* [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jean-Marc Pigeon, Patrick McHardy
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca>
Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (93 days old)
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
@ 2010-09-12 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jean-Marc Pigeon, Patrick McHardy
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp-4qkeo2rQ0gg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (93 days old)
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-13 11:42 ` Jan Kara
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 1 reply; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jan Kara, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (77 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.3/00884.html
Handled-By : Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-13 11:42 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2010-09-13 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Jan Kara, Zdenek Kabelac
Hi,
On Sun 12-09-10 21:08:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
> Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
> Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (77 days old)
> Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.3/00884.html
> Handled-By : Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
Sorry, it isn't fixed yet. Christoph wanted to do the patch a bit
differently and I was busy with other work...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
@ 2010-09-13 11:42 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2010-09-13 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Jan Kara, Zdenek Kabelac
Hi,
On Sun 12-09-10 21:08:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
> Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
> Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (77 days old)
> Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.3/00884.html
> Handled-By : Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
Sorry, it isn't fixed yet. Christoph wanted to do the patch a bit
differently and I was busy with other work...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
@ 2010-09-13 17:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-13 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Zdenek Kabelac
On Monday, September 13, 2010, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun 12-09-10 21:08:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
> > Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
> > Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (77 days old)
> > Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
> > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.3/00884.html
> > Handled-By : Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
> Sorry, it isn't fixed yet. Christoph wanted to do the patch a bit
> differently and I was busy with other work...
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
@ 2010-09-13 17:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-13 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Zdenek Kabelac
On Monday, September 13, 2010, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun 12-09-10 21:08:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
> > Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
> > Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (77 days old)
> > Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
> > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.3/00884.html
> > Handled-By : Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
> Sorry, it isn't fixed yet. Christoph wanted to do the patch a bit
> differently and I was busy with other work...
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Artem S. Tashkinov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16380
Subject : Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
Submitter : Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem@mailcity.com>
Date : 2010-07-13 23:21 (62 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Chris Wilson, Dave Airlie,
Theodore Ts'o
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (96 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29536
Handled-By : Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Fries, Miles Lane
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (94 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Fries, Miles Lane
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (94 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70() Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas,
Brian Bloniarz, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (89 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, boris64, H. Peter Anvin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322
Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net>
Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (74 days old)
Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16458] Bluetooth disabled after resume
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, AttilaN
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
Subject : Bluetooth disabled after resume
Submitter : AttilaN <attila123456@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-25 09:33 (50 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16458] Bluetooth disabled after resume
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, AttilaN
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
Subject : Bluetooth disabled after resume
Submitter : AttilaN <attila123456-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-07-25 09:33 (50 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16495] Kernel 2.6.35 takes almost half an hour to boot
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Claudio M. Camacho
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16495
Subject : Kernel 2.6.35 takes almost half an hour to boot
Submitter : Claudio M. Camacho <claudiomkd@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-02 17:16 (42 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16525] unexpected high load since 2.6.35
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, MadLoisae
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
Subject : unexpected high load since 2.6.35
Submitter : MadLoisae@gmx.net <MadLoisae@gmx.net>
Date : 2010-08-02 20:53 (42 days old)
Message-ID : <4C573041.1070103@gmx.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128078243726655&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16515] [bisected] Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Albert Gall, Alex Deucher,
Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
Subject : [bisected] Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
Submitter : Albert Gall <ss3vdr@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-04 16:10 (40 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27350
Handled-By : Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16488] [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Linus Torvalds, Milan Bouchet-Valat
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
Subject : [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
Submitter : Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan@club.fr>
Date : 2010-08-01 08:55 (43 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16488] [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Linus Torvalds, Milan Bouchet-Valat
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
Subject : [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
Submitter : Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan-pqIVbhRXszc@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-08-01 08:55 (43 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16532] random suspend (S3) problems on Intel DG45ID board
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alexey Fisher
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16532
Subject : random suspend (S3) problems on Intel DG45ID board
Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
Date : 2010-08-07 08:55 (37 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16532] random suspend (S3) problems on Intel DG45ID board Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 18:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16549] 2.6.35: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 1 reply; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Paul E. McKenney, Rolf Eike Beer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-20 18:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-09-20 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rolf Eike Beer
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
> Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
> Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
> Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
> Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I cannot reproduce this. The function that is claimed to hang contains
only printk()s. I have asked the guys who can actually reproduce it
to try a later kernel, and will let you know how this goes.
If you cannot trust printk(), who can you trust? ;-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
@ 2010-09-20 18:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-09-20 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rolf Eike Beer
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
> Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
> Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel-F+mm6HnICJmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
> Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
I cannot reproduce this. The function that is claimed to hang contains
only printk()s. I have asked the guys who can actually reproduce it
to try a later kernel, and will let you know how this goes.
If you cannot trust printk(), who can you trust? ;-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
@ 2010-09-20 19:20 ` Rolf Eike Beer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rolf Eike Beer @ 2010-09-20 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1231 bytes --]
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
> > Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
> > Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
> > Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
> > Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> I cannot reproduce this. The function that is claimed to hang contains
> only printk()s. I have asked the guys who can actually reproduce it
> to try a later kernel, and will let you know how this goes.
>
> If you cannot trust printk(), who can you trust? ;-)
I suspect that it is related to:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git;a=commit;h=5a8477871f0b45664eedfa352c3942093408a169
I'll try to test plain 2.6.35 with this patch and see it this works.
Eike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
@ 2010-09-20 19:20 ` Rolf Eike Beer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rolf Eike Beer @ 2010-09-20 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1292 bytes --]
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
> > Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
> > Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel-F+mm6HnICJmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
> > Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
>
> I cannot reproduce this. The function that is claimed to hang contains
> only printk()s. I have asked the guys who can actually reproduce it
> to try a later kernel, and will let you know how this goes.
>
> If you cannot trust printk(), who can you trust? ;-)
I suspect that it is related to:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git;a=commit;h=5a8477871f0b45664eedfa352c3942093408a169
I'll try to test plain 2.6.35 with this patch and see it this works.
Eike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
2010-09-20 19:20 ` Rolf Eike Beer
(?)
@ 2010-09-20 19:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-09-20 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rolf Eike Beer
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:20:27PM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
> > > Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
> > > Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
> > > Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
> > > Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > I cannot reproduce this. The function that is claimed to hang contains
> > only printk()s. I have asked the guys who can actually reproduce it
> > to try a later kernel, and will let you know how this goes.
> >
> > If you cannot trust printk(), who can you trust? ;-)
>
> I suspect that it is related to:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git;a=commit;h=5a8477871f0b45664eedfa352c3942093408a169
>
> I'll try to test plain 2.6.35 with this patch and see it this works.
That would explain my utter failure to reproduce this bug -- I don't have
a PA-RISC system. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
2010-09-20 18:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
(?)
(?)
@ 2010-09-21 18:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-21 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 51+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-09-21 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rolf Eike Beer
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:26:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
> > Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
> > Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
> > Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
> > Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> I cannot reproduce this. The function that is claimed to hang contains
> only printk()s. I have asked the guys who can actually reproduce it
> to try a later kernel, and will let you know how this goes.
>
> If you cannot trust printk(), who can you trust? ;-)
It turns out that this problem is due to tab processing in the PA-RISC
firmware, which certainly explains my inability to reproduce it. It
turns out that it is fixed by:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d9b68e5e88248bb24fd4e455588bea1d56108fd6
So we can close this regression.
Many thanks to Guy Martin <gmsoft@tuxicoman.be> for much help with
this!!!
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
@ 2010-09-21 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-21 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rolf Eike Beer
On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:26:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
> > > Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
> > > Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
> > > Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
> > > Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > I cannot reproduce this. The function that is claimed to hang contains
> > only printk()s. I have asked the guys who can actually reproduce it
> > to try a later kernel, and will let you know how this goes.
> >
> > If you cannot trust printk(), who can you trust? ;-)
>
> It turns out that this problem is due to tab processing in the PA-RISC
> firmware, which certainly explains my inability to reproduce it. It
> turns out that it is fixed by:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d9b68e5e88248bb24fd4e455588bea1d56108fd6
>
> So we can close this regression.
>
> Many thanks to Guy Martin <gmsoft@tuxicoman.be> for much help with
> this!!!
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
@ 2010-09-21 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-21 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rolf Eike Beer
On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:26:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
> > > Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
> > > Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel-F+mm6HnICJmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (37 days old)
> > > Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > I cannot reproduce this. The function that is claimed to hang contains
> > only printk()s. I have asked the guys who can actually reproduce it
> > to try a later kernel, and will let you know how this goes.
> >
> > If you cannot trust printk(), who can you trust? ;-)
>
> It turns out that this problem is due to tab processing in the PA-RISC
> firmware, which certainly explains my inability to reproduce it. It
> turns out that it is fixed by:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d9b68e5e88248bb24fd4e455588bea1d56108fd6
>
> So we can close this regression.
>
> Many thanks to Guy Martin <gmsoft-OHzg2hESl54FHpyHPIa6Kw@public.gmane.org> for much help with
> this!!!
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16549] 2.6.35: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Vladislav Bolkhovitin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16549
Subject : 2.6.35: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
Submitter : Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
Date : 2010-08-04 10:56 (40 days old)
Message-ID : <4C594740.1090608@vlnb.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128091938215177&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, KOSAKI Motohiro, M. Vefa Bicakci
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (29 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904@superonline.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16562] 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin Piszcz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16562
Subject : 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date : 2010-08-06 22:09 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008061800530.5241@p34.internal.lan>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128113260904048&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16562] 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin Piszcz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16562
Subject : 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-08-06 22:09 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008061800530.5241-0qmrozcXWo8bm2hyYBkBBg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128113260904048&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16691] IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to 2.6.35.2 update
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16614] [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx] Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Can Celasun
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16691
Subject : IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to 2.6.35.2 update
Submitter : Can Celasun <dcelasun@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-21 08:28 (23 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16614] [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16691] IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to 2.6.35.2 update Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16633] ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sander Eikelenboom
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16614
Subject : [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
Submitter : Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Date : 2010-08-10 22:12 (34 days old)
Message-ID : <61936849.20100811001257@eikelenboom.it>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128152075830927&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #16633] ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16614] [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx] Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI * Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, NiTr0
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16633
Subject : ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel
Submitter : NiTr0 <nitr0@seti.kr.ua>
Date : 2010-08-19 19:37 (25 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16633] ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #17732] [2.6.35.x regression] rcu_preempt_state stall warning and machine slow-downs Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 1 reply; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, zersaa
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17772
Subject : Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
Submitter : zersaa <zersaa@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-09-04 21:28 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI * Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2010-09-12 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Feng Tang, H. Peter Anvin,
Thomas Gleixner, Yinghai Lu, Andrew Morton
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, zersaa
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17772
> Subject : Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
> Submitter : zersaa <zersaa@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-09-04 21:28 (9 days old)
this is an error message introduced via ACPI commit:
| commit 2a4ab640d3c28c2952967e5f63ea495555bf2a5f
| Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
| Date: Tue Jul 7 23:01:15 2009 -0400
|
| ACPI, x86: expose some IO-APIC routines when CONFIG_ACPI=n
It's not clear from the bugzilla entry whether it's just a new error
message, or an actual boot failure. It appears to me it's just a new
message - i.e. not a regression.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
@ 2010-09-12 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2010-09-12 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Feng Tang, H. Peter Anvin,
Thomas Gleixner, Yinghai Lu
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, zersaa
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17772
> Subject : Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
> Submitter : zersaa <zersaa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-09-04 21:28 (9 days old)
this is an error message introduced via ACPI commit:
| commit 2a4ab640d3c28c2952967e5f63ea495555bf2a5f
| Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Date: Tue Jul 7 23:01:15 2009 -0400
|
| ACPI, x86: expose some IO-APIC routines when CONFIG_ACPI=n
It's not clear from the bugzilla entry whether it's just a new error
message, or an actual boot failure. It appears to me it's just a new
message - i.e. not a regression.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
@ 2010-09-13 2:45 ` Yinghai Lu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2010-09-13 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zersaa
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Feng Tang,
H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner, Andrew Morton,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Eric W. Biederman
On 09/12/2010 01:29 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17772
>> Subject : Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
>> Submitter : zersaa <zersaa@gmail.com>
>> Date : 2010-09-04 21:28 (9 days old)
>
> this is an error message introduced via ACPI commit:
>
> | commit 2a4ab640d3c28c2952967e5f63ea495555bf2a5f
> | Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> | Date: Tue Jul 7 23:01:15 2009 -0400
> |
> | ACPI, x86: expose some IO-APIC routines when CONFIG_ACPI=n
>
> It's not clear from the bugzilla entry whether it's just a new error
> message, or an actual boot failure. It appears to me it's just a new
> message - i.e. not a regression.
>
can you post whole bootlog with "debug apic=debug"?
Thanks
Yinghai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
@ 2010-09-13 2:45 ` Yinghai Lu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2010-09-13 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zersaa
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Feng Tang,
H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner, Andrew Morton,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Eric W. Biederman
On 09/12/2010 01:29 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17772
>> Subject : Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI *
>> Submitter : zersaa <zersaa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Date : 2010-09-04 21:28 (9 days old)
>
> this is an error message introduced via ACPI commit:
>
> | commit 2a4ab640d3c28c2952967e5f63ea495555bf2a5f
> | Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> | Date: Tue Jul 7 23:01:15 2009 -0400
> |
> | ACPI, x86: expose some IO-APIC routines when CONFIG_ACPI=n
>
> It's not clear from the bugzilla entry whether it's just a new error
> message, or an actual boot failure. It appears to me it's just a new
> message - i.e. not a regression.
>
can you post whole bootlog with "debug apic=debug"?
Thanks
Yinghai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #17732] [2.6.35.x regression] rcu_preempt_state stall warning and machine slow-downs
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #17772] Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI * Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Matthias Dahl
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17732
Subject : [2.6.35.x regression] rcu_preempt_state stall warning and machine slow-downs
Submitter : Matthias Dahl <ml_kernel@mortal-soul.de>
Date : 2010-09-01 6:47 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <201009010847.20236.ml_kernel@mortal-soul.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128332418629305&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #17812] Kernel completely frozen when memory is full
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Mickey86
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17812
Subject : Kernel completely frozen when memory is full
Submitter : Mickey86 <mikael.cordon@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-09-05 13:09 (8 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #17812] Kernel completely frozen when memory is full
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Mickey86
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17812
Subject : Kernel completely frozen when memory is full
Submitter : Mickey86 <mikael.cordon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-09-05 13:09 (8 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug #18202] Microphone levels too low
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #18272] 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (ACPI idle?) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #18032] No sound on headphone jack Rafael J. Wysocki
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alexander Hunziker
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18202
Subject : Microphone levels too low
Submitter : Alexander Hunziker <alex.hunziker@rega-sense.ch>
Date : 2010-09-09 22:20 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #18272] 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (ACPI idle?)
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #18202] Microphone levels too low Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #18032] No sound on headphone jack Rafael J. Wysocki
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, H. Peter Anvin, Nix,
Thomas Gleixner, Venkatesh Pallipadi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18272
Subject : 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (ACPI idle?)
Submitter : Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Date : 2010-09-05 0:51 (8 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/30a564be9d9554c168a654eddc2165869cc0d7bf
Message-ID : <87zkvx2ese.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128364994602942&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread* [Bug #18032] No sound on headphone jack
2010-09-12 19:07 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 19:08 ` [Bug #18272] 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (ACPI idle?) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-09-12 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
25 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alexander Hunziker, Takashi Iwai
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18032
Subject : No sound on headphone jack
Submitter : Alexander Hunziker <alex.hunziker@rega-sense.ch>
Date : 2010-09-07 21:45 (6 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread