[PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[Björn Töpel]

From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>

In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.

This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
excerpt from an incorrect image:

  | ...
  |     3b8:       00c50663                beq     a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
  |     3bc:       0020e317                auipc   t1,0x20e
  |     3c0:       49630067                jalr    zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
  | ...
  |  20e84c:       8796                    c.mv    a5,t0
  |  20e84e:       6422                    c.ldsp  s0,8(sp)    # Epilogue start
  |  20e850:       6141                    c.addi16sp      sp,16
  |  20e852:       853e                    c.mv    a0,a5       # Incorrect jump target
  |  20e854:       8082                    c.jr    ra

The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
final pass.

Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
to track what registers that are touched.

Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h      |  6 +++---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
index bf9802a63061..2717f5490428 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rv_jit_context {
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;
 	u16 *insns;		/* RV insns */
 	int ninsns;
-	int body_len;
+	int prologue_len;
 	int epilogue_offset;
 	int *offset;		/* BPF to RV */
 	int nexentries;
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static inline int rv_offset(int insn, int off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 	int from, to;
 
 	off++; /* BPF branch is from PC+1, RV is from PC */
-	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : 0;
-	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : 0;
+	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
+	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
 	return ninsns_rvoff(to - from);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
index 737baf8715da..7a26a3e1c73c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	unsigned int prog_size = 0, extable_size = 0;
 	bool tmp_blinded = false, extra_pass = false;
 	struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
-	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, prologue_len, i;
+	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, i;
 	struct rv_jit_data *jit_data;
 	struct rv_jit_context *ctx;
 
@@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		prog = orig_prog;
 		goto out_offset;
 	}
+
+	if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, NULL)) {
+		prog = orig_prog;
+		goto out_offset;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
 		prev_ninsns += 32;
 		ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns;
@@ -91,12 +97,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
 		pass++;
 		ctx->ninsns = 0;
+
+		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
+		ctx->prologue_len = ctx->ninsns;
+
 		if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, ctx->offset)) {
 			prog = orig_prog;
 			goto out_offset;
 		}
-		ctx->body_len = ctx->ninsns;
-		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
+
 		ctx->epilogue_offset = ctx->ninsns;
 		bpf_jit_build_epilogue(ctx);
 
@@ -162,10 +171,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 
 	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
 		bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(jit_data->header);
-		prologue_len = ctx->epilogue_offset - ctx->body_len;
 		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++)
-			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(prologue_len +
-						      ctx->offset[i]);
+			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
 		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
 out_offset:
 		kfree(ctx->offset);

base-commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[Björn Töpel]

From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>

In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.

This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
excerpt from an incorrect image:

  | ...
  |     3b8:       00c50663                beq     a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
  |     3bc:       0020e317                auipc   t1,0x20e
  |     3c0:       49630067                jalr    zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
  | ...
  |  20e84c:       8796                    c.mv    a5,t0
  |  20e84e:       6422                    c.ldsp  s0,8(sp)    # Epilogue start
  |  20e850:       6141                    c.addi16sp      sp,16
  |  20e852:       853e                    c.mv    a0,a5       # Incorrect jump target
  |  20e854:       8082                    c.jr    ra

The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
final pass.

Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
to track what registers that are touched.

Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h      |  6 +++---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
index bf9802a63061..2717f5490428 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rv_jit_context {
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;
 	u16 *insns;		/* RV insns */
 	int ninsns;
-	int body_len;
+	int prologue_len;
 	int epilogue_offset;
 	int *offset;		/* BPF to RV */
 	int nexentries;
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static inline int rv_offset(int insn, int off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 	int from, to;
 
 	off++; /* BPF branch is from PC+1, RV is from PC */
-	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : 0;
-	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : 0;
+	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
+	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
 	return ninsns_rvoff(to - from);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
index 737baf8715da..7a26a3e1c73c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	unsigned int prog_size = 0, extable_size = 0;
 	bool tmp_blinded = false, extra_pass = false;
 	struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
-	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, prologue_len, i;
+	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, i;
 	struct rv_jit_data *jit_data;
 	struct rv_jit_context *ctx;
 
@@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		prog = orig_prog;
 		goto out_offset;
 	}
+
+	if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, NULL)) {
+		prog = orig_prog;
+		goto out_offset;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
 		prev_ninsns += 32;
 		ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns;
@@ -91,12 +97,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
 		pass++;
 		ctx->ninsns = 0;
+
+		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
+		ctx->prologue_len = ctx->ninsns;
+
 		if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, ctx->offset)) {
 			prog = orig_prog;
 			goto out_offset;
 		}
-		ctx->body_len = ctx->ninsns;
-		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
+
 		ctx->epilogue_offset = ctx->ninsns;
 		bpf_jit_build_epilogue(ctx);
 
@@ -162,10 +171,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 
 	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
 		bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(jit_data->header);
-		prologue_len = ctx->epilogue_offset - ctx->body_len;
 		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++)
-			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(prologue_len +
-						      ctx->offset[i]);
+			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
 		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
 out_offset:
 		kfree(ctx->offset);

base-commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[Palmer Dabbelt]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5227 bytes --]

On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:41:31 PDT (-0700), bjorn@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>
> In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
> know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
> pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
> program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
> prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.
>
> This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
> programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
> hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
> incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
> is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
> final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
> excerpt from an incorrect image:
>
>   | ...
>   |     3b8:       00c50663                beq     a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
>   |     3bc:       0020e317                auipc   t1,0x20e
>   |     3c0:       49630067                jalr    zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
>   | ...
>   |  20e84c:       8796                    c.mv    a5,t0
>   |  20e84e:       6422                    c.ldsp  s0,8(sp)    # Epilogue start
>   |  20e850:       6141                    c.addi16sp      sp,16
>   |  20e852:       853e                    c.mv    a0,a5       # Incorrect jump target
>   |  20e854:       8082                    c.jr    ra
>
> The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
> final pass.
>
> Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
> outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
> to track what registers that are touched.
>
> Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h      |  6 +++---
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> index bf9802a63061..2717f5490428 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rv_jit_context {
>  	struct bpf_prog *prog;
>  	u16 *insns;		/* RV insns */
>  	int ninsns;
> -	int body_len;
> +	int prologue_len;
>  	int epilogue_offset;
>  	int *offset;		/* BPF to RV */
>  	int nexentries;
> @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static inline int rv_offset(int insn, int off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>  	int from, to;
>
>  	off++; /* BPF branch is from PC+1, RV is from PC */
> -	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : 0;
> -	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : 0;
> +	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
> +	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>  	return ninsns_rvoff(to - from);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> index 737baf8715da..7a26a3e1c73c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	unsigned int prog_size = 0, extable_size = 0;
>  	bool tmp_blinded = false, extra_pass = false;
>  	struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
> -	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, prologue_len, i;
> +	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, i;
>  	struct rv_jit_data *jit_data;
>  	struct rv_jit_context *ctx;
>
> @@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  		prog = orig_prog;
>  		goto out_offset;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, NULL)) {
> +		prog = orig_prog;
> +		goto out_offset;
> +	}
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
>  		prev_ninsns += 32;
>  		ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns;
> @@ -91,12 +97,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>  		pass++;
>  		ctx->ninsns = 0;
> +
> +		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
> +		ctx->prologue_len = ctx->ninsns;
> +
>  		if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, ctx->offset)) {
>  			prog = orig_prog;
>  			goto out_offset;
>  		}
> -		ctx->body_len = ctx->ninsns;
> -		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
> +
>  		ctx->epilogue_offset = ctx->ninsns;
>  		bpf_jit_build_epilogue(ctx);
>
> @@ -162,10 +171,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>
>  	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
>  		bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(jit_data->header);
> -		prologue_len = ctx->epilogue_offset - ctx->body_len;
>  		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++)
> -			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(prologue_len +
> -						      ctx->offset[i]);
> +			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
>  		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
>  out_offset:
>  		kfree(ctx->offset);
>
> base-commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>

I'm assuming this is aimed at the BPF tree, but LMK if you guys want me 
to pick it up -- I've already got something for this week, so it's easy 
on my end.  I'm dropping it from my queue and patchwork for now, though.

Thanks for the fix!

Re: [PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[Palmer Dabbelt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5228 bytes --]

On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:41:31 PDT (-0700), bjorn@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>
> In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
> know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
> pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
> program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
> prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.
>
> This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
> programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
> hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
> incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
> is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
> final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
> excerpt from an incorrect image:
>
>   | ...
>   |     3b8:       00c50663                beq     a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
>   |     3bc:       0020e317                auipc   t1,0x20e
>   |     3c0:       49630067                jalr    zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
>   | ...
>   |  20e84c:       8796                    c.mv    a5,t0
>   |  20e84e:       6422                    c.ldsp  s0,8(sp)    # Epilogue start
>   |  20e850:       6141                    c.addi16sp      sp,16
>   |  20e852:       853e                    c.mv    a0,a5       # Incorrect jump target
>   |  20e854:       8082                    c.jr    ra
>
> The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
> final pass.
>
> Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
> outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
> to track what registers that are touched.
>
> Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h      |  6 +++---
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> index bf9802a63061..2717f5490428 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rv_jit_context {
>  	struct bpf_prog *prog;
>  	u16 *insns;		/* RV insns */
>  	int ninsns;
> -	int body_len;
> +	int prologue_len;
>  	int epilogue_offset;
>  	int *offset;		/* BPF to RV */
>  	int nexentries;
> @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static inline int rv_offset(int insn, int off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>  	int from, to;
>
>  	off++; /* BPF branch is from PC+1, RV is from PC */
> -	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : 0;
> -	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : 0;
> +	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
> +	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>  	return ninsns_rvoff(to - from);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> index 737baf8715da..7a26a3e1c73c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	unsigned int prog_size = 0, extable_size = 0;
>  	bool tmp_blinded = false, extra_pass = false;
>  	struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
> -	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, prologue_len, i;
> +	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, i;
>  	struct rv_jit_data *jit_data;
>  	struct rv_jit_context *ctx;
>
> @@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  		prog = orig_prog;
>  		goto out_offset;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, NULL)) {
> +		prog = orig_prog;
> +		goto out_offset;
> +	}
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
>  		prev_ninsns += 32;
>  		ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns;
> @@ -91,12 +97,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>  		pass++;
>  		ctx->ninsns = 0;
> +
> +		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
> +		ctx->prologue_len = ctx->ninsns;
> +
>  		if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, ctx->offset)) {
>  			prog = orig_prog;
>  			goto out_offset;
>  		}
> -		ctx->body_len = ctx->ninsns;
> -		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
> +
>  		ctx->epilogue_offset = ctx->ninsns;
>  		bpf_jit_build_epilogue(ctx);
>
> @@ -162,10 +171,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>
>  	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
>  		bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(jit_data->header);
> -		prologue_len = ctx->epilogue_offset - ctx->body_len;
>  		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++)
> -			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(prologue_len +
> -						      ctx->offset[i]);
> +			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
>  		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
>  out_offset:
>  		kfree(ctx->offset);
>
> base-commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>

I'm assuming this is aimed at the BPF tree, but LMK if you guys want me 
to pick it up -- I've already got something for this week, so it's easy 
on my end.  I'm dropping it from my queue and patchwork for now, though.

Thanks for the fix!


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 7/11/23 7:50 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:41:31 PDT (-0700), bjorn@kernel.org wrote:
>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>>
>> In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
>> know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
>> pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
>> program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
>> prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.
>>
>> This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
>> programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
>> hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
>> incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
>> is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
>> final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
>> excerpt from an incorrect image:
>>
>>    | ...
>>    |     3b8:       00c50663                beq     a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
>>    |     3bc:       0020e317                auipc   t1,0x20e
>>    |     3c0:       49630067                jalr    zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
>>    | ...
>>    |  20e84c:       8796                    c.mv    a5,t0
>>    |  20e84e:       6422                    c.ldsp  s0,8(sp)    # Epilogue start
>>    |  20e850:       6141                    c.addi16sp      sp,16
>>    |  20e852:       853e                    c.mv    a0,a5       # Incorrect jump target
>>    |  20e854:       8082                    c.jr    ra
>>
>> The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
>> final pass.
>>
>> Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
>> outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
>> to track what registers that are touched.
>>
>> Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
>> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h      |  6 +++---
>>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>> index bf9802a63061..2717f5490428 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rv_jit_context {
>>   	struct bpf_prog *prog;
>>   	u16 *insns;		/* RV insns */
>>   	int ninsns;
>> -	int body_len;
>> +	int prologue_len;
>>   	int epilogue_offset;
>>   	int *offset;		/* BPF to RV */
>>   	int nexentries;
>> @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static inline int rv_offset(int insn, int off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>>   	int from, to;
>>
>>   	off++; /* BPF branch is from PC+1, RV is from PC */
>> -	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : 0;
>> -	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : 0;
>> +	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>> +	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>>   	return ninsns_rvoff(to - from);
>>   }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>> index 737baf8715da..7a26a3e1c73c 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>   	unsigned int prog_size = 0, extable_size = 0;
>>   	bool tmp_blinded = false, extra_pass = false;
>>   	struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
>> -	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, prologue_len, i;
>> +	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, i;
>>   	struct rv_jit_data *jit_data;
>>   	struct rv_jit_context *ctx;
>>
>> @@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>   		prog = orig_prog;
>>   		goto out_offset;
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, NULL)) {
>> +		prog = orig_prog;
>> +		goto out_offset;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
>>   		prev_ninsns += 32;
>>   		ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns;
>> @@ -91,12 +97,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>   	for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>>   		pass++;
>>   		ctx->ninsns = 0;
>> +
>> +		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
>> +		ctx->prologue_len = ctx->ninsns;
>> +
>>   		if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, ctx->offset)) {
>>   			prog = orig_prog;
>>   			goto out_offset;
>>   		}
>> -		ctx->body_len = ctx->ninsns;
>> -		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
>> +
>>   		ctx->epilogue_offset = ctx->ninsns;
>>   		bpf_jit_build_epilogue(ctx);
>>
>> @@ -162,10 +171,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>
>>   	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
>>   		bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(jit_data->header);
>> -		prologue_len = ctx->epilogue_offset - ctx->body_len;
>>   		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++)
>> -			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(prologue_len +
>> -						      ctx->offset[i]);
>> +			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
>>   		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
>>   out_offset:
>>   		kfree(ctx->offset);
>>
>> base-commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9
> 
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> 
> I'm assuming this is aimed at the BPF tree, but LMK if you guys want me
> to pick it up -- I've already got something for this week, so it's easy
> on my end.  I'm dropping it from my queue and patchwork for now, though.

Sounds good, we applied it to bpf already.

Thanks,
Daniel

Re: [PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 7/11/23 7:50 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:41:31 PDT (-0700), bjorn@kernel.org wrote:
>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>>
>> In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
>> know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
>> pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
>> program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
>> prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.
>>
>> This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
>> programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
>> hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
>> incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
>> is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
>> final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
>> excerpt from an incorrect image:
>>
>>    | ...
>>    |     3b8:       00c50663                beq     a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
>>    |     3bc:       0020e317                auipc   t1,0x20e
>>    |     3c0:       49630067                jalr    zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
>>    | ...
>>    |  20e84c:       8796                    c.mv    a5,t0
>>    |  20e84e:       6422                    c.ldsp  s0,8(sp)    # Epilogue start
>>    |  20e850:       6141                    c.addi16sp      sp,16
>>    |  20e852:       853e                    c.mv    a0,a5       # Incorrect jump target
>>    |  20e854:       8082                    c.jr    ra
>>
>> The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
>> final pass.
>>
>> Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
>> outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
>> to track what registers that are touched.
>>
>> Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
>> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h      |  6 +++---
>>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>> index bf9802a63061..2717f5490428 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rv_jit_context {
>>   	struct bpf_prog *prog;
>>   	u16 *insns;		/* RV insns */
>>   	int ninsns;
>> -	int body_len;
>> +	int prologue_len;
>>   	int epilogue_offset;
>>   	int *offset;		/* BPF to RV */
>>   	int nexentries;
>> @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static inline int rv_offset(int insn, int off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>>   	int from, to;
>>
>>   	off++; /* BPF branch is from PC+1, RV is from PC */
>> -	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : 0;
>> -	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : 0;
>> +	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>> +	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>>   	return ninsns_rvoff(to - from);
>>   }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>> index 737baf8715da..7a26a3e1c73c 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>   	unsigned int prog_size = 0, extable_size = 0;
>>   	bool tmp_blinded = false, extra_pass = false;
>>   	struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
>> -	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, prologue_len, i;
>> +	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, i;
>>   	struct rv_jit_data *jit_data;
>>   	struct rv_jit_context *ctx;
>>
>> @@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>   		prog = orig_prog;
>>   		goto out_offset;
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, NULL)) {
>> +		prog = orig_prog;
>> +		goto out_offset;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
>>   		prev_ninsns += 32;
>>   		ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns;
>> @@ -91,12 +97,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>   	for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>>   		pass++;
>>   		ctx->ninsns = 0;
>> +
>> +		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
>> +		ctx->prologue_len = ctx->ninsns;
>> +
>>   		if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, ctx->offset)) {
>>   			prog = orig_prog;
>>   			goto out_offset;
>>   		}
>> -		ctx->body_len = ctx->ninsns;
>> -		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
>> +
>>   		ctx->epilogue_offset = ctx->ninsns;
>>   		bpf_jit_build_epilogue(ctx);
>>
>> @@ -162,10 +171,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>
>>   	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
>>   		bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(jit_data->header);
>> -		prologue_len = ctx->epilogue_offset - ctx->body_len;
>>   		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++)
>> -			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(prologue_len +
>> -						      ctx->offset[i]);
>> +			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
>>   		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
>>   out_offset:
>>   		kfree(ctx->offset);
>>
>> base-commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9
> 
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> 
> I'm assuming this is aimed at the BPF tree, but LMK if you guys want me
> to pick it up -- I've already got something for this week, so it's easy
> on my end.  I'm dropping it from my queue and patchwork for now, though.

Sounds good, we applied it to bpf already.

Thanks,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:03:47 PDT (-0700), daniel@iogearbox.net wrote:
> On 7/11/23 7:50 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:41:31 PDT (-0700), bjorn@kernel.org wrote:
>>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>>>
>>> In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
>>> know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
>>> pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
>>> program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
>>> prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.
>>>
>>> This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
>>> programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
>>> hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
>>> incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
>>> is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
>>> final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
>>> excerpt from an incorrect image:
>>>
>>>    | ...
>>>    |     3b8:       00c50663                beq     a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
>>>    |     3bc:       0020e317                auipc   t1,0x20e
>>>    |     3c0:       49630067                jalr    zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
>>>    | ...
>>>    |  20e84c:       8796                    c.mv    a5,t0
>>>    |  20e84e:       6422                    c.ldsp  s0,8(sp)    # Epilogue start
>>>    |  20e850:       6141                    c.addi16sp      sp,16
>>>    |  20e852:       853e                    c.mv    a0,a5       # Incorrect jump target
>>>    |  20e854:       8082                    c.jr    ra
>>>
>>> The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
>>> final pass.
>>>
>>> Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
>>> outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
>>> to track what registers that are touched.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
>>> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h      |  6 +++---
>>>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>>> index bf9802a63061..2717f5490428 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rv_jit_context {
>>>   	struct bpf_prog *prog;
>>>   	u16 *insns;		/* RV insns */
>>>   	int ninsns;
>>> -	int body_len;
>>> +	int prologue_len;
>>>   	int epilogue_offset;
>>>   	int *offset;		/* BPF to RV */
>>>   	int nexentries;
>>> @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static inline int rv_offset(int insn, int off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>>>   	int from, to;
>>>
>>>   	off++; /* BPF branch is from PC+1, RV is from PC */
>>> -	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : 0;
>>> -	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : 0;
>>> +	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>>> +	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>>>   	return ninsns_rvoff(to - from);
>>>   }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>>> index 737baf8715da..7a26a3e1c73c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>   	unsigned int prog_size = 0, extable_size = 0;
>>>   	bool tmp_blinded = false, extra_pass = false;
>>>   	struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
>>> -	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, prologue_len, i;
>>> +	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, i;
>>>   	struct rv_jit_data *jit_data;
>>>   	struct rv_jit_context *ctx;
>>>
>>> @@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>   		prog = orig_prog;
>>>   		goto out_offset;
>>>   	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, NULL)) {
>>> +		prog = orig_prog;
>>> +		goto out_offset;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>   	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
>>>   		prev_ninsns += 32;
>>>   		ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns;
>>> @@ -91,12 +97,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>   	for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>>>   		pass++;
>>>   		ctx->ninsns = 0;
>>> +
>>> +		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
>>> +		ctx->prologue_len = ctx->ninsns;
>>> +
>>>   		if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, ctx->offset)) {
>>>   			prog = orig_prog;
>>>   			goto out_offset;
>>>   		}
>>> -		ctx->body_len = ctx->ninsns;
>>> -		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
>>> +
>>>   		ctx->epilogue_offset = ctx->ninsns;
>>>   		bpf_jit_build_epilogue(ctx);
>>>
>>> @@ -162,10 +171,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>
>>>   	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
>>>   		bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(jit_data->header);
>>> -		prologue_len = ctx->epilogue_offset - ctx->body_len;
>>>   		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++)
>>> -			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(prologue_len +
>>> -						      ctx->offset[i]);
>>> +			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
>>>   		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
>>>   out_offset:
>>>   		kfree(ctx->offset);
>>>
>>> base-commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9
>>
>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>>
>> I'm assuming this is aimed at the BPF tree, but LMK if you guys want me
>> to pick it up -- I've already got something for this week, so it's easy
>> on my end.  I'm dropping it from my queue and patchwork for now, though.
>
> Sounds good, we applied it to bpf already.

Thanks!

>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

Re: [PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix inconsistent JIT image generation

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:03:47 PDT (-0700), daniel@iogearbox.net wrote:
> On 7/11/23 7:50 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:41:31 PDT (-0700), bjorn@kernel.org wrote:
>>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>>>
>>> In order to generate the prologue and epilogue, the BPF JIT needs to
>>> know which registers that are clobbered. Therefore, the during
>>> pre-final passes, the prologue is generated after the body of the
>>> program body-prologue-epilogue. Then, in the final pass, a proper
>>> prologue-body-epilogue JITted image is generated.
>>>
>>> This scheme has worked most of the time. However, for some large
>>> programs with many jumps, e.g. the test_kmod.sh BPF selftest with
>>> hardening enabled (blinding constants), this has shown to be
>>> incorrect. For the final pass, when the proper prologue-body-epilogue
>>> is generated, the image has not converged. This will lead to that the
>>> final image will have incorrect jump offsets. The following is an
>>> excerpt from an incorrect image:
>>>
>>>    | ...
>>>    |     3b8:       00c50663                beq     a0,a2,3c4 <.text+0x3c4>
>>>    |     3bc:       0020e317                auipc   t1,0x20e
>>>    |     3c0:       49630067                jalr    zero,1174(t1) # 20e852 <.text+0x20e852>
>>>    | ...
>>>    |  20e84c:       8796                    c.mv    a5,t0
>>>    |  20e84e:       6422                    c.ldsp  s0,8(sp)    # Epilogue start
>>>    |  20e850:       6141                    c.addi16sp      sp,16
>>>    |  20e852:       853e                    c.mv    a0,a5       # Incorrect jump target
>>>    |  20e854:       8082                    c.jr    ra
>>>
>>> The image has shrunk, and the epilogue offset is incorrect in the
>>> final pass.
>>>
>>> Correct the problem by always generating proper prologue-body-epilogue
>>> outputs, which means that the first pass will only generate the body
>>> to track what registers that are touched.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
>>> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h      |  6 +++---
>>>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>>> index bf9802a63061..2717f5490428 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
>>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct rv_jit_context {
>>>   	struct bpf_prog *prog;
>>>   	u16 *insns;		/* RV insns */
>>>   	int ninsns;
>>> -	int body_len;
>>> +	int prologue_len;
>>>   	int epilogue_offset;
>>>   	int *offset;		/* BPF to RV */
>>>   	int nexentries;
>>> @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static inline int rv_offset(int insn, int off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>>>   	int from, to;
>>>
>>>   	off++; /* BPF branch is from PC+1, RV is from PC */
>>> -	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : 0;
>>> -	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : 0;
>>> +	from = (insn > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>>> +	to = (insn + off > 0) ? ctx->offset[insn + off - 1] : ctx->prologue_len;
>>>   	return ninsns_rvoff(to - from);
>>>   }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>>> index 737baf8715da..7a26a3e1c73c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
>>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>   	unsigned int prog_size = 0, extable_size = 0;
>>>   	bool tmp_blinded = false, extra_pass = false;
>>>   	struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
>>> -	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, prologue_len, i;
>>> +	int pass = 0, prev_ninsns = 0, i;
>>>   	struct rv_jit_data *jit_data;
>>>   	struct rv_jit_context *ctx;
>>>
>>> @@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>   		prog = orig_prog;
>>>   		goto out_offset;
>>>   	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, NULL)) {
>>> +		prog = orig_prog;
>>> +		goto out_offset;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>   	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
>>>   		prev_ninsns += 32;
>>>   		ctx->offset[i] = prev_ninsns;
>>> @@ -91,12 +97,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>   	for (i = 0; i < NR_JIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
>>>   		pass++;
>>>   		ctx->ninsns = 0;
>>> +
>>> +		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
>>> +		ctx->prologue_len = ctx->ninsns;
>>> +
>>>   		if (build_body(ctx, extra_pass, ctx->offset)) {
>>>   			prog = orig_prog;
>>>   			goto out_offset;
>>>   		}
>>> -		ctx->body_len = ctx->ninsns;
>>> -		bpf_jit_build_prologue(ctx);
>>> +
>>>   		ctx->epilogue_offset = ctx->ninsns;
>>>   		bpf_jit_build_epilogue(ctx);
>>>
>>> @@ -162,10 +171,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>
>>>   	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
>>>   		bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(jit_data->header);
>>> -		prologue_len = ctx->epilogue_offset - ctx->body_len;
>>>   		for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++)
>>> -			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(prologue_len +
>>> -						      ctx->offset[i]);
>>> +			ctx->offset[i] = ninsns_rvoff(ctx->offset[i]);
>>>   		bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx->offset);
>>>   out_offset:
>>>   		kfree(ctx->offset);
>>>
>>> base-commit: 496720b7cfb6574a8f6f4d434f23e3d1e6cfaeb9
>>
>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>>
>> I'm assuming this is aimed at the BPF tree, but LMK if you guys want me
>> to pick it up -- I've already got something for this week, so it's easy
>> on my end.  I'm dropping it from my queue and patchwork for now, though.
>
> Sounds good, we applied it to bpf already.

Thanks!

>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv