All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
	<wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>, <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/iommu_type1: Populate full dirty when detach non-pinned group
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:25:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8de434c-1993-cfe8-c451-2235be1ceb85@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210115110144.61e3c843@omen.home.shazbot.org>



On 2021/1/16 2:01, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:26:42 +0800
> Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> If a group with non-pinned-page dirty scope is detached with dirty
>> logging enabled, we should fully populate the dirty bitmaps at the
>> time it's removed since we don't know the extent of its previous DMA,
>> nor will the group be present to trigger the full bitmap when the user
>> retrieves the dirty bitmap.
>>
>> Fixes: d6a4c185660c ("vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking")
>> Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 0b4dedaa9128..4e82b9a3440f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -236,6 +236,19 @@ static void vfio_dma_populate_bitmap(struct vfio_dma *dma, size_t pgsize)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>> +{
>> +	struct rb_node *n;
>> +	unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
>> +
>> +	for (n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>> +		struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
>> +
>> +		if (dma->iommu_mapped)
>> +			bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, dma->size >> pgshift);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, size_t pgsize)
>>  {
>>  	struct rb_node *n;
>> @@ -2415,8 +2428,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>>  	 * Removal of a group without dirty tracking may allow the iommu scope
>>  	 * to be promoted.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (update_dirty_scope)
>> +	if (update_dirty_scope) {
>>  		update_pinned_page_dirty_scope(iommu);
>> +		if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking)
>> +			vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(iommu);
>> +	}
>>  	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>  }
>>  
> 
> This doesn't do the right thing.  This marks the bitmap dirty if:
> 
>  * The detached group dirty scope was not limited to pinned pages
> 
>  AND
> 
>  * Dirty tracking is enabled
> 
>  AND
> 
>  * The vfio_dma is *currently* (ie. after the detach) iommu_mapped
> 
> We need to mark the bitmap dirty based on whether the vfio_dma *was*
> iommu_mapped by the group that is now detached.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
Hi Alex,

Yes, I missed this point again :-(. The update_dirty_scope means we detached
an iommu backed group, and that means the vfio_dma *was* iommu_mapped by this
group, so we can populate full bitmap unconditionally, right?

Thanks,
Keqian


> .
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	jiangkunkun@huawei.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/iommu_type1: Populate full dirty when detach non-pinned group
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:25:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8de434c-1993-cfe8-c451-2235be1ceb85@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210115110144.61e3c843@omen.home.shazbot.org>



On 2021/1/16 2:01, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:26:42 +0800
> Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> If a group with non-pinned-page dirty scope is detached with dirty
>> logging enabled, we should fully populate the dirty bitmaps at the
>> time it's removed since we don't know the extent of its previous DMA,
>> nor will the group be present to trigger the full bitmap when the user
>> retrieves the dirty bitmap.
>>
>> Fixes: d6a4c185660c ("vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking")
>> Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 0b4dedaa9128..4e82b9a3440f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -236,6 +236,19 @@ static void vfio_dma_populate_bitmap(struct vfio_dma *dma, size_t pgsize)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>> +{
>> +	struct rb_node *n;
>> +	unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
>> +
>> +	for (n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>> +		struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
>> +
>> +		if (dma->iommu_mapped)
>> +			bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, dma->size >> pgshift);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, size_t pgsize)
>>  {
>>  	struct rb_node *n;
>> @@ -2415,8 +2428,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>>  	 * Removal of a group without dirty tracking may allow the iommu scope
>>  	 * to be promoted.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (update_dirty_scope)
>> +	if (update_dirty_scope) {
>>  		update_pinned_page_dirty_scope(iommu);
>> +		if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking)
>> +			vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(iommu);
>> +	}
>>  	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>  }
>>  
> 
> This doesn't do the right thing.  This marks the bitmap dirty if:
> 
>  * The detached group dirty scope was not limited to pinned pages
> 
>  AND
> 
>  * Dirty tracking is enabled
> 
>  AND
> 
>  * The vfio_dma is *currently* (ie. after the detach) iommu_mapped
> 
> We need to mark the bitmap dirty based on whether the vfio_dma *was*
> iommu_mapped by the group that is now detached.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
Hi Alex,

Yes, I missed this point again :-(. The update_dirty_scope means we detached
an iommu backed group, and that means the vfio_dma *was* iommu_mapped by this
group, so we can populate full bitmap unconditionally, right?

Thanks,
Keqian


> .
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/iommu_type1: Populate full dirty when detach non-pinned group
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:25:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8de434c-1993-cfe8-c451-2235be1ceb85@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210115110144.61e3c843@omen.home.shazbot.org>



On 2021/1/16 2:01, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:26:42 +0800
> Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> If a group with non-pinned-page dirty scope is detached with dirty
>> logging enabled, we should fully populate the dirty bitmaps at the
>> time it's removed since we don't know the extent of its previous DMA,
>> nor will the group be present to trigger the full bitmap when the user
>> retrieves the dirty bitmap.
>>
>> Fixes: d6a4c185660c ("vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking")
>> Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 0b4dedaa9128..4e82b9a3440f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -236,6 +236,19 @@ static void vfio_dma_populate_bitmap(struct vfio_dma *dma, size_t pgsize)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>> +{
>> +	struct rb_node *n;
>> +	unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
>> +
>> +	for (n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>> +		struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
>> +
>> +		if (dma->iommu_mapped)
>> +			bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, dma->size >> pgshift);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, size_t pgsize)
>>  {
>>  	struct rb_node *n;
>> @@ -2415,8 +2428,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>>  	 * Removal of a group without dirty tracking may allow the iommu scope
>>  	 * to be promoted.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (update_dirty_scope)
>> +	if (update_dirty_scope) {
>>  		update_pinned_page_dirty_scope(iommu);
>> +		if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking)
>> +			vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(iommu);
>> +	}
>>  	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>  }
>>  
> 
> This doesn't do the right thing.  This marks the bitmap dirty if:
> 
>  * The detached group dirty scope was not limited to pinned pages
> 
>  AND
> 
>  * Dirty tracking is enabled
> 
>  AND
> 
>  * The vfio_dma is *currently* (ie. after the detach) iommu_mapped
> 
> We need to mark the bitmap dirty based on whether the vfio_dma *was*
> iommu_mapped by the group that is now detached.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
Hi Alex,

Yes, I missed this point again :-(. The update_dirty_scope means we detached
an iommu backed group, and that means the vfio_dma *was* iommu_mapped by this
group, so we can populate full bitmap unconditionally, right?

Thanks,
Keqian


> .
> 
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	jiangkunkun@huawei.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/iommu_type1: Populate full dirty when detach non-pinned group
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:25:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8de434c-1993-cfe8-c451-2235be1ceb85@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210115110144.61e3c843@omen.home.shazbot.org>



On 2021/1/16 2:01, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:26:42 +0800
> Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> If a group with non-pinned-page dirty scope is detached with dirty
>> logging enabled, we should fully populate the dirty bitmaps at the
>> time it's removed since we don't know the extent of its previous DMA,
>> nor will the group be present to trigger the full bitmap when the user
>> retrieves the dirty bitmap.
>>
>> Fixes: d6a4c185660c ("vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking")
>> Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 0b4dedaa9128..4e82b9a3440f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -236,6 +236,19 @@ static void vfio_dma_populate_bitmap(struct vfio_dma *dma, size_t pgsize)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>> +{
>> +	struct rb_node *n;
>> +	unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
>> +
>> +	for (n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>> +		struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
>> +
>> +		if (dma->iommu_mapped)
>> +			bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, dma->size >> pgshift);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, size_t pgsize)
>>  {
>>  	struct rb_node *n;
>> @@ -2415,8 +2428,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>>  	 * Removal of a group without dirty tracking may allow the iommu scope
>>  	 * to be promoted.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (update_dirty_scope)
>> +	if (update_dirty_scope) {
>>  		update_pinned_page_dirty_scope(iommu);
>> +		if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking)
>> +			vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(iommu);
>> +	}
>>  	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>  }
>>  
> 
> This doesn't do the right thing.  This marks the bitmap dirty if:
> 
>  * The detached group dirty scope was not limited to pinned pages
> 
>  AND
> 
>  * Dirty tracking is enabled
> 
>  AND
> 
>  * The vfio_dma is *currently* (ie. after the detach) iommu_mapped
> 
> We need to mark the bitmap dirty based on whether the vfio_dma *was*
> iommu_mapped by the group that is now detached.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
Hi Alex,

Yes, I missed this point again :-(. The update_dirty_scope means we detached
an iommu backed group, and that means the vfio_dma *was* iommu_mapped by this
group, so we can populate full bitmap unconditionally, right?

Thanks,
Keqian


> .
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-18 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-15  9:26 [PATCH v2 0/2] vfio/iommu_type1: some fixes Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/iommu_type1: Populate full dirty when detach non-pinned group Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26   ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26   ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26   ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15 18:01   ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-15 18:01     ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-15 18:01     ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-15 18:01     ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-18 12:25     ` Keqian Zhu [this message]
2021-01-18 12:25       ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-18 12:25       ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-18 12:25       ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-21 18:05       ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-21 18:05         ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-21 18:05         ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-21 18:05         ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-15  9:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vfio/iommu_type1: Sanity check pfn_list when remove vfio_dma Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26   ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26   ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15  9:26   ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-15 19:14   ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-15 19:14     ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-15 19:14     ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-15 19:14     ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-18 13:16     ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-18 13:16       ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-18 13:16       ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-18 13:16       ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-21 18:14       ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-21 18:14         ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-21 18:14         ` Alex Williamson
2021-01-21 18:14         ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8de434c-1993-cfe8-c451-2235be1ceb85@huawei.com \
    --to=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.