All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:51:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hk0pd8b9l.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YG4kEEqExSUjA0kh@intel.com>

On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:28:48 +0200,
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 06:56:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 18:34:46 +0200,
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:23:17AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > intel_dsm_platform_mux_info() tries to parse the ACPI package data
> > > > from _DSM for the debug information, but it assumes the fixed format
> > > > without checking what values are stored in the elements actually.
> > > > When an unexpected value is returned from BIOS, it may lead to GPF or
> > > > NULL dereference, as reported recently.
> > > > 
> > > > Add the checks of the contents in the returned values and skip the
> > > > values for invalid cases.
> > > > 
> > > > v1->v2: Check the info contents before dereferencing, too
> > > > 
> > > > BugLink: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1184074
> > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > > > index e21fb14d5e07..833d0c1be4f1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > > > @@ -84,13 +84,31 @@ static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(acpi_handle dhandle)
> > > >  		return;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > +	if (!pkg->package.count) {
> > > > +		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("no connection in _DSM\n");
> > > > +		return;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > >  	connector_count = &pkg->package.elements[0];
> > > >  	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("MUX info connectors: %lld\n",
> > > >  		  (unsigned long long)connector_count->integer.value);
> > > >  	for (i = 1; i < pkg->package.count; i++) {
> > > >  		union acpi_object *obj = &pkg->package.elements[i];
> > > > -		union acpi_object *connector_id = &obj->package.elements[0];
> > > > -		union acpi_object *info = &obj->package.elements[1];
> > > > +		union acpi_object *connector_id;
> > > > +		union acpi_object *info;
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || obj->package.count < 2) {
> > > > +			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Invalid object for MUX #%d\n", i);
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +
> > > > +		connector_id = &obj->package.elements[0];
> > > 
> > > You don't want to check connector_id->type as well?
> > 
> > I added only the minimal checks that may lead to Oops.
> 
> OK. I guess misinterpreting something else as an integer isn't
> particular dangerous in this case.
> 
> Pushed to drm-intel-next. Thanks.

Great, thanks!

> Oh, could you ask the bug reporter to attach an acpidump to the
> bug? Might be good to have that stuff on record somewhere if/when
> someone wants to actually figure out what's going on here.

OK, I'll ask.

> That said, maybe we should just nuke this whole thing instead?
> Unless I'm missing someting this code doesn't seem to actually
> do anything...

Yeah, that looks nothing but showing the debug information and that
can be checked via acpidump output, too...


Takashi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:51:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hk0pd8b9l.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YG4kEEqExSUjA0kh@intel.com>

On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:28:48 +0200,
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 06:56:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 18:34:46 +0200,
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:23:17AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > intel_dsm_platform_mux_info() tries to parse the ACPI package data
> > > > from _DSM for the debug information, but it assumes the fixed format
> > > > without checking what values are stored in the elements actually.
> > > > When an unexpected value is returned from BIOS, it may lead to GPF or
> > > > NULL dereference, as reported recently.
> > > > 
> > > > Add the checks of the contents in the returned values and skip the
> > > > values for invalid cases.
> > > > 
> > > > v1->v2: Check the info contents before dereferencing, too
> > > > 
> > > > BugLink: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1184074
> > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > > > index e21fb14d5e07..833d0c1be4f1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_acpi.c
> > > > @@ -84,13 +84,31 @@ static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(acpi_handle dhandle)
> > > >  		return;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > +	if (!pkg->package.count) {
> > > > +		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("no connection in _DSM\n");
> > > > +		return;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > >  	connector_count = &pkg->package.elements[0];
> > > >  	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("MUX info connectors: %lld\n",
> > > >  		  (unsigned long long)connector_count->integer.value);
> > > >  	for (i = 1; i < pkg->package.count; i++) {
> > > >  		union acpi_object *obj = &pkg->package.elements[i];
> > > > -		union acpi_object *connector_id = &obj->package.elements[0];
> > > > -		union acpi_object *info = &obj->package.elements[1];
> > > > +		union acpi_object *connector_id;
> > > > +		union acpi_object *info;
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || obj->package.count < 2) {
> > > > +			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Invalid object for MUX #%d\n", i);
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +
> > > > +		connector_id = &obj->package.elements[0];
> > > 
> > > You don't want to check connector_id->type as well?
> > 
> > I added only the minimal checks that may lead to Oops.
> 
> OK. I guess misinterpreting something else as an integer isn't
> particular dangerous in this case.
> 
> Pushed to drm-intel-next. Thanks.

Great, thanks!

> Oh, could you ask the bug reporter to attach an acpidump to the
> bug? Might be good to have that stuff on record somewhere if/when
> someone wants to actually figure out what's going on here.

OK, I'll ask.

> That said, maybe we should just nuke this whole thing instead?
> Unless I'm missing someting this code doesn't seem to actually
> do anything...

Yeah, that looks nothing but showing the debug information and that
can be checked via acpidump output, too...


Takashi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-02  8:23 [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects Takashi Iwai
2021-04-02  8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Takashi Iwai
2021-04-02  8:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects (rev2) Patchwork
2021-04-02  9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-04-02 10:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-04-07 16:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-07 16:34   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-07 16:56   ` Takashi Iwai
2021-04-07 16:56     ` Takashi Iwai
2021-04-07 21:28     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-07 21:28       ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-08  7:51       ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2021-04-08  7:51         ` Takashi Iwai
2021-04-08 16:34         ` Takashi Iwai
2021-04-08 16:34           ` Takashi Iwai
2021-04-08 16:56           ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-08 16:56             ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-08 17:29             ` Takashi Iwai
2021-04-08 17:29               ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5hk0pd8b9l.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.