Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] mmc: tegra: Reconfigure pad voltages during voltage switching

* Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] mmc: tegra: Reconfigure pad voltages during voltage switching
@ 2018-07-31  9:15 Stefan Agner
  2018-07-31 11:59   ` Aapo Vienamo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Agner @ 2018-07-31  9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aapo Vienamo
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Thierry Reding,
	Jonathan Hunter, Adrian Hunter, Mikko Perttunen, linux-mmc,
	devicetree, linux-tegra, linux-kernel, linux-tegra-owner

On 27.07.2018 10:44, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:33:11 +0200
> Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> wrote:
> 
>> On 26.07.2018 14:19, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
>> > Parse the pinctrl state and nvidia,only-1-8-v properties from the device
>> > tree and implement pad voltage state reconfiguration in the mmc
>> > start_signal_voltage_switch() callback. Validate the pinctrl and
>> > regulator configuration before unmasking UHS modes. Add
>> > NVQUIRK_NEEDS_PAD_CONTROL and add set it for Tegra210 and Tegra186.
>> >
>> > The pad configuration is done in the mmc callback because the order of
>> > pad reconfiguration and sdhci voltage switch depend on the voltage to
>> > which the transition occurs.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@nvidia.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> >  1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
>> > index ddf00166..9587365 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
>> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> >  #include <linux/io.h>
>> >  #include <linux/of.h>
>> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> > +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>> >  #include <linux/reset.h>
>> >  #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
>> >  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>> > @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@
>> >  #define NVQUIRK_ENABLE_SDR104		BIT(4)
>> >  #define NVQUIRK_ENABLE_DDR50		BIT(5)
>> >  #define NVQUIRK_HAS_PADCALIB		BIT(6)
>> > +#define NVQUIRK_NEEDS_PAD_CONTROL	BIT(7)
>> >
>> >  struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data {
>> >  	const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata;
>> > @@ -66,8 +68,13 @@ struct sdhci_tegra {
>> >  	struct gpio_desc *power_gpio;
>> >  	bool ddr_signaling;
>> >  	bool pad_calib_required;
>> > +	bool pad_control_available;
>> > +	bool only_1v8;
>> >
>> >  	struct reset_control *rst;
>> > +	struct pinctrl *pinctrl_sdmmc;
>> > +	struct pinctrl_state *pinctrl_state_3v3;
>> > +	struct pinctrl_state *pinctrl_state_1v8;
>> >  };
>> >
>> >  static u16 tegra_sdhci_readw(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
>> > @@ -138,12 +145,47 @@ static unsigned int tegra_sdhci_get_ro(struct
>> > sdhci_host *host)
>> >  	return mmc_gpio_get_ro(host->mmc);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +static bool tegra_sdhci_is_uhs_valid(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> > +	struct sdhci_tegra *tegra_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> > +	const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data *soc_data = tegra_host->soc_data;
>> > +
>> > +	/*
>> > +	 * The 1.8 V only host controllers don't need to have configurable
>> > +	 * regulators and pad voltages. In this case the UHS modes can be
>> > +	 * enabled regardless.
>> > +	 */
>> > +	if (tegra_host->only_1v8)
>> > +		return true;
>>
>> Hm, SD always needs 3.3V capabilities, not?
> 
> Yes, the controllers used for eMMCs should have the only_1v8 property
> set and they exit the function here. With controllers used for SD cards,
> the regulator and pad configurations are verified later in the function.
> 

By returning true you ask the controller to enable UHS modes. However,
if you have 1.8V only, there should be no UHS modes advertised (since SD
cards require 1.8V).

That assumes that UHS modes are a SD card thing only (which I think
strictly speaking should be the case).

However, at least on Tegra 3 it seems that enabling SD 3.0 is also
required for higher eMMC speeds:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10521147/

So UHS is probably not so much about SD card UHS modes but more about
higher speed modes in general...

>> So if the controller is 1.8V only, then only eMMC modes are allowed.
>>
>> You can use MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V in caps2.
> 
> I can't quite follow you, how this should be used here?
> 

Similar to 

        if (tegra_host->soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_ENABLE_DDR50)      

                host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR

You can enable higher speed eMMC modes without advertising SD card
modes.

>> So far the Tegra SDHCI driver did not use device tree to indicate modes,
>> but maybe we should start doing that. In this case you can use
>> mmc-hs200-1_8v/mmc-hs400-1_8v to indicate higher eMMC speed modes.
>>
>> > +
>> > +	/*
>> > +	 * If the board does not define a regulator for the SDHCI IO voltage,
>> > +	 * then don't advertise support for UHS modes even if the device
>> > +	 * supports it because the IO voltage cannot be configured.
>> > +	 */
>> > +	if (IS_ERR(host->mmc->supply.vqmmc))
>> > +		return false;
>>
>> The stack should already check that and mask caps1 accordingly (see
>> sdhci_setup_host).
> 
> True, the logic seems to be duplicated here. Although also
> tegra_sdhci_reset() needs to be change so that the bits masked off by
> sdhci_setup_host() aren't set if this check is removed.
> 

sdhci_setup_host() calls reset before doing initialization (e.g. in
__sdhci_read_caps).

Checking just for vqmmc presence is bogus IMHO. It does not say anything
about the exact capabilities of that regulator.

I think we should do something like this:

	if (there is a host->mmc->supply.vqmmc) {
		if (host->mmc->supply.vqmmc can do 1.8V (or/and also 1.2V?)) {
			/* 
			 * Enable SDHCI spec v3.00 support
			 * This is required for SD UHS modes as well as higher eMMC speeds
			 */
			if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_ENABLE_SDHCI_SPEC_300)
				misc_ctrl |= SDHCI_MISC_CTRL_ENABLE_SDHCI_SPEC_300;

			if (host->mmc->supply.vqmmc can do 3.3V) {
				/*
				 * Proper SD voltage switching is possible, advertise SD UHS 
				 * modes as supported by host
				 */
				if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_ENABLE_SDR50)
					misc_ctrl |= SDHCI_MISC_CTRL_ENABLE_SDR50;
				if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_ENABLE_DDR50)
					misc_ctrl |= SDHCI_MISC_CTRL_ENABLE_DDR50;
				if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_ENABLE_SDR104)
					misc_ctrl |= SDHCI_MISC_CTRL_ENABLE_SDR104;
				if (soc_data->nvquirks & SDHCI_MISC_CTRL_ENABLE_SDR50)
					clk_ctrl |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CTRL_SDR50_TUNING_OVERRIDE;
			}
		}
	}

>> > +
>> > +	/*
>> > +	 * Later SoC generations require software pad voltage configuration.
>> > +	 * The UHS modes should only be enabled if the pad configuration states
>> > +	 * are available on platforms where they are required in order to switch
>> > +	 * the signaling voltage.
>> > +	 */
>> > +	if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_NEEDS_PAD_CONTROL)
>> > +		return tegra_host->pad_control_available;
>> > +
>> > +	return false;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> >  static void tegra_sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
>> >  {
>> >  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> >  	struct sdhci_tegra *tegra_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> >  	const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data *soc_data = tegra_host->soc_data;
>> >  	u32 misc_ctrl, clk_ctrl;
>> > +	bool uhs_valid;
>> >
>> >  	sdhci_reset(host, mask);
>> >
>> > @@ -160,13 +202,8 @@ static void tegra_sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host
>> > *host, u8 mask)
>> >
>> >  	clk_ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CLOCK_CTRL_SPI_MODE_CLKEN_OVERRIDE;
>> >
>> > -	/*
>> > -	 * If the board does not define a regulator for the SDHCI
>> > -	 * IO voltage, then don't advertise support for UHS modes
>> > -	 * even if the device supports it because the IO voltage
>> > -	 * cannot be configured.
>> > -	 */
>> > -	if (!IS_ERR(host->mmc->supply.vqmmc)) {
>> > +	uhs_valid = tegra_sdhci_is_uhs_valid(host);
>> > +	if (uhs_valid) {
>> >  		/* Erratum: Enable SDHCI spec v3.00 support */
>> >  		if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_ENABLE_SDHCI_SPEC_300)
>> >  			misc_ctrl |= SDHCI_MISC_CTRL_ENABLE_SDHCI_SPEC_300;
>> > @@ -286,14 +323,80 @@ static int tegra_sdhci_execute_tuning(struct
>> > sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
>> >  	return mmc_send_tuning(host->mmc, opcode, NULL);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > -static void tegra_sdhci_voltage_switch(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> > +static int tegra_sdhci_set_padctrl(struct sdhci_host *host, int voltage)
>> >  {
>> >  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> >  	struct sdhci_tegra *tegra_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> > -	const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data *soc_data = tegra_host->soc_data;
>> > +	int ret;
>> > +
>> > +	if (!tegra_host->pad_control_available)
>> > +		return 0;
>> > +
>> > +	if (voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) {
>> > +		ret = pinctrl_select_state(tegra_host->pinctrl_sdmmc,
>> > +					   tegra_host->pinctrl_state_1v8);
>> > +		if (ret < 0)
>> > +			dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
>> > +				"setting 1.8V failed, ret: %d\n", ret);
>> > +	} else {
>> > +		ret = pinctrl_select_state(tegra_host->pinctrl_sdmmc,
>> > +					   tegra_host->pinctrl_state_3v3);
>> > +		if (ret < 0)
>> > +			dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
>> > +				"setting 3.3V failed, ret: %d\n", ret);
>> > +	}
>> >
>> > -	if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_HAS_PADCALIB)
>> > -		tegra_host->pad_calib_required = true;

Is this really not needed anymore?

>> > +	return ret;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int sdhci_tegra_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc,
>> > +						   struct mmc_ios *ios)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> > +	int ret = 0;
>> > +
>> > +	if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330) {
>> > +		ret = tegra_sdhci_set_padctrl(host, ios->signal_voltage);
>> > +		if (ret < 0)
>> > +			return ret;
>> > +		ret = sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch(mmc, ios);
>> > +	} else if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) {
>> > +		ret = sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch(mmc, ios);
>> > +		if (ret < 0)
>> > +			return ret;
>> > +		ret = tegra_sdhci_set_padctrl(host, ios->signal_voltage);
>>
>> So depending on voltage you first set the pads setting and then do the
>> signaling voltage switch. Is this necessary? Why?
> 
> This is done to enforce the constraint of keeping the signaling voltage
> always less or equal to the pad voltage. Driving 3.3 V into a pad that
> has been configured to 1.8 V will damage it. This is stated in the
> Tegra210 and Tegra186 TRMs in SDMMC Initialization Sequece sections of
> controllers supporting voltage switching.
> 
> Here when switching from 3.3 V to 1.8 V the regulator is first
> configured to 1.8 V by sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch() and after
> that the pad is configured to 1.8 V. When going in the other direction
> the pad needs to be first configured to 3.3 V before the regulator
> voltage can be raised.

Ok makes sense. Can you add a comment, e.g. /* Order of operation
matters, it make sure to keep signaling voltage below pad voltage */

> 
>> > +	}
>> > +
>> > +	return ret;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void tegra_sdhci_init_pinctrl_info(struct device *dev,
>> > +					  struct sdhci_tegra *tegra_host)
>> > +{
>> > +	tegra_host->pinctrl_sdmmc = devm_pinctrl_get(dev);
>> > +	if (IS_ERR(tegra_host->pinctrl_sdmmc)) {
>> > +		dev_dbg(dev, "No pinctrl info, err: %ld\n",
>> > +			PTR_ERR(tegra_host->pinctrl_sdmmc));
>> > +		return;
>> > +	}
>> > +
>> > +	tegra_host->pinctrl_state_3v3 =
>> > +		pinctrl_lookup_state(tegra_host->pinctrl_sdmmc, "sdmmc-3v3");
>> > +	if (IS_ERR(tegra_host->pinctrl_state_3v3)) {
>> > +		dev_err(dev, "Missing 3.3V pad state, err: %ld\n",
>> > +			PTR_ERR(tegra_host->pinctrl_state_3v3));
>> > +		return;
>> > +	}
>> > +
>> > +	tegra_host->pinctrl_state_1v8 =
>> > +		pinctrl_lookup_state(tegra_host->pinctrl_sdmmc, "sdmmc-1v8");
>> > +	if (IS_ERR(tegra_host->pinctrl_state_1v8)) {
>> > +		dev_err(dev, "Missing 1.8V pad state, err: %ld\n",
>> > +			  PTR_ERR(tegra_host->pinctrl_state_3v3));
>>
>> Is missing pad states considered as error? If yes, we should return a
>> error code and make the probe function fail.
>>
>> If it is ok to run it without the states, then this should be dev_warn
>> or dev_info.
> 
> I don't think failing probe due to missing pinctrl entries can be done
> because it would break backwards compatibility with pre-existing dtbs.
> Also SDHCI controllers with fixed signaling voltage don't support pad
> voltage reconfiguration and therefore the pinctrl properties won't be
> there either. In the case of fixed voltage SDHCI controllers the
> "nvidia,only-1-8-v" property is used to signal that pad reconfiguration
> doesn't need to be performed.

Ok, if they are not mandatory, just use dev_warn(...).

Btw,

+    if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_NEEDS_PAD_CONTROL) {
+        host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch =
+            sdhci_tegra_start_signal_voltage_switch;
+        tegra_sdhci_init_pinctrl_info(&pdev->dev, tegra_host);
+    }
+

Can we make tegra_sdhci_init_pinctrl_info return a boolean and do the
tegra_host->pad_control_available assignment here? I think this would be
cleaner.

It also won't assign host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch if
not needed.

	if (soc_data->nvquirks & NVQUIRK_NEEDS_PAD_CONTROL &&
	    tegra_sdhci_init_pinctrl_info(&pdev->dev, tegra_host)) {
		host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch =
			sdhci_tegra_start_signal_voltage_switch;
		tegra_host->pad_control_available = true;
	}

--
Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread