All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
@ 2022-01-27 18:09 Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/6] drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (13 more replies)
  0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-01-27 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.95-rc1

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()

David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
    KVM: x86/mmu: Fix write-protection of PTs mapped by the TDP MMU

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks

Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
    bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs

Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
    bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0

Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |   4 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c                         |   6 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h   |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c          |  10 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c                 | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h                 |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h           |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h                    |  11 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c                    |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c                |  26 +++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h                |   2 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h        |  11 ++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c    |   6 +-
 .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h    |   2 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h    |   3 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c   |  75 ++++++++++-----
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c  |  13 ++-
 fs/select.c                                        |  63 +++++++------
 kernel/rcu/tree.c                                  |   7 +-
 19 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5.10 1/6] drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-27 18:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/6] bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0 Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-01-27 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Tvrtko Ursulin,
	Sushma Venkatesh Reddy, Daniel Vetter, Dave Airlie,
	Jon Bloomfield, Joonas Lahtinen, Jani Nikula, Linus Torvalds

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

commit 7938d61591d33394a21bdd7797a245b65428f44c upstream.

We need to flush TLBs before releasing backing store otherwise userspace
is able to encounter stale entries if a) it is not declaring access to
certain buffers and b) it races with the backing store release from a
such undeclared execution already executing on the GPU in parallel.

The approach taken is to mark any buffer objects which were ever bound
to the GPU and to trigger a serialized TLB flush when their backing
store is released.

Alternatively the flushing could be done on VMA unbind, at which point
we would be able to ascertain whether there is potential a parallel GPU
execution (which could race), but essentially it boils down to paying
the cost of TLB flushes potentially needlessly at VMA unbind time (when
the backing store is not known to be going away so not needed for
safety), versus potentially needlessly at backing store relase time
(since we at that point cannot tell whether there is anything executing
on the GPU which uses that object).

Thereforce simplicity of implementation has been chosen for now with
scope to benchmark and refine later as required.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reported-by: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h |    1 
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c        |   10 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c               |  102 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h               |    2 
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h         |    2 
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h                  |   11 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c                  |    3 
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c              |   26 ++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h              |    2 
 9 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
 #define I915_BO_ALLOC_VOLATILE   BIT(1)
 #define I915_BO_ALLOC_FLAGS (I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS | I915_BO_ALLOC_VOLATILE)
 #define I915_BO_READONLY         BIT(2)
+#define I915_BO_WAS_BOUND_BIT    3
 
 	/*
 	 * Is the object to be mapped as read-only to the GPU
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include "i915_gem_lmem.h"
 #include "i915_gem_mman.h"
 
+#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
+
 void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 				 struct sg_table *pages,
 				 unsigned int sg_page_sizes)
@@ -186,6 +188,14 @@ __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm
 	__i915_gem_object_reset_page_iter(obj);
 	obj->mm.page_sizes.phys = obj->mm.page_sizes.sg = 0;
 
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(I915_BO_WAS_BOUND_BIT, &obj->flags)) {
+		struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
+		intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
+
+		with_intel_runtime_pm_if_active(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref)
+			intel_gt_invalidate_tlbs(&i915->gt);
+	}
+
 	return pages;
 }
 
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ void intel_gt_init_early(struct intel_gt
 
 	spin_lock_init(&gt->irq_lock);
 
+	mutex_init(&gt->tlb_invalidate_lock);
+
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gt->closed_vma);
 	spin_lock_init(&gt->closed_lock);
 
@@ -661,3 +663,103 @@ void intel_gt_info_print(const struct in
 
 	intel_sseu_dump(&info->sseu, p);
 }
+
+struct reg_and_bit {
+	i915_reg_t reg;
+	u32 bit;
+};
+
+static struct reg_and_bit
+get_reg_and_bit(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, const bool gen8,
+		const i915_reg_t *regs, const unsigned int num)
+{
+	const unsigned int class = engine->class;
+	struct reg_and_bit rb = { };
+
+	if (drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&engine->i915->drm,
+			     class >= num || !regs[class].reg))
+		return rb;
+
+	rb.reg = regs[class];
+	if (gen8 && class == VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS)
+		rb.reg.reg += 4 * engine->instance; /* GEN8_M2TCR */
+	else
+		rb.bit = engine->instance;
+
+	rb.bit = BIT(rb.bit);
+
+	return rb;
+}
+
+void intel_gt_invalidate_tlbs(struct intel_gt *gt)
+{
+	static const i915_reg_t gen8_regs[] = {
+		[RENDER_CLASS]			= GEN8_RTCR,
+		[VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS]		= GEN8_M1TCR, /* , GEN8_M2TCR */
+		[VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS]	= GEN8_VTCR,
+		[COPY_ENGINE_CLASS]		= GEN8_BTCR,
+	};
+	static const i915_reg_t gen12_regs[] = {
+		[RENDER_CLASS]			= GEN12_GFX_TLB_INV_CR,
+		[VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS]		= GEN12_VD_TLB_INV_CR,
+		[VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS]	= GEN12_VE_TLB_INV_CR,
+		[COPY_ENGINE_CLASS]		= GEN12_BLT_TLB_INV_CR,
+	};
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
+	struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
+	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+	enum intel_engine_id id;
+	const i915_reg_t *regs;
+	unsigned int num = 0;
+
+	if (I915_SELFTEST_ONLY(gt->awake == -ENODEV))
+		return;
+
+	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 12) {
+		regs = gen12_regs;
+		num = ARRAY_SIZE(gen12_regs);
+	} else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 8 && INTEL_GEN(i915) <= 11) {
+		regs = gen8_regs;
+		num = ARRAY_SIZE(gen8_regs);
+	} else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 8) {
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (drm_WARN_ONCE(&i915->drm, !num,
+			  "Platform does not implement TLB invalidation!"))
+		return;
+
+	GEM_TRACE("\n");
+
+	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(&i915->runtime_pm);
+
+	mutex_lock(&gt->tlb_invalidate_lock);
+	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+
+	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
+		/*
+		 * HW architecture suggest typical invalidation time at 40us,
+		 * with pessimistic cases up to 100us and a recommendation to
+		 * cap at 1ms. We go a bit higher just in case.
+		 */
+		const unsigned int timeout_us = 100;
+		const unsigned int timeout_ms = 4;
+		struct reg_and_bit rb;
+
+		rb = get_reg_and_bit(engine, regs == gen8_regs, regs, num);
+		if (!i915_mmio_reg_offset(rb.reg))
+			continue;
+
+		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, rb.reg, rb.bit);
+		if (__intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore,
+						 rb.reg, rb.bit, 0,
+						 timeout_us, timeout_ms,
+						 NULL))
+			drm_err_ratelimited(&gt->i915->drm,
+					    "%s TLB invalidation did not complete in %ums!\n",
+					    engine->name, timeout_ms);
+	}
+
+	intel_uncore_forcewake_put_delayed(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+	mutex_unlock(&gt->tlb_invalidate_lock);
+}
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
@@ -77,4 +77,6 @@ static inline bool intel_gt_is_wedged(co
 void intel_gt_info_print(const struct intel_gt_info *info,
 			 struct drm_printer *p);
 
+void intel_gt_invalidate_tlbs(struct intel_gt *gt);
+
 #endif /* __INTEL_GT_H__ */
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ struct intel_gt {
 
 	struct intel_uc uc;
 
+	struct mutex tlb_invalidate_lock;
+
 	struct intel_gt_timelines {
 		spinlock_t lock; /* protects active_list */
 		struct list_head active_list;
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -2639,6 +2639,12 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i
 #define   GAMT_CHKN_DISABLE_DYNAMIC_CREDIT_SHARING	(1 << 28)
 #define   GAMT_CHKN_DISABLE_I2M_CYCLE_ON_WR_PORT	(1 << 24)
 
+#define GEN8_RTCR	_MMIO(0x4260)
+#define GEN8_M1TCR	_MMIO(0x4264)
+#define GEN8_M2TCR	_MMIO(0x4268)
+#define GEN8_BTCR	_MMIO(0x426c)
+#define GEN8_VTCR	_MMIO(0x4270)
+
 #if 0
 #define PRB0_TAIL	_MMIO(0x2030)
 #define PRB0_HEAD	_MMIO(0x2034)
@@ -2728,6 +2734,11 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i
 #define   FAULT_VA_HIGH_BITS		(0xf << 0)
 #define   FAULT_GTT_SEL			(1 << 4)
 
+#define GEN12_GFX_TLB_INV_CR	_MMIO(0xced8)
+#define GEN12_VD_TLB_INV_CR	_MMIO(0xcedc)
+#define GEN12_VE_TLB_INV_CR	_MMIO(0xcee0)
+#define GEN12_BLT_TLB_INV_CR	_MMIO(0xcee4)
+
 #define GEN12_AUX_ERR_DBG		_MMIO(0x43f4)
 
 #define FPGA_DBG		_MMIO(0x42300)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
@@ -439,6 +439,9 @@ int i915_vma_bind(struct i915_vma *vma,
 		vma->ops->bind_vma(vma->vm, NULL, vma, cache_level, bind_flags);
 	}
 
+	if (vma->obj)
+		set_bit(I915_BO_WAS_BOUND_BIT, &vma->obj->flags);
+
 	atomic_or(bind_flags, &vma->flags);
 	return 0;
 }
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -694,7 +694,8 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(
 }
 
 static void __intel_uncore_forcewake_put(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
-					 enum forcewake_domains fw_domains)
+					 enum forcewake_domains fw_domains,
+					 bool delayed)
 {
 	struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *domain;
 	unsigned int tmp;
@@ -709,7 +710,11 @@ static void __intel_uncore_forcewake_put
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		uncore->funcs.force_wake_put(uncore, domain->mask);
+		if (delayed &&
+		    !(domain->uncore->fw_domains_timer & domain->mask))
+			fw_domain_arm_timer(domain);
+		else
+			uncore->funcs.force_wake_put(uncore, domain->mask);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -730,7 +735,20 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_put(struct i
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&uncore->lock, irqflags);
-	__intel_uncore_forcewake_put(uncore, fw_domains);
+	__intel_uncore_forcewake_put(uncore, fw_domains, false);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uncore->lock, irqflags);
+}
+
+void intel_uncore_forcewake_put_delayed(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
+					enum forcewake_domains fw_domains)
+{
+	unsigned long irqflags;
+
+	if (!uncore->funcs.force_wake_put)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&uncore->lock, irqflags);
+	__intel_uncore_forcewake_put(uncore, fw_domains, true);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uncore->lock, irqflags);
 }
 
@@ -772,7 +790,7 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(
 	if (!uncore->funcs.force_wake_put)
 		return;
 
-	__intel_uncore_forcewake_put(uncore, fw_domains);
+	__intel_uncore_forcewake_put(uncore, fw_domains, false);
 }
 
 void assert_forcewakes_inactive(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
@@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_get(struct i
 				enum forcewake_domains domains);
 void intel_uncore_forcewake_put(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
 				enum forcewake_domains domains);
+void intel_uncore_forcewake_put_delayed(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
+					enum forcewake_domains domains);
 void intel_uncore_forcewake_flush(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
 				  enum forcewake_domains fw_domains);
 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5.10 2/6] bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/6] drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-27 18:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 3/6] bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-01-27 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Manish Chopra, Prabhakar Kushwaha,
	Alok Prasad, Ariel Elior, David S. Miller

From: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>

commit b7a49f73059fe6147b6b78e8f674ce0d21237432 upstream

This new firmware addresses few important issues and enhancements
as mentioned below -

- Support direct invalidation of FP HSI Ver per function ID, required for
  invalidating FP HSI Ver prior to each VF start, as there is no VF start
- BRB hardware block parity error detection support for the driver
- Fix the FCOE underrun flow
- Fix PSOD during FCoE BFS over the NIC ports after preboot driver
- Maintains backward compatibility

This patch incorporates this new firmware 7.13.21.0 in bnx2x driver.

Signed-off-by: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <pkushwaha@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Alok Prasad <palok@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h         |   11 ++
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c     |    6 -
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h |    2 
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h     |    3 
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c    |   75 ++++++++++++++------
 5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
@@ -1850,6 +1850,14 @@ struct bnx2x {
 
 	/* Vxlan/Geneve related information */
 	u16 udp_tunnel_ports[BNX2X_UDP_PORT_MAX];
+
+#define FW_CAP_INVALIDATE_VF_FP_HSI	BIT(0)
+	u32 fw_cap;
+
+	u32 fw_major;
+	u32 fw_minor;
+	u32 fw_rev;
+	u32 fw_eng;
 };
 
 /* Tx queues may be less or equal to Rx queues */
@@ -2526,5 +2534,6 @@ void bnx2x_register_phc(struct bnx2x *bp
  * Meant for implicit re-load flows.
  */
 int bnx2x_vlan_reconfigure_vid(struct bnx2x *bp);
-
+int bnx2x_init_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp);
+void bnx2x_release_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp);
 #endif /* bnx2x.h */
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
@@ -2364,10 +2364,8 @@ int bnx2x_compare_fw_ver(struct bnx2x *b
 	if (load_code != FW_MSG_CODE_DRV_LOAD_COMMON_CHIP &&
 	    load_code != FW_MSG_CODE_DRV_LOAD_COMMON) {
 		/* build my FW version dword */
-		u32 my_fw = (BCM_5710_FW_MAJOR_VERSION) +
-			(BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION << 8) +
-			(BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION << 16) +
-			(BCM_5710_FW_ENGINEERING_VERSION << 24);
+		u32 my_fw = (bp->fw_major) + (bp->fw_minor << 8) +
+				(bp->fw_rev << 16) + (bp->fw_eng << 24);
 
 		/* read loaded FW from chip */
 		u32 loaded_fw = REG_RD(bp, XSEM_REG_PRAM);
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h
@@ -241,6 +241,8 @@
 	IRO[221].m2))
 #define XSTORM_VF_TO_PF_OFFSET(funcId) \
 	(IRO[48].base + ((funcId) * IRO[48].m1))
+#define XSTORM_ETH_FUNCTION_INFO_FP_HSI_VALID_E2_OFFSET(fid)	\
+	(IRO[386].base + ((fid) * IRO[386].m1))
 #define COMMON_ASM_INVALID_ASSERT_OPCODE 0x0
 
 /* eth hsi version */
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h
@@ -3024,7 +3024,8 @@ struct afex_stats {
 
 #define BCM_5710_FW_MAJOR_VERSION			7
 #define BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION			13
-#define BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION		15
+#define BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION		21
+#define BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION_V15	15
 #define BCM_5710_FW_ENGINEERING_VERSION		0
 #define BCM_5710_FW_COMPILE_FLAGS			1
 
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
@@ -74,9 +74,19 @@
 	__stringify(BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION) "."	\
 	__stringify(BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION) "."	\
 	__stringify(BCM_5710_FW_ENGINEERING_VERSION)
+
+#define FW_FILE_VERSION_V15				\
+	__stringify(BCM_5710_FW_MAJOR_VERSION) "."      \
+	__stringify(BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION) "."	\
+	__stringify(BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION_V15) "."	\
+	__stringify(BCM_5710_FW_ENGINEERING_VERSION)
+
 #define FW_FILE_NAME_E1		"bnx2x/bnx2x-e1-" FW_FILE_VERSION ".fw"
 #define FW_FILE_NAME_E1H	"bnx2x/bnx2x-e1h-" FW_FILE_VERSION ".fw"
 #define FW_FILE_NAME_E2		"bnx2x/bnx2x-e2-" FW_FILE_VERSION ".fw"
+#define FW_FILE_NAME_E1_V15	"bnx2x/bnx2x-e1-" FW_FILE_VERSION_V15 ".fw"
+#define FW_FILE_NAME_E1H_V15	"bnx2x/bnx2x-e1h-" FW_FILE_VERSION_V15 ".fw"
+#define FW_FILE_NAME_E2_V15	"bnx2x/bnx2x-e2-" FW_FILE_VERSION_V15 ".fw"
 
 /* Time in jiffies before concluding the transmitter is hung */
 #define TX_TIMEOUT		(5*HZ)
@@ -747,9 +757,7 @@ static int bnx2x_mc_assert(struct bnx2x
 		  CHIP_IS_E1(bp) ? "everest1" :
 		  CHIP_IS_E1H(bp) ? "everest1h" :
 		  CHIP_IS_E2(bp) ? "everest2" : "everest3",
-		  BCM_5710_FW_MAJOR_VERSION,
-		  BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION,
-		  BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION);
+		  bp->fw_major, bp->fw_minor, bp->fw_rev);
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -12355,6 +12363,15 @@ static int bnx2x_init_bp(struct bnx2x *b
 
 	bnx2x_read_fwinfo(bp);
 
+	if (IS_PF(bp)) {
+		rc = bnx2x_init_firmware(bp);
+
+		if (rc) {
+			bnx2x_free_mem_bp(bp);
+			return rc;
+		}
+	}
+
 	func = BP_FUNC(bp);
 
 	/* need to reset chip if undi was active */
@@ -12367,6 +12384,7 @@ static int bnx2x_init_bp(struct bnx2x *b
 
 		rc = bnx2x_prev_unload(bp);
 		if (rc) {
+			bnx2x_release_firmware(bp);
 			bnx2x_free_mem_bp(bp);
 			return rc;
 		}
@@ -13366,16 +13384,11 @@ static int bnx2x_check_firmware(struct b
 	/* Check FW version */
 	offset = be32_to_cpu(fw_hdr->fw_version.offset);
 	fw_ver = firmware->data + offset;
-	if ((fw_ver[0] != BCM_5710_FW_MAJOR_VERSION) ||
-	    (fw_ver[1] != BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION) ||
-	    (fw_ver[2] != BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION) ||
-	    (fw_ver[3] != BCM_5710_FW_ENGINEERING_VERSION)) {
+	if (fw_ver[0] != bp->fw_major || fw_ver[1] != bp->fw_minor ||
+	    fw_ver[2] != bp->fw_rev || fw_ver[3] != bp->fw_eng) {
 		BNX2X_ERR("Bad FW version:%d.%d.%d.%d. Should be %d.%d.%d.%d\n",
-		       fw_ver[0], fw_ver[1], fw_ver[2], fw_ver[3],
-		       BCM_5710_FW_MAJOR_VERSION,
-		       BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION,
-		       BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION,
-		       BCM_5710_FW_ENGINEERING_VERSION);
+			  fw_ver[0], fw_ver[1], fw_ver[2], fw_ver[3],
+			  bp->fw_major, bp->fw_minor, bp->fw_rev, bp->fw_eng);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -13453,34 +13466,51 @@ do {									\
 	     (u8 *)bp->arr, len);					\
 } while (0)
 
-static int bnx2x_init_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
+int bnx2x_init_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
 {
-	const char *fw_file_name;
+	const char *fw_file_name, *fw_file_name_v15;
 	struct bnx2x_fw_file_hdr *fw_hdr;
 	int rc;
 
 	if (bp->firmware)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (CHIP_IS_E1(bp))
+	if (CHIP_IS_E1(bp)) {
 		fw_file_name = FW_FILE_NAME_E1;
-	else if (CHIP_IS_E1H(bp))
+		fw_file_name_v15 = FW_FILE_NAME_E1_V15;
+	} else if (CHIP_IS_E1H(bp)) {
 		fw_file_name = FW_FILE_NAME_E1H;
-	else if (!CHIP_IS_E1x(bp))
+		fw_file_name_v15 = FW_FILE_NAME_E1H_V15;
+	} else if (!CHIP_IS_E1x(bp)) {
 		fw_file_name = FW_FILE_NAME_E2;
-	else {
+		fw_file_name_v15 = FW_FILE_NAME_E2_V15;
+	} else {
 		BNX2X_ERR("Unsupported chip revision\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
+
 	BNX2X_DEV_INFO("Loading %s\n", fw_file_name);
 
 	rc = request_firmware(&bp->firmware, fw_file_name, &bp->pdev->dev);
 	if (rc) {
-		BNX2X_ERR("Can't load firmware file %s\n",
-			  fw_file_name);
-		goto request_firmware_exit;
+		BNX2X_DEV_INFO("Trying to load older fw %s\n", fw_file_name_v15);
+
+		/* try to load prev version */
+		rc = request_firmware(&bp->firmware, fw_file_name_v15, &bp->pdev->dev);
+
+		if (rc)
+			goto request_firmware_exit;
+
+		bp->fw_rev = BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION_V15;
+	} else {
+		bp->fw_cap |= FW_CAP_INVALIDATE_VF_FP_HSI;
+		bp->fw_rev = BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION;
 	}
 
+	bp->fw_major = BCM_5710_FW_MAJOR_VERSION;
+	bp->fw_minor = BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION;
+	bp->fw_eng = BCM_5710_FW_ENGINEERING_VERSION;
+
 	rc = bnx2x_check_firmware(bp);
 	if (rc) {
 		BNX2X_ERR("Corrupt firmware file %s\n", fw_file_name);
@@ -13536,7 +13566,7 @@ request_firmware_exit:
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static void bnx2x_release_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
+void bnx2x_release_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
 {
 	kfree(bp->init_ops_offsets);
 	kfree(bp->init_ops);
@@ -14053,6 +14083,7 @@ static int bnx2x_init_one(struct pci_dev
 	return 0;
 
 init_one_freemem:
+	bnx2x_release_firmware(bp);
 	bnx2x_free_mem_bp(bp);
 
 init_one_exit:



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5.10 3/6] bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/6] drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/6] bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0 Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-27 18:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 4/6] rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-01-27 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Manish Chopra, Prabhakar Kushwaha,
	Alok Prasad, Ariel Elior, David S. Miller

From: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>

commit 802d4d207e75d7208ff75adb712b556c1e91cf1c upstream

Commit 0a6890b9b4df ("bnx2x: Utilize FW 7.13.15.0.")
added validation for fastpath HSI versions for different
client init which was not meant for SR-IOV VF clients, which
resulted in firmware asserts when running VF clients with
different fastpath HSI version.

This patch along with the new firmware support in patch #1
fixes this behavior in order to not validate fastpath HSI
version for the VFs.

Fixes: 0a6890b9b4df ("bnx2x: Utilize FW 7.13.15.0.")
Signed-off-by: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <pkushwaha@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Alok Prasad <palok@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c |   13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c
@@ -758,9 +758,18 @@ static void bnx2x_vf_igu_reset(struct bn
 
 void bnx2x_vf_enable_access(struct bnx2x *bp, u8 abs_vfid)
 {
+	u16 abs_fid;
+
+	abs_fid = FW_VF_HANDLE(abs_vfid);
+
 	/* set the VF-PF association in the FW */
-	storm_memset_vf_to_pf(bp, FW_VF_HANDLE(abs_vfid), BP_FUNC(bp));
-	storm_memset_func_en(bp, FW_VF_HANDLE(abs_vfid), 1);
+	storm_memset_vf_to_pf(bp, abs_fid, BP_FUNC(bp));
+	storm_memset_func_en(bp, abs_fid, 1);
+
+	/* Invalidate fp_hsi version for vfs */
+	if (bp->fw_cap & FW_CAP_INVALIDATE_VF_FP_HSI)
+		REG_WR8(bp, BAR_XSTRORM_INTMEM +
+			    XSTORM_ETH_FUNCTION_INFO_FP_HSI_VALID_E2_OFFSET(abs_fid), 0);
 
 	/* clear vf errors*/
 	bnx2x_vf_semi_clear_err(bp, abs_vfid);



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5.10 4/6] rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 3/6] bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-27 18:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix write-protection of PTs mapped by the TDP MMU Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-01-27 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Guillaume Morin, Paul E. McKenney

From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

commit 614ddad17f22a22e035e2ea37a04815f50362017 upstream.

Currently, rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks that a grace period is in
progress, however, that grace period could end just after the check.
This commit rechecks that a grace period is still in progress while
holding the rcu_node structure's lock.  The grace period cannot end while
the current CPU's rcu_node structure's ->lock is held, thus avoiding
false positives from the WARN_ON_ONCE().

As Daniel Vacek noted, it is not necessary for the rcu_node structure
to have a CPU that has not yet passed through its quiescent state.

Tested-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1581,10 +1581,11 @@ static void __maybe_unused rcu_advance_c
 						  struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
 	rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
-	if (!rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)) ||
-	    !raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(rnp))
+	if (!rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)) || !raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(rnp))
 		return;
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_advance_cbs(rnp, rdp));
+	// The grace period cannot end while we hold the rcu_node lock.
+	if (rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)))
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_advance_cbs(rnp, rdp));
 	raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp);
 }
 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5.10 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix write-protection of PTs mapped by the TDP MMU
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 4/6] rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-27 18:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 6/6] select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout() Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-01-27 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, David Matlack, Sean Christopherson,
	Paolo Bonzini

From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>

commit 7c8a4742c4abe205ec9daf416c9d42fd6b406e8e upstream.

When the TDP MMU is write-protection GFNs for page table protection (as
opposed to for dirty logging, or due to the HVA not being writable), it
checks if the SPTE is already write-protected and if so skips modifying
the SPTE and the TLB flush.

This behavior is incorrect because it fails to check if the SPTE
is write-protected for page table protection, i.e. fails to check
that MMU-writable is '0'.  If the SPTE was write-protected for dirty
logging but not page table protection, the SPTE could locklessly be made
writable, and vCPUs could still be running with writable mappings cached
in their TLB.

Fix this by only skipping setting the SPTE if the SPTE is already
write-protected *and* MMU-writable is already clear.  Technically,
checking only MMU-writable would suffice; a SPTE cannot be writable
without MMU-writable being set.  But check both to be paranoid and
because it arguably yields more readable code.

Fixes: 46044f72c382 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support write protection for nesting in tdp MMU")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220113233020.3986005-2-dmatlack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1130,12 +1130,12 @@ static bool write_protect_gfn(struct kvm
 	bool spte_set = false;
 
 	tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, gfn, gfn + 1) {
-		if (!is_writable_pte(iter.old_spte))
-			break;
-
 		new_spte = iter.old_spte &
 			~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE);
 
+		if (new_spte == iter.old_spte)
+			break;
+
 		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
 		spte_set = true;
 	}



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5.10 6/6] select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix write-protection of PTs mapped by the TDP MMU Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-27 18:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2022-01-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Pavel Machek
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-01-27 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Linus Torvalds, Jan Kara

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

commit 68514dacf2715d11b91ca50d88de047c086fea9c upstream.

A task can end up indefinitely sleeping in do_select() ->
poll_schedule_timeout() when the following race happens:

  TASK1 (thread1)             TASK2                   TASK1 (thread2)
  do_select()
    setup poll_wqueues table
    with 'fd'
                              write data to 'fd'
                                pollwake()
                                  table->triggered = 1
                                                      closes 'fd' thread1 is
                                                        waiting for
    poll_schedule_timeout()
      - sees table->triggered
      table->triggered = 0
      return -EINTR
    loop back in do_select()

But at this point when TASK1 loops back, the fdget() in the setup of
poll_wqueues fails.  So now so we never find 'fd' is ready for reading
and sleep in poll_schedule_timeout() indefinitely.

Treat an fd that got closed as a fd on which some event happened.  This
makes sure cannot block indefinitely in do_select().

Another option would be to return -EBADF in this case but that has a
potential of subtly breaking applications that excercise this behavior
and it happens to work for them.  So returning fd as active seems like a
safer choice.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/select.c |   63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -458,9 +458,11 @@ get_max:
 	return max;
 }
 
-#define POLLIN_SET (EPOLLRDNORM | EPOLLRDBAND | EPOLLIN | EPOLLHUP | EPOLLERR)
-#define POLLOUT_SET (EPOLLWRBAND | EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLOUT | EPOLLERR)
-#define POLLEX_SET (EPOLLPRI)
+#define POLLIN_SET (EPOLLRDNORM | EPOLLRDBAND | EPOLLIN | EPOLLHUP | EPOLLERR |\
+			EPOLLNVAL)
+#define POLLOUT_SET (EPOLLWRBAND | EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLOUT | EPOLLERR |\
+			 EPOLLNVAL)
+#define POLLEX_SET (EPOLLPRI | EPOLLNVAL)
 
 static inline void wait_key_set(poll_table *wait, unsigned long in,
 				unsigned long out, unsigned long bit,
@@ -527,6 +529,7 @@ static int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits
 					break;
 				if (!(bit & all_bits))
 					continue;
+				mask = EPOLLNVAL;
 				f = fdget(i);
 				if (f.file) {
 					wait_key_set(wait, in, out, bit,
@@ -534,34 +537,34 @@ static int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits
 					mask = vfs_poll(f.file, wait);
 
 					fdput(f);
-					if ((mask & POLLIN_SET) && (in & bit)) {
-						res_in |= bit;
-						retval++;
-						wait->_qproc = NULL;
-					}
-					if ((mask & POLLOUT_SET) && (out & bit)) {
-						res_out |= bit;
-						retval++;
-						wait->_qproc = NULL;
-					}
-					if ((mask & POLLEX_SET) && (ex & bit)) {
-						res_ex |= bit;
-						retval++;
-						wait->_qproc = NULL;
-					}
-					/* got something, stop busy polling */
-					if (retval) {
-						can_busy_loop = false;
-						busy_flag = 0;
-
-					/*
-					 * only remember a returned
-					 * POLL_BUSY_LOOP if we asked for it
-					 */
-					} else if (busy_flag & mask)
-						can_busy_loop = true;
-
 				}
+				if ((mask & POLLIN_SET) && (in & bit)) {
+					res_in |= bit;
+					retval++;
+					wait->_qproc = NULL;
+				}
+				if ((mask & POLLOUT_SET) && (out & bit)) {
+					res_out |= bit;
+					retval++;
+					wait->_qproc = NULL;
+				}
+				if ((mask & POLLEX_SET) && (ex & bit)) {
+					res_ex |= bit;
+					retval++;
+					wait->_qproc = NULL;
+				}
+				/* got something, stop busy polling */
+				if (retval) {
+					can_busy_loop = false;
+					busy_flag = 0;
+
+				/*
+				 * only remember a returned
+				 * POLL_BUSY_LOOP if we asked for it
+				 */
+				} else if (busy_flag & mask)
+					can_busy_loop = true;
+
 			}
 			if (res_in)
 				*rinp = res_in;



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 6/6] select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout() Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-27 19:44 ` Pavel Machek
  2022-01-27 21:49 ` Florian Fainelli
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2022-01-27 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 765 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still
hit the gmp.h compilation issue):

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Pavel Machek
@ 2022-01-27 21:49 ` Florian Fainelli
  2022-01-28  1:16 ` Shuah Khan
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-01-27 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
  Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
	pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee



On 1/27/2022 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-27 21:49 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-01-28  1:16 ` Shuah Khan
  2022-01-28 11:19 ` Jon Hunter
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-01-28  1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
  Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
	pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, Shuah Khan

On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-28  1:16 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-01-28 11:19 ` Jon Hunter
  2022-01-28 11:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2022-01-28 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, linux-tegra

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:16 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    75 tests:	75 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.95-rc1-ga2441d7f51b1
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-28 11:19 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2022-01-28 11:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
  2022-01-28 14:25 ` Sudip Mukherjee
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-01-28 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.95-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: a2441d7f51b176a085cf4ea62e1071ffb4dfcf2c
* git describe: v5.10.94-7-ga2441d7f51b1
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.94-7-ga2441d7f51b1

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 84455, pass: 72139, fail: 461, skip: 11140, xfail: 715

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 46 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 22 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-28 11:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-01-28 14:25 ` Sudip Mukherjee
  2022-01-28 20:54 ` Fox Chen
  2022-01-29  1:06 ` Guenter Roeck
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2022-01-28 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/666
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/670


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-28 14:25 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2022-01-28 20:54 ` Fox Chen
  2022-01-29  1:06 ` Guenter Roeck
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Fox Chen @ 2022-01-28 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, Fox Chen

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:16 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

5.10.95-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
                
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review
  2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-01-28 20:54 ` Fox Chen
@ 2022-01-29  1:06 ` Guenter Roeck
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-01-29  1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-29  1:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-27 18:09 [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/6] drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/6] bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 3/6] bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 4/6] rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix write-protection of PTs mapped by the TDP MMU Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH 5.10 6/6] select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Pavel Machek
2022-01-27 21:49 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-28  1:16 ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-28 11:19 ` Jon Hunter
2022-01-28 11:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-01-28 14:25 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-01-28 20:54 ` Fox Chen
2022-01-29  1:06 ` Guenter Roeck

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.