Re: [PATCH v16 3/7] soc: mediatek: SVS: introduce MTK SVS engine

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>]

Il 24/12/21 10:27, Roger Lu ha scritto:
> Hi AngeloGioacchino,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply and thanks for all the advices.
> 
> On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 10:46 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 28/04/21 08:54, Roger Lu ha scritto:
>>> The Smart Voltage Scaling(SVS) engine is a piece of hardware
>>> which calculates suitable SVS bank voltages to OPP voltage table.
>>> Then, DVFS driver could apply those SVS bank voltages to PMIC/Buck
>>> when receiving OPP_EVENT_ADJUST_VOLTAGE.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Lu <roger.lu@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig   |   10 +
>>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile  |    1 +
>>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c | 1723 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    3 files changed, 1734 insertions(+)
>>>    create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>> +/* svs bank common setting */
>>> +#define SVSB_DET_CLK_EN			BIT(31)
>>> +#define SVSB_TZONE_HIGH_TEMP_MAX	U32_MAX
>>> +#define SVSB_RUNCONFIG_DEFAULT		0x80000000
>>> +#define SVSB_DC_SIGNED_BIT		0x8000
>>> +#define SVSB_INTEN_INIT0x		0x00005f01
>>> +#define SVSB_INTEN_MONVOPEN		0x00ff0000
>>> +#define SVSB_EN_OFF			0x0
>>> +#define SVSB_EN_MASK			0x7
>>> +#define SVSB_EN_INIT01			0x1
>>> +#define SVSB_EN_INIT02			0x5
>>> +#define SVSB_EN_MON			0x2
>>> +#define SVSB_INTSTS_MONVOP		0x00ff0000
>>> +#define SVSB_INTSTS_COMPLETE		0x1
>>> +#define SVSB_INTSTS_CLEAN		0x00ffffff
>>> +
>>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mtk_svs_lock);
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>
>> Thanks for using kernel-doc!! However, to be proper, this has to be
>> /**
>>    * ..........
> 
> Oh okay. Thanks. I will use /** to add multi-line comments. However, I checked
> kernel doc-guide and it uses indent as below. So, I'll follow it. If I'm doing
> it wrong, please correct me. Thanks a lot.
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html
> 
> /**
>   * .........
> 

You're welcome! By the way, yes, the indentation is as shown on the documentation.

Regards,
- Angelo