> worse this means that the INT0002 device driver interrupt handler will
> no longer run, causing the PME to not get cleared and resulting in the
> system hanging. Trying to wakeup the system after such a PME through e.g.
> the power button no longer works.
>
> Add an acpi_register_wakeup_handler() function which registers
> a handler to be called from acpi_s2idle_wake() and when the handler
> returns true, return true from acpi_s2idle_wake().
>
> The INT0002 driver will use this mechanism to check the GPE0a_STS
> register from acpi_s2idle_wake() and to tell the system to wakeup
> if a PME is signaled in the register.
>
> Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system")
> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Rebased on top of the current mainline and applied as 5.7-rc material
along with the [2/2], thanks!

> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Some small indentation changes
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Move the new helpers to drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> - Rename the helpers to acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler(), also give some
>   types/variables better names
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sleep.c  |  4 +++
>  drivers/acpi/sleep.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/acpi/wakeup.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/acpi.h  |  5 +++
>  4 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> index e5f95922bc21..dc8c71c47285 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -1025,6 +1025,10 @@ static bool acpi_s2idle_wake(void)
>                 if (acpi_any_gpe_status_set() && !acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe())
>                         return true;
>
> +               /* Check wakeups from drivers sharing the SCI. */
> +               if (acpi_check_wakeup_handlers())
> +                       return true;
> +
>                 /*
>                  * Cancel the wakeup and process all pending events in case
>                  * there are any wakeup ones in there.
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.h b/drivers/acpi/sleep.h
> index 41675d24a9bc..3d90480ce1b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>
>  extern void acpi_enable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state);
>  extern void acpi_disable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state);
> +extern bool acpi_check_wakeup_handlers(void);
>
>  extern struct list_head acpi_wakeup_device_list;
>  extern struct mutex acpi_device_lock;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> index 9614126bf56e..90c40f992e13 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
>  #include "internal.h"
>  #include "sleep.h"
>
> +struct acpi_wakeup_handler {
> +       struct list_head list_node;
> +       bool (*wakeup)(void *context);
> +       void *context;
> +};
> +
> +static LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_handler_head);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
> +
>  /*
>   * We didn't lock acpi_device_lock in the file, because it invokes oops in
>   * suspend/resume and isn't really required as this is called in S-state. At
> @@ -96,3 +105,75 @@ int __init acpi_wakeup_device_init(void)
>         mutex_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
>         return 0;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * acpi_register_wakeup_handler - Register wakeup handler
> + * @wake_irq: The IRQ through which the device may receive wakeups
> + * @wakeup:   Wakeup-handler to call when the SCI has triggered a wakeup
> + * @context:  Context to pass to the handler when calling it
> + *
> + * Drivers which may share an IRQ with the SCI can use this to register
> + * a handler which returns true when the device they are managing wants
> + * to trigger a wakeup.
> + */
> +int acpi_register_wakeup_handler(int wake_irq, bool (*wakeup)(void *context),
> +                                void *context)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_wakeup_handler *handler;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * If the device is not sharing its IRQ with the SCI, there is no
> +        * need to register the handler.
> +        */
> +       if (!acpi_sci_irq_valid() || wake_irq != acpi_sci_irq)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       handler = kmalloc(sizeof(*handler), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!handler)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       handler->wakeup = wakeup;
> +       handler->context = context;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
> +       list_add(&handler->list_node, &acpi_wakeup_handler_head);
> +       mutex_unlock(&acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_register_wakeup_handler);
> +
> +/**
> + * acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler - Unregister wakeup handler
> + * @wakeup:   Wakeup-handler passed to acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
> + * @context:  Context passed to acpi_register_wakeup_handler()
> + */
> +void acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(bool (*wakeup)(void *context),
> +                                   void *context)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_wakeup_handler *handler;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
> +       list_for_each_entry(handler, &acpi_wakeup_handler_head, list_node) {
> +               if (handler->wakeup == wakeup && handler->context == context) {
> +                       list_del(&handler->list_node);
> +                       kfree(handler);
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +       }
> +       mutex_unlock(&acpi_wakeup_handler_mutex);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler);
> +
> +bool acpi_check_wakeup_handlers(void)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_wakeup_handler *handler;
> +
> +       /* No need to lock, nothing else is running when we're called. */
> +       list_for_each_entry(handler, &acpi_wakeup_handler_head, list_node) {
> +               if (handler->wakeup(handler->context))
> +                       return true;
> +       }
> +
> +       return false;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 0f24d701fbdc..efac0f9c01a2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -488,6 +488,11 @@ void __init acpi_nvs_nosave_s3(void);
>  void __init acpi_sleep_no_blacklist(void);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
>
> +int acpi_register_wakeup_handler(
> +       int wake_irq, bool (*wakeup)(void *context), void *context);
> +void acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(
> +       bool (*wakeup)(void *context), void *context);
> +
>  struct acpi_osc_context {
>         char *uuid_str;                 /* UUID string */
>         int rev;
> --
> 2.26.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-04 17:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-03 15:48 [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler() Hans de Goede
2020-04-03 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Use acpi_register_wakeup_handler() Hans de Goede
2020-04-03 16:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-04-03 16:23     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-04 11:52       ` Hans de Goede
2020-04-04 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler() Rafael J. Wysocki

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.