From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>,
Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tcg: Remove stack protection from helper functions
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:29:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2sjniip5a.fsf@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-kkobH763sPVs3zbgh6J9LTsJjo5XkEqHC5g3TDwaMMg@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Maydell's message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:19:15 +0100")
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>
> The answer is that the edge cases basically never match. No CPU
> architecture does handling of NaNs and input denormals and output
> denormals and underflow checks and all the rest of it in exactly
> the same way as anybody else. (In particular x86 is pretty crazy,
Can you clarify this?
IEEE754 is pretty strict on how all these things are handled
and to my knowledge all serious x86 are fully IEEE compliant.
Or are you refering to the x87 80bits expansion? While useful
that's not used anymore with SSE.
On the other hand qemu is not very good at it, e.g. with x87
it doesn't even pass paranoia.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-27 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-26 7:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tcg: Remove stack protection from helper functions Jan Kiszka
2011-09-26 8:01 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2011-09-26 8:15 ` Laurent Desnogues
2011-09-26 17:41 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-26 19:43 ` Richard Henderson
2011-09-26 19:52 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-26 19:53 ` Richard Henderson
2011-09-26 20:20 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-26 20:19 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-26 20:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-27 4:29 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2011-09-27 7:58 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-26 10:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] " Jan Kiszka
2011-09-26 11:33 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-26 11:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-26 11:56 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-26 17:22 ` Blue Swirl
2011-09-26 17:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-26 18:20 ` Blue Swirl
2011-09-26 18:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-26 18:40 ` Blue Swirl
2011-09-26 19:08 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2sjniip5a.fsf@firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=laurent.desnogues@gmail.com \
--cc=mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.