All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] kexec-tools: purgatory: fix build on `binutils-2.42`
@ 2024-01-31 10:05 Sergei Trofimovich
  2024-01-31 11:04 ` Baoquan He
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Trofimovich @ 2024-01-31 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kexec; +Cc: Baoquan He, Vivek Goyal, Dave Young, Sergei Trofimovich

`binutils-2.42` introduced stricter checks on what `.arch` can be used
in 64-bit mode and started failing the build as:

    $ as-2.42 --64 -o entry32-16-debug.o entry32-16-debug.s
    purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S: Assembler messages:
    purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S:28: Error: 64bit mode not supported on `i386'.

The change moves `.code32` before `.arch 386` as suggested in
https://sourceware.org/PR31319

Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
---
 purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S | 2 +-
 purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S       | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
index 5167944..297d6f5 100644
--- a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
+++ b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@
 	.globl entry16_debug_pre32
 	.globl entry16_debug_first32
 	.globl entry16_debug_old_first32
+	.code32
 	.arch i386
 	.balign 16
 entry16_debug:
-	.code32
 	/* Compute where I am running at (assumes esp valid) */
 	call	1f
 1:	popl	%ebx
diff --git a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
index c051aab..7a84565 100644
--- a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
+++ b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
@@ -20,10 +20,10 @@
 #undef i386	
 	.text
 	.globl entry16, entry16_regs
+	.code32
 	.arch i386
 	.balign 16
 entry16:
-	.code32
 	/* Compute where I am running at (assumes esp valid) */
 	call	1f
 1:	popl	%ebx
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kexec-tools: purgatory: fix build on `binutils-2.42`
  2024-01-31 10:05 [PATCH] kexec-tools: purgatory: fix build on `binutils-2.42` Sergei Trofimovich
@ 2024-01-31 11:04 ` Baoquan He
  2024-02-02  3:01   ` Coiby Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baoquan He @ 2024-01-31 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sergei Trofimovich; +Cc: kexec, Vivek Goyal, Dave Young, coxu

On 01/31/24 at 10:05am, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> `binutils-2.42` introduced stricter checks on what `.arch` can be used
> in 64-bit mode and started failing the build as:
> 
>     $ as-2.42 --64 -o entry32-16-debug.o entry32-16-debug.s
>     purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S: Assembler messages:
>     purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S:28: Error: 64bit mode not supported on `i386'.
> 
> The change moves `.code32` before `.arch 386` as suggested in
> https://sourceware.org/PR31319

I am not familiar with the gas behaviour, the fix sounds good from
discussion in above link.

Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
> ---
>  purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S | 2 +-
>  purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S       | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
> index 5167944..297d6f5 100644
> --- a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
> +++ b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
> @@ -25,10 +25,10 @@
>  	.globl entry16_debug_pre32
>  	.globl entry16_debug_first32
>  	.globl entry16_debug_old_first32
> +	.code32
>  	.arch i386
>  	.balign 16
>  entry16_debug:
> -	.code32
>  	/* Compute where I am running at (assumes esp valid) */
>  	call	1f
>  1:	popl	%ebx
> diff --git a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
> index c051aab..7a84565 100644
> --- a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
> +++ b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
> @@ -20,10 +20,10 @@
>  #undef i386	
>  	.text
>  	.globl entry16, entry16_regs
> +	.code32
>  	.arch i386
>  	.balign 16
>  entry16:
> -	.code32
>  	/* Compute where I am running at (assumes esp valid) */
>  	call	1f
>  1:	popl	%ebx
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [PATCH] kexec-tools: purgatory: fix build on `binutils-2.42`
  2024-01-31 11:04 ` Baoquan He
@ 2024-02-02  3:01   ` Coiby Xu
  2024-02-02  4:16     ` Baoquan He
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Coiby Xu @ 2024-02-02  3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baoquan He
  Cc: Michel Lind, Sergei Trofimovich, kexec, Vivek Goyal, Dave Young

Hi,

FYI, before this patch, Michel already sent 
"[PATCH] Fix building on x86_64 with binutils 2.41" 
to address the same issue. Currently I almost know nothing about
assembly but Michel's patch seems to be more complete because two more
files are touched.

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 07:04:57PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 01/31/24 at 10:05am, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>> `binutils-2.42` introduced stricter checks on what `.arch` can be used
>> in 64-bit mode and started failing the build as:
>>
>>     $ as-2.42 --64 -o entry32-16-debug.o entry32-16-debug.s
>>     purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S: Assembler messages:
>>     purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S:28: Error: 64bit mode not supported on `i386'.
>>
>> The change moves `.code32` before `.arch 386` as suggested in
>> https://sourceware.org/PR31319
>
>I am not familiar with the gas behaviour, the fix sounds good from
>discussion in above link.
>
>Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S | 2 +-
>>  purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S       | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
>> index 5167944..297d6f5 100644
>> --- a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
>> +++ b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
>> @@ -25,10 +25,10 @@
>>  	.globl entry16_debug_pre32
>>  	.globl entry16_debug_first32
>>  	.globl entry16_debug_old_first32
>> +	.code32
>>  	.arch i386
>>  	.balign 16
>>  entry16_debug:
>> -	.code32
>>  	/* Compute where I am running at (assumes esp valid) */
>>  	call	1f
>>  1:	popl	%ebx
>> diff --git a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
>> index c051aab..7a84565 100644
>> --- a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
>> +++ b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
>> @@ -20,10 +20,10 @@
>>  #undef i386	
>>  	.text
>>  	.globl entry16, entry16_regs
>> +	.code32
>>  	.arch i386
>>  	.balign 16
>>  entry16:
>> -	.code32
>>  	/* Compute where I am running at (assumes esp valid) */
>>  	call	1f
>>  1:	popl	%ebx
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Coiby


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kexec-tools: purgatory: fix build on `binutils-2.42`
  2024-02-02  3:01   ` Coiby Xu
@ 2024-02-02  4:16     ` Baoquan He
  2024-02-02  8:57       ` Simon Horman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baoquan He @ 2024-02-02  4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Coiby Xu
  Cc: Michel Lind, horms, Sergei Trofimovich, kexec, Vivek Goyal, Dave Young

On 02/02/24 at 11:01am, Coiby Xu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> FYI, before this patch, Michel already sent "[PATCH] Fix building on x86_64
> with binutils 2.41" to address the same issue. Currently I almost know
> nothing about
> assembly but Michel's patch seems to be more complete because two more
> files are touched.

Thanks for telling, I didn't notice that one. I didn't know these
either, leave them to Sergei and Michel to decide what is the
appropriate solution.

> 
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 07:04:57PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 01/31/24 at 10:05am, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > > `binutils-2.42` introduced stricter checks on what `.arch` can be used
> > > in 64-bit mode and started failing the build as:
> > > 
> > >     $ as-2.42 --64 -o entry32-16-debug.o entry32-16-debug.s
> > >     purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S: Assembler messages:
> > >     purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S:28: Error: 64bit mode not supported on `i386'.
> > > 
> > > The change moves `.code32` before `.arch 386` as suggested in
> > > https://sourceware.org/PR31319
> > 
> > I am not familiar with the gas behaviour, the fix sounds good from
> > discussion in above link.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S | 2 +-
> > >  purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S       | 2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
> > > index 5167944..297d6f5 100644
> > > --- a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
> > > +++ b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
> > > @@ -25,10 +25,10 @@
> > >  	.globl entry16_debug_pre32
> > >  	.globl entry16_debug_first32
> > >  	.globl entry16_debug_old_first32
> > > +	.code32
> > >  	.arch i386
> > >  	.balign 16
> > >  entry16_debug:
> > > -	.code32
> > >  	/* Compute where I am running at (assumes esp valid) */
> > >  	call	1f
> > >  1:	popl	%ebx
> > > diff --git a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
> > > index c051aab..7a84565 100644
> > > --- a/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
> > > +++ b/purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16.S
> > > @@ -20,10 +20,10 @@
> > >  #undef i386	
> > >  	.text
> > >  	.globl entry16, entry16_regs
> > > +	.code32
> > >  	.arch i386
> > >  	.balign 16
> > >  entry16:
> > > -	.code32
> > >  	/* Compute where I am running at (assumes esp valid) */
> > >  	call	1f
> > >  1:	popl	%ebx
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Coiby
> 


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kexec-tools: purgatory: fix build on `binutils-2.42`
  2024-02-02  4:16     ` Baoquan He
@ 2024-02-02  8:57       ` Simon Horman
  2024-02-04  9:07         ` Baoquan He
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2024-02-02  8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baoquan He
  Cc: Coiby Xu, Michel Lind, Sergei Trofimovich, kexec, Vivek Goyal,
	Dave Young

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:16:38PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 02/02/24 at 11:01am, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > FYI, before this patch, Michel already sent "[PATCH] Fix building on x86_64
> > with binutils 2.41" to address the same issue. Currently I almost know
> > nothing about
> > assembly but Michel's patch seems to be more complete because two more
> > files are touched.
> 
> Thanks for telling, I didn't notice that one. I didn't know these
> either, leave them to Sergei and Michel to decide what is the
> appropriate solution.

Hi,

I did go ahead and apply Michael's patch.
Let's follow-up with incremental changes if necessary.

...

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kexec-tools: purgatory: fix build on `binutils-2.42`
  2024-02-02  8:57       ` Simon Horman
@ 2024-02-04  9:07         ` Baoquan He
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baoquan He @ 2024-02-04  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Simon Horman
  Cc: Coiby Xu, Michel Lind, Sergei Trofimovich, kexec, Vivek Goyal,
	Dave Young

On 02/02/24 at 09:57am, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:16:38PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/02/24 at 11:01am, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > FYI, before this patch, Michel already sent "[PATCH] Fix building on x86_64
> > > with binutils 2.41" to address the same issue. Currently I almost know
> > > nothing about
> > > assembly but Michel's patch seems to be more complete because two more
> > > files are touched.
> > 
> > Thanks for telling, I didn't notice that one. I didn't know these
> > either, leave them to Sergei and Michel to decide what is the
> > appropriate solution.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I did go ahead and apply Michael's patch.
> Let's follow-up with incremental changes if necessary.

Sounds great, thanks.


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-04  9:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-31 10:05 [PATCH] kexec-tools: purgatory: fix build on `binutils-2.42` Sergei Trofimovich
2024-01-31 11:04 ` Baoquan He
2024-02-02  3:01   ` Coiby Xu
2024-02-02  4:16     ` Baoquan He
2024-02-02  8:57       ` Simon Horman
2024-02-04  9:07         ` Baoquan He

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.