[patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Lin_Lynn]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]


In mini-httpd recipe,there is a .mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp dirty file,the
patch in the attach is to remove this dirty file.

Thanks

Lynn Lin

 <<0001-remove-dirty-.swp-file.patch>> 


[-- Attachment #2: 0001-remove-dirty-.swp-file.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1829 bytes --]

From efc25b52ac7db70fc4cc85a0638721015c18cd11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lynn Lin <Lin_Lynn@emc.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:22:28 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] remove dirty .swp file

---
 recipes/mini-httpd/.mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp |  Bin 12288 -> 0 bytes
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 recipes/mini-httpd/.mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp

diff --git a/recipes/mini-httpd/.mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp b/recipes/mini-httpd/.mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp
deleted file mode 100644
index d3845771240915ccef20be51f8011c750142a345..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
GIT binary patch
literal 0
HcmV?d00001

literal 12288
zcmeI2O^@3|7{{N&X$9?8AR&$qZlv8k#Lg}%ZGlCkPSjd$vX-5;DykGs;z{DhFOfaj
z(1ySj2`+#Td;vZMFXF-x&Ri?L16O#)P8Dleb-6;Hk^b?#JoBHK-;57dX3)6nbnuFK
z0F*8Q{Q1#0&M!}1gxA{u(@Z?n)n}#0G6~h>tSEqwwV}00v#FIzE1k(i#se7yGO%W1
zI2B`=TXC3#^@&omppxzHoBP+y!Qkv6ID!c<fzt@g)u?{;JiK|Z-_XsMj5qMrSMHn^
z$#qPC2`~XBzyz286JP>NfC>Ch38>jQ_=MK>!g_tR_4C|`=eo!bCcp%k025#WOn?b6
z0Vco%m;e)C0!-jPNI(Pt+b;opPtyPYKmGpybsOMw(r2W5q}NElUjX=x^eyRA(ubsg
z^a1HU=>qAG^8i1Sz9W52`jYeoDI@tLkJKPpB$ITJv`zZ!Wq>E7A4p%3x+Ea|xSrcj
zdVZXk025#WOn?b60Vco%n85Q(U<F&L>}T^N7E_5k*PU+5@eXUt)~dG52VoL~*=h%O
zI?YObEY{Uwk}DBKu(i%$J;uhB%a^gXym#c?BBxd50<JkslMyu)){k;s((WfCp6Nyx
zd(|lxy4ox+`}T`_zZH|<l=#gB;WGkD<7Wp!koKPf*xkb=K$uKqMiUitm8vw2a-7cs
zp=3Q9n)ImzJ|3cRf>Al|dTr_6T^RsQ*XjAT=eWJT+w_{9qDvr0Vjij7s5W<-owoMV
zYbs5s`<4M)I0_^Awq+H}9&E~+#g{u$Y06}r9?QCIn=_$?lXr^W!+orTByv$N&qcjF
z2mc85J-dI$a}Eu?6Eyx}u`tCjmNZ&y<>^Q*L?(+}FQ;3{mdiJl$jtF$8WmhmFD+{r
z&}zHwZmYncFMa2EWPsncd(Kf;ha^%NaNDulUB94l-ESFi^QhByn>UJze>)isu1uSp
zqi`q^6j7eyK%zdm;dq|O09A@XioSo_y4mZwKGK_kj(hx;Ss*KYsCO98A{om><zy0}
znn)aoJRIUk3PnaarX%W$+5~f%9m|XiTJ7=#te3diU<}Cz^H_UTy68dS5_&R{BB#mC
zlYo5mU>&E2Q8*-Q5_fYc(LQqTJKY<mZWyIykdj%P?~#F>&K_mqc%pFE-ot}N;~L(Y
b$QV8G5Z|TS_vVyJ?~h{<MrN9g--EvaP$`^o

-- 
1.5.4.3

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 577 bytes --]

Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>

Lin_Lynn@emc.com wrote:
> In mini-httpd recipe,there is a .mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp dirty file,the
> patch in the attach is to remove this dirty file.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Lynn Lin
> 
>  <<0001-remove-dirty-.swp-file.patch>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Rolf Leggewie]

Lin_Lynn@emc.com wrote:
> In mini-httpd recipe,there is a .mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp dirty file,the
> patch in the attach is to remove this dirty file.

Acked-by: Rolf Leggewie

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Koen Kooi]

On 30-05-09 20:27, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Lin_Lynn@emc.com wrote:
>> In mini-httpd recipe,there is a .mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp dirty file,the
>> patch in the attach is to remove this dirty file.
>
> Acked-by: Rolf Leggewie

Acked-by and S-o-b take an email address as well so people can start 
sending hatemail when things introduce bugs ;)

regards,

Koen

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 559 bytes --]



Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 30-05-09 20:27, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> Lin_Lynn@emc.com wrote:
>>> In mini-httpd recipe,there is a .mini-httpd_1.19.bb.swp dirty file,the
>>> patch in the attach is to remove this dirty file.
>>
>> Acked-by: Rolf Leggewie
> 
> Acked-by and S-o-b take an email address as well so people can start 
> sending hatemail when things introduce bugs ;)

or in other words, use the form: Acked-by: Rolf Leggewie 
<some@email.address>

And yes, the brackets are important. THey help patchwork pick up the 
patches.

Philip

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Rolf Leggewie]

Philip Balister wrote:
> or in other words, use the form: Acked-by: Rolf Leggewie 
> <some@email.address>
> 
> And yes, the brackets are important. THey help patchwork pick up the 
> patches.

OK,, thanks.  Can the ACK be done from patchwork while I am logged in? 
I kind of hate to have to type all this or copy it from somewhere every 
time.

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 503 bytes --]

Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Philip Balister wrote:
>> or in other words, use the form: Acked-by: Rolf Leggewie 
>> <some@email.address>
>>
>> And yes, the brackets are important. THey help patchwork pick up the 
>> patches.
> 
> OK,, thanks.  Can the ACK be done from patchwork while I am logged in? I 
> kind of hate to have to type all this or copy it from somewhere every time.

No, this is an annoying feature. Patchwork is designed to track mailing 
list traffic, not replace it.

Philip

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 544 bytes --]

Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Philip Balister wrote:
>> or in other words, use the form: Acked-by: Rolf Leggewie 
>> <some@email.address>
>>
>> And yes, the brackets are important. THey help patchwork pick up the 
>> patches.
> 
> OK,, thanks.  Can the ACK be done from patchwork while I am logged in? I 
> kind of hate to have to type all this or copy it from somewhere every time.

I manage the problem of acking patches I deleted by subscribing to 
oe.dev via gmane nntp using thunderbird. Then I can ack patches from there.

Philip

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Rolf Leggewie]

Philip Balister wrote:
>> OK,, thanks.  Can the ACK be done from patchwork while I am logged in? I 
>> kind of hate to have to type all this or copy it from somewhere every time.
> 
> No, this is an annoying feature. 

:-/

I'm starting to miss the old and simple days of "+1"  I don't think I'm 
capable of more than that ;-)

> Patchwork is designed to track mailing list traffic, not replace it.

valid point, but then again patchwork could be made to send the mail on 
my behalf.

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Koen Kooi]

On 02-06-09 20:41, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Philip Balister wrote:
>>> OK,, thanks. Can the ACK be done from patchwork while I am logged in?
>>> I kind of hate to have to type all this or copy it from somewhere
>>> every time.
>>
>> No, this is an annoying feature.
>
> :-/
>
> I'm starting to miss the old and simple days of "+1" I don't think I'm
> capable of more than that ;-)
>
>> Patchwork is designed to track mailing list traffic, not replace it.
>
> valid point, but then again patchwork could be made to send the mail on
> my behalf.

patchwork can do that, but we disabled the 'impersonate' feature.

regards,

Koen

Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 802 bytes --]

Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 02-06-09 20:41, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> Philip Balister wrote:
>>>> OK,, thanks. Can the ACK be done from patchwork while I am logged in?
>>>> I kind of hate to have to type all this or copy it from somewhere
>>>> every time.
>>>
>>> No, this is an annoying feature.
>>
>> :-/
>>
>> I'm starting to miss the old and simple days of "+1" I don't think I'm
>> capable of more than that ;-)
>>
>>> Patchwork is designed to track mailing list traffic, not replace it.
>>
>> valid point, but then again patchwork could be made to send the mail on
>> my behalf.
> 
> patchwork can do that, but we disabled the 'impersonate' feature.

Hmm, I don't see it.

Anyway, this page has some background on patchwork:

http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/

Philip

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]