All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mt7622.dtsi thermal cpu
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb633034-96e5-6165-b43f-290ae1a65cfd@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47261865-00e3-41eb-bb36-2b939f81f1e8@gmail.com>

On 23/06/2021 20:43, Eric Woudstra wrote:
> 
> I choose "hot" before, because 87 degrees seems ok to start frequency
> throttling. But, yes, it should be passive.
> 
> 87 is still quite low if I compare this temperature with the
> wrt3200acm Marvell dual core arm soc. They even went above 100
> degrees so I feel for an arm processor inside a router box it is fine
> to use 87 degrees But maybe someone at Mediatek can give some more
> details about operating temperatures.

Sometimes, the SoC vendor puts a high temperature in the DT just to
export the thermal zone and deal with it from userspace. So putting the
high temp allow the userspace (usually a thermal engine - Android stuff)
to deal with the mitigation without a kernel interaction.

Having more than 100°C could be this kind of setup. Only the operating
temperature from the hardware documentation will tell the safe
temperature for the silicon.

IMO, 77°C is a good compromise until getting the documented temp. 87°C
sounds to me a bit too hot.

> It may be possible to leave the active map in the device tree as some
> users of the bananapi might choose to install a fan as it is one of
> the options.

The active trip only makes sense if the cooling device is a fan (or any
active device), so the mapping points to a fan node, like:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thermal/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi#n192

If there is no such [pwm] fan output on the board, no active trip point
should be added.

> ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​
> 
> On Jun 23, 2021, 5:58 PM, at 5:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 23/06/2021 17:35, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>>> It is only useful to set 1 map with the regulated temperature for
>>> cpu frequency throttling. Same as in the kernel document
>>> example.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It has no use to set frequency scaling on 2 different
>>> temperature trip points, as the lowest one makes sure the higher
>>> one(s) are never reached.
>> 
>> I looked more closely the DT and there is a misunderstanding of
>> the thermal framework in the definition.
>> 
>> There is one trip point with the passive type and the cpu cooling 
>> device, followed by a second trip point with the active type *but*
>> the same cpu cooling device. That is wrong.
>> 
>> And finally, there is the hot trip point as a third mapping and
>> the same cooling device.
>> 
>> The hot trip point is only there to notify userspace and let it
>> take an immediate action to prevent an emergency shutdown when
>> reaching the critical temperature.
>> 
>>> It can be applied only at 1 trip point. Multiple trip points is
>>> only usefully for fan control to make sure the fan is not too 
>>> noisy when it is not necessary to be noisy.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The CPU will almost come to a dead stop when it starts to pass
>>> the lowest thermal map with frequency throttling.
>>> 
>>> This is why it is a bug and needs a fix, not only adjustment.
>> 
>> Yes, you are right. It should be something like (verbatim copy):
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi index
>> 890a942ec608..88c81d24f4ff 100644 ---
>> a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi +++
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi @@ -136,24 +136,18 @@
>> secmon_reserved: secmon@43000000 {
>> 
>> thermal-zones { cpu_thermal: cpu-thermal { -
>> polling-delay-passive = <1000>; +			polling-delay-passive = <250>; 
>> polling-delay = <1000>;
>> 
>> thermal-sensors = <&thermal 0>;
>> 
>> trips { cpu_passive: cpu-passive { -					temperature = <47000>; +
>> temperature = <77000>; hysteresis = <2000>; type = "passive"; };
>> 
>> -				cpu_active: cpu-active { -					temperature = <67000>; -
>> hysteresis = <2000>; -					type = "active"; -				}; - cpu_hot:
>> cpu-hot { temperature = <87000>; hysteresis = <2000>; @@ -173,18
>> +167,6 @@ map0 { cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, <&cpu1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; }; - 
>> -				map1 { -					trip = <&cpu_active>; -					cooling-device =
>> <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, -							 <&cpu1
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; -				}; - -				map2 { -
>> trip = <&cpu_hot>; -					cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, -							 <&cpu1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; -				}; }; }; };
>> 
>> 
>> -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for
>> ARM SoCs
>> 
>> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | 
>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | 
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
> 


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mt7622.dtsi thermal cpu
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb633034-96e5-6165-b43f-290ae1a65cfd@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47261865-00e3-41eb-bb36-2b939f81f1e8@gmail.com>

On 23/06/2021 20:43, Eric Woudstra wrote:
> 
> I choose "hot" before, because 87 degrees seems ok to start frequency
> throttling. But, yes, it should be passive.
> 
> 87 is still quite low if I compare this temperature with the
> wrt3200acm Marvell dual core arm soc. They even went above 100
> degrees so I feel for an arm processor inside a router box it is fine
> to use 87 degrees But maybe someone at Mediatek can give some more
> details about operating temperatures.

Sometimes, the SoC vendor puts a high temperature in the DT just to
export the thermal zone and deal with it from userspace. So putting the
high temp allow the userspace (usually a thermal engine - Android stuff)
to deal with the mitigation without a kernel interaction.

Having more than 100°C could be this kind of setup. Only the operating
temperature from the hardware documentation will tell the safe
temperature for the silicon.

IMO, 77°C is a good compromise until getting the documented temp. 87°C
sounds to me a bit too hot.

> It may be possible to leave the active map in the device tree as some
> users of the bananapi might choose to install a fan as it is one of
> the options.

The active trip only makes sense if the cooling device is a fan (or any
active device), so the mapping points to a fan node, like:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thermal/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi#n192

If there is no such [pwm] fan output on the board, no active trip point
should be added.

> ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​
> 
> On Jun 23, 2021, 5:58 PM, at 5:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 23/06/2021 17:35, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>>> It is only useful to set 1 map with the regulated temperature for
>>> cpu frequency throttling. Same as in the kernel document
>>> example.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It has no use to set frequency scaling on 2 different
>>> temperature trip points, as the lowest one makes sure the higher
>>> one(s) are never reached.
>> 
>> I looked more closely the DT and there is a misunderstanding of
>> the thermal framework in the definition.
>> 
>> There is one trip point with the passive type and the cpu cooling 
>> device, followed by a second trip point with the active type *but*
>> the same cpu cooling device. That is wrong.
>> 
>> And finally, there is the hot trip point as a third mapping and
>> the same cooling device.
>> 
>> The hot trip point is only there to notify userspace and let it
>> take an immediate action to prevent an emergency shutdown when
>> reaching the critical temperature.
>> 
>>> It can be applied only at 1 trip point. Multiple trip points is
>>> only usefully for fan control to make sure the fan is not too 
>>> noisy when it is not necessary to be noisy.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The CPU will almost come to a dead stop when it starts to pass
>>> the lowest thermal map with frequency throttling.
>>> 
>>> This is why it is a bug and needs a fix, not only adjustment.
>> 
>> Yes, you are right. It should be something like (verbatim copy):
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi index
>> 890a942ec608..88c81d24f4ff 100644 ---
>> a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi +++
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi @@ -136,24 +136,18 @@
>> secmon_reserved: secmon@43000000 {
>> 
>> thermal-zones { cpu_thermal: cpu-thermal { -
>> polling-delay-passive = <1000>; +			polling-delay-passive = <250>; 
>> polling-delay = <1000>;
>> 
>> thermal-sensors = <&thermal 0>;
>> 
>> trips { cpu_passive: cpu-passive { -					temperature = <47000>; +
>> temperature = <77000>; hysteresis = <2000>; type = "passive"; };
>> 
>> -				cpu_active: cpu-active { -					temperature = <67000>; -
>> hysteresis = <2000>; -					type = "active"; -				}; - cpu_hot:
>> cpu-hot { temperature = <87000>; hysteresis = <2000>; @@ -173,18
>> +167,6 @@ map0 { cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, <&cpu1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; }; - 
>> -				map1 { -					trip = <&cpu_active>; -					cooling-device =
>> <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, -							 <&cpu1
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; -				}; - -				map2 { -
>> trip = <&cpu_hot>; -					cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, -							 <&cpu1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; -				}; }; }; };
>> 
>> 
>> -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for
>> ARM SoCs
>> 
>> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | 
>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | 
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
> 


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mt7622.dtsi thermal cpu
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb633034-96e5-6165-b43f-290ae1a65cfd@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47261865-00e3-41eb-bb36-2b939f81f1e8@gmail.com>

On 23/06/2021 20:43, Eric Woudstra wrote:
> 
> I choose "hot" before, because 87 degrees seems ok to start frequency
> throttling. But, yes, it should be passive.
> 
> 87 is still quite low if I compare this temperature with the
> wrt3200acm Marvell dual core arm soc. They even went above 100
> degrees so I feel for an arm processor inside a router box it is fine
> to use 87 degrees But maybe someone at Mediatek can give some more
> details about operating temperatures.

Sometimes, the SoC vendor puts a high temperature in the DT just to
export the thermal zone and deal with it from userspace. So putting the
high temp allow the userspace (usually a thermal engine - Android stuff)
to deal with the mitigation without a kernel interaction.

Having more than 100°C could be this kind of setup. Only the operating
temperature from the hardware documentation will tell the safe
temperature for the silicon.

IMO, 77°C is a good compromise until getting the documented temp. 87°C
sounds to me a bit too hot.

> It may be possible to leave the active map in the device tree as some
> users of the bananapi might choose to install a fan as it is one of
> the options.

The active trip only makes sense if the cooling device is a fan (or any
active device), so the mapping points to a fan node, like:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thermal/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi#n192

If there is no such [pwm] fan output on the board, no active trip point
should be added.

> ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​
> 
> On Jun 23, 2021, 5:58 PM, at 5:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 23/06/2021 17:35, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>>> It is only useful to set 1 map with the regulated temperature for
>>> cpu frequency throttling. Same as in the kernel document
>>> example.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It has no use to set frequency scaling on 2 different
>>> temperature trip points, as the lowest one makes sure the higher
>>> one(s) are never reached.
>> 
>> I looked more closely the DT and there is a misunderstanding of
>> the thermal framework in the definition.
>> 
>> There is one trip point with the passive type and the cpu cooling 
>> device, followed by a second trip point with the active type *but*
>> the same cpu cooling device. That is wrong.
>> 
>> And finally, there is the hot trip point as a third mapping and
>> the same cooling device.
>> 
>> The hot trip point is only there to notify userspace and let it
>> take an immediate action to prevent an emergency shutdown when
>> reaching the critical temperature.
>> 
>>> It can be applied only at 1 trip point. Multiple trip points is
>>> only usefully for fan control to make sure the fan is not too 
>>> noisy when it is not necessary to be noisy.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The CPU will almost come to a dead stop when it starts to pass
>>> the lowest thermal map with frequency throttling.
>>> 
>>> This is why it is a bug and needs a fix, not only adjustment.
>> 
>> Yes, you are right. It should be something like (verbatim copy):
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi index
>> 890a942ec608..88c81d24f4ff 100644 ---
>> a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi +++
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi @@ -136,24 +136,18 @@
>> secmon_reserved: secmon@43000000 {
>> 
>> thermal-zones { cpu_thermal: cpu-thermal { -
>> polling-delay-passive = <1000>; +			polling-delay-passive = <250>; 
>> polling-delay = <1000>;
>> 
>> thermal-sensors = <&thermal 0>;
>> 
>> trips { cpu_passive: cpu-passive { -					temperature = <47000>; +
>> temperature = <77000>; hysteresis = <2000>; type = "passive"; };
>> 
>> -				cpu_active: cpu-active { -					temperature = <67000>; -
>> hysteresis = <2000>; -					type = "active"; -				}; - cpu_hot:
>> cpu-hot { temperature = <87000>; hysteresis = <2000>; @@ -173,18
>> +167,6 @@ map0 { cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, <&cpu1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; }; - 
>> -				map1 { -					trip = <&cpu_active>; -					cooling-device =
>> <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, -							 <&cpu1
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; -				}; - -				map2 { -
>> trip = <&cpu_hot>; -					cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, -							 <&cpu1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; -				}; }; }; };
>> 
>> 
>> -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for
>> ARM SoCs
>> 
>> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | 
>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | 
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
> 


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-23 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-19 12:19 [PATCH] Fix mt7622.dtsi thermal cpu ericwouds
2021-06-19 12:19 ` ericwouds
2021-06-19 12:19 ` ericwouds
2021-06-21 18:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-21 18:29   ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-21 18:29   ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-23 15:35   ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-23 15:35     ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-23 15:35     ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-23 15:58     ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-23 15:58       ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-23 15:58       ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-23 18:43       ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-23 18:43         ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-23 18:43         ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-23 20:08         ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2021-06-23 20:08           ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-23 20:08           ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-24  9:59           ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-24  9:59             ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-24  9:59             ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-24 10:21               ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-24 10:21               ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-24 13:29               ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-24 13:29                 ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-24 13:29                 ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-25  8:16                 ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25  8:16                   ` Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25  8:16                   ` Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25  9:22                   ` Daniel Golle
2021-06-25  9:22                     ` Daniel Golle
2021-06-25  9:22                     ` Daniel Golle
2021-06-25  9:31                     ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25  9:31                       ` Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25  9:31                       ` Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25 10:11                       ` Daniel Golle
2021-06-25 10:11                         ` Daniel Golle
2021-06-25 10:11                         ` Daniel Golle
2021-06-25  9:57                   ` Aw: " Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-25  9:57                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-25  9:57                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-25 11:03                     ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25 11:03                       ` Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25 11:03                       ` Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25 11:07                       ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-25 11:07                         ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-25 11:07                         ` Eric Woudstra
2021-06-25 11:47                       ` Aw: " Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-25 11:47                         ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-25 11:47                         ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-25 12:28                         ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25 12:28                           ` Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25 12:28                           ` Frank Wunderlich
2021-06-25 12:50                           ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-25 12:50                             ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-06-25 12:50                             ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb633034-96e5-6165-b43f-290ae1a65cfd@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.