* How is X4500MHD performance in Windows 7?
@ 2010-04-12 19:17 Pedro Ribeiro
2010-04-12 20:04 ` Clemens Eisserer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Ribeiro @ 2010-04-12 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Hi all,
I'm buying a computer for a relative. The most graphics intensive
application she'll run is Google Earth. Besides that, she needs
excellent 2D performance and image quality.
I have a X4500 in my laptop and it works very well - under Linux.
However, I've heard some horror stories around the web about how bad
the drivers are in Windows. Does anyone have hands on experience? Is
it good enough for running Google Earth under Windows 7?
Regards,
Pedro
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: How is X4500MHD performance in Windows 7?
2010-04-12 19:17 How is X4500MHD performance in Windows 7? Pedro Ribeiro
@ 2010-04-12 20:04 ` Clemens Eisserer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Clemens Eisserer @ 2010-04-12 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Jep sure.
At least from my experiences windows-opengl drivers are far superior
than the linux ones.
I usually get twice the FPS for the same game running it on windows.
(Thought about an RadeonHD4200 based laptop, is usually 2x as fast as 4500)
- Clemens
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-12 20:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-12 19:17 How is X4500MHD performance in Windows 7? Pedro Ribeiro
2010-04-12 20:04 ` Clemens Eisserer
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.