All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de>
To: Simon Huelck <simonmail@gmx.de>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@synopsys.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Gpeppe.cavallaro@st.com,
	alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	Emiliano Ingrassia <ingrassia@epigenesys.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stmmac / meson8b-dwmac
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:42:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f08f2659-dde0-41ec-9233-6b4d5f375ffe@newmedia-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ec64936-c8fa-1f0e-68bf-2ad1d6e8f5d9@gmx.de>


> **
>
> **its clearly visible when i activated the other stream for getting
> duplex load ... The highest rate also stays alot under the possible
> 930MBits that i have seen earlier with 4.14.
> **
>
> **
> **
>
> **the parallel stream reached around 450Mbits , which almost sums up to
> 660Mbits. This is what i meant when i said that duplex might be broken.
> **
>
> **
> **
>
> **Connecting to host 10.10.11.100, port 5201
> [  5] local 10.10.11.1 port 38658 connected to 10.10.11.100 port 5201
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  62.9 MBytes   528 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  56.9 MBytes   477 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  55.9 MBytes   469 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  53.0 MBytes   445 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  54.3 MBytes   455 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  54.8 MBytes   460 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  45.3 MBytes   380 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  51.2 MBytes   429 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  56.1 MBytes   470 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  55.3 MBytes   464 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
> [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   546 MBytes   458 Mbits/sec    0             sender
> [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   545 MBytes   457 Mbits/sec
> receiver**
>
> **
> **
>
> **regards,**
>
> **Simon
> **
>
> **
> **
which stmac device are you talking about? its not your windows pc. if 
its a ipq8064 based device or something like that you should look
on a very different location. this platform like the r7800 has stmac 
performance problems since the kernel clk code for this device is lets 
say "very wrong".
so alot of clocks arent correct and so the ethernet performance will 
suffer.

i can tell you that i'm able to get 930 mbit on a stmmac based device. 
but as i said. the kernel needs other numerous fixes to get a good 
performance

root@TEW827:~# iperf3 -c 10.88.193.134 -i 1
Connecting to host 10.88.193.134, port 5201
[  5] local 10.88.193.90 port 36024 connected to 10.88.193.134 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   108 MBytes   903 Mbits/sec    0   5.17 MBytes
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   112 MBytes   943 Mbits/sec    0   5.17 MBytes
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   109 MBytes   913 Mbits/sec    0   6.02 MBytes
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   112 MBytes   944 Mbits/sec    0   6.02 MBytes
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   109 MBytes   910 Mbits/sec    1   6.02 MBytes
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   111 MBytes   935 Mbits/sec    0   6.02 MBytes
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   109 MBytes   912 Mbits/sec    1   6.02 MBytes
^C[  5]   7.00-7.51   sec  56.2 MBytes   935 Mbits/sec    0   6.02 MBytes

>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de>
To: Simon Huelck <simonmail@gmx.de>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@synopsys.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	Emiliano Ingrassia <ingrassia@epigenesys.com>,
	Gpeppe.cavallaro@st.com
Subject: Re: stmmac / meson8b-dwmac
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:42:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f08f2659-dde0-41ec-9233-6b4d5f375ffe@newmedia-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ec64936-c8fa-1f0e-68bf-2ad1d6e8f5d9@gmx.de>


> **
>
> **its clearly visible when i activated the other stream for getting
> duplex load ... The highest rate also stays alot under the possible
> 930MBits that i have seen earlier with 4.14.
> **
>
> **
> **
>
> **the parallel stream reached around 450Mbits , which almost sums up to
> 660Mbits. This is what i meant when i said that duplex might be broken.
> **
>
> **
> **
>
> **Connecting to host 10.10.11.100, port 5201
> [  5] local 10.10.11.1 port 38658 connected to 10.10.11.100 port 5201
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  62.9 MBytes   528 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  56.9 MBytes   477 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  55.9 MBytes   469 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  53.0 MBytes   445 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  54.3 MBytes   455 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  54.8 MBytes   460 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  45.3 MBytes   380 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  51.2 MBytes   429 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  56.1 MBytes   470 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  55.3 MBytes   464 Mbits/sec    0   65.6 KBytes
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
> [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   546 MBytes   458 Mbits/sec    0             sender
> [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   545 MBytes   457 Mbits/sec
> receiver**
>
> **
> **
>
> **regards,**
>
> **Simon
> **
>
> **
> **
which stmac device are you talking about? its not your windows pc. if 
its a ipq8064 based device or something like that you should look
on a very different location. this platform like the r7800 has stmac 
performance problems since the kernel clk code for this device is lets 
say "very wrong".
so alot of clocks arent correct and so the ethernet performance will 
suffer.

i can tell you that i'm able to get 930 mbit on a stmmac based device. 
but as i said. the kernel needs other numerous fixes to get a good 
performance

root@TEW827:~# iperf3 -c 10.88.193.134 -i 1
Connecting to host 10.88.193.134, port 5201
[  5] local 10.88.193.90 port 36024 connected to 10.88.193.134 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   108 MBytes   903 Mbits/sec    0   5.17 MBytes
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   112 MBytes   943 Mbits/sec    0   5.17 MBytes
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   109 MBytes   913 Mbits/sec    0   6.02 MBytes
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   112 MBytes   944 Mbits/sec    0   6.02 MBytes
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   109 MBytes   910 Mbits/sec    1   6.02 MBytes
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   111 MBytes   935 Mbits/sec    0   6.02 MBytes
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   109 MBytes   912 Mbits/sec    1   6.02 MBytes
^C[  5]   7.00-7.51   sec  56.2 MBytes   935 Mbits/sec    0   6.02 MBytes

>
>

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-24 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <a38e643c-ed9f-c306-cc95-84f70ebc1f10@gmx.de>
     [not found] ` <CAFBinCDebPOsmrhSXecx48nGWHh7g_OGPbr1Y0M+n_v9Ht91ew@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-17 21:23   ` stmmac / meson8b-dwmac Simon Huelck
2019-01-17 21:23     ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-04 14:34     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-04 14:34       ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-06 10:36       ` Emiliano Ingrassia
2019-02-06 10:36         ` Emiliano Ingrassia
2019-02-06 18:04         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-06 18:04           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-06 21:21         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-06 21:21           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-07 19:30         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-07 19:30           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-09  1:09           ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-09  1:09             ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-11 13:44             ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-11 13:44               ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-14  7:21               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-14  7:21                 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-17 14:48               ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-17 14:48                 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-17 19:13                 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-17 19:13                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18  8:42                 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18  8:42                   ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18  8:45                   ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18  8:45                     ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 12:33                     ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 12:33                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 12:41                       ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 12:41                         ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 13:02                         ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 13:02                           ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 15:29                           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 15:29                             ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 15:31                             ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 15:31                               ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 15:53                               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 15:53                                 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 16:26                                 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 16:26                                   ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 16:40                                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 16:40                                     ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 16:43                                     ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 16:43                                       ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 16:51                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 16:51                                         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 17:05                                         ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 17:05                                           ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 18:05                                           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 18:05                                             ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-19  8:47                                             ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-19  8:47                                               ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-19 19:41                                               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-19 19:41                                                 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-21 14:21                                                 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-21 14:21                                                   ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-21 17:27                                                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-21 17:27                                                     ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-21 17:46                                                     ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-21 17:46                                                       ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-21 19:34                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-21 19:34                                                         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-22 17:21                                                         ` Anand Moon
2019-02-22 17:21                                                           ` Anand Moon
2019-02-24 15:00                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 15:00                                                         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 15:02                                                         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 15:02                                                           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 19:42                                                         ` Sebastian Gottschall [this message]
2019-02-24 19:42                                                           ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-02-24 20:34                                                           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 20:34                                                             ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-27 11:09                                                             ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-27 11:09                                                               ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-27 19:02                                                               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-27 19:02                                                                 ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-01  9:23                                                                 ` Jose Abreu
2019-03-01  9:23                                                                   ` Jose Abreu
2019-03-05  9:55                                                                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-05  9:55                                                                     ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-06 11:35                                                                     ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-06 11:35                                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-06 11:45                                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-06 11:45                                                                         ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-11 14:53                                                                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-11 14:53                                                                     ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-13  9:07                                                                     ` Jose Abreu
2019-05-13  9:07                                                                       ` Jose Abreu
2019-05-22 12:48                                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-22 12:48                                                                         ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-22 14:02                                                                       ` Neil Armstrong
2019-05-22 14:02                                                                         ` Neil Armstrong
2019-02-27 21:03                                                               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-27 21:03                                                                 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 17:05                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 17:05                                         ` Simon Huelck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f08f2659-dde0-41ec-9233-6b4d5f375ffe@newmedia-net.de \
    --to=s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de \
    --cc=Gpeppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=ingrassia@epigenesys.com \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jose.abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simonmail@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.