All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
Cc: Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@st.com>,
	"mchehab\@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"mcoquelin.stm32\@gmail.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	"linux-media\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-stm32\@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"vincent.guittot\@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"rjw\@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: stm32-dcmi: Set minimum cpufreq requirement
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 14:35:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhjo8q1io9o.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f95ce45f-7a1c-0feb-afa8-203ddb500f2f@st.com>


On 02/06/20 12:37, Benjamin GAIGNARD wrote:
> On 6/2/20 11:31 AM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>>> @@ -99,6 +100,8 @@ enum state {
>>>
>>>   #define OVERRUN_ERROR_THRESHOLD	3
>>>
>>> +#define DCMI_MIN_FREQ	650000 /* in KHz */
>>> +
>> This assumes the handling part is guaranteed to always run on the same CPU
>> with the same performance profile (regardless of the platform). If that's
>> not guaranteed, it feels like you'd want this to be configurable in some
>> way.
> Yes I could add a st,stm32-dcmi-min-frequency (in KHz) parameter the
> device tree node.
>

Something like that - I'm not sure how well this fits with the DT
landscape, as you could argue it isn't really a description of the
hardware, more of a description of the performance expectations of the
software. I won't really argue here.

>>
>>>   struct dcmi_graph_entity {
>>>        struct v4l2_async_subdev asd;
>>>
>> [...]
>>> @@ -2020,6 +2042,8 @@ static int dcmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>                goto err_cleanup;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> +	dcmi->policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0);
>>> +
>> Ideally you'd want to fetch the policy of the CPU your IRQ (and handling
>> thread) is affined to; The only compatible DTS I found describes a single
>> A7, which is somewhat limited in the affinity area...
> If I move this code just before start streaming and use get_cpu(), would
> it works ?
>

AFAIA streaming_start() is not necessarily executing on the same CPU as the
one that will handle the interrupt. I was thinking you could use the IRQ's
effective affinity as a hint of which CPU(s) to boost, i.e. something like:

---
    struct cpumask_var_t visited;
    struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);

    err = alloc_cpumask_var(visited, GFP_KERNEL);
    /* ... */
    for_each_cpu(cpu, irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(d)) {
            /* check if not already spanned */
            if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, visited))
                    continue;

            policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
            cpumask_or(visited, visited, policy->cpus);
            /* do the boost for that policy here */
            /* ... */
            cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
    }
---

That of course falls apart when hotplug gets involved, and the effective
affinity changes... There's irq_set_affinity_notifier() out there, but it
seems it's only about the affinity, not the effective_affinity, I'm not
sure how valid it would be to query the effective_affinity in that
notifier.

> Benjamin
>>
>>>        dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Probe done\n");
>>>
>>>        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dcmi);
>>> @@ -2049,6 +2073,9 @@ static int dcmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>>        pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>>>
>>> +	if (dcmi->policy)
>>> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(dcmi->policy);
>>> +
>>>        v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&dcmi->notifier);
>>>        v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&dcmi->notifier);
>>>        media_entity_cleanup(&dcmi->vdev->entity);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
Cc: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@st.com>,
	"mchehab@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com"
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: stm32-dcmi: Set minimum cpufreq requirement
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 14:35:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhjo8q1io9o.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f95ce45f-7a1c-0feb-afa8-203ddb500f2f@st.com>


On 02/06/20 12:37, Benjamin GAIGNARD wrote:
> On 6/2/20 11:31 AM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>>> @@ -99,6 +100,8 @@ enum state {
>>>
>>>   #define OVERRUN_ERROR_THRESHOLD	3
>>>
>>> +#define DCMI_MIN_FREQ	650000 /* in KHz */
>>> +
>> This assumes the handling part is guaranteed to always run on the same CPU
>> with the same performance profile (regardless of the platform). If that's
>> not guaranteed, it feels like you'd want this to be configurable in some
>> way.
> Yes I could add a st,stm32-dcmi-min-frequency (in KHz) parameter the
> device tree node.
>

Something like that - I'm not sure how well this fits with the DT
landscape, as you could argue it isn't really a description of the
hardware, more of a description of the performance expectations of the
software. I won't really argue here.

>>
>>>   struct dcmi_graph_entity {
>>>        struct v4l2_async_subdev asd;
>>>
>> [...]
>>> @@ -2020,6 +2042,8 @@ static int dcmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>                goto err_cleanup;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> +	dcmi->policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0);
>>> +
>> Ideally you'd want to fetch the policy of the CPU your IRQ (and handling
>> thread) is affined to; The only compatible DTS I found describes a single
>> A7, which is somewhat limited in the affinity area...
> If I move this code just before start streaming and use get_cpu(), would
> it works ?
>

AFAIA streaming_start() is not necessarily executing on the same CPU as the
one that will handle the interrupt. I was thinking you could use the IRQ's
effective affinity as a hint of which CPU(s) to boost, i.e. something like:

---
    struct cpumask_var_t visited;
    struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);

    err = alloc_cpumask_var(visited, GFP_KERNEL);
    /* ... */
    for_each_cpu(cpu, irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(d)) {
            /* check if not already spanned */
            if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, visited))
                    continue;

            policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
            cpumask_or(visited, visited, policy->cpus);
            /* do the boost for that policy here */
            /* ... */
            cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
    }
---

That of course falls apart when hotplug gets involved, and the effective
affinity changes... There's irq_set_affinity_notifier() out there, but it
seems it's only about the affinity, not the effective_affinity, I'm not
sure how valid it would be to query the effective_affinity in that
notifier.

> Benjamin
>>
>>>        dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Probe done\n");
>>>
>>>        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dcmi);
>>> @@ -2049,6 +2073,9 @@ static int dcmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>>        pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>>>
>>> +	if (dcmi->policy)
>>> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(dcmi->policy);
>>> +
>>>        v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&dcmi->notifier);
>>>        v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&dcmi->notifier);
>>>        media_entity_cleanup(&dcmi->vdev->entity);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-02 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-27 15:16 [PATCH] media: stm32-dcmi: Set minimum cpufreq requirement Benjamin Gaignard
2020-05-27 15:16 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-06-02  8:29 ` Hugues FRUCHET
2020-06-02  8:29   ` Hugues FRUCHET
2020-06-02  9:31 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-06-02  9:31   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-06-02 11:37   ` Benjamin GAIGNARD
2020-06-02 11:37     ` Benjamin GAIGNARD
2020-06-02 13:35     ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-06-02 13:35       ` Valentin Schneider
2020-06-03  7:34       ` Benjamin GAIGNARD
2020-06-03  7:34         ` Benjamin GAIGNARD
2020-06-03  7:50         ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-03  7:50           ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-03  9:41           ` Valentin Schneider
2020-06-03  9:41             ` Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jhjo8q1io9o.mognet@arm.com \
    --to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
    --cc=hugues.fruchet@st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.