All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: misc: usbtest: remove redundant check on retval < 0
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:44:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffc33c9f-191a-d19c-8aaa-b18519dd25af@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760keqshs.fsf@linux.intel.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1344 bytes --]

On 13/02/17 10:45, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> writes:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> The check for retval being less than zero is always true since
>> retval equal to -EPIPE at that point.  Replace the existing
>> conditional with just return retval.
>>
>> Detected with CoverityScan, CID#114349 ("Logically dead code")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
>> index 3525626..17c0810 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
>> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static int ch9_postconfig(struct usbtest_dev *dev)
>>  				dev_err(&iface->dev,
>>  						"hs dev qualifier --> %d\n",
>>  						retval);
>> -				return (retval < 0) ? retval : -EDOM;
>> +				return retval;
> 
> you're changing return value here, are you sure there's nothing else
> depending on this error?
> 
The code in the current state will never return -EDOM and will always
return retval, so this change actually makes no functional change, it
just removes a redundant check.  So it's not going to make a jot of
difference to the current behaver.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 837 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-13 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-12 18:35 [PATCH] usb: misc: usbtest: remove redundant check on retval < 0 Colin King
2017-02-13  9:49 ` Peter Chen
2017-02-13  9:49   ` Peter Chen
2017-02-13 10:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-02-13 10:45   ` Felipe Balbi
2017-02-13 16:44   ` Colin Ian King [this message]
2017-02-13 16:45   ` Alan Stern
2017-02-13 16:45     ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ffc33c9f-191a-d19c-8aaa-b18519dd25af@canonical.com \
    --to=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.