All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [linux-lvm] Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync
@ 2022-04-01 23:19 Demi Marie Obenour
  2022-04-04  8:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-01 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LVM general discussion and development


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 522 bytes --]

Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe?
In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these,
but only for operations performed by qubesd.  systemd-udevd will still
be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices
these commands create or destroy.  systemd-udevd will still be in charge
of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use
neither of these.
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Invisible Things Lab

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 202 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [linux-lvm] Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync
  2022-04-01 23:19 [linux-lvm] Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync Demi Marie Obenour
@ 2022-04-04  8:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zdenek Kabelac @ 2022-04-04  8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LVM general discussion and development, Demi Marie Obenour

Dne 02. 04. 22 v 1:19 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
> Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe?
> In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these,
> but only for operations performed by qubesd.  systemd-udevd will still
> be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices
> these commands create or destroy.  systemd-udevd will still be in charge
> of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use
> neither of these.

This env variable is not meant to be use on system with running udev.

So it's never safe - and it's only purpose is to be able to make some progress 
in some critical system condition.

Regards

Zdenek

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-04  8:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-01 23:19 [linux-lvm] Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync Demi Marie Obenour
2022-04-04  8:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.