From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: misc: usbtest: remove redundant check on retval < 0
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:49:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213094959.GA1483@b29397-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170212183518.22528-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 06:35:18PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check for retval being less than zero is always true since
> retval equal to -EPIPE at that point. Replace the existing
> conditional with just return retval.
>
> Detected with CoverityScan, CID#114349 ("Logically dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> index 3525626..17c0810 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static int ch9_postconfig(struct usbtest_dev *dev)
> dev_err(&iface->dev,
> "hs dev qualifier --> %d\n",
> retval);
> - return (retval < 0) ? retval : -EDOM;
> + return retval;
> }
> /* usb2.0 but not high-speed capable; fine */
> } else if (retval != sizeof(struct usb_qualifier_descriptor)) {
Reviewed-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: misc: usbtest: remove redundant check on retval < 0
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:49:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213094959.GA1483@b29397-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170212183518.22528-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 06:35:18PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check for retval being less than zero is always true since
> retval equal to -EPIPE at that point. Replace the existing
> conditional with just return retval.
>
> Detected with CoverityScan, CID#114349 ("Logically dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> index 3525626..17c0810 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static int ch9_postconfig(struct usbtest_dev *dev)
> dev_err(&iface->dev,
> "hs dev qualifier --> %d\n",
> retval);
> - return (retval < 0) ? retval : -EDOM;
> + return retval;
> }
> /* usb2.0 but not high-speed capable; fine */
> } else if (retval != sizeof(struct usb_qualifier_descriptor)) {
Reviewed-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-12 18:35 [PATCH] usb: misc: usbtest: remove redundant check on retval < 0 Colin King
2017-02-13 9:49 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2017-02-13 9:49 ` Peter Chen
2017-02-13 10:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-02-13 10:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-02-13 16:44 ` Colin Ian King
2017-02-13 16:45 ` Alan Stern
2017-02-13 16:45 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170213094959.GA1483@b29397-desktop \
--to=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.