From: Lawrence MacIntyre <lpz@ornl.gov>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:11:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106562246000917@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106562149532078@msgid-missing>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 967 bytes --]
I've used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic
over 100 Mb/s interfaces. I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s
interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more
difficult to measure accurately at this speed).
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.
> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC
> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached
> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more
> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and
> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the
> same issue? thanks
--
Lawrence MacIntyre 865.574.8696 lpz@ornl.gov
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
High Performance Information Infrastructure Technology Group
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-08 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre [this message]
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
2003-10-09 8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106562246000917@msgid-missing \
--to=lpz@ornl.gov \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.