All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC 08/17] x86/asm/64: De-Xen-ify our NMI code
Date: Wed,  6 Sep 2017 14:36:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0d45728756ebe8540edcc7b0da57bb77b3b719e.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org>

Xen PV is fundamentally incompatible with our fancy NMI code: it
doesn't use IST at all, and Xen entries clobber two stack slots
below the hardware frame.

Drop Xen PV support from our NMI code entirely.

XXX: Juergen: could you write and test the tiny patch needed to
make Xen PV have a xen_nmi entry that handles NMIs?  I don't know
how to test it.

Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 41 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index a9e318f7cc9b..c81e05fb999e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -1171,21 +1171,12 @@ ENTRY(error_exit)
 	jmp	retint_user
 END(error_exit)
 
-/* Runs on exception stack */
+/*
+ * Runs on exception stack.  Xen PV does not go through this path at all,
+ * so we can use real assembly here.
+ */
 ENTRY(nmi)
 	/*
-	 * Fix up the exception frame if we're on Xen.
-	 * PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME is guaranteed to push at most
-	 * one value to the stack on native, so it may clobber the rdx
-	 * scratch slot, but it won't clobber any of the important
-	 * slots past it.
-	 *
-	 * Xen is a different story, because the Xen frame itself overlaps
-	 * the "NMI executing" variable.
-	 */
-	PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME
-
-	/*
 	 * We allow breakpoints in NMIs. If a breakpoint occurs, then
 	 * the iretq it performs will take us out of NMI context.
 	 * This means that we can have nested NMIs where the next
@@ -1240,7 +1231,7 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
 	 * stacks lest we corrupt the "NMI executing" variable.
 	 */
 
-	SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK
+	swapgs
 	cld
 	movq	%rsp, %rdx
 	movq	PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rsp
@@ -1402,7 +1393,7 @@ nested_nmi_out:
 	popq	%rdx
 
 	/* We are returning to kernel mode, so this cannot result in a fault. */
-	INTERRUPT_RETURN
+	iretq
 
 first_nmi:
 	/* Restore rdx. */
@@ -1432,7 +1423,7 @@ first_nmi:
 	pushfq			/* RFLAGS */
 	pushq	$__KERNEL_CS	/* CS */
 	pushq	$1f		/* RIP */
-	INTERRUPT_RETURN	/* continues at repeat_nmi below */
+	iretq			/* continues at repeat_nmi below */
 1:
 #endif
 
@@ -1502,20 +1493,22 @@ nmi_restore:
 	/*
 	 * Clear "NMI executing".  Set DF first so that we can easily
 	 * distinguish the remaining code between here and IRET from
-	 * the SYSCALL entry and exit paths.  On a native kernel, we
-	 * could just inspect RIP, but, on paravirt kernels,
-	 * INTERRUPT_RETURN can translate into a jump into a
-	 * hypercall page.
+	 * the SYSCALL entry and exit paths.
+	 *
+	 * We arguably should just inspect RIP instead, but I (Andy) wrote
+	 * this code when I had the misapprehension that Xen PV supported
+	 * NMIs, and Xen PV would break that approach.
 	 */
 	std
 	movq	$0, 5*8(%rsp)		/* clear "NMI executing" */
 
 	/*
-	 * INTERRUPT_RETURN reads the "iret" frame and exits the NMI
-	 * stack in a single instruction.  We are returning to kernel
-	 * mode, so this cannot result in a fault.
+	 * iretq reads the "iret" frame and exits the NMI stack in a
+	 * single instruction.  We are returning to kernel mode, so this
+	 * cannot result in a fault.  Similarly, we don't need to worry
+	 * about espfix64 on the way back to kernel mode.
 	 */
-	INTERRUPT_RETURN
+	iretq
 END(nmi)
 
 ENTRY(ignore_sysret)
-- 
2.13.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-06 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-06 21:36 [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 01/17] x86/asm/64: Remove the restore_c_regs_and_iret label Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-07  9:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-07  9:46     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-07  9:49       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-07  9:57         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-07 10:29           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 02/17] x86/asm/64: Split the iret-to-user and iret-to-kernel paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 03/17] x86/asm/64: Move SWAPGS into the common iret-to-usermode path Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 04/17] x86/asm/64: Simplify reg restore code in the standard IRET paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:05   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 05/17] x86/asm/64: Shrink paranoid_exit_restore and make labels local Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 06/17] x86/asm/64: Use pop instead of movq in syscall_return_via_sysret Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 07/17] x86/asm/64: Merge the fast and slow SYSRET paths Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2017-09-07  9:34   ` [RFC 08/17] x86/asm/64: De-Xen-ify our NMI code Juergen Gross
2017-09-07 18:38     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-08  4:26       ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 09/17] x86/asm/32: Pull MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS update code out of native_load_sp0() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:06   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 10/17] x86/asm/64: Pass sp0 directly to load_sp0() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 11/17] x86/asm: Add task_top_of_stack() to find the top of a task's stack Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 12/17] x86/xen/64: Clean up SP code in cpu_initialize_context() Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:09   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 13/17] x86/boot/64: Stop initializing TSS.sp0 at boot Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:36 ` [RFC 14/17] x86/asm/64: Remove all remaining direct thread_struct::sp0 reads Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 15/17] x86/boot/32: Fix cpu_current_top_of_stack initialization at boot Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 16/17] x86/asm/64: Remove thread_struct::sp0 Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06 21:37 ` [RFC 17/17] x86/traps: Use a new on_thread_stack() helper to clean up an assertion Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-12 20:11   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-12 20:25     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-09-06 22:16 ` [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes Andi Kleen
2017-09-07  0:01   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-07  7:04     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0d45728756ebe8540edcc7b0da57bb77b3b719e.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.