All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel
	<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	kexec mailing list
	<kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Bhupesh SHARMA
	<bhupesh.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug Report] kdump crashes after latest EFI memblock changes on arm64 machines with large number of CPUs
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:31:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5c4c03a-e88f-ea42-b791-e50808e8247b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_1PNiGbgRqd3_0k6CGzh-2P+iAmqk=oSSek69kBCnb8Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 05/11/18 11:11, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> (+ Marc)
> 
> On 1 November 2018 at 22:14, Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the latest EFI changes for memblock reservation across kdump
>> kernel from Ard (Commit 71e0940d52e107748b270213a01d3b1546657d74
>> ["efi: honour memory reservations passed via a linux specific config
>> table"]), we hit a panic while trying to boot the kdump kernel on
>> machines which have large number of CPUs.
>>
> 
> Just for my understanding: why do you boot all 224 CPus when running
> the crash kernel?

FWIW, I've used these patches to kexec a kernel on a 256 CPUs system,
without any issue. Why am I not seeing this problem?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Bug Report] kdump crashes after latest EFI memblock changes on arm64 machines with large number of CPUs
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:31:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5c4c03a-e88f-ea42-b791-e50808e8247b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_1PNiGbgRqd3_0k6CGzh-2P+iAmqk=oSSek69kBCnb8Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/11/18 11:11, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> (+ Marc)
> 
> On 1 November 2018 at 22:14, Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the latest EFI changes for memblock reservation across kdump
>> kernel from Ard (Commit 71e0940d52e107748b270213a01d3b1546657d74
>> ["efi: honour memory reservations passed via a linux specific config
>> table"]), we hit a panic while trying to boot the kdump kernel on
>> machines which have large number of CPUs.
>>
> 
> Just for my understanding: why do you boot all 224 CPus when running
> the crash kernel?

FWIW, I've used these patches to kexec a kernel on a 256 CPUs system,
without any issue. Why am I not seeing this problem?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	kexec mailing list <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.linux@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug Report] kdump crashes after latest EFI memblock changes on arm64 machines with large number of CPUs
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:31:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5c4c03a-e88f-ea42-b791-e50808e8247b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_1PNiGbgRqd3_0k6CGzh-2P+iAmqk=oSSek69kBCnb8Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/11/18 11:11, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> (+ Marc)
> 
> On 1 November 2018 at 22:14, Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the latest EFI changes for memblock reservation across kdump
>> kernel from Ard (Commit 71e0940d52e107748b270213a01d3b1546657d74
>> ["efi: honour memory reservations passed via a linux specific config
>> table"]), we hit a panic while trying to boot the kdump kernel on
>> machines which have large number of CPUs.
>>
> 
> Just for my understanding: why do you boot all 224 CPus when running
> the crash kernel?

FWIW, I've used these patches to kexec a kernel on a 256 CPUs system,
without any issue. Why am I not seeing this problem?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-05 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-01 21:14 [Bug Report] kdump crashes after latest EFI memblock changes on arm64 machines with large number of CPUs Bhupesh Sharma
2018-11-01 21:14 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2018-11-01 21:14 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2018-11-05 11:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-05 11:11   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-05 11:11   ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found]   ` <CAKv+Gu_1PNiGbgRqd3_0k6CGzh-2P+iAmqk=oSSek69kBCnb8Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-05 11:31     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2018-11-05 11:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-05 11:31       ` Marc Zyngier
     [not found] ` <CACi5LpOyy0YkhEzWWqt8hAQfKku2Vzp5+da_dGS23JMyHReNew-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-06  1:30   ` Will Deacon
2018-11-06  1:30     ` Will Deacon
2018-11-06  1:30     ` Will Deacon
2018-11-06  8:44     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06  8:44       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06  8:44       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-08  5:58       ` Bhupesh Sharma
2018-11-08  5:58         ` Bhupesh Sharma
2018-11-08  5:58         ` Bhupesh Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f5c4c03a-e88f-ea42-b791-e50808e8247b@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bhsharma-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bhupesh.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.