All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>,
	Ming Lin <mlin@minggr.net>,
	Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 03/17] block: simplify issueing discard, write_same, zeroout
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:48:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe96db02d805ca6191dd605d03dac0d04c926fc1.1419241597.git.dongsu.park@profitbricks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f67d71b4a375ab504c2fc02e94a9d2a651686cab.1419241597.git.dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1419241597.git.dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>

From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>

Simplify special cases for issueing discard, write_same, and zeroout,
replacing bio_batch completions with submit_bio_wait(). This conversion
is possible because generic_make_request() will now do for us what the
code in blk-lib.c was doing manually, with the bio_batch stuff. So we
still need some looping in case we're trying to discard/zeroout more
than around a gigabyte, but when we can submit that much at a time
doing the submissions in parallel really shouldn't matter.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
[dpark: add more description in commit message]
Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 block/blk-lib.c | 173 ++++++++++----------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 8411be3..deef044 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -9,23 +9,6 @@
 
 #include "blk.h"
 
-struct bio_batch {
-	atomic_t		done;
-	unsigned long		flags;
-	struct completion	*wait;
-};
-
-static void bio_batch_end_io(struct bio *bio, int err)
-{
-	struct bio_batch *bb = bio->bi_private;
-
-	if (err && (err != -EOPNOTSUPP))
-		clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bb->flags);
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bb->done))
-		complete(bb->wait);
-	bio_put(bio);
-}
-
 /**
  * blkdev_issue_discard - queue a discard
  * @bdev:	blockdev to issue discard for
@@ -40,15 +23,10 @@ static void bio_batch_end_io(struct bio *bio, int err)
 int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 		sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags)
 {
-	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	int type = REQ_WRITE | REQ_DISCARD;
-	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
-	int alignment;
-	struct bio_batch bb;
 	struct bio *bio;
 	int ret = 0;
-	struct blk_plug plug;
 
 	if (!q)
 		return -ENXIO;
@@ -56,69 +34,27 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
-	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
-	alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
-
-	/*
-	 * Ensure that max_discard_sectors is of the proper
-	 * granularity, so that requests stay aligned after a split.
-	 */
-	max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
-	max_discard_sectors -= max_discard_sectors % granularity;
-	if (unlikely(!max_discard_sectors)) {
-		/* Avoid infinite loop below. Being cautious never hurts. */
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
-
 	if (flags & BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE) {
 		if (!blk_queue_secdiscard(q))
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		type |= REQ_SECURE;
 	}
 
-	atomic_set(&bb.done, 1);
-	bb.flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
-	bb.wait = &wait;
-
-	blk_start_plug(&plug);
 	while (nr_sects) {
-		unsigned int req_sects;
-		sector_t end_sect, tmp;
-
 		bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 1);
-		if (!bio) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			break;
-		}
-
-		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, max_discard_sectors);
+		if (!bio)
+			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		/*
-		 * If splitting a request, and the next starting sector would be
-		 * misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
-		 */
-		end_sect = sector + req_sects;
-		tmp = end_sect;
-		if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
-		    sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
-			end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
-			sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
-			end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
-			req_sects = end_sect - sector;
-		}
-
-		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
-		bio->bi_end_io = bio_batch_end_io;
 		bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
-		bio->bi_private = &bb;
+		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
+		bio->bi_iter.bi_size = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, 1 << 20) << 9;
 
-		bio->bi_iter.bi_size = req_sects << 9;
-		nr_sects -= req_sects;
-		sector = end_sect;
+		sector += bio_sectors(bio);
+		nr_sects -= bio_sectors(bio);
 
-		atomic_inc(&bb.done);
-		submit_bio(type, bio);
+		ret = submit_bio_wait(type, bio);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
 
 		/*
 		 * We can loop for a long time in here, if someone does
@@ -128,14 +64,6 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 		 */
 		cond_resched();
 	}
-	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
-
-	/* Wait for bios in-flight */
-	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&bb.done))
-		wait_for_completion_io(&wait);
-
-	if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bb.flags))
-		ret = -EIO;
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -156,61 +84,37 @@ int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 			    sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 			    struct page *page)
 {
-	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
-	unsigned int max_write_same_sectors;
-	struct bio_batch bb;
 	struct bio *bio;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!q)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
-	max_write_same_sectors = q->limits.max_write_same_sectors;
-
-	if (max_write_same_sectors == 0)
+	if (!q->limits.max_write_same_sectors)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	atomic_set(&bb.done, 1);
-	bb.flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
-	bb.wait = &wait;
-
 	while (nr_sects) {
 		bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 1);
-		if (!bio) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			break;
-		}
+		if (!bio)
+			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
-		bio->bi_end_io = bio_batch_end_io;
 		bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
-		bio->bi_private = &bb;
+		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
+		bio->bi_iter.bi_size = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, 1 << 20) << 9;
 		bio->bi_vcnt = 1;
 		bio->bi_io_vec->bv_page = page;
 		bio->bi_io_vec->bv_offset = 0;
 		bio->bi_io_vec->bv_len = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev);
 
-		if (nr_sects > max_write_same_sectors) {
-			bio->bi_iter.bi_size = max_write_same_sectors << 9;
-			nr_sects -= max_write_same_sectors;
-			sector += max_write_same_sectors;
-		} else {
-			bio->bi_iter.bi_size = nr_sects << 9;
-			nr_sects = 0;
-		}
+		sector += bio_sectors(bio);
+		nr_sects -= bio_sectors(bio);
 
-		atomic_inc(&bb.done);
-		submit_bio(REQ_WRITE | REQ_WRITE_SAME, bio);
+		ret = submit_bio_wait(REQ_WRITE | REQ_WRITE_SAME, bio);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
 	}
 
-	/* Wait for bios in-flight */
-	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&bb.done))
-		wait_for_completion_io(&wait);
-
-	if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bb.flags))
-		ret = -ENOTSUPP;
-
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_write_same);
@@ -225,33 +129,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_write_same);
  * Description:
  *  Generate and issue number of bios with zerofiled pages.
  */
-
 static int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 				  sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 	struct bio *bio;
-	struct bio_batch bb;
 	unsigned int sz;
-	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
-
-	atomic_set(&bb.done, 1);
-	bb.flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
-	bb.wait = &wait;
 
-	ret = 0;
-	while (nr_sects != 0) {
+	while (nr_sects) {
 		bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask,
-				min(nr_sects, (sector_t)BIO_MAX_PAGES));
-		if (!bio) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			break;
-		}
+				min(nr_sects / (PAGE_SIZE >> 9),
+				    (sector_t)BIO_MAX_PAGES));
+		if (!bio)
+			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
 		bio->bi_bdev   = bdev;
-		bio->bi_end_io = bio_batch_end_io;
-		bio->bi_private = &bb;
 
 		while (nr_sects != 0) {
 			sz = min((sector_t) PAGE_SIZE >> 9 , nr_sects);
@@ -261,18 +154,11 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 			if (ret < (sz << 9))
 				break;
 		}
-		ret = 0;
-		atomic_inc(&bb.done);
-		submit_bio(WRITE, bio);
-	}
-
-	/* Wait for bios in-flight */
-	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&bb.done))
-		wait_for_completion_io(&wait);
 
-	if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bb.flags))
-		/* One of bios in the batch was completed with error.*/
-		ret = -EIO;
+		ret = submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -287,7 +173,6 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
  * Description:
  *  Generate and issue number of bios with zerofiled pages.
  */
-
 int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 			 sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
-- 
2.1.0


  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-22 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-22 11:48 [RFC PATCH 00/17] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48 ` [RFC PATCH 01/17] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48   ` [RFC PATCH 02/17] block: simplify bio_add_page() Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48     ` Dongsu Park [this message]
2014-12-22 11:48       ` [RFC PATCH 04/17] bcache: clean up hacks around bio_split_pool Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48         ` [RFC PATCH 05/17] btrfs: remove bio splitting and merge_bvec_fn() calls Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48           ` [RFC PATCH 06/17] btrfs: make use of immutable biovecs Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48             ` [RFC PATCH 07/17] block: replace sg_iovec with iov_iter Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48               ` [RFC PATCH 08/17] block: refactor __bio_copy_iov() Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                 ` [RFC PATCH 09/17] block: refactor iov_count_pages() from bio_{copy,map}_user_iov() Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                   ` [RFC PATCH 10/17] block: refactor bio_get_user_pages() from __bio_map_user_iov() Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                     ` [RFC PATCH 11/17] block: allow __blk_queue_bounce() to handle bios larger than BIO_MAX_PAGES Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                       ` [RFC PATCH 12/17] md/raid10: make sync_request_write() call bio_copy_data() Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                         ` [RFC PATCH 13/17] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev() Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                           ` [RFC PATCH 14/17] block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                             ` [RFC PATCH 15/17] fs: use helper bio_add_page() instead of open coding on bi_io_vec Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                               ` [RFC PATCH 16/17] fs: convert buffer head etc. to use immutable biovecs API Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 11:48                                 ` [RFC PATCH 17/17] Documentation: update notes in biovecs about arbitrarily sized bios Dongsu Park
2014-12-23 10:52                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 12:34                                     ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-23 10:51                                 ` [RFC PATCH 16/17] fs: convert buffer head etc. to use immutable biovecs API Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 12:33                                   ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-22 15:22                               ` [RFC PATCH 15/17] fs: use helper bio_add_page() instead of open coding on bi_io_vec Dave Kleikamp
2014-12-22 15:22                                 ` Dave Kleikamp
2014-12-23 10:48                         ` [RFC PATCH 12/17] md/raid10: make sync_request_write() call bio_copy_data() Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 12:31                           ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-23 10:45                 ` [RFC PATCH 08/17] block: refactor __bio_copy_iov() Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 12:24                   ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-23 10:44               ` [RFC PATCH 07/17] block: replace sg_iovec with iov_iter Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 12:18                 ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-27 15:03                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 10:35             ` [RFC PATCH 06/17] btrfs: make use of immutable biovecs Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 12:09               ` Dongsu Park
     [not found]           ` <e4b7b017eaa81784889ebb2a4e6a7d4366adf13a.1419241597.git.dongsu.park@profit bricks.com>
2014-12-23 14:44             ` [RFC PATCH 05/17] btrfs: remove bio splitting and merge_bvec_fn() calls Chris Mason
2014-12-23 10:23       ` [RFC PATCH 03/17] block: simplify issueing discard, write_same, zeroout Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 10:22     ` [RFC PATCH 02/17] block: simplify bio_add_page() Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 11:46       ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-23 10:16   ` [RFC PATCH 01/17] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 11:41     ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-27 15:02       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-23 19:14   ` Geoff Levand
2014-12-24 10:37     ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-25  6:09   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe96db02d805ca6191dd605d03dac0d04c926fc1.1419241597.git.dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
    --to=dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlin@minggr.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.