From: Mohammed Gamal <m.gamal005@gmail.com> To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Cam Macdonell <cam@cs.ualberta.ca> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [GSoC 2010] Pass-through filesystem support. Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:01:01 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <p2q52d4a3891004080901we0550f14h378771cd51595b0@mail.gmail.com> (raw) Hi, Now that Cam is almost done with his ivshmem patches, I was thinking of another idea for GSoC which is improving the pass-though filesystems. I've got some questions on that: 1- What does the community prefer to use and improve? CIFS, 9p, or both? And which is better taken up for GSoC. 2- With respect to CIFS. I wonder how the shares are supposed to be exposed to the guest. Should the Samba server be modified to be able to use unix domain sockets instead of TCP ports and then QEMU communicating on these sockets. With that approach, how should the guest be able to see the exposed share? And what is the problem of using Samba with TCP ports? 3- In addition, I see the idea mentions that some Windows code needs to be written to use network shares on a special interface. What's that interface? And what's the nature of that Windows code? (a driver a la "guest additions"?) Regards, Mohammed
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mohammed Gamal <m.gamal005@gmail.com> To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Cam Macdonell <cam@cs.ualberta.ca> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [GSoC 2010] Pass-through filesystem support. Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:01:01 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <p2q52d4a3891004080901we0550f14h378771cd51595b0@mail.gmail.com> (raw) Hi, Now that Cam is almost done with his ivshmem patches, I was thinking of another idea for GSoC which is improving the pass-though filesystems. I've got some questions on that: 1- What does the community prefer to use and improve? CIFS, 9p, or both? And which is better taken up for GSoC. 2- With respect to CIFS. I wonder how the shares are supposed to be exposed to the guest. Should the Samba server be modified to be able to use unix domain sockets instead of TCP ports and then QEMU communicating on these sockets. With that approach, how should the guest be able to see the exposed share? And what is the problem of using Samba with TCP ports? 3- In addition, I see the idea mentions that some Windows code needs to be written to use network shares on a special interface. What's that interface? And what's the nature of that Windows code? (a driver a la "guest additions"?) Regards, Mohammed
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-08 16:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-04-08 16:01 Mohammed Gamal [this message] 2010-04-08 16:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [GSoC 2010] Pass-through filesystem support Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-08 16:02 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-08 16:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-08 16:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2010-04-08 16:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi 2010-04-09 13:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Luiz Capitulino 2010-04-09 17:11 ` jvrao 2010-04-09 17:11 ` jvrao 2010-04-09 17:23 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-09 17:23 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-09 21:22 ` Jamie Lokier 2010-04-09 22:17 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-09 22:22 ` Javier Guerra Giraldez 2010-04-09 22:22 ` Javier Guerra Giraldez 2010-04-09 22:34 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-09 22:34 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-10 12:12 ` Jamie Lokier 2010-04-10 12:12 ` Jamie Lokier 2010-04-10 12:42 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-10 12:42 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-11 0:35 ` Javier Guerra Giraldez 2010-04-11 0:35 ` Javier Guerra Giraldez 2010-04-11 22:29 ` Jamie Lokier 2010-04-12 8:15 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-12 8:15 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-12 8:59 ` Alexander Graf 2010-04-12 8:59 ` Alexander Graf 2010-04-12 12:04 ` Jamie Lokier 2010-04-12 12:04 ` Jamie Lokier 2010-04-12 12:10 ` Alexander Graf 2010-04-12 12:10 ` Alexander Graf 2010-04-12 11:58 ` Jamie Lokier 2010-04-12 11:58 ` Jamie Lokier 2010-04-12 12:14 ` Alexander Graf 2010-04-12 12:14 ` Alexander Graf 2010-04-12 15:43 ` jvrao 2010-04-12 15:43 ` jvrao 2010-04-13 19:08 ` jvrao 2010-04-13 20:17 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-13 20:17 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-19 22:54 ` jvrao 2010-04-20 4:26 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-20 4:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-20 18:36 ` jvrao 2010-04-21 4:20 ` Mohammed Gamal 2010-04-21 6:33 ` jvrao 2010-04-12 15:16 ` jvrao 2010-04-12 15:16 ` jvrao
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=p2q52d4a3891004080901we0550f14h378771cd51595b0@mail.gmail.com \ --to=m.gamal005@gmail.com \ --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \ --cc=cam@cs.ualberta.ca \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.