All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	alexander.deucher@amd.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, ray.huang@amd.com,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, sroland@vmware.com,
	zackr@vmware.com, shashank.sharma@amd.com, sam@ravnborg.org,
	emil.velikov@collabora.com, nirmoy.das@amd.com
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 3/8] drm/amdgpu: Implement mmap as GEM object function
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 04:37:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2e3ae0d-083c-c919-74bd-8fedbfad7718@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63c90815-c9d8-68df-daa1-c165215a6b7c@suse.de>

Am 2021-04-14 um 3:44 a.m. schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 07.04.21 um 21:49 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
>> On 2021-04-07 3:34 p.m., Felix Kuehling wrote:
>>> On 2021-04-07 7:25 a.m., Christian König wrote:
>>>>>>>> +    /*
>>>>>>>> +     * Don't verify access for KFD BOs. They 
> don't have a GEM
>>>>>>>> +     * object associated with them.
>>>>>>>> +     */
>>>>>>>> +    if (bo->kfd_bo)
>>>>>>>> +        goto out;
>>>>>>> Who does the access verification now?
>>>>>> This is somewhat confusing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I took this check as-is, including the comment, from amdgpu's
>>>>>> verify_access function. The verify_access function was called by
>>>>>> ttm_bo_mmap. It returned 0 and ttm_bo_mmap did the mapping.
>>>>> This is probably a left-over from when we mapped BOs using /dev/kfd. 
> We
>>>>> changed this to use /dev/dri/renderD* a long time ago to fix CPU
>>>>> mapping
>>>>> invalidations on memory evictions. I think we can let GEM do the
>>>>> access
>>>>> check.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, good to know.
>>>>
>>>> Thomas can you remove the extra handling in a separate prerequisite
>>>> patch?
>>>>
>>>> If anybody then bisects to this patch we at least know what to do
>>>> to get it working again.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I ran KFDTest test with this shortcut removed on current
>>> amd-staging-drm-next + my HMM patch series, and it didn't seem to
>>> cause any issues.
>>
>> Wait, I celebrated too soon. I was running the wrong kernel. I do see
>> some failures where access is being denied. I need to do more debugging 
>
>> to figure out what's causing that.
>
> Any news here? I saw the patch at [1], which removes the kfd_bo test.
> Can I assume that the series addresses the issue?

Yes, that series fixes the problem. I need to pester more people to
review it.

Regards,
  Felix


>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/427516/?series=88822&rev=1
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Felix
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>   Felix
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian. 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	alexander.deucher@amd.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, ray.huang@amd.com,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, sroland@vmware.com,
	zackr@vmware.com, shashank.sharma@amd.com, sam@ravnborg.org,
	emil.velikov@collabora.com, nirmoy.das@amd.com
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] drm/amdgpu: Implement mmap as GEM object function
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 04:37:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2e3ae0d-083c-c919-74bd-8fedbfad7718@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63c90815-c9d8-68df-daa1-c165215a6b7c@suse.de>

Am 2021-04-14 um 3:44 a.m. schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 07.04.21 um 21:49 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
>> On 2021-04-07 3:34 p.m., Felix Kuehling wrote:
>>> On 2021-04-07 7:25 a.m., Christian König wrote:
>>>>>>>> +    /*
>>>>>>>> +     * Don't verify access for KFD BOs. They 
> don't have a GEM
>>>>>>>> +     * object associated with them.
>>>>>>>> +     */
>>>>>>>> +    if (bo->kfd_bo)
>>>>>>>> +        goto out;
>>>>>>> Who does the access verification now?
>>>>>> This is somewhat confusing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I took this check as-is, including the comment, from amdgpu's
>>>>>> verify_access function. The verify_access function was called by
>>>>>> ttm_bo_mmap. It returned 0 and ttm_bo_mmap did the mapping.
>>>>> This is probably a left-over from when we mapped BOs using /dev/kfd. 
> We
>>>>> changed this to use /dev/dri/renderD* a long time ago to fix CPU
>>>>> mapping
>>>>> invalidations on memory evictions. I think we can let GEM do the
>>>>> access
>>>>> check.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, good to know.
>>>>
>>>> Thomas can you remove the extra handling in a separate prerequisite
>>>> patch?
>>>>
>>>> If anybody then bisects to this patch we at least know what to do
>>>> to get it working again.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I ran KFDTest test with this shortcut removed on current
>>> amd-staging-drm-next + my HMM patch series, and it didn't seem to
>>> cause any issues.
>>
>> Wait, I celebrated too soon. I was running the wrong kernel. I do see
>> some failures where access is being denied. I need to do more debugging 
>
>> to figure out what's causing that.
>
> Any news here? I saw the patch at [1], which removes the kfd_bo test.
> Can I assume that the series addresses the issue?

Yes, that series fixes the problem. I need to pester more people to
review it.

Regards,
  Felix


>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/427516/?series=88822&rev=1
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Felix
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>   Felix
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian. 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	alexander.deucher@amd.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, ray.huang@amd.com,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, sroland@vmware.com,
	zackr@vmware.com, shashank.sharma@amd.com, sam@ravnborg.org,
	emil.velikov@collabora.com, nirmoy.das@amd.com
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] drm/amdgpu: Implement mmap as GEM object function
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 04:37:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2e3ae0d-083c-c919-74bd-8fedbfad7718@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63c90815-c9d8-68df-daa1-c165215a6b7c@suse.de>

Am 2021-04-14 um 3:44 a.m. schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 07.04.21 um 21:49 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
>> On 2021-04-07 3:34 p.m., Felix Kuehling wrote:
>>> On 2021-04-07 7:25 a.m., Christian König wrote:
>>>>>>>> +    /*
>>>>>>>> +     * Don't verify access for KFD BOs. They 
> don't have a GEM
>>>>>>>> +     * object associated with them.
>>>>>>>> +     */
>>>>>>>> +    if (bo->kfd_bo)
>>>>>>>> +        goto out;
>>>>>>> Who does the access verification now?
>>>>>> This is somewhat confusing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I took this check as-is, including the comment, from amdgpu's
>>>>>> verify_access function. The verify_access function was called by
>>>>>> ttm_bo_mmap. It returned 0 and ttm_bo_mmap did the mapping.
>>>>> This is probably a left-over from when we mapped BOs using /dev/kfd. 
> We
>>>>> changed this to use /dev/dri/renderD* a long time ago to fix CPU
>>>>> mapping
>>>>> invalidations on memory evictions. I think we can let GEM do the
>>>>> access
>>>>> check.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, good to know.
>>>>
>>>> Thomas can you remove the extra handling in a separate prerequisite
>>>> patch?
>>>>
>>>> If anybody then bisects to this patch we at least know what to do
>>>> to get it working again.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I ran KFDTest test with this shortcut removed on current
>>> amd-staging-drm-next + my HMM patch series, and it didn't seem to
>>> cause any issues.
>>
>> Wait, I celebrated too soon. I was running the wrong kernel. I do see
>> some failures where access is being denied. I need to do more debugging 
>
>> to figure out what's causing that.
>
> Any news here? I saw the patch at [1], which removes the kfd_bo test.
> Can I assume that the series addresses the issue?

Yes, that series fixes the problem. I need to pester more people to
review it.

Regards,
  Felix


>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/427516/?series=88822&rev=1
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Felix
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>   Felix
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian. 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06  9:08 [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/8] drm: Clean up mmap for TTM-based GEM drivers Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 1/8] drm/ttm: Don't override vm_ops callbacks, if set Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 2/8] drm/amdgpu: Remove unused function amdgpu_bo_fbdev_mmap() Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:43   ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-04-06  9:43     ` Christian König
2021-04-06  9:43     ` Christian König
2021-04-06 10:21     ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 10:21       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 10:21       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 3/8] drm/amdgpu: Implement mmap as GEM object function Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:35   ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-04-06  9:35     ` Christian König
2021-04-06  9:35     ` Christian König
2021-04-06 10:38     ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 10:38       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 10:38       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 10:56       ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-04-06 10:56         ` Christian König
2021-04-06 10:56         ` Christian König
2021-04-06 11:55         ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 11:55           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 11:55           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 12:42           ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-04-06 12:42             ` Christian König
2021-04-06 12:42             ` Christian König
2021-04-06 12:52             ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 12:52               ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 12:52               ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06 13:04               ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-04-06 13:04                 ` Christian König
2021-04-06 13:04                 ` Christian König
2021-04-06 15:22                 ` [Nouveau] " Felix Kuehling
2021-04-06 15:22                   ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-06 15:22                   ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-06 15:27       ` [Nouveau] " Felix Kuehling
2021-04-06 15:27         ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-06 15:27         ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-07 11:25         ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-04-07 11:25           ` Christian König
2021-04-07 11:25           ` Christian König
2021-04-07 19:34           ` [Nouveau] " Felix Kuehling
2021-04-07 19:34             ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-07 19:34             ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-07 19:49             ` [Nouveau] " Felix Kuehling
2021-04-07 19:49               ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-07 19:49               ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-08  4:45               ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-08  4:45                 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-08  4:45                 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-14  7:44               ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-14  7:44                 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-14  7:44                 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-14  8:37                 ` Felix Kuehling [this message]
2021-04-14  8:37                   ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-14  8:37                   ` Felix Kuehling
2021-04-06  9:08 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 4/8] drm/radeon: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:38   ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-04-06  9:38     ` Christian König
2021-04-06  9:38     ` Christian König
2021-04-06 14:18   ` [Nouveau] " Alex Deucher
2021-04-06 14:18     ` Alex Deucher
2021-04-06 14:18     ` Alex Deucher
2021-04-06  9:09 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 5/8] drm/nouveau: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 6/8] drm/vmwgfx: Inline ttm_bo_mmap() into vmwgfx driver Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-07 16:52   ` [Nouveau] " Zack Rusin
2021-04-07 16:52     ` Zack Rusin
2021-04-07 16:52     ` Zack Rusin
2021-04-06  9:09 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 7/8] drm/vmwgfx: Inline vmw_verify_access() Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-07 16:52   ` [Nouveau] " Zack Rusin
2021-04-07 16:52     ` Zack Rusin
2021-04-07 16:52     ` Zack Rusin
2021-04-06  9:09 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: Remove ttm_bo_mmap() and friends Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-06  9:40   ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2021-04-06  9:40     ` Christian König
2021-04-06  9:40     ` Christian König
2021-04-08 11:19 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/8] drm: Clean up mmap for TTM-based GEM drivers Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 11:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 11:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 11:38   ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-08 11:38     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-08 11:38     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-04-08 11:42     ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 11:42       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 11:42       ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f2e3ae0d-083c-c919-74bd-8fedbfad7718@amd.com \
    --to=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emil.velikov@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@amd.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
    --cc=sroland@vmware.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=zackr@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.