Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: per channel irq

From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
To: Leong Ching Swee <leong.ching.swee@intel.com>,
	 Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	 "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: per channel irq
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 23:10:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffiewfybqvh66nmri4im4veupwytvlxk5jfgdy3nbj6wldxjl2@2vwvnnu37pt7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240105070925.2948871-2-leong.ching.swee@intel.com>

On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 03:09:22PM +0800, Leong Ching Swee wrote:
> From: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee@intel.com>
> 
> Add dt-bindings for per channel irq.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml   | 24 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> index 5c2769dc689a..e72dded824f4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> @@ -103,17 +103,27 @@ properties:
>  
>    interrupts:
>      minItems: 1
> -    items:
> -      - description: Combined signal for various interrupt events
> -      - description: The interrupt to manage the remote wake-up packet detection
> -      - description: The interrupt that occurs when Rx exits the LPI state
> +    maxItems: 19
>  
>    interrupt-names:
>      minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 19
>      items:
> -      - const: macirq
> -      - enum: [eth_wake_irq, eth_lpi]
> -      - const: eth_lpi
> +      oneOf:
> +        - description: Combined signal for various interrupt events
> +          const: macirq
> +        - description: The interrupt to manage the remote wake-up packet detection
> +          const: eth_wake_irq
> +        - description: The interrupt that occurs when Rx exits the LPI state
> +          const: eth_lpi
> +        - description: DMA Tx per-channel interrupt
> +          pattern: '^dma_tx[0-7]?$'
> +        - description: DMA Rx per-channel interrupt
> +          pattern: '^dma_rx[0-7]?$'
> +
> +    allOf:
> +      - contains:
> +          const: macirq

In order to restore the v1 discussion around this change, here is my
comment copied from there:

> As Rob correctly noted it's also better to make sure that 'macirq' is placed first
> in the array. So instead of the constraint above I guess the next one would
> make sure both the array has 'macirq' name and it's the first item:
>
> allOf:
>   - maxItems: 34
>     items:
>       - const: macirq

Leong said it didn't work:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CH0PR11MB54904615B45E521DE6B1A7B3CF61A@CH0PR11MB5490.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/

Rob, Krzysztof, Conor could you please clarify whether this change is ok the
way it is or it would be better to preserve the stricter constraint
and fix the DT-schema validation tool somehow?

-Serge(y)

>  
>    clocks:
>      minItems: 1
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 