* [PATCH 1/1] nbd: trace long NBD operations
@ 2022-05-27 8:43 Denis V. Lunev
2022-05-27 9:33 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-05-27 9:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2022-05-27 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-block, qemu-devel
Cc: Denis V. Lunev, Eric Blake, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy,
Kevin Wolf, Hanna Reitz, Paolo Bonzini
At the moment there are 2 sources of lengthy operations if configured:
* open connection, which could retry inside and
* reconnect of already opened connection
These operations could be quite lengthy and cumbersome to catch thus
it would be quite natural to add trace points for them.
This patch is based on the original downstream work made by Vladimir.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
CC: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
CC: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
block/nbd.c | 11 ++++++++---
block/trace-events | 2 ++
nbd/client-connection.c | 2 ++
nbd/trace-events | 3 +++
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
index 6085ab1d2c..f1a473d36b 100644
--- a/block/nbd.c
+++ b/block/nbd.c
@@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ static bool nbd_client_connecting(BDRVNBDState *s)
/* Called with s->requests_lock taken. */
static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
{
+ int ret;
bool blocking = s->state == NBD_CLIENT_CONNECTING_WAIT;
/*
@@ -380,6 +381,8 @@ static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
assert(nbd_client_connecting(s));
assert(s->in_flight == 1);
+ trace_nbd_reconnect_attempt(s->bs->in_flight);
+
if (blocking && !s->reconnect_delay_timer) {
/*
* It's the first reconnect attempt after switching to
@@ -401,7 +404,7 @@ static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
}
qemu_mutex_unlock(&s->requests_lock);
- nbd_co_do_establish_connection(s->bs, blocking, NULL);
+ ret = nbd_co_do_establish_connection(s->bs, blocking, NULL);
qemu_mutex_lock(&s->requests_lock);
/*
@@ -410,6 +413,8 @@ static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
* this I/O request (so draining removes all timers).
*/
reconnect_delay_timer_del(s);
+
+ trace_nbd_reconnect_attempt_result(ret, s->bs->in_flight);
}
static coroutine_fn int nbd_receive_replies(BDRVNBDState *s, uint64_t handle)
@@ -1856,8 +1861,8 @@ static int nbd_process_options(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options,
goto error;
}
- s->reconnect_delay = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "reconnect-delay", 0);
- s->open_timeout = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "open-timeout", 0);
+ s->reconnect_delay = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "reconnect-delay", 300);
+ s->open_timeout = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "open-timeout", 300);
ret = 0;
diff --git a/block/trace-events b/block/trace-events
index 549090d453..caab699c22 100644
--- a/block/trace-events
+++ b/block/trace-events
@@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ nbd_read_reply_entry_fail(int ret, const char *err) "ret = %d, err: %s"
nbd_co_request_fail(uint64_t from, uint32_t len, uint64_t handle, uint16_t flags, uint16_t type, const char *name, int ret, const char *err) "Request failed { .from = %" PRIu64", .len = %" PRIu32 ", .handle = %" PRIu64 ", .flags = 0x%" PRIx16 ", .type = %" PRIu16 " (%s) } ret = %d, err: %s"
nbd_client_handshake(const char *export_name) "export '%s'"
nbd_client_handshake_success(const char *export_name) "export '%s'"
+nbd_reconnect_attempt(int in_flight) "in_flight %d"
+nbd_reconnect_attempt_result(int ret, int in_flight) "ret %d in_flight %d"
# ssh.c
ssh_restart_coroutine(void *co) "co=%p"
diff --git a/nbd/client-connection.c b/nbd/client-connection.c
index 2a632931c3..a5ee82e804 100644
--- a/nbd/client-connection.c
+++ b/nbd/client-connection.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "trace.h"
#include "block/nbd.h"
@@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ static void *connect_thread_func(void *opaque)
object_unref(OBJECT(conn->sioc));
conn->sioc = NULL;
if (conn->do_retry && !conn->detached) {
+ trace_nbd_connect_iteration(timeout);
qemu_mutex_unlock(&conn->mutex);
sleep(timeout);
diff --git a/nbd/trace-events b/nbd/trace-events
index c4919a2dd5..bdadfdc82d 100644
--- a/nbd/trace-events
+++ b/nbd/trace-events
@@ -73,3 +73,6 @@ nbd_co_receive_request_decode_type(uint64_t handle, uint16_t type, const char *n
nbd_co_receive_request_payload_received(uint64_t handle, uint32_t len) "Payload received: handle = %" PRIu64 ", len = %" PRIu32
nbd_co_receive_align_compliance(const char *op, uint64_t from, uint32_t len, uint32_t align) "client sent non-compliant unaligned %s request: from=0x%" PRIx64 ", len=0x%" PRIx32 ", align=0x%" PRIx32
nbd_trip(void) "Reading request"
+
+# client-connection.c
+nbd_connect_iteration(int in_flight) "timeout %d"
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] nbd: trace long NBD operations
2022-05-27 8:43 [PATCH 1/1] nbd: trace long NBD operations Denis V. Lunev
@ 2022-05-27 9:33 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-05-27 12:12 ` Denis V. Lunev
2022-05-27 9:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy @ 2022-05-27 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis V. Lunev, qemu-block, qemu-devel
Cc: Eric Blake, Kevin Wolf, Hanna Reitz, Paolo Bonzini
On 5/27/22 11:43, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> At the moment there are 2 sources of lengthy operations if configured:
> * open connection, which could retry inside and
> * reconnect of already opened connection
> These operations could be quite lengthy and cumbersome to catch thus
> it would be quite natural to add trace points for them.
>
> This patch is based on the original downstream work made by Vladimir.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
> CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> CC: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
> CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> CC: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/nbd.c | 11 ++++++++---
> block/trace-events | 2 ++
> nbd/client-connection.c | 2 ++
> nbd/trace-events | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
> index 6085ab1d2c..f1a473d36b 100644
> --- a/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/block/nbd.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ static bool nbd_client_connecting(BDRVNBDState *s)
> /* Called with s->requests_lock taken. */
> static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
> {
> + int ret;
> bool blocking = s->state == NBD_CLIENT_CONNECTING_WAIT;
>
> /*
> @@ -380,6 +381,8 @@ static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
> assert(nbd_client_connecting(s));
> assert(s->in_flight == 1);
>
> + trace_nbd_reconnect_attempt(s->bs->in_flight);
> +
> if (blocking && !s->reconnect_delay_timer) {
> /*
> * It's the first reconnect attempt after switching to
> @@ -401,7 +404,7 @@ static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
> }
>
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&s->requests_lock);
> - nbd_co_do_establish_connection(s->bs, blocking, NULL);
> + ret = nbd_co_do_establish_connection(s->bs, blocking, NULL);
> qemu_mutex_lock(&s->requests_lock);
>
> /*
> @@ -410,6 +413,8 @@ static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
> * this I/O request (so draining removes all timers).
> */
> reconnect_delay_timer_del(s);
> +
> + trace_nbd_reconnect_attempt_result(ret, s->bs->in_flight);
May be better trace exactly after nbd_co_do_establish_connection(). Doesn't really matter, just simpler code.
> }
>
> static coroutine_fn int nbd_receive_replies(BDRVNBDState *s, uint64_t handle)
> @@ -1856,8 +1861,8 @@ static int nbd_process_options(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options,
> goto error;
> }
>
> - s->reconnect_delay = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "reconnect-delay", 0);
> - s->open_timeout = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "open-timeout", 0);
> + s->reconnect_delay = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "reconnect-delay", 300);
> + s->open_timeout = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "open-timeout", 300);
That's changing defaults. Should not be in this patch. And I don't think we can simply change upstream default of open-timeout, as it breaks habitual behavior.
>
> ret = 0;
>
> diff --git a/block/trace-events b/block/trace-events
> index 549090d453..caab699c22 100644
> --- a/block/trace-events
> +++ b/block/trace-events
> @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ nbd_read_reply_entry_fail(int ret, const char *err) "ret = %d, err: %s"
> nbd_co_request_fail(uint64_t from, uint32_t len, uint64_t handle, uint16_t flags, uint16_t type, const char *name, int ret, const char *err) "Request failed { .from = %" PRIu64", .len = %" PRIu32 ", .handle = %" PRIu64 ", .flags = 0x%" PRIx16 ", .type = %" PRIu16 " (%s) } ret = %d, err: %s"
> nbd_client_handshake(const char *export_name) "export '%s'"
> nbd_client_handshake_success(const char *export_name) "export '%s'"
> +nbd_reconnect_attempt(int in_flight) "in_flight %d"
> +nbd_reconnect_attempt_result(int ret, int in_flight) "ret %d in_flight %d"
bs->in_flight is "unsigned int", so a bit better would be use "unsigned int" and "%u" here
>
> # ssh.c
> ssh_restart_coroutine(void *co) "co=%p"
> diff --git a/nbd/client-connection.c b/nbd/client-connection.c
> index 2a632931c3..a5ee82e804 100644
> --- a/nbd/client-connection.c
> +++ b/nbd/client-connection.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> */
>
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "trace.h"
>
> #include "block/nbd.h"
>
> @@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ static void *connect_thread_func(void *opaque)
> object_unref(OBJECT(conn->sioc));
> conn->sioc = NULL;
> if (conn->do_retry && !conn->detached) {
> + trace_nbd_connect_iteration(timeout);
Here we are going to sleep a bit, before next reconnect attempt. I'd call the trace-point "trace_nbd_connect_thread_sleep" or something like this to be more intuitive.
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&conn->mutex);
>
> sleep(timeout);
> diff --git a/nbd/trace-events b/nbd/trace-events
> index c4919a2dd5..bdadfdc82d 100644
> --- a/nbd/trace-events
> +++ b/nbd/trace-events
> @@ -73,3 +73,6 @@ nbd_co_receive_request_decode_type(uint64_t handle, uint16_t type, const char *n
> nbd_co_receive_request_payload_received(uint64_t handle, uint32_t len) "Payload received: handle = %" PRIu64 ", len = %" PRIu32
> nbd_co_receive_align_compliance(const char *op, uint64_t from, uint32_t len, uint32_t align) "client sent non-compliant unaligned %s request: from=0x%" PRIx64 ", len=0x%" PRIx32 ", align=0x%" PRIx32
> nbd_trip(void) "Reading request"
> +
> +# client-connection.c
> +nbd_connect_iteration(int in_flight) "timeout %d"
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] nbd: trace long NBD operations
2022-05-27 9:33 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
@ 2022-05-27 12:12 ` Denis V. Lunev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2022-05-27 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, qemu-block, qemu-devel
Cc: Eric Blake, Kevin Wolf, Hanna Reitz, Paolo Bonzini
On 27.05.2022 11:33, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 5/27/22 11:43, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> At the moment there are 2 sources of lengthy operations if configured:
>> * open connection, which could retry inside and
>> * reconnect of already opened connection
>> These operations could be quite lengthy and cumbersome to catch thus
>> it would be quite natural to add trace points for them.
>>
>> This patch is based on the original downstream work made by Vladimir.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
>> CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>> CC: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
>> CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>> CC: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
>> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> block/nbd.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> block/trace-events | 2 ++
>> nbd/client-connection.c | 2 ++
>> nbd/trace-events | 3 +++
>> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
>> index 6085ab1d2c..f1a473d36b 100644
>> --- a/block/nbd.c
>> +++ b/block/nbd.c
>> @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ static bool nbd_client_connecting(BDRVNBDState *s)
>> /* Called with s->requests_lock taken. */
>> static coroutine_fn void nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
>> {
>> + int ret;
>> bool blocking = s->state == NBD_CLIENT_CONNECTING_WAIT;
>> /*
>> @@ -380,6 +381,8 @@ static coroutine_fn void
>> nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
>> assert(nbd_client_connecting(s));
>> assert(s->in_flight == 1);
>> + trace_nbd_reconnect_attempt(s->bs->in_flight);
>> +
>> if (blocking && !s->reconnect_delay_timer) {
>> /*
>> * It's the first reconnect attempt after switching to
>> @@ -401,7 +404,7 @@ static coroutine_fn void
>> nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
>> }
>> qemu_mutex_unlock(&s->requests_lock);
>> - nbd_co_do_establish_connection(s->bs, blocking, NULL);
>> + ret = nbd_co_do_establish_connection(s->bs, blocking, NULL);
>> qemu_mutex_lock(&s->requests_lock);
>> /*
>> @@ -410,6 +413,8 @@ static coroutine_fn void
>> nbd_reconnect_attempt(BDRVNBDState *s)
>> * this I/O request (so draining removes all timers).
>> */
>> reconnect_delay_timer_del(s);
>> +
>> + trace_nbd_reconnect_attempt_result(ret, s->bs->in_flight);
>
> May be better trace exactly after nbd_co_do_establish_connection().
> Doesn't really matter, just simpler code.
>
ya, I'll change this
>> }
>> static coroutine_fn int nbd_receive_replies(BDRVNBDState *s,
>> uint64_t handle)
>> @@ -1856,8 +1861,8 @@ static int nbd_process_options(BlockDriverState
>> *bs, QDict *options,
>> goto error;
>> }
>> - s->reconnect_delay = qemu_opt_get_number(opts,
>> "reconnect-delay", 0);
>> - s->open_timeout = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "open-timeout", 0);
>> + s->reconnect_delay = qemu_opt_get_number(opts,
>> "reconnect-delay", 300);
>> + s->open_timeout = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "open-timeout", 300);
>
> That's changing defaults. Should not be in this patch. And I don't
> think we can simply change upstream default of open-timeout, as it
> breaks habitual behavior.
>
whoops :( used for testing, cut before sending once but somehow
this goes out anyway.
Thanks for pointing this.
>> ret = 0;
>> diff --git a/block/trace-events b/block/trace-events
>> index 549090d453..caab699c22 100644
>> --- a/block/trace-events
>> +++ b/block/trace-events
>> @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ nbd_read_reply_entry_fail(int ret, const char
>> *err) "ret = %d, err: %s"
>> nbd_co_request_fail(uint64_t from, uint32_t len, uint64_t handle,
>> uint16_t flags, uint16_t type, const char *name, int ret, const char
>> *err) "Request failed { .from = %" PRIu64", .len = %" PRIu32 ",
>> .handle = %" PRIu64 ", .flags = 0x%" PRIx16 ", .type = %" PRIu16 "
>> (%s) } ret = %d, err: %s"
>> nbd_client_handshake(const char *export_name) "export '%s'"
>> nbd_client_handshake_success(const char *export_name) "export '%s'"
>> +nbd_reconnect_attempt(int in_flight) "in_flight %d"
>> +nbd_reconnect_attempt_result(int ret, int in_flight) "ret %d
>> in_flight %d"
>
> bs->in_flight is "unsigned int", so a bit better would be use
> "unsigned int" and "%u" here
>
noted
>> # ssh.c
>> ssh_restart_coroutine(void *co) "co=%p"
>> diff --git a/nbd/client-connection.c b/nbd/client-connection.c
>> index 2a632931c3..a5ee82e804 100644
>> --- a/nbd/client-connection.c
>> +++ b/nbd/client-connection.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> */
>> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "trace.h"
>> #include "block/nbd.h"
>> @@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ static void *connect_thread_func(void *opaque)
>> object_unref(OBJECT(conn->sioc));
>> conn->sioc = NULL;
>> if (conn->do_retry && !conn->detached) {
>> + trace_nbd_connect_iteration(timeout);
>
> Here we are going to sleep a bit, before next reconnect attempt. I'd
> call the trace-point "trace_nbd_connect_thread_sleep" or something
> like this to be more intuitive.
>
ok
>> qemu_mutex_unlock(&conn->mutex);
>> sleep(timeout);
>> diff --git a/nbd/trace-events b/nbd/trace-events
>> index c4919a2dd5..bdadfdc82d 100644
>> --- a/nbd/trace-events
>> +++ b/nbd/trace-events
>> @@ -73,3 +73,6 @@ nbd_co_receive_request_decode_type(uint64_t handle,
>> uint16_t type, const char *n
>> nbd_co_receive_request_payload_received(uint64_t handle, uint32_t
>> len) "Payload received: handle = %" PRIu64 ", len = %" PRIu32
>> nbd_co_receive_align_compliance(const char *op, uint64_t from,
>> uint32_t len, uint32_t align) "client sent non-compliant unaligned %s
>> request: from=0x%" PRIx64 ", len=0x%" PRIx32 ", align=0x%" PRIx32
>> nbd_trip(void) "Reading request"
>> +
>> +# client-connection.c
>> +nbd_connect_iteration(int in_flight) "timeout %d"
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] nbd: trace long NBD operations
2022-05-27 8:43 [PATCH 1/1] nbd: trace long NBD operations Denis V. Lunev
2022-05-27 9:33 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
@ 2022-05-27 9:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-05-27 12:13 ` Denis V. Lunev
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy @ 2022-05-27 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis V. Lunev, qemu-block, qemu-devel
Cc: Eric Blake, Kevin Wolf, Hanna Reitz, Paolo Bonzini
On 5/27/22 11:43, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> +++ b/nbd/client-connection.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> */
>
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "trace.h"
>
> #include "block/nbd.h"
>
> @@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ static void *connect_thread_func(void *opaque)
> object_unref(OBJECT(conn->sioc));
> conn->sioc = NULL;
> if (conn->do_retry && !conn->detached) {
> + trace_nbd_connect_iteration(timeout);
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&conn->mutex);
>
> sleep(timeout);
> diff --git a/nbd/trace-events b/nbd/trace-events
> index c4919a2dd5..bdadfdc82d 100644
> --- a/nbd/trace-events
> +++ b/nbd/trace-events
> @@ -73,3 +73,6 @@ nbd_co_receive_request_decode_type(uint64_t handle, uint16_t type, const char *n
> nbd_co_receive_request_payload_received(uint64_t handle, uint32_t len) "Payload received: handle = %" PRIu64 ", len = %" PRIu32
> nbd_co_receive_align_compliance(const char *op, uint64_t from, uint32_t len, uint32_t align) "client sent non-compliant unaligned %s request: from=0x%" PRIx64 ", len=0x%" PRIx32 ", align=0x%" PRIx32
> nbd_trip(void) "Reading request"
> +
> +# client-connection.c
> +nbd_connect_iteration(int in_flight) "timeout %d"
timeout is uint64_t, so, it should be "uint64_t timeout" here and %" PRIu64
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] nbd: trace long NBD operations
2022-05-27 9:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
@ 2022-05-27 12:13 ` Denis V. Lunev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2022-05-27 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, qemu-block, qemu-devel
Cc: Eric Blake, Kevin Wolf, Hanna Reitz, Paolo Bonzini
On 27.05.2022 11:36, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 5/27/22 11:43, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> +++ b/nbd/client-connection.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> */
>> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "trace.h"
>> #include "block/nbd.h"
>> @@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ static void *connect_thread_func(void *opaque)
>> object_unref(OBJECT(conn->sioc));
>> conn->sioc = NULL;
>> if (conn->do_retry && !conn->detached) {
>> + trace_nbd_connect_iteration(timeout);
>> qemu_mutex_unlock(&conn->mutex);
>> sleep(timeout);
>> diff --git a/nbd/trace-events b/nbd/trace-events
>> index c4919a2dd5..bdadfdc82d 100644
>> --- a/nbd/trace-events
>> +++ b/nbd/trace-events
>> @@ -73,3 +73,6 @@ nbd_co_receive_request_decode_type(uint64_t handle,
>> uint16_t type, const char *n
>> nbd_co_receive_request_payload_received(uint64_t handle, uint32_t
>> len) "Payload received: handle = %" PRIu64 ", len = %" PRIu32
>> nbd_co_receive_align_compliance(const char *op, uint64_t from,
>> uint32_t len, uint32_t align) "client sent non-compliant unaligned %s
>> request: from=0x%" PRIx64 ", len=0x%" PRIx32 ", align=0x%" PRIx32
>> nbd_trip(void) "Reading request"
>> +
>> +# client-connection.c
>> +nbd_connect_iteration(int in_flight) "timeout %d"
>
> timeout is uint64_t, so, it should be "uint64_t timeout" here and %"
> PRIu64
>
Thanks! will change
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-27 12:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-27 8:43 [PATCH 1/1] nbd: trace long NBD operations Denis V. Lunev
2022-05-27 9:33 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-05-27 12:12 ` Denis V. Lunev
2022-05-27 9:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-05-27 12:13 ` Denis V. Lunev
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.