[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Hi,

Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
are checkbashisms clean.

This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh@canonical.com
(Note that this is still under development)

So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
I think this can help us to find out whether it was
written in a way out of POSIX.

Thank you,

---

Masami Hiramatsu (2):
      selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
      selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase


 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
 .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
 .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc

--
Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[mhiramat]

Hi,

Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
are checkbashisms clean.

This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh at canonical.com
(Note that this is still under development)

So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
I think this can help us to find out whether it was
written in a way out of POSIX.

Thank you,

---

Masami Hiramatsu (2):
      selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
      selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase


 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
 .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
 .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc

--
Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat at kernel.org>

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Hi,

Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
are checkbashisms clean.

This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh at canonical.com
(Note that this is still under development)

So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
I think this can help us to find out whether it was
written in a way out of POSIX.

Thank you,

---

Masami Hiramatsu (2):
      selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
      selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase


 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
 .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
 .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc

--
Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat at kernel.org>

[PATCH selftests 1/2] selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Make kprobe_ftrace.tc checkbashisms clean. Since
"grep function available_tracers" causes an error
on checkbashisms, fix it by explicitly escaping
with double-quotations.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
index 492426e95e09..7650a82db3f5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 # description: Kprobe dynamic event with function tracer
 
 [ -f kprobe_events ] || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
-grep function available_tracers || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
+grep "function" available_tracers || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
 
 # prepare
 echo nop > current_tracer

[PATCH selftests 1/2] selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean

[mhiramat]

Make kprobe_ftrace.tc checkbashisms clean. Since
"grep function available_tracers" causes an error
on checkbashisms, fix it by explicitly escaping
with double-quotations.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
---
 .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
index 492426e95e09..7650a82db3f5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 # description: Kprobe dynamic event with function tracer
 
 [ -f kprobe_events ] || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
-grep function available_tracers || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
+grep "function" available_tracers || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
 
 # prepare
 echo nop > current_tracer

[PATCH selftests 1/2] selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Make kprobe_ftrace.tc checkbashisms clean. Since
"grep function available_tracers" causes an error
on checkbashisms, fix it by explicitly escaping
with double-quotations.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
---
 .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
index 492426e95e09..7650a82db3f5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 # description: Kprobe dynamic event with function tracer
 
 [ -f kprobe_events ] || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
-grep function available_tracers || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
+grep "function" available_tracers || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
 
 # prepare
 echo nop > current_tracer

[PATCH selftests 2/2] selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Add a meta-testcase which tests ftracetest itself with
checkbasisms. This helps us to keep our test script
bashisms clean.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
 .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
index 75244db70331..72b6df37cdb9 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ run_test() { # testfile
     local testlog=/proc/self/fd/1
   fi
   export TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/ftracetest-dir.XXXXXX`
+  export FTRACETEST_ROOT=$TOP_DIR
   echo "execute$INSTANCE: "$1 > $testlog
   SIG_RESULT=0
   if [ $VERBOSE -eq -1 ]; then
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1b081e910e14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# description: Meta-selftest: Checkbashisms
+
+if [ ! -f $FTRACETEST_ROOT/ftracetest ]; then
+  echo "Hmm, we can not find ftracetest"
+  exit_unresolved
+fi
+
+if ! which checkbashisms > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
+  echo "No checkbashisms found. skipped."
+  exit_unresolved
+fi
+
+checkbashisms $FTRACETEST_ROOT/ftracetest
+checkbashisms $FTRACETEST_ROOT/test.d/functions
+for t in $(find $FTRACETEST_ROOT/test.d -name \*.tc); do
+  checkbashisms $t
+done
+
+exit 0

[PATCH selftests 2/2] selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[mhiramat]

Add a meta-testcase which tests ftracetest itself with
checkbasisms. This helps us to keep our test script
bashisms clean.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
 .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
index 75244db70331..72b6df37cdb9 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ run_test() { # testfile
     local testlog=/proc/self/fd/1
   fi
   export TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/ftracetest-dir.XXXXXX`
+  export FTRACETEST_ROOT=$TOP_DIR
   echo "execute$INSTANCE: "$1 > $testlog
   SIG_RESULT=0
   if [ $VERBOSE -eq -1 ]; then
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1b081e910e14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# description: Meta-selftest: Checkbashisms
+
+if [ ! -f $FTRACETEST_ROOT/ftracetest ]; then
+  echo "Hmm, we can not find ftracetest"
+  exit_unresolved
+fi
+
+if ! which checkbashisms > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
+  echo "No checkbashisms found. skipped."
+  exit_unresolved
+fi
+
+checkbashisms $FTRACETEST_ROOT/ftracetest
+checkbashisms $FTRACETEST_ROOT/test.d/functions
+for t in $(find $FTRACETEST_ROOT/test.d -name \*.tc); do
+  checkbashisms $t
+done
+
+exit 0

[PATCH selftests 2/2] selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Add a meta-testcase which tests ftracetest itself with
checkbasisms. This helps us to keep our test script
bashisms clean.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
 .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
index 75244db70331..72b6df37cdb9 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ run_test() { # testfile
     local testlog=/proc/self/fd/1
   fi
   export TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/ftracetest-dir.XXXXXX`
+  export FTRACETEST_ROOT=$TOP_DIR
   echo "execute$INSTANCE: "$1 > $testlog
   SIG_RESULT=0
   if [ $VERBOSE -eq -1 ]; then
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1b081e910e14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# description: Meta-selftest: Checkbashisms
+
+if [ ! -f $FTRACETEST_ROOT/ftracetest ]; then
+  echo "Hmm, we can not find ftracetest"
+  exit_unresolved
+fi
+
+if ! which checkbashisms > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
+  echo "No checkbashisms found. skipped."
+  exit_unresolved
+fi
+
+checkbashisms $FTRACETEST_ROOT/ftracetest
+checkbashisms $FTRACETEST_ROOT/test.d/functions
+for t in $(find $FTRACETEST_ROOT/test.d -name \*.tc); do
+  checkbashisms $t
+done
+
+exit 0

Re: [PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Hi Shuah,

Could you pick this to your tree? I think this can prevent further
simillar errors before release...

Thank you,

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:26:27 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
> are checkbashisms clean.
> 
> This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
> Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh@canonical.com
> (Note that this is still under development)
> 
> So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
> compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
> To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
> which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
> I think this can help us to find out whether it was
> written in a way out of POSIX.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> ---
> 
> Masami Hiramatsu (2):
>       selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
>       selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase
> 
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
>  .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
>  .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
> 
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@kernel.org>


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[mhiramat]

Hi Shuah,

Could you pick this to your tree? I think this can prevent further
simillar errors before release...

Thank you,

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:26:27 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
> are checkbashisms clean.
> 
> This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
> Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh at canonical.com
> (Note that this is still under development)
> 
> So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
> compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
> To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
> which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
> I think this can help us to find out whether it was
> written in a way out of POSIX.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> ---
> 
> Masami Hiramatsu (2):
>       selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
>       selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase
> 
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
>  .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
>  .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
> 
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat at kernel.org>


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Hi Shuah,

Could you pick this to your tree? I think this can prevent further
simillar errors before release...

Thank you,

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:26:27 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
> are checkbashisms clean.
> 
> This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
> Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh at canonical.com
> (Note that this is still under development)
> 
> So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
> compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
> To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
> which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
> I think this can help us to find out whether it was
> written in a way out of POSIX.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> ---
> 
> Masami Hiramatsu (2):
>       selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
>       selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase
> 
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
>  .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
>  .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
> 
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat at kernel.org>


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[Steven Rostedt]

Shuah,

Want to take this or would you want me to?

-- Steve


On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:27:46 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi Shuah,
> 
> Could you pick this to your tree? I think this can prevent further
> simillar errors before release...
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:26:27 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
> > are checkbashisms clean.
> > 
> > This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
> > Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.
> > 
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh@canonical.com
> > (Note that this is still under development)
> > 
> > So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
> > compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
> > To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
> > which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
> > I think this can help us to find out whether it was
> > written in a way out of POSIX.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Masami Hiramatsu (2):
> >       selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
> >       selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase
> > 
> > 
> >  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
> >  .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
> >  .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
> > 
> > --
> > Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@kernel.org>  
> 
> 

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[rostedt]

Shuah,

Want to take this or would you want me to?

-- Steve


On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:27:46 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi Shuah,
> 
> Could you pick this to your tree? I think this can prevent further
> simillar errors before release...
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:26:27 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
> > are checkbashisms clean.
> > 
> > This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
> > Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.
> > 
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh at canonical.com
> > (Note that this is still under development)
> > 
> > So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
> > compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
> > To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
> > which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
> > I think this can help us to find out whether it was
> > written in a way out of POSIX.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Masami Hiramatsu (2):
> >       selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
> >       selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase
> > 
> > 
> >  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
> >  .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
> >  .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
> > 
> > --
> > Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat at kernel.org>  
> 
> 

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[Steven Rostedt]

Shuah,

Want to take this or would you want me to?

-- Steve


On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:27:46 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi Shuah,
> 
> Could you pick this to your tree? I think this can prevent further
> simillar errors before release...
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:26:27 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
> > are checkbashisms clean.
> > 
> > This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
> > Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.
> > 
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh at canonical.com
> > (Note that this is still under development)
> > 
> > So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
> > compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
> > To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
> > which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
> > I think this can help us to find out whether it was
> > written in a way out of POSIX.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Masami Hiramatsu (2):
> >       selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
> >       selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase
> > 
> > 
> >  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest          |    1 +
> >  .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc          |    2 +-
> >  .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc   |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
> > 
> > --
> > Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat at kernel.org>  
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[shuah]

On 5/23/19 8:31 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> Shuah,
> 
> Want to take this or would you want me to?
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 

I can take them through my tree.

thanks,
-- Shuah

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[shuah]

On 5/23/19 8:31 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> Shuah,
> 
> Want to take this or would you want me to?
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 

I can take them through my tree.

thanks,
-- Shuah

[PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase

[shuah]

On 5/23/19 8:31 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> Shuah,
> 
> Want to take this or would you want me to?
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 

I can take them through my tree.

thanks,
-- Shuah