* [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] @ 2022-01-03 10:04 Nikhil V 2022-01-03 11:10 ` Andrei Kartashev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Nikhil V @ 2022-01-03 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openbmc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 736 bytes --] Hi, I am trying to build image for openbmc on SAMA5D27-som1-ek1 development board made by microchip(atmel). SAMA5D27 board has yocto support. I have added meta-atmel layer to openbmc, while building/compiling using " bitbake obmc-phosphor-image ", I am facing following error, [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] I have tried by updating with following content but didnt get any result. PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-at91" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot-at91" Can you help me to find a solution. Thanks & Regards, Nikhil Muley [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2774 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] 2022-01-03 10:04 [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] Nikhil V @ 2022-01-03 11:10 ` Andrei Kartashev 2022-01-03 11:36 ` Nikhil V 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andrei Kartashev @ 2022-01-03 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikhil V, openbmc Hello, It's hard to say what's wrong without knowing of what are you exactly doing. Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we don't know what recipe do you use for u-boot. Generally, u-boot recipe should include u-boot.inc: > require recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc This include file provide u-boot-default-env recipe https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/blob/master/poky/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#L215 On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 15:34 +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to build image for openbmc on SAMA5D27-som1-ek1 > development board made by microchip(atmel). SAMA5D27 board has yocto > support. > I have added meta-atmel layer to openbmc, while building/compiling > using " bitbake obmc-phosphor-image ", I am facing following error, > > [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] > > I have tried by updating with following content but didnt get any > result. > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-at91" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot-at91" > > Can you help me to find a solution. > > > Thanks & Regards, > Nikhil Muley > > > -- Best regards, Andrei Kartashev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] 2022-01-03 11:10 ` Andrei Kartashev @ 2022-01-03 11:36 ` Nikhil V 2022-01-03 12:30 ` Andrei Kartashev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Nikhil V @ 2022-01-03 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akartashev; +Cc: openbmc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3136 bytes --] Hello kartashev, Thanks for your quick response, I will provide some background on what i am trying to achieve. I am using openbmc, downloaded from following location, steps are as follow, 1) git clone https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc.git -b dunfell 2) git clone git://github.com/linux4sam/meta-atmel.git -b dunfell 3) . openbmc-env build-sama5d27 4) then add following layers bitbake-layers add-layer ../meta-atmel ../meta-security ../meta-openembedded/meta-perl ../meta-openembedded/meta-initramfs 5) Edit in local.conf MACHINE="sama5d27-som1-ek-sd" 6) bitbake obmc-phosphor-image "Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we don't know what recipe do you use for u-boot." Here I am using meta-atmel layer provided by microchip. It has its own u-boot under meta-atmel/recipe-bsp. you will find it once you downloaded it from step 2. when i do bitbake obmc-phosphor-image i am getting error. ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env' hope i have described my problem correctly. For any query feel free to contact. Thanks & Regards, Nikhil Muley ---- On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 16:40:09 +0530 Andrei Kartashev <a.kartashev@yadro.com> wrote ---- Hello, It's hard to say what's wrong without knowing of what are you exactly doing. Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we don't know what recipe do you use for u-boot. Generally, u-boot recipe should include u-boot.inc: > require recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc This include file provide u-boot-default-env recipe https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/blob/master/poky/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#L215 On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 15:34 +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to build image for openbmc on SAMA5D27-som1-ek1 > development board made by microchip(atmel). SAMA5D27 board has yocto > support. > I have added meta-atmel layer to openbmc, while building/compiling > using " bitbake obmc-phosphor-image ", I am facing following error, > > [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] > > I have tried by updating with following content but didnt get any > result. > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-at91" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot-at91" > > Can you help me to find a solution. > > > Thanks & Regards, > Nikhil Muley > > > -- Best regards, Andrei Kartashev [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5701 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] 2022-01-03 11:36 ` Nikhil V @ 2022-01-03 12:30 ` Andrei Kartashev 2022-01-03 13:15 ` Nikhil V 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andrei Kartashev @ 2022-01-03 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikhil V; +Cc: openbmc Well, as I say, they don't use u-boot.inc an they don't implement u- boot-default-env. I can't give you an universal hint on how to solve this, but I advice you to build upstream Yocto for your platform first (I mean, generic yocto, instead of OpenBMC). Once you succeeded with upstream Yocto, integrating into OpenBMC would be less painful. What you trying to do is not a typical usecase for OpenBMC, generally we don't do like this. What are your expectations and final goal? On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 17:06 +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > Hello kartashev, > Thanks for your quick response, I will provide > some background on what i am trying to achieve. > I am using openbmc, downloaded from following > location, steps are as follow, > > 1) git clone > https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc.git -b dunfell > 2) git clone > git://github.com/linux4sam/meta-atmel.git -b dunfell > 3) . openbmc-env build-sama5d27 > 4) then add following layers > bitbake-layers add-layer ../meta-atmel > ../meta-security ../meta-openembedded/meta-perl ../meta- > openembedded/meta-initramfs > 5) Edit in local.conf > MACHINE="sama5d27-som1-ek-sd" > 6) bitbake obmc-phosphor-image > > "Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we don't know > what recipe do you use for u-boot." > Here I am using meta-atmel layer provided by microchip. It has its > own u-boot under meta-atmel/recipe-bsp. > you will find it once you downloaded it from step 2. > > when i do bitbake obmc-phosphor-image i am getting error. ERROR: > Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env' > > hope i have described my problem correctly. > > For any query feel free to contact. > > Thanks & Regards, > Nikhil Muley > > > ---- On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 16:40:09 +0530 Andrei Kartashev > <a.kartashev@yadro.com> wrote ---- > > > Hello, > > > > It's hard to say what's wrong without knowing of what are you > > exactly > > doing. Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we > > don't > > know what recipe do you use for u-boot. > > Generally, u-boot recipe should include u-boot.inc: > > > > > require recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc > > > > This include file provide u-boot-default-env recipe > > https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/blob/master/poky/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#L215 > > > > On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 15:34 +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am trying to build image for openbmc on SAMA5D27-som1-ek1 > > > development board made by microchip(atmel). SAMA5D27 board has > > > yocto > > > support. > > > I have added meta-atmel layer to openbmc, while > > > building/compiling > > > using " bitbake obmc-phosphor-image ", I am facing following > > > error, > > > > > > [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] > > > > > > I have tried by updating with following content but didnt > > > get any > > > result. > > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-at91" > > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot- > > > at91" > > > > > > Can you help me to find a solution. > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Nikhil Muley > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, Andrei Kartashev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] 2022-01-03 12:30 ` Andrei Kartashev @ 2022-01-03 13:15 ` Nikhil V 2022-01-05 11:10 ` Nikhil V 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Nikhil V @ 2022-01-03 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akartashev; +Cc: openbmc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5871 bytes --] Hello Andrei Kartashev, Thanks for your patience and support. As suggested by you to try with normal yocto build and then go for OpenBMC. I have a success with yocto image for SAMA5D27 development board and tested and verified using steps described in following link ( https://www.linux4sam.org/bin/view/Linux4SAM/Sama5d27Som1EKMainPage ) But i got error when i do same for openbmc, As i am new to openbmc and may be i am wrong with my interpretation I have the following Interpretation towards problem. If you look into meta/recipe-bsp/u-boot/libubootenv_0.3.1.bb It describe that it "It provides hardware-independent replacement for fw_printenv/setenv utilities provided by U-Boot" If you look into meta-atmel/recipe-bsp There is nothing indicating fw_printenv/setenv at u-boot-at91_2020.01.bb recipe. Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks & Regards, Nikhil Muley ---- On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:00:56 +0530 Andrei Kartashev <a.kartashev@yadro.com> wrote ---- Well, as I say, they don't use u-boot.inc an they don't implement u- boot-default-env. I can't give you an universal hint on how to solve this, but I advice you to build upstream Yocto for your platform first (I mean, generic yocto, instead of OpenBMC). Once you succeeded with upstream Yocto, integrating into OpenBMC would be less painful. What you trying to do is not a typical usecase for OpenBMC, generally we don't do like this. What are your expectations and final goal? On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 17:06 +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > Hello kartashev, > Thanks for your quick response, I will provide > some background on what i am trying to achieve. > I am using openbmc, downloaded from following > location, steps are as follow, > > 1) git clone > https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc.git -b dunfell > 2) git clone > git://github.com/linux4sam/meta-atmel.git -b dunfell > 3) . openbmc-env build-sama5d27 > 4) then add following layers > bitbake-layers add-layer ../meta-atmel > ../meta-security ../meta-openembedded/meta-perl ../meta- > openembedded/meta-initramfs > 5) Edit in local.conf > MACHINE="sama5d27-som1-ek-sd" > 6) bitbake obmc-phosphor-image > > "Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we don't know > what recipe do you use for u-boot." > Here I am using meta-atmel layer provided by microchip. It has its > own u-boot under meta-atmel/recipe-bsp. > you will find it once you downloaded it from step 2. > > when i do bitbake obmc-phosphor-image i am getting error. ERROR: > Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env' > > hope i have described my problem correctly. > > For any query feel free to contact. > > Thanks & Regards, > Nikhil Muley > > > ---- On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 16:40:09 +0530 Andrei Kartashev > <mailto:a.kartashev@yadro.com> wrote ---- > > > Hello, > > > > It's hard to say what's wrong without knowing of what are you > > exactly > > doing. Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we > > don't > > know what recipe do you use for u-boot. > > Generally, u-boot recipe should include u-boot.inc: > > > > > require recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc > > > > This include file provide u-boot-default-env recipe > > https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/blob/master/poky/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#L215 > > > > On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 15:34 +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am trying to build image for openbmc on SAMA5D27-som1-ek1 > > > development board made by microchip(atmel). SAMA5D27 board has > > > yocto > > > support. > > > I have added meta-atmel layer to openbmc, while > > > building/compiling > > > using " bitbake obmc-phosphor-image ", I am facing following > > > error, > > > > > > [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] > > > > > > I have tried by updating with following content but didnt > > > get any > > > result. > > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-at91" > > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot- > > > at91" > > > > > > Can you help me to find a solution. > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Nikhil Muley > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, Andrei Kartashev [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10839 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] 2022-01-03 13:15 ` Nikhil V @ 2022-01-05 11:10 ` Nikhil V 2022-01-05 17:01 ` Patrick Williams 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Nikhil V @ 2022-01-05 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akartashev; +Cc: openbmc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6901 bytes --] hi, What are your expectations and final goal? Trying to implement openbmc on SAMA5D27 development board and to use secure boot feature provided by microchip. To make openbmc more secure. Looking at boot sequence of SAMA5D27 (https://microchipdeveloper.com/32mpu:boot-sama5d2-series and http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/AppNotes/DS00002748A.pdf) • ROM code (first stage loader) • AT91bootstrap bootloader (second stage loader) • U-Boot bootloader (third stage loader) In Normal Situation for eg. if we implement openbmc in beaglebone black bootprocess seen by openbmc • ROM code (first stage loader) • U-Boot bootloader (second stage loader) Is additional layer of AT91bootstrap causing problem to openbmc to give "ERROR" during bitbake? Thanks & Regards, Nikhil Muley ---- On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:45:24 +0530 Nikhil V <nikhil.vu@zohocorp.com> wrote ---- Hello Andrei Kartashev, Thanks for your patience and support. As suggested by you to try with normal yocto build and then go for OpenBMC. I have a success with yocto image for SAMA5D27 development board and tested and verified using steps described in following link ( https://www.linux4sam.org/bin/view/Linux4SAM/Sama5d27Som1EKMainPage ) But i got error when i do same for openbmc, As i am new to openbmc and may be i am wrong with my interpretation I have the following Interpretation towards problem. If you look into meta/recipe-bsp/u-boot/libubootenv_0.3.1.bb It describe that it "It provides hardware-independent replacement for fw_printenv/setenv utilities provided by U-Boot" If you look into meta-atmel/recipe-bsp There is nothing indicating fw_printenv/setenv at u-boot-at91_2020.01.bb recipe. Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks & Regards, Nikhil Muley ---- On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:00:56 +0530 Andrei Kartashev <mailto:a.kartashev@yadro.com> wrote ---- Well, as I say, they don't use u-boot.inc an they don't implement u- boot-default-env. I can't give you an universal hint on how to solve this, but I advice you to build upstream Yocto for your platform first (I mean, generic yocto, instead of OpenBMC). Once you succeeded with upstream Yocto, integrating into OpenBMC would be less painful. What you trying to do is not a typical usecase for OpenBMC, generally we don't do like this. What are your expectations and final goal? On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 17:06 +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > Hello kartashev, > Thanks for your quick response, I will provide > some background on what i am trying to achieve. > I am using openbmc, downloaded from following > location, steps are as follow, > > 1) git clone > https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc.git -b dunfell > 2) git clone > git://github.com/linux4sam/meta-atmel.git -b dunfell > 3) . openbmc-env build-sama5d27 > 4) then add following layers > bitbake-layers add-layer ../meta-atmel > ../meta-security ../meta-openembedded/meta-perl ../meta- > openembedded/meta-initramfs > 5) Edit in local.conf > MACHINE="sama5d27-som1-ek-sd" > 6) bitbake obmc-phosphor-image > > "Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we don't know > what recipe do you use for u-boot." > Here I am using meta-atmel layer provided by microchip. It has its > own u-boot under meta-atmel/recipe-bsp. > you will find it once you downloaded it from step 2. > > when i do bitbake obmc-phosphor-image i am getting error. ERROR: > Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env' > > hope i have described my problem correctly. > > For any query feel free to contact. > > Thanks & Regards, > Nikhil Muley > > > ---- On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 16:40:09 +0530 Andrei Kartashev > <mailto:a.kartashev@yadro.com> wrote ---- > > > Hello, > > > > It's hard to say what's wrong without knowing of what are you > > exactly > > doing. Since there is no such platform as "at91" in OpenBMC, we > > don't > > know what recipe do you use for u-boot. > > Generally, u-boot recipe should include u-boot.inc: > > > > > require recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc > > > > This include file provide u-boot-default-env recipe > > https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/blob/master/poky/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#L215 > > > > On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 15:34 +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am trying to build image for openbmc on SAMA5D27-som1-ek1 > > > development board made by microchip(atmel). SAMA5D27 board has > > > yocto > > > support. > > > I have added meta-atmel layer to openbmc, while > > > building/compiling > > > using " bitbake obmc-phosphor-image ", I am facing following > > > error, > > > > > > [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] > > > > > > I have tried by updating with following content but didnt > > > get any > > > result. > > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-at91" > > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot- > > > at91" > > > > > > Can you help me to find a solution. > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Nikhil Muley > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, Andrei Kartashev [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12976 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] 2022-01-05 11:10 ` Nikhil V @ 2022-01-05 17:01 ` Patrick Williams 2022-01-06 6:13 ` Nikhil V 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Patrick Williams @ 2022-01-05 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikhil V; +Cc: openbmc, akartashev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 995 bytes --] On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:40:52PM +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > Trying to implement openbmc on SAMA5D27 development board and to use secure boot feature provided by microchip. To make openbmc more secure. I don't have much help on your specific problem, but I think there is some surprise in your use of this chip for a few reasons. - This isn't really a BMC-oriented chip and is likely missing hardware that a BMC would typically have for interacting with the host processors. - The A5 core in this chip is probably slower than the AST2500 (or maybe in the same ballpark) which is already a generation behind. - Aspeed has secure boot support also / already. This isn't to say that you might not be able to get the SAMA5D27 working as a BMC-like device for your system, but the fact that nobody else has decided to build a server around it would give me a bit of concern if it showed up in a system design I was working on. -- Patrick Williams [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] 2022-01-05 17:01 ` Patrick Williams @ 2022-01-06 6:13 ` Nikhil V 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Nikhil V @ 2022-01-06 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: patrick; +Cc: openbmc, akartashev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1629 bytes --] Hi Patrick, Thanks for your response, I totally agree with above points. As I have SAMA5D27 lying arround and i wanted to explore/understand openbmc. Also i have seen some people have implemented openbmc on beaglebone, raspberry pi, Freescale Processors. As no one has tried porting openbmc with Atmel SAM series processor, I thought that i can give it a try to port openbmc on SAMA5D27, Any pointer or document will be helpful. Thanks & Regards, Nikhil Muley ---- On Wed, 05 Jan 2022 22:31:42 +0530 Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> wrote ---- On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:40:52PM +0530, Nikhil V wrote: > Trying to implement openbmc on SAMA5D27 development board and to use secure boot feature provided by microchip. To make openbmc more secure. I don't have much help on your specific problem, but I think there is some surprise in your use of this chip for a few reasons. - This isn't really a BMC-oriented chip and is likely missing hardware that a BMC would typically have for interacting with the host processors. - The A5 core in this chip is probably slower than the AST2500 (or maybe in the same ballpark) which is already a generation behind. - Aspeed has secure boot support also / already. This isn't to say that you might not be able to get the SAMA5D27 working as a BMC-like device for your system, but the fact that nobody else has decided to build a server around it would give me a bit of concern if it showed up in a system design I was working on. -- Patrick Williams [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2557 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-06 6:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-01-03 10:04 [ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'u-boot-default-env'] Nikhil V 2022-01-03 11:10 ` Andrei Kartashev 2022-01-03 11:36 ` Nikhil V 2022-01-03 12:30 ` Andrei Kartashev 2022-01-03 13:15 ` Nikhil V 2022-01-05 11:10 ` Nikhil V 2022-01-05 17:01 ` Patrick Williams 2022-01-06 6:13 ` Nikhil V
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.