All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
	"Dave.Martin@arm.com" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	"christoffer.dall@arm.com" <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"jintack@cs.columbia.edu" <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	"julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Anil Kumar Reddy H <areddy3@marvell.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:11:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f55386a9-8eaa-944f-453d-9c3c4abee5fb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED3A535FCF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>

Hi,

On 4/16/20 2:38 AM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
> Hi Marc:
>
> Got it.
> Really a bit patch set :)
>
> BTW, I have done a basic kvm unit test
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git
> And I find that after apply the patch KVM: arm64: VNCR-ize ELR_EL1,
> The psci test failed for some reason, I can't understand why, this
> is only the test result.(find the patch by git bisect + kvm test)

Just a heads-up, a couple of fixes to kvm-unit-tests were merged last week, and
among them was one touching the psci code, e14e6ba56f6e ("arm/arm64: psci: Don't
run C code without stack or vectors"). It might be worth checking that you have
it, and if you don't, if applying it fixes the issue.

Thanks,
Alex
>
> My platform: Hisilicon D06 board.
> Linux kernel: Linux 5.6-rc6 + nv patches(some rebases)
> Could you help to take a look?
>
> Thanks 
> Zengtao 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@kernel.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 5:24 PM
>> To: Zengtao (B)
>> Cc: George Cherian; Dave.Martin@arm.com; alexandru.elisei@arm.com;
>> andre.przywara@arm.com; christoffer.dall@arm.com;
>> james.morse@arm.com; jintack@cs.columbia.edu;
>> julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
>> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
>> suzuki.poulose@arm.com; Anil Kumar Reddy H; Ganapatrao Kulkarni
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested
>> Virtualization support
>>
>> Hi Zengtao,
>>
>> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100,
>> "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Marc:
>>>
>>> Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform
>>>  which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series
>>> affects the existed virtualization functions or not.
>>>
>>> Any suggestion about the test focus?
>> Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every
>> architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful
>> testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> 	M.
>>
>> --
>> Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@marvell.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	"Dave.Martin@arm.com" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Anil Kumar Reddy H <areddy3@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:11:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f55386a9-8eaa-944f-453d-9c3c4abee5fb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED3A535FCF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>

Hi,

On 4/16/20 2:38 AM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
> Hi Marc:
>
> Got it.
> Really a bit patch set :)
>
> BTW, I have done a basic kvm unit test
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git
> And I find that after apply the patch KVM: arm64: VNCR-ize ELR_EL1,
> The psci test failed for some reason, I can't understand why, this
> is only the test result.(find the patch by git bisect + kvm test)

Just a heads-up, a couple of fixes to kvm-unit-tests were merged last week, and
among them was one touching the psci code, e14e6ba56f6e ("arm/arm64: psci: Don't
run C code without stack or vectors"). It might be worth checking that you have
it, and if you don't, if applying it fixes the issue.

Thanks,
Alex
>
> My platform: Hisilicon D06 board.
> Linux kernel: Linux 5.6-rc6 + nv patches(some rebases)
> Could you help to take a look?
>
> Thanks 
> Zengtao 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@kernel.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 5:24 PM
>> To: Zengtao (B)
>> Cc: George Cherian; Dave.Martin@arm.com; alexandru.elisei@arm.com;
>> andre.przywara@arm.com; christoffer.dall@arm.com;
>> james.morse@arm.com; jintack@cs.columbia.edu;
>> julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
>> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
>> suzuki.poulose@arm.com; Anil Kumar Reddy H; Ganapatrao Kulkarni
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested
>> Virtualization support
>>
>> Hi Zengtao,
>>
>> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100,
>> "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Marc:
>>>
>>> Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform
>>>  which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series
>>> affects the existed virtualization functions or not.
>>>
>>> Any suggestion about the test focus?
>> Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every
>> architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful
>> testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> 	M.
>>
>> --
>> Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@marvell.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	"christoffer.dall@arm.com" <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	"Dave.Martin@arm.com" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
	"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Anil Kumar Reddy H <areddy3@marvell.com>,
	"jintack@cs.columbia.edu" <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	"julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:11:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f55386a9-8eaa-944f-453d-9c3c4abee5fb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED3A535FCF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>

Hi,

On 4/16/20 2:38 AM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
> Hi Marc:
>
> Got it.
> Really a bit patch set :)
>
> BTW, I have done a basic kvm unit test
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git
> And I find that after apply the patch KVM: arm64: VNCR-ize ELR_EL1,
> The psci test failed for some reason, I can't understand why, this
> is only the test result.(find the patch by git bisect + kvm test)

Just a heads-up, a couple of fixes to kvm-unit-tests were merged last week, and
among them was one touching the psci code, e14e6ba56f6e ("arm/arm64: psci: Don't
run C code without stack or vectors"). It might be worth checking that you have
it, and if you don't, if applying it fixes the issue.

Thanks,
Alex
>
> My platform: Hisilicon D06 board.
> Linux kernel: Linux 5.6-rc6 + nv patches(some rebases)
> Could you help to take a look?
>
> Thanks 
> Zengtao 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@kernel.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 5:24 PM
>> To: Zengtao (B)
>> Cc: George Cherian; Dave.Martin@arm.com; alexandru.elisei@arm.com;
>> andre.przywara@arm.com; christoffer.dall@arm.com;
>> james.morse@arm.com; jintack@cs.columbia.edu;
>> julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
>> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
>> suzuki.poulose@arm.com; Anil Kumar Reddy H; Ganapatrao Kulkarni
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested
>> Virtualization support
>>
>> Hi Zengtao,
>>
>> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100,
>> "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Marc:
>>>
>>> Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform
>>>  which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series
>>> affects the existed virtualization functions or not.
>>>
>>> Any suggestion about the test focus?
>> Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every
>> architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful
>> testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> 	M.
>>
>> --
>> Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-17 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-03  7:27 [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support George Cherian
2020-04-03  7:27 ` George Cherian
2020-04-03  8:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-03  8:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-03  8:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-11  4:10   ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-11  4:10     ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-11  4:10     ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-11  9:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-11  9:23       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-11  9:23       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-16  1:38       ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-16  1:38         ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-16  1:38         ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-16 18:22         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-16 18:22           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-16 18:22           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-17 15:06           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-17 15:06             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-17 15:06             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-18  2:49             ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-18  2:49               ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-18  2:49               ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-20 14:03               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-20 14:03                 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-20 14:03                 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-21  2:22                 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-21  2:22                   ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-21  2:22                   ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-17 15:11         ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2020-04-17 15:11           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-04-17 15:11           ` Alexandru Elisei
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-03  9:36 George Cherian
2020-04-03  9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-03  9:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-03  9:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-11 17:48 Marc Zyngier
2020-02-11 17:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-11 17:48 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f55386a9-8eaa-944f-453d-9c3c4abee5fb@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=areddy3@marvell.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=gcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=gkulkarni@marvell.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.