Mains blink, chassisoff, and power restore policy

Mains blink, chassisoff, and power restore policy

[Wang, Kuiying]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 185 bytes --]

Hi Alexander,
We did ipmi command to user to configure the policy.
Please refer:
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/c/openbmc/intel-dbus-interfaces/+/15471/


Thanks,
Kwin.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2345 bytes --]

Re: Mains blink, chassisoff, and power restore policy

[Alexander Amelkin]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 594 bytes --]

I don't see any IPMI command there. Only some yaml and yaml-generating scripts.

Anyway, such a command is vendor-specific would not be supported by ipmitool (unlike `chassis power off`).

Most admins would just do `ipmitool chassis power off` and won't know about the need to issue a raw command afterwards.

08.11.2018 04:55, Wang, Kuiying wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> We did ipmi command to user to configure the policy.
>
> Please refer:
>
> https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/c/openbmc/intel-dbus-interfaces/+/15471/
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kwin.
>
>  
>


[-- Attachment #1.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2960 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Mains blink, chassisoff, and power restore policy

[Alexander Amelkin]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 788 bytes --]

Hi all!

Do you think that a host turned off with `obmcutil chassisoff` (not `obmcutil poweroff`) should return back to 'on' state upon AC power cycle when power restore policy is 'Restore' ?

Currently it does, quite weirdly. That happens because `obmcutil poweroff` command sets RequestedHostTransition to Off, but `obmcutil chassisoff` command does not change that property.

It is proposed to add a new service, which sets RequestedHostTransition property to value Off on obmc-chassis-hard-poweroff target call.

The corresponding change is in Gerrit:
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/c/openbmc/meta-phosphor/+/15061/

I invite everyone to discuss it there as so far we have only two quite opposite opinions on this expressed in Gerrit comments.

WBR,
Alexander.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]