From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
debian-ia64 <debian-ia64@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] sched/topology: NUMA distance deduplication
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:29:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f06aa8f4-9dba-109e-2033-020b3de60490@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210317211424.33090a37@sf>
Hi Sergei!
On 3/17/21 10:14 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Or is it just an early bootstrap message assuming more are to come?
>
> Could it be that we initialize too little of generic acpi boilerplace
> when there is no SRAT? Somewhere around:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c#n446
>
> arm64 and riscv calls `arch_numa_init()` and initializes numa node
> data in numa_init().
> While ia64 only calls acpi_numa_init() but not arch_acpi_numa_init()
> (which would do numa_init() for us).
>
> x86 seems to vaguely resemble generic code by duplicating numa_init().
>
> (UNTESTED) Could it be that we need something like:
>
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ setup_arch (char **cmdline_p)
> acpi_table_init();
> early_acpi_boot_init();
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> - acpi_numa_init();
> + arch_numa_init();
> acpi_numa_fixup();
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
> prefill_possible_map();
That doesn't build:
CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
<stdin>:1511:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
CHK include/generated/compile.h
CC arch/ia64/kernel/setup.o
CC arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.o
arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch':
arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c:574:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_numa_init'; did you mean 'acpi_numa_init'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
574 | arch_numa_init();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| acpi_numa_init
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:271: arch/ia64/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [Makefile:1851: arch/ia64/kernel] Error 2
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
debian-ia64 <debian-ia64@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] sched/topology: NUMA distance deduplication
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:29:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f06aa8f4-9dba-109e-2033-020b3de60490@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210317211424.33090a37@sf>
Hi Sergei!
On 3/17/21 10:14 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Or is it just an early bootstrap message assuming more are to come?
>
> Could it be that we initialize too little of generic acpi boilerplace
> when there is no SRAT? Somewhere around:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c#n446
>
> arm64 and riscv calls `arch_numa_init()` and initializes numa node
> data in numa_init().
> While ia64 only calls acpi_numa_init() but not arch_acpi_numa_init()
> (which would do numa_init() for us).
>
> x86 seems to vaguely resemble generic code by duplicating numa_init().
>
> (UNTESTED) Could it be that we need something like:
>
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ setup_arch (char **cmdline_p)
> acpi_table_init();
> early_acpi_boot_init();
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> - acpi_numa_init();
> + arch_numa_init();
> acpi_numa_fixup();
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
> prefill_possible_map();
That doesn't build:
CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
<stdin>:1511:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
CHK include/generated/compile.h
CC arch/ia64/kernel/setup.o
CC arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.o
arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch':
arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c:574:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_numa_init'; did you mean 'acpi_numa_init'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
574 | arch_numa_init();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| acpi_numa_init
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:271: arch/ia64/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [Makefile:1851: arch/ia64/kernel] Error 2
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 19:04 [PATCH 0/1] sched/topology: NUMA distance deduplication John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-17 19:36 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-17 19:36 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-17 19:47 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-17 19:47 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-17 20:04 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-17 20:04 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-17 20:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-17 20:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-17 23:26 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-17 23:26 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-18 10:28 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-18 10:28 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-18 10:48 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-18 10:48 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-17 21:14 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2021-03-17 21:14 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2021-03-17 21:58 ` Anatoly Pugachev
2021-03-17 21:58 ` Anatoly Pugachev
2021-03-17 23:29 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [this message]
2021-03-17 23:29 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-22 12:39 Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f06aa8f4-9dba-109e-2033-020b3de60490@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--to=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=debian-ia64@lists.debian.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.