Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab

[Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>]

Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> writes:

> Hi again everyone,
>
> I have checked the pipelines with SPDK branch v21.01.x on the main DPDK branch.
> It still seems to have an issue with compilation, and I have attached
> a log of a Fedora SPDK compilation.
> There are some undefined references to "rte_ether_unformat_addr"
> I will continue to look into this. If you have any ideas on how to fix
> this, please let me know.

Looks like rte_ethdev depends on rte_net - maybe I missed something.

Brandon, can we disable this test for the time being since it's been
failing for a while now?  Can you also send me the container image /
definitions you're using so that I can help work on this?

> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:07 AM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I will adjust the branches and watch over the first few pipelines to
>> make sure everything goes smoothly.
>>
>> Thanks for the update,
>> Brandon
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > "Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> writes:
>> >
>> > > Hi Lincoln,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even from a few
>> > hours ago).  I suppose the lab side might need some adjustment, too?
>> >
>> > >
>> > > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against
>> > > dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if
>> > > this is what you are seeing on your end too.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Tomek
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
>> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM
>> > > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
>> > > Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Brandon Lo
>> > > <blo@iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org;
>> > > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks Tomek,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure
>> > > the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure
>> > > is. :-P
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Lincoln
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >  Hi Aaron,
>> > >
>> > >  Thank you for reporting this !
>> > >
>> > >  This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was resolved on latest SPDK.
>> > >
>> > >  I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK
>> > > branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK
>> > >  release, would be v21.01.x:
>> > >  https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x
>> > >
>> > >  The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly:
>> > >  https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320
>> > >
>> > >  Thanks,
>> > >  Tomek
>> > >
>> > >  > -----Original Message-----
>> > >  > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Aaron Conole
>> > >  > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM
>> > >  > To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
>> > >  > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org
>> > >  > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Greetings,
>> > >  >
>> > >  > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab seems
>> > >  > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure.
>> > >  > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol that isn't
>> > >  > available when linking.
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Job details (for example):
>> > >  > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results-
>> > >  > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20
>> > >  > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of
>> > >  > SPDK?  Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object?
>> > >  > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong?
>> > >  >
>> > >  > Thanks,
>> > >  > -Aaron
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Brandon Lo
>>
>> UNH InterOperability Laboratory
>>
>> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
>>
>> blo@iol.unh.edu
>>
>> www.iol.unh.edu