All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: Enable KFENCE for PPC32
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:27:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f806de26-daf9-9317-fdaa-a0f7a32d8fe0@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG_fn=WFffkVzqC9b6pyNuweFhFswZfa8RRio2nL9-Wq10nBbw@mail.gmail.com>



Le 02/03/2021 à 10:21, Alexander Potapenko a écrit :
>> [   14.998426] BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c
>> [   14.998426]
>> [   15.007061] Invalid read at 0x(ptrval):
>> [   15.010906]  finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c
>> [   15.015633]  kunit_try_run_case+0x5c/0xd0
>> [   15.019682]  kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x24/0x30
>> [   15.025099]  kthread+0x15c/0x174
>> [   15.028359]  ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
>> [   15.032747]
>> [   15.034251] CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B
>> 5.12.0-rc1-s3k-dev-01534-g4f14ae75edf0-dirty #4674
>> [   15.045811] ==================================================================
>> [   15.053324]     # test_invalid_access: EXPECTATION FAILED at mm/kfence/kfence_test.c:636
>> [   15.053324]     Expected report_matches(&expect) to be true, but is false
>> [   15.068359]     not ok 21 - test_invalid_access
> 
> The test expects the function name to be test_invalid_access, i. e.
> the first line should be "BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in
> test_invalid_access".
> The error reporting function unwinds the stack, skips a couple of
> "uninteresting" frames
> (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc1/source/mm/kfence/report.c#L43)
> and uses the first "interesting" one frame to print the report header
> (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc1/source/mm/kfence/report.c#L226).
> 
> It's strange that test_invalid_access is missing altogether from the
> stack trace - is that expected?
> Can you try printing the whole stacktrace without skipping any frames
> to see if that function is there?
> 

Booting with 'no_hash_pointers" I get the following. Does it helps ?

[   16.837198] ==================================================================
[   16.848521] BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c
[   16.848521]
[   16.857158] Invalid read at 0xdf98800a:
[   16.861004]  finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c
[   16.865731]  kunit_try_run_case+0x5c/0xd0
[   16.869780]  kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x24/0x30
[   16.875199]  kthread+0x15c/0x174
[   16.878460]  ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
[   16.882847]
[   16.884351] CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B 
5.12.0-rc1-s3k-dev-01534-g4f14ae75edf0-dirty #4674
[   16.895908] NIP:  c016eb8c LR: c02f50dc CTR: c016eb38
[   16.900963] REGS: e2449d90 TRAP: 0301   Tainted: G    B 
(5.12.0-rc1-s3k-dev-01534-g4f14ae75edf0-dirty)
[   16.911386] MSR:  00009032 <EE,ME,IR,DR,RI>  CR: 22000004  XER: 00000000
[   16.918153] DAR: df98800a DSISR: 20000000
[   16.918153] GPR00: c02f50dc e2449e50 c1140d00 e100dd24 c084b13c 00000008 c084b32b c016eb38
[   16.918153] GPR08: c0850000 df988000 c0d10000 e2449eb0 22000288
[   16.936695] NIP [c016eb8c] test_invalid_access+0x54/0x108
[   16.942125] LR [c02f50dc] kunit_try_run_case+0x5c/0xd0
[   16.947292] Call Trace:
[   16.949746] [e2449e50] [c005a5ec] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c (unreliable)
[   16.957443] [e2449eb0] [c02f50dc] kunit_try_run_case+0x5c/0xd0
[   16.963319] [e2449ed0] [c02f63ec] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x24/0x30
[   16.970574] [e2449ef0] [c004e710] kthread+0x15c/0x174
[   16.975670] [e2449f30] [c001317c] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
[   16.981896] Instruction dump:
[   16.984879] 8129d608 38e7eb38 81020280 911f004c 39000000 995f0024 907f0028 90ff001c
[   16.992710] 3949000a 915f0020 3d40c0d1 3d00c085 <8929000a> 3908adb0 812a4b98 3d40c02f
[   17.000711] ==================================================================
[   17.008223]     # test_invalid_access: EXPECTATION FAILED at mm/kfence/kfence_test.c:636
[   17.008223]     Expected report_matches(&expect) to be true, but is false
[   17.023243]     not ok 21 - test_invalid_access

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: Enable KFENCE for PPC32
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:27:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f806de26-daf9-9317-fdaa-a0f7a32d8fe0@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG_fn=WFffkVzqC9b6pyNuweFhFswZfa8RRio2nL9-Wq10nBbw@mail.gmail.com>



Le 02/03/2021 à 10:21, Alexander Potapenko a écrit :
>> [   14.998426] BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c
>> [   14.998426]
>> [   15.007061] Invalid read at 0x(ptrval):
>> [   15.010906]  finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c
>> [   15.015633]  kunit_try_run_case+0x5c/0xd0
>> [   15.019682]  kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x24/0x30
>> [   15.025099]  kthread+0x15c/0x174
>> [   15.028359]  ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
>> [   15.032747]
>> [   15.034251] CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B
>> 5.12.0-rc1-s3k-dev-01534-g4f14ae75edf0-dirty #4674
>> [   15.045811] ==================================================================
>> [   15.053324]     # test_invalid_access: EXPECTATION FAILED at mm/kfence/kfence_test.c:636
>> [   15.053324]     Expected report_matches(&expect) to be true, but is false
>> [   15.068359]     not ok 21 - test_invalid_access
> 
> The test expects the function name to be test_invalid_access, i. e.
> the first line should be "BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in
> test_invalid_access".
> The error reporting function unwinds the stack, skips a couple of
> "uninteresting" frames
> (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc1/source/mm/kfence/report.c#L43)
> and uses the first "interesting" one frame to print the report header
> (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc1/source/mm/kfence/report.c#L226).
> 
> It's strange that test_invalid_access is missing altogether from the
> stack trace - is that expected?
> Can you try printing the whole stacktrace without skipping any frames
> to see if that function is there?
> 

Booting with 'no_hash_pointers" I get the following. Does it helps ?

[   16.837198] ==================================================================
[   16.848521] BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c
[   16.848521]
[   16.857158] Invalid read at 0xdf98800a:
[   16.861004]  finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c
[   16.865731]  kunit_try_run_case+0x5c/0xd0
[   16.869780]  kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x24/0x30
[   16.875199]  kthread+0x15c/0x174
[   16.878460]  ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
[   16.882847]
[   16.884351] CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B 
5.12.0-rc1-s3k-dev-01534-g4f14ae75edf0-dirty #4674
[   16.895908] NIP:  c016eb8c LR: c02f50dc CTR: c016eb38
[   16.900963] REGS: e2449d90 TRAP: 0301   Tainted: G    B 
(5.12.0-rc1-s3k-dev-01534-g4f14ae75edf0-dirty)
[   16.911386] MSR:  00009032 <EE,ME,IR,DR,RI>  CR: 22000004  XER: 00000000
[   16.918153] DAR: df98800a DSISR: 20000000
[   16.918153] GPR00: c02f50dc e2449e50 c1140d00 e100dd24 c084b13c 00000008 c084b32b c016eb38
[   16.918153] GPR08: c0850000 df988000 c0d10000 e2449eb0 22000288
[   16.936695] NIP [c016eb8c] test_invalid_access+0x54/0x108
[   16.942125] LR [c02f50dc] kunit_try_run_case+0x5c/0xd0
[   16.947292] Call Trace:
[   16.949746] [e2449e50] [c005a5ec] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x54/0x23c (unreliable)
[   16.957443] [e2449eb0] [c02f50dc] kunit_try_run_case+0x5c/0xd0
[   16.963319] [e2449ed0] [c02f63ec] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x24/0x30
[   16.970574] [e2449ef0] [c004e710] kthread+0x15c/0x174
[   16.975670] [e2449f30] [c001317c] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
[   16.981896] Instruction dump:
[   16.984879] 8129d608 38e7eb38 81020280 911f004c 39000000 995f0024 907f0028 90ff001c
[   16.992710] 3949000a 915f0020 3d40c0d1 3d00c085 <8929000a> 3908adb0 812a4b98 3d40c02f
[   17.000711] ==================================================================
[   17.008223]     # test_invalid_access: EXPECTATION FAILED at mm/kfence/kfence_test.c:636
[   17.008223]     Expected report_matches(&expect) to be true, but is false
[   17.023243]     not ok 21 - test_invalid_access

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-02  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02  8:37 [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: Enable KFENCE for PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02  8:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02  8:58 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-02  8:58   ` Marco Elver
2021-03-02  9:05   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02  9:05     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02  9:21     ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-03-02  9:21       ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-03-02  9:27       ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2021-03-02  9:27         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02  9:53         ` Marco Elver
2021-03-02  9:53           ` Marco Elver
2021-03-02 11:21           ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 11:21             ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-02 11:39             ` Marco Elver
2021-03-02 11:39               ` Marco Elver
2021-03-03 10:38               ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 10:38                 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 10:56                 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-03 10:56                   ` Marco Elver
2021-03-04 11:23                   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 11:23                     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 11:31                     ` Marco Elver
2021-03-04 11:31                       ` Marco Elver
2021-03-04 11:48                       ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 11:48                         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 12:00                         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 12:00                           ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 12:02                           ` Marco Elver
2021-03-04 12:02                             ` Marco Elver
2021-03-04 12:48                         ` Marco Elver
2021-03-04 12:48                           ` Marco Elver
2021-03-04 14:08                           ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 14:08                             ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 14:19                             ` Marco Elver
2021-03-04 14:19                               ` Marco Elver
2021-03-05  5:01                           ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-05  5:01                             ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-05  7:50                             ` Marco Elver
2021-03-05  7:50                               ` Marco Elver
2021-03-05  8:23                               ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-05  8:23                                 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-05  9:14                                 ` Marco Elver
2021-03-05  9:14                                   ` Marco Elver
2021-03-05 11:49                                   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-05 11:49                                     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-05 13:46                                     ` Marco Elver
2021-03-05 13:46                                       ` Marco Elver
2021-03-02 11:40             ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-02 11:40               ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-02 18:48               ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-03-02 18:48                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-03-03 10:28               ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 10:28                 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 10:31           ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 10:31             ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 10:39             ` Marco Elver
2021-03-03 10:39               ` Marco Elver
2021-03-03 10:56               ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-03 10:56                 ` Christophe Leroy
     [not found]             ` <CANpmjNMKEObjf=WyfDQB5vPmR5RuyUMBJyfr6P2ykCd67wyMbA__49537.1361424745$1614767987$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-03 10:46               ` Andreas Schwab
2021-03-03 10:46                 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f806de26-daf9-9317-fdaa-a0f7a32d8fe0@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.